Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Hormone Regulation on Seed Germination of Coix Based on Muli-Omics Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense Strains AbV5 and AbV6 Increases Nutrition, Chlorophyll, and Leaf Yield of Hydroponic Lettuce
Previous Article in Journal
Spectral Reflectance Indexes Reveal Differences in the Physiological Status of Brassica oleracea with Contrasting Glucosinolate Content under Biotic Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Soybean Yield and Nutrition Grown on the Straw of Grain Sorghum Inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Intercropped with BRS Paiaguás Grass
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 14
10.3390/plants12142699
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Technological Quality of Sugarcane Inoculated with Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria and Residual Effect of Phosphorus Rates

by
Guilherme Carlos Fernandes
1,
Poliana Aparecida Leonel Rosa
1,
Arshad Jalal
1,
Carlos Eduardo da Silva Oliveira
1,
Fernando Shintate Galindo
2,
Ronaldo da Silva Viana
2,
Pedro Henrique Gomes De Carvalho
1,
Edson Cabral da Silva
1,
Thiago Assis Rodrigues Nogueira
1,3,
Abdulaziz A. Al-Askar
4,
Amr H. Hashem
5,
Hamada AbdElgawad
6 and
Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira Filho
1,*
1
Department of Plant Health, College of Engineering, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rural Engineering and Soils, Ilha Solteira 15385-000, SP, Brazil
2
Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agricultural and Technological Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Dracena 17900-000, SP, Brazil
3
Department of Agricultural Sciences, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Via do Prof Access Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, Jabotcabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil
4
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt
6
Integrated Molecular Plant Physiology Research, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(14), 2699; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142699
Submission received: 28 June 2023 / Revised: 11 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 20 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria in Fertilization Application: At the Soil-Plant Level)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Phosphate fertilization in highly weathered soils has been a major challenge for sugarcane production. The objective of this work was to evaluate the foliar levels of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) and the technological quality and productivity of second ratoon cane as a function of inoculation with plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPBs) together with the residual effect of phosphate fertilization. The experiment was carried out at the research and extension farm of Ilha Solteira, state of São Paulo, Brazil. The experiment was designed in a randomized block with three replications in a 5 × 8 factorial scheme. The treatments consisted of five residual doses of phosphorus (0, 45, 90, 135 and 180 kg ha−1 of P2O5, 46% P) applied at planting from the source of triple superphosphate and eight inoculations from three species of PGPB (Azospirillum brasilense, Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens), applied in single or co-inoculation at the base of stems of sugarcane variety RB92579. Inoculation with PGPBs influenced leaf N concentration, while inoculations with Pseudomonas fluorescens and combinations of bacteria together with the highest doses exerted a positive effect on leaf P concentration. Co-inoculation with A. brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens associated with a residual dose of 135 kg ha−1 of P2O5 increased stem productivity by 42%. Thus, it was concluded that inoculations with Pseudomonas fluorescens and their combinations are beneficial for the sugarcane crop, reducing phosphate fertilization and increasing productivity.

1. Introduction

Brazil is the world’s largest producer of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), with a total production of 654.5 million tons in the 2020/2021 harvest. The state of São Paulo is ranked as the largest national producer of sugarcane with a total of 354.3 million tons and an average of 79.719 kg ha−1 [1]. Sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) is a semi-perennial crop which provides cuts and production cycles for an average of six years [2]. The first cut generated from seedlings is called cane plants and the other cuts are called ratoon cane. In addition, sugarcane is a viable alternative source of biofuel and energy generation given the increasing worldwide concern about climate change and growing demand for sustainable production. Sugarcane is one of the main agricultural crops to produce sugar and ethanol [1], in addition to other products such as liquor, molasses, brown sugar and by-products such as bagasse that are used for the co-generation of energy [3].
Sugarcane, like many other crops, has phosphorus (P) as the nutrient that most limits its productivity. In addition, it is a great challenge to ensure that P is in its labile form and available in the soil solution, which directly interferes with crop production [4]. The application of adequate doses of phosphate fertilizers is of great importance for vegetative development, generating more productive stumps and increasing the durability of the sugarcane crop [5]. The low availability of P during several years of sugarcane cultivation is due to several factors such as source, doses, low natural availability, adsorption to clay particles and precipitation with iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) oxides [6].
Phosphorus plays an important role in sugarcane metabolism, being specifically involved in protein formation, cell division, photosynthesis, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis, sugar breakdown, respiration and sucrose formation as well as favoring rooting, tillering, final yield, sugar production and absorption of other nutrients [7]. In addition to benefits in the field, P fertilization is greatly important for the quality of sugarcane, influencing sucrose percentage and juice purity [8]. The quality of raw material is defined by a set of characteristics that consider the demands of industry at the time of processing, especially sucrose and industrial fiber contents [9]. Consequently, there is a need to apply high P doses, but the efficiency of P fertilization is still very low. In this way, new techniques are needed to adapt to increased P fertilization efficiency and its residual effect along sugarcane cuts, especially in the regions of less fertility and highly weathered soils with limited P availability, to reduce high doses fertilization and inputs costs.
Sustainable management efforts aim to maintain the ecosystem and biodiversity, seeking possibilities to reduce possible negative environmental impacts resulting from the continuous use of fertilizers. Therefore, a more sustainable way is the use of plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPBs) that can contribute to the growth of cultures through the synthesis of phytohormones and secondary metabolites, better absorption and assimilation of water and nutrients, solubilization of nutrients such as P, zinc (Zn) and potassium (K), promotion of biological nitrogen fixation and induction of tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses [10,11,12,13,14].
Some microorganisms can transform insoluble phosphorus into ions that can be absorbed by plants through the processes of solubilization and mineralization of inorganic phosphorus (Pi) and organic phosphorus (Po) present in the soil, respectively. The BPCPs that could solubilize Pi carry out this process through the secretion of low-molecular-weight organic acids, such as glycolic, lactic, citric, and others [15]. The process of mineralization of Po, in turn, occurs after the decomposition of organic matter present in the soil, of which the final product will be a series of organic molecules containing Po, which are then dephosphorylated by bacteria that produce phosphatases [16]. Bacteria of the genera Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Rhizobium, among others, have demonstrated the ability to solubilize phosphates [17], thus having potential for the better use of phosphorus present in the solid phase of the soil, constituting viable alternatives for the inoculation of crops. However, it is noteworthy that the genera Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Rhizobium are considered the most efficient solubilizers of inorganic phosphates [15].
Among the combinations of PGPBs, co-inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus subtilis has shown positive results in nutrient cycling and soil fertility improvement, thus contributing to better sugarcane root development [18]. The Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera are the most efficient phosphate solubilizing inoculants [19] due to their role in the production of organic acids and solubilization of insoluble inorganic phosphate compounds such as tricalcium phosphate, dicalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite and rock phosphate [17,20], and their phosphatase activity to mineralize organic phosphorus [15], thus improving the residual effect of phosphorus fertilization.
It is believed that the interactions between the species of PGPBs of the genera Azospirillum, Bacillus and Pseudomonas have the capacity to increase the efficiency of fertilization with residual P in rat cane, with positive effects on the productivity and technological quality of the sugarcane crop [21]. In this context, the present objective was to evaluate the effect of inoculation with three species of plant-growth-promoting bacteria, applied alone or in combination with residual doses of P2O5 (applied at the time of planting) on foliar nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, yield of stalks, sugar and technological quality of cane second ratoon in tropical soil with low P content.

2. Results

2.1. Leaf Concentrations of N and P as a Function of Inoculations and P2O5 Doses

The effects of interactions between inoculations and phosphorus (P) doses, as well as the effect of P2O5 doses, were not significant on leaf N concentrations of sugarcane; however, the effect of inoculations was significant on leaf N concentration (Table 1). The treatments with inoculation of PGPBs provided higher leaf N concentration in sugarcane compared to those without inoculation treatments.
There was a significant interaction (p < 0.05) between inoculations with PGPBs and P2O5 doses for leaf P concentration of sugarcane (Table 1).
Leaf P concentration of sugarcane plants was increased with inoculations of Azospirillum brasilense, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis, Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens in association with increasing residual P2O5 doses (Figure 1). Inoculations with A. brasilense, P. fluorescens, A. brasilense + B. subtilis, A. brasilense + P. fluorescens, B. subtilis + P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + B. subtilis + P. fluorescens at a residual P2O5 dose of 180 kg ha−1 were observed with higher leaf P concentration, which were statistically not different from the leaf P concentration obtained in the residual P2O5 dose of 135 kg ha−1 in combination with inoculations of P. fluorescens, A. brasilense + B. subtilis, A. brasilense + P. fluorescens and B. subtilis + P. fluorescens (Figure 1).

2.2. Technological Attributes of Sugarcane as a Function of Inoculations and P2O5 Doses

Interactions between inoculations with PGPBs and phosphorus (P) doses were significant for % fiber, juice brix, pol, total recoverable sugar (ATR), stem yield (STY) and sugar yield (SUY) of cane sugar. The effect of the single treatment of inoculations and the residual dose of P2O5 and their interactions were not significant for the purity of the sugarcane juice (Table 2).
The highest fiber % was observed in the treatments with inoculations of A. brasilense, P. fluorescens, A. brasilense + B. subtilis and A. brasilense + B. subtilis + P. fluorescens without residual P fertilization. In addition, inoculations with P. fluorescens, A. brasilense + P. fluorescens, B. subtilis + P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + B. subtilis + P. fluorescens at a residual P2O5 dose of 45 kg ha−1 obtained the highest fiber % while the triple co-inoculation provided higher fiber % only at residual P2O5 dose of 90 kg ha−1. The treatments without inoculation and with co-inoculations of A. brasilense + P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens increased fiber % at a residual P2O5 dose of 135 kg ha−1, whereas inoculations with A. brasilense, B. subtilis, P. fluorescens, A. brasilense + P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + B. subtilis + P. fluorescens provided higher fiber % at a residual P2O5 dose of 180 kg ha−1 (Figure 2A).
Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis reduced sugarcane fiber % with increasing residual P2O5 doses, indicating that increasing P fertilization doses collaborates effectively with the performance of these bacteria to reduce fiber %, which is undesirable for juice extraction. The inverse was observed with co-inoculation of A. brasilense + P. fluorescens, where fiber % of sugarcane was increased with increasing residual P doses, which is harmful to the quality of sugarcane (Figure 2A).
The percentage of apparent soluble solids (% brix) increased with increasing doses of residual P2O5 under co-inoculation of B. subtilis + P. fluorescens (Figure 2B). Inoculation with B. subtilis at the residual P2O5 dose of 45 kg ha−1 was observed with highest % of brix. The lowest % brix was determined in the treatments with inoculation of P. fluorescens and with co-inoculation of A. brasilense + P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + B. subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens at a residual P2O5 dose of 90 kg ha−1. Inoculations of A. brasilense, B. subtilis, P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + P. fluorescens associated with a residual P2O5 dose of 180 kg ha−1 provided lower % brix (Figure 2B).
There was an increase in pol percentage of sugarcane (% of pol) with increasing residual P2O5 doses up to 75 kg ha−1 in combination with inoculation of Bacillus subtilis, while a further increase in residual P2O5 doses led to the reduction in pol % in sugarcane. In addition, pol% of sugarcane was also reduced with increasing residual P2O5 doses under inoculations with Pseudomonas fluorescens and A. brasilense + B. subtilis (Figure 2C).

2.3. Total Recoverable Sugar, Stalks and Sugar Yield as a Function of Inoculations and P Doses

The concentration of total recoverable sugar (TRS) was reduced in the treatments with inoculation of P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + B. subtilis + P. fluorescens as compared to other inoculations and co-inoculations at a residual P2O5 dose of 90 kg ha−1. The same effect was observed with inoculations of A. brasilense, B. subtilis, P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + P. fluorescens at a residual P2O5 dose of 180 kg ha−1. In addition, TRS concentration was increased with inoculation of B. subtilis under the increasing residual dose of P2O5 up to 72 kg ha−1 (Figure 3A).
The treatments inoculated with A. brasilense and B. subtilis were observed with greater stalk productivity or stalk yield (STY) ha−1 and sugar yield (SUY) ha−1 in the absence of P2O5 fertilization in relation to other inoculations. Stalk yield and SUY were increased with inoculations of A. brasilense, B. subtilis, P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + B. subtilis under the residual P2O5 dose of 45 kg ha−1, while the same effect was observed with inoculation of P. fluorescens at the residual P2O5 dose of 90 kg ha−1, and with co-inoculation of A. brasilense + P. fluorescens at a P2O5 dose of 135 kg ha−1 (Figure 3A, C). The residual P2O5 dose of 180 kg ha−1 under inoculations of A. brasilense, P. fluorescens, A. brasilense + B. subtilis and B. subtilis + P. fluorescens were observed with greater STY as compared with other treatments at the same P2O5 dose. Sugarcane stalk yield was also increased in the treatments with inoculation of P. fluorescens and without inoculation in association with increasing residual P2O5 doses up to 102 and 114 kg ha−1, respectively. The treatments without inoculation and inoculation with P. fluorescens could produce a maximum STY of 110.5 and 142.8 t stalks ha−1 at calculated residual P2O5 dose of 102 and 114 kg ha−1. In addition, there was a reduction in STY in the treatments with inoculation of B. subtilis and increasing residual P2O5 doses (Figure 3B).
Sugar yield (SUY) of sugarcane was increased without inoculation and with inoculation of P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + P. fluorescens under maximum residual P2O5 doses of 116, 98 and 110 kg ha−1, giving a maximum estimated SUY of 15, 16.7 and 16 t ha−1, respectively. Sugar yield was increased with increasing residual P2O5 doses under co-inoculation of B. subtilis + P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + B. subtilis + P. fluorescens. In addition, there was a reduction in SUY with increasing P doses and inoculations with A. brasilense and B. subtilis (Figure 3C).

3. Discussion

Nitrogen and phosphorus are considered the most important nutrients for the growth and yield of crop plants. Leaf concentrations of N and P in the range of 18–26 and 1.5–3.0 g kg−1, respectively, are considered adequate for sugarcane ratoon leaves [22,23]. Leaf N concentrations in the present study are within the established standard range, except for treatments without inoculation (17.35 g kg−1) and with inoculation of A. brasilense (3.20 g ha−1). Leaf P concentration in treatments with inoculations of A. brasilense and A. brasilense + B. subtilis under residual P2O5 dose of 180 kg ha−1 was increased by 31 and 28% as compared to without inoculation. This may be due to the ability of PGPBs to improve plant growth directly and indirectly through various mechanisms [11], including nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization. This may be because of greater root growth (increasing soil exploitation by roots) and biological N fixation by A. brasilense [24] and increasing P availability and accumulation with inoculations of Bacillus subtilis and P. fluorescens [21]. The mechanism of P solubilization has been associated with the release of organic acids, which chelate cations of phosphate through hydroxyl and carboxyl groups and then convert them into soluble forms [25,26] with greater availability to the roots, thus increasing its uptake by plant roots and transport to the leaves, resulting in higher leaf P concentrations. It has also been reported that by-products enriched with phosphate rock and inoculated with P-solubilizing bacteria (P. aeruginosa, Bacillus sp. and Rhizobium sp.) in soils cultivated with sugarcane [27]. Rosa et al. [28] reported that inoculation and co-inoculation with A. brasilense, B. subtilis and P. fluorescens increased foliar P concentrations in the first sugarcane harvest.
The % of sugarcane fiber was increased by 11.65% (Table 2; Figure 2A); this is within the agro-industrial quality of sugarcane within the standard range of 11–13% found in a previous study [29]. It is interesting and worth mentioning that % fiber values could not exceed the maximum value of 13%, as the higher % fiber content would negatively interfere at the time of juice extraction. Renan et al. [10] showed that the percentage of sugarcane fiber reflects on the juice extraction efficiency, where higher values of % fiber reduce the extraction efficiency. Furthermore, it should be considered that sugarcane varieties with low fiber content are more susceptible to mechanical damage during cutting and transport, thus impairing % brix, Pol and SUY.
Sugarcane requires low % brix, and minimum % brix values produced 18% higher sugar yield regardless of residual P doses and inoculations (Table 2). The % brix is directly related to sugar yield and the ideal % varies from 18 to 25% [30]. Inoculation with B. subtilis at a residual P2O5 dose of 45 kg ha−1 increased brix by 0.8% as compared to without inoculation with the highest value for the present work. This demonstrated the ability of these PGPBs in associate with residual P doses to improve quality of sugarcane juice (Figure 2B). It has previously reported that inoculation and co-inoculation with A. brasilense, P. fluorescens and B. subtilis under reduced P2O5 dose improved brix% in the first crop of sugarcane, proved that P solubilization favors the production of sugar [28].
The sugarcane pol% indicates all the apparent sucrose of the absolute juice of the harvested cane. Thus, increasing pol values could improve industrial yield of sugarcane [31]. The present study indicated that pol % of sugarcane was reduced in the treatments with increasing residual P2O5 doses under inoculation of P. fluorescens and co-inoculation of A. brasilense + B. subtilis, indicating that increase in P fertilization can reduce efficiency of these bacteria in the industrial sugarcane production. The co-inoculation with A. brasilense + B. subtilis + P. fluorescens provided the highest pol% of sugarcane in comparison to other inoculations, being at least 1.4% higher than the other inoculations (Figure 2C).
Inoculation with B. subtilis and A. brasilense + B. subtilis at the residual P2O5 dose of 45 kg ha−1 provided the highest total recoverable sugar (TRS) in relation to the other P doses within the same inoculation (Figure 3A), which allows us to infer that these bacteria benefited from the low P2O5 dose. Phosphate fertilizer allowing the release of compounds that could help to improve industrial quality of sugarcane juice of this variety. Rosa et al. [28] describes that inoculation and co-inoculation with A. brasilense, B. subtilis and P. fluorescens provided higher TRS of sugarcane juice under reduced P doses.
At a residual P2O5 dose of 45 kg ha−1, the stalk yield (STY) (t ha−1) was increased with inoculation of A. brasilense, B. subtilis, P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + B. subtilis + P. fluorescens, being 28, 21, 18 and 16% higher in relation to without inoculation, respectively (Figure 3B). Inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens increased the STY of sugarcane by 17% (17.96 t ha−1) as compared to without inoculation at a residual P2O5 dose of 90 kg ha−1. In addition, co-inoculation with A. brasilense + P. fluorescens at residual P2O5 dose of 135 kg ha−1 provided 42% (36.69 t ha−1) higher STY than without inoculation, being the highest STY observed in the entire study, also allowing a 25% reduction in phosphate fertilization. It was reported in a previous study that ratoon cane productivity was significantly improved with joint application of PGPBs, green manure and adequate fertilizers [27].
The P use efficiency for the treatments with inoculation of A. brasilense, B. subtilis and P. fluorescens at a residual P2O5 dose of 45 kg ha−1, were 0.76, 0.62 and 0.58 t of sugarcane kg−1 P2O5, respectively. For inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens at a residual P2O5 dose of 90 kg ha−1, the P use efficiency was 0.54 t of sugarcane kg−1 P2O5. The P use efficiency for the co-inoculation with A. brasilense + P. fluorescens at residual P2O5 dose of 135 kg ha−1 was 0.38 t of sugarcane kg−1 P2O5.
Sugar yield (SUY) (t ha−1) was increased with inoculation of A. brasilense, B. subtilis, P. fluorescens and A. brasilense + B. subtilis + P. fluorescens at a residual P2O5 dose of 45 kg ha−1, being 26, 23, 14 and 17% higher as compared to without inoculation treatments (Figure 3C). Inoculation with P. fluorescens and co-inoculation with A. brasilense + P. fluorescens at a residual P2O5 dose of 90 kg ha−1 provided 8 and 43% higher SUY, respectively, in comparison of without inoculated treatments (Table 2; Figure 3C). The previous study with the first sugarcane crop indicated that co-inoculation of A. brasilense + B. subtilis reduced P2O5 fertilization by 75% during first sugarcane crop while inoculation with A. brasilense improved agro-industrial quality of sugarcane under P2O5 dose of 45 kg ha−1 [28].
The exact mechanisms of inoculation with A. brasilense and B. subtilis on the productivity and industrial quality of sugarcane is still needed to be disclosed. However, use of these microorganisms increased availability and absorption of P, which is mainly responsible for high leaf P concentration, growth, industrial quality and yield of sugarcane crops [32,33,34]. The gene sequencing of A. brasilense (Ab-V5 and Ab-V6 strains) highlighted its role in auxin synthesis [34], nutrient availability and cycling [14,35] and biological N fixation [36,37]. Furthermore, B. subtilis has been described as having the potential ability to promote plant growth, solubilize P, and inhibit infestation of phyto-pathogenic attack and heavy metal accumulation [38,39]. Bacillus sp. is a genus that is characterized by being an excellent phosphate solubilizer, including B. subtilis, and P is considered one of the most critical nutrients to increase crop yield [40,41]. Studies have described that plants adapt different mechanisms under inoculation with A. brasilense and B. subtilis to potentially increase soil P availability and food security [39,42]. Bacteria of the genera Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Rhizobium, among others, have demonstrated the ability to solubilize phosphates [17]. Therefore, these PGPBs have the potential to make better use of phosphorus present in the solid phase of the soil, constituting viable alternatives for the inoculation of crops. However, it is noteworthy that the genera Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Rhizobium are considered the most efficient solubilizers of inorganic phosphates [15].
Single inoculation with P. fluorescens and/or co-inoculation with A. brasilense and B. subtilis increased leaf P concentration, industrial quality and productivity of sugarcane in the current study. It may be possible due to the efficiency of P. fluorescens bacterium to use metabolites as a bio-control agent with the synthesis of antibiotics and volatile organic compounds to combat soil pathogens [43,44]. This is promising in terms of phosphate solubilization [45] and N-fixing activities [46]. The genus Pseudomonas sp. produces gluconic acid, which is among the different types of organic acids involved in the solubilization of phosphate, which is considered as an important technique to improve management of P fertilization in modern agriculture [47]. Therefore, co-inoculation with A. brasilense + P. fluorescens can be an important tool in the sustainable management of phosphate fertilization in sugarcane cultivated in tropical soils, optimizing the use of residual P2O5 doses and allowing to reduce P2O5 fertilization by 25% in the ratoon cane field.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. The Location of the Experimental Area

This experiment was conducted during the 2019/20 cropping season at Limoeiro Farm, a part of the ethanol and sugar industry in Ilha Solteira, in the northwest of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The experimental area is located at the geographical coordinates of 20°21′14″ S latitude and 51°04′51″ W longitude, with an altitude of 371 m. The experiment was conducted during the third year of sugar-cane cultivation (second ratoon). The climate in the region is Aw (Köppen scale, defined as tropical with dry winters). Climatic data referring to the period of the experiment were recorded (Figure 4).
The cultivation history of the area in the last ten years and prior to the implantation of sugarcane (2017) showed that this area was cultivated with a pasture (Urochloa brizantha) with some degree of degradation. The soil was classified as Rhodic Haplustox according to USDA [48], and as medium-to-sandy-textured Red Dystrophic soil according to SiBCS [49], with a granulometry of 777, 98, 125 g kg−1 and 747, 88, 165 g kg−1 of sand, silt and clay at depths of 0.00–0.25 and 0.25–0.50 m, respectively. The chemical attributes of the soil were determined before implantation of sugarcane and regrowth of second ratoon cane crop (Table 3).

4.2. Experimental Design and Treatments

The experiment was designed in randomized blocks with three replications and arranged in an 8 × 5 factorial scheme. The treatments consisted of eight inoculations (1. No inoculation (control); 2. Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense; 3. Inoculation with Bacillus subtilis; 4. Inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens; 5. Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense + B. subtilis; 6. Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens; 7. Inoculation with Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens; 8. Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens) and five residual doses of P2O5 (0, 45, 90, 135 and 180 kg ha−1). Phosphate fertilizer doses were applied at the time of sugarcane plantation in 2017 from the source of triple superphosphate 46% P2O5, corresponding to 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% of the recommended P2O5 dose according to [50]. These PGPBs are commercially used in Brazil with strains of A. brasilense (AzoTotal™), B. subtilis (Vult™) and P. fluorescens (Audax™). The plots consisted of 5 lines 5 m in length and spaced at 1.5 m, considering the three central lines of each plot for evaluations.

4.3. Installation and Conduct of the Experiment

The experimental field was applied with soil 1.0 t ha−1 of dolomitic limestone (PRNT 85%) to obtain 60% base saturation as well as 1.0 t ha−1 of gypsum to raise sulfur content (S) after initial soil chemical characterization and 15 days before planting, as recommended for sugarcane cultivation. Three harrowing and one sub-soiling operations were carried out, followed by furrowing at a depth of 0.40 m and applying the insecticide fipronil (180 g ha−1 of ai) + fungicide pyraclostrobin (125 g ha−1 of ai) in planting furrow.
Manual plantation of a sugarcane variety RB92579 was carried out in planting furrows on 11 July 2017, containing about 22 buds m−1. All the treatments were equally fertilized with 30 kg ha−1 of N (ammonium nitrate, 33% N) and 120 kg ha−1 of K2O (potassium chloride, 60% K2O) based on soil analysis. In addition, respective doses of P2O5 were applied in a single dose for each treatment in the planting furrow at the time of sugarcane implantation in 2017.
Fertilization of topdressing in the second ratoon was performed 30 days after sprouting (DAS) on 12 September 2019 from ammonium nitrate as a source of N and potassium chloride as a source of K2O based on the recommendations of [23], as well as land slope and precipitation. The inoculation with PGPBs was performed at 30 DAS of the second ratoon sugarcane crop, using the following liquid inoculants doses: 1.0 L ha−1 of A. brasilense (strains Ab-V5 and Ab-V6 (guarantee of 2 × 108 colony forming units (CFU) mL−1)), 0.5 L ha−1 of B. subtilis (strains CCTB04 (guarantee of 1 × 108 CFU mL−1)) and 0.5 L ha−1 of P. fluorescens (strains CCTB03 (guarantee of 2 × 108 CFU mL−1)) on the basis of manufacturer’s recommendations. The spray volume was 200 L ha−1 (for all applied inoculants), applied with a backpack sprayer at the base of the second ratoon cane tillers during early morning due to milder temperature.
The correction of boron and zinc deficiency was carried out by applying 5 kg ha−1 of zinc (zinc sulfate, 20% Zn and 10% S) and 2 kg ha−1 of boron (boric acid, 17% B) in coverage at about 15 cm from the base of the plants at 60 DAS.
Weeds, pests and diseases were controlled via chemicals and biological ways according to the crop needs throughout the growth cycle. The Insecticides Chlorantraniliprole (10 g ha−1 ai) + Lambda cyhalothrin (5 g ha−1 ai) were applied. Four releases of Trichogramma galloi were performed throughout the crop cycle at 142, 148, 213 and 220 DAS to biologically control sugarcane borer (Diatraea saccharalis). The ratoon sugarcane was manually harvested on the 5th August 2020, at 357 DAS.

4.4. Assessments

The middle third of 12 flag leaves per plot were collected at the full vegetative growth phase (157 DAS) in the morning, and the midrib was removed as described by [50] for the determination of leaf N and P concentrations [51]. The weight was quantified at the time of harvest in order to estimate stalk yield per hectare (STY) (t ha−1).
Ten commercial-quality sugarcane stalks were collected from each plot at the time of harvest and determined for technological quality at Technological Analysis Laboratory by following the methodology defined in the System Payment of Sugarcane Based on Sucrose Content (SPSBSC), according to [52]. Fiber (%), juice purity (%), soluble solids or juice brix content (brix %), apparent sucrose content of cane (Pol-%) and total recoverable sugar (TRS) (kg sugar per t cane−1) were also evaluated at the technological laboratory of ethanol and sugar industry at Suzanápolis, Brazil. Sugar yield SUY (t sugar ha−1) was quantified from the product of STY and pol %, divided by 100 in each individual plot.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The results were submitted to analysis of variance (F test) and Scott–Knott tests (p ≤ 0.05) to compare inoculation means, and regression equations were adjusted for the residual effect of P2O5 doses. Statistical analyses were processed using the computer program SISVAR [53], and graphs were plotted with the aid of SigmaPlot 12.5 software.

5. Conclusions

Inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens alone, and the co-inoculations Azospirillum brasilense + B. subtilis, Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens under residual P2O5 doses of 135 and 180 kg ha−1 increased leaf P concentration. In addition, the isolated or combined inoculation with Azospirullum brasilense, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis promoted leaf N concentration in relation to control.
The co-inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens in association with a residual P2O5 dose of 45 kg ha−1 improved agro-industrial quality of the second ratoon cane. Co-inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens at a residual P2O5 dose of 135 kg ha−1 increased stalk yield by 42% and sugar by 43%, providing a 25% reduction in phosphate fertilization in the second ratoon cane.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.C.F., P.A.L.R. and M.C.M.T.F.; methodology, G.C.F., A.J. and C.E.d.S.O.; software, C.E.d.S.O. and P.A.L.R.; validation, M.C.M.T.F., E.C.d.S. and H.A.; formal analysis, G.C.F., P.A.L.R. and C.E.d.S.O.; investigation, A.J., R.d.S.V., P.H.G.D.C. and M.C.M.T.F.; resources, M.C.M.T.F.; data curation, G.C.F., E.C.d.S., P.A.L.R. and H.A.; writing—original draft preparation, G.C.F., A.J. and C.E.d.S.O.; writing—review and editing, F.S.G., T.A.R.N., M.C.M.T.F., A.J. and A.H.H.; visualization, M.C.M.T.F.; supervise, P.A.L.R. and M.C.M.T.F.; project administration, M.C.M.T.F.; funding acquisition, T.A.R.N., A.A.A.-A. and M.C.M.T.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) productivity research grant (award number: 311308/2020-1) for the corresponding author. The authors extend their appreciation to the researcher supporting project number (RSP2023R505) for A.A.A.-A.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Sao Paulo State University and CAPES for supporting this work through Researchers. The authors express their sincere thanks to the researcher supporting project number (RSP2023R505), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for funding this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. CONAB. National Supply Company. Monitoring the Brazilian Crop: Sugarcane, First Survey 2020/21 Crop. Available online: https://www.conab.gov.br/ (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  2. Bordonal, R.D.O.; Carvalho, J.L.N.; Lal, R.; de Figueiredo, E.B.; de Oliveira, B.G.; La Scala, N. Sustainability of sugarcane production in Brazil: A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chen, J.Y.; Yen, G.C.; Tsai, N.T.; Lin, J.A. Risk and benefit of natural and commercial dark brown sugars as evidenced by phenolic and Maillard reaction product contents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bento, C.B.; Filoso, S.; Pitombo, L.M.; Cantarella, H.; Rossetto, R.; Martinelli, L.A.; do Carmo, J.B. Impacts of sugarcane agriculture expansion over low-intensity cattle ranch pasture in Brazil on greenhouse gases. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 206, 980–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Soltangheisi, A.; Withers, P.J.; Pavinato, P.S.; Cherubin, M.R.; Rossetto, R.; Do Carmo, J.B.; da Rocha, G.C.; Martinelli, L.A. Improving phosphorus sustainability of sugarcane production in Brazil. GCB Bioenergy 2019, 11, 1444–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Caione, G.; Prado, R.D.M.; Campos, C.N.S.; Rosatto Moda, L.; de Lima Vasconcelos, R.; Pizauro Júnior, J.M. Response of sugarcane in a red ultisol to phosphorus rates, phosphorus sources, and filter cake. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 405970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Caione, G.; Fernandes, F.M.; Lange, A. Efeito residual de fontes de fósforo nos atributos químicos do solo, nutrição e produtividade de biomassa da cana-de-açúcar. Rev. Bras. Ciências Agrar. 2013, 8, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Simões Neto, D.E.; Oliveira, A.C.; Freire, F.J.; Freire, M.B.G.S.; Birth, C.W.A.; Rocha, A.T. Phosphorus extraction in soils cultivated with sugarcane and its relationship with the buffer capacity. Braz. J. Agric. Environ. Eng. 2009, 13, 840–848. [Google Scholar]
  9. Moura, M.V.P.D.S.; Farias, C.H.D.A.; Azevedo, C.A.V.D.; Dantas Neto, J.; Azevedo, H.M.D.; Pordeus, R.V. Levels of manuring in the sugar-cane crop, first leaf, with and without irrigation. Ciência Agrotecnologia 2005, 29, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Renan, O.P.; Nivaldo, S.; Rafael, C.M.; Willian, P.; Adelson, P.D.A.; Segundo, U.; Veronica, M.R. Growth analysis of sugarcane inoculated with diazotrophic bacteria and nitrogen fertilization. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 11, 2786–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hungria, M.; Ribeiro, R.A.; Nogueira, M.A. Draft genome sequences of Azospirillum brasilense strains Ab-V5 and Ab-V6, commercially used in inoculants for grasses and legumes in Brazil. Genome Announc. 2018, 6, e00393-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Steiner, F.; da Silva Oliveira, C.E.; Zoz, T.; Zuffo, A.M.; de Freitas, R.S. Co-Inoculation of common bean with Rhizobium and Azospirillum enhance the drought tolerance. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 67, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jalal, A.; Galindo, F.S.; Boleta, E.H.M.; Oliveira, C.E.D.S.; Reis, A.R.D.; Nogueira, T.A.R.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. Common bean yield and zinc use efficiency in association with diazotrophic bacteria co-inoculations. Agronomy 2021, 11, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jalal, A.; da Silva Oliveira, C.E.; Freitas, L.A.; Galindo, F.S.; Lima, B.H.; Boleta, E.H.M.; Da Silva, E.C.; do Nascimento, V.; Nogueira, T.A.R.; Buzetti, S.; et al. Agronomic biofortification and productivity of wheat with soil zinc and diazotrophic bacteria in tropical savannah. Crop Pasture Sci. 2022, 73, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rodríguez, H.; Fraga, R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol. Adv. 1999, 17, 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, Y.; LI, Y.; Wang, S.; Umbreen, S.; Zhow, C. Soil phosphorus fractionation and its association whith soil pohosphate-solubilizing bacteria in a chronosequence of vegetation restotaion. Ecol. Eng. 2021, 164, 106–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oteino, N.; Lally, R.D.; Kiwanuka, S.; Lloyd, A.; Ryan, D.; Germaine, K.J.; Dowling, D.N. Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tayade, A.S.; Geetha, P.; Anusha, S.; Dhanapal, R.; Hari, K. Bio-intensive modulation of sugarcane ratoon rhizosphere for enhanced soil health and sugarcane productivity under tropical Indian condition. SugarTech 2019, 21, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Souchie, E.L.; Azcón, R.; Barea, J.M.; Saggin-Júnior, O.J.; Silva, E.M.R.D. Phosphate solubilization in solid and liquid media by soil bacteria and fungi. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 2005, 40, 1149–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cheng, J.; Zhuang, W.; Li, N.N.; Tang, C.L.; Ying, H.J. Efficient biosynthesis of d-ribose using a novel co-feeding strategy in Bacillus subtilis without acid formation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 64, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rosa, P.A.L.; Mortinho, E.S.; Jalal, A.; Galindo, F.S.; Buzetti, S.; Fernandes, G.C.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. Inoculation with growth-promoting bacteria associated with the reduction of phosphate fertilization in sugarcane. Front. Environ. Sci. 2020, 32, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raij, B.V.; Cantarella, H.; Quaggio, J.A.; Furlani, A.M.C. Fertilization and Liming Recommendations for the State of São Paulo, 2nd ed.; Instituto Agonronomico: Campinas, Brazil, 1996; 285p.
  23. Cantarella, H.; van Raij, B.; Quaggio, J.A. Soil and plant analyses for lime and fertilizer recommendations in Brazil. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1998, 29, 1691–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Galindo, F.S.; Pagliari, P.H.; Fernandes, G.C.; Rodrigues, W.L.; Boleta, E.H.M.; Jalal, A.; Céu, E.G.O.; Lima, B.H.D.; Lavres, J.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. Improving sustainable field-grown wheat production with Azospirillum brasilense under tropical conditions: A potential tool for improving nitrogen management. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bhattacharyya, P.N.; Goswami, M.P.; Bhattacharyya, L.H. Perspective of beneficial microbes in agriculture under changing climatic scenario: A Review. J. Phytol. 2016, 8, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Patel, T.S.; Minocheherhomji, F.P. Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria: Blessing to agriculture. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 2018, 6, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lopes, C.M.; Silva, A.M.M.; Estrada-Bonilla, G.A.; Ferraz-Almeida, R.; Vieira, J.L.V.; Otto, R.; Cardoso, E.J.B.N. Improving the fertilizer value of sugarcane wastes through phosphate rock amendment and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria inoculation. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 298, 126821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rosa, P.A.L.; Galindo, F.S.; Oliveira, C.E.D.S.; Jalal, A.; Mortinho, E.S.; Fernandes, G.C.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. Inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria to reduce phosphate fertilization requirement and enhance technological quality and yield of sugarcane. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. de Miranda, E.E.; Marcelo, F.F. Sugarcane: Food production, energy, and environment. In Sugarcane Biorefinery, Technology and Perspectives; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 67–88. [Google Scholar]
  30. Duarte, A.; Salgado, A.P., Jr.; Lemos, S.V.; de Souza, M.A., Jr.; de Almeida, A.F. Proposal of operating best practices that contribute to the technical efficiency in Brazilian sugar and ethanol mills. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 214, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oliveira, D.M.; Cherubin, M.R.; Franco, A.L.; Santos, A.S.; Gelain, J.G.; Dias, N.M.; Diniz, T.R.; Almeida, A.N.; Feigl, B.J.; Davies, C.A.; et al. Is the expansion of sugarcane over pasturelands a sustainable strategy for Brazil’s bioenergy industry? Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2019, 102, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Fukami, J.; Ollero, F.J.; Megias, M.; Hungary, M. Phytohormones and induction of plant-stress tolerance and defense genes by seed and foliar inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense cells and metabolites promote maize growth. AMB Express 2017, 7, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Di Salvo, L.P.; Ferrando, L.; Fernández-Scavino, A.; García de Salamone, I.E. Microorganisms reveal what plants do not: Wheat growth and rhizosphere microbial communities after Azospirillum brasilense inoculation and nitrogen fertilization under field conditions. Plant Soil 2018, 424, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Marra, L.M.; de Oliveira, S.M.; Soares, C.R.F.S.; Moreira, F.M.S. Solubilization of inorganic phosphates by inoculant strains from tropical vegetables. Sci. Agri. 2011, 68, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Galindo, F.S.; Rodrigues, W.L.; Fernandes, G.C.; Boleta, E.H.M.; Jalal, A.; Rosa, P.A.L.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. Enhancing agronomic efficiency and maize grain yield with Azospirillum brasilense inoculation under Brazilian savannah conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 2022, 134, 126471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pankievicz, V.C.; do Amaral, F.P.; Santos, K.F.; Agtuca, B.; Xu, Y.; Schueller, M.J.; Ferrieri, R.A. Robust biological nitrogen fixation in a model grass–bacterial association. Plant J. 2015, 81, 907–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Skonieski, F.R.; Viégas, J.; Martin, T.N.; Mingotti, C.C.A.; Naetzold, S.; Tonin, T.J.; Meinerz, G.R. Effect of nitrogen topdressing fertilization and inoculation of seeds with Azospirillum brasilense on corn yield and agronomic characteristics. Agronomy 2019, 9, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Rekha, K.; Baskar, B.; Srinath, S.; Usha, B. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus subtilis RR4 isolated from rice rhizosphere induces malic acid biosynthesis in rice roots. Can. J. Microbiol. 2018, 64, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Prakash, J.; Arora, N.K. Phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus sp. enhances growth, phosphorus uptake and oil yield of Mentha arvensis L. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ramirez, L.C.C.; Leal, L.C.S.; Galvez, Y.A.; Burbano, V.E.M. Bacillus: A genus of bacteria that exhibits important phosphate solubilizing abilities. Nova 2014, 12, 165–178. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  41. Jalal, A.; Azeem, K.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M.; Khan, A. Enhancing soil properties and maize yield through organic and inorganic nitrogen and diazotrophic bacteria. In Sustainable Crop Production; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; pp. 165–178. [Google Scholar]
  42. Martins, M.R.; Jantalia, C.P.; Reis, V.M.; Döwich, I.; Polidoro, J.C.; Alves, B.J.R.; Urquiaga, S. Impact of plant growth-promoting bacteria on grain yield, protein content, and urea-15 N recovery by maize in a Cerrado Oxisol. Plant Soil 2018, 422, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. David, B.V.; Chandrasehar, G.; Selvam, P.N. Pseudomonas fluorescens: A plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) with potential role in biocontrol of pests of crops. In Crop Improvement through Microbial Biotechnology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 221–243. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kamble, R.; Jadhav, P.; Gurjar, M. Biocontrol potential of Pseudomonas species against phytopathogens. Int. Res. J. Mod. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2020, 2, 558–568. [Google Scholar]
  45. Alaylar, B.; Egamberdieva, D.; Gulluce, M.; Karadayi, M.; Arora, N.K. Integration of molecular tools in microbial phosphate solubilization research in agriculture perspective. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jing, X.; Cui, Q.; Li, X.; Yin, J.; Ravichandran, V.; Pan, D.; Zhang, Y. Engineering Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5 to improve its antifungal activity and nitrogen fixation. Microb. Biotechnol. 2020, 13, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Pineda, M.E.B. Phosphate solubilization as a microbial strategy for promoting plant growth. Corpoica Sci. Technol. Agric. 2014, 15, 101–113, (In Spanish, abstract in English). [Google Scholar]
  48. Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy—USDA; Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
  49. Santos, H.G.; Jacomine, P.K.T.; Angels, L.H.C.; Oliveira, V.A.; Lumbreras, J.F.; Coelho, M.R.; Almeida, J.A.; Araujo Filho, J.C.; Oliveira, J.B.; Cunha, T.J.F. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation. In Brazilian System of Soil Classification; Embrapa: Brasilia, Brazil, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cantarella, H.; van Raij, B.; Camargo, C.E.O. Other industrial crops: Sugarcane. In Technical Bulletin 100: Liming and Fertilization Recommendations for the State of São Paulo; van Raij, B., Cantarella, H., Quaggio, J.A., Furlani, A.M.C., Eds.; Instituto Agronômico de Campinas: Campinas, Brazil, 1997; pp. 237–239. [Google Scholar]
  51. Malavolta, E.; Vitti, G.C.; Oliveira, S.A. Assessment of the Nutritional Status of Plants: Principles and Applications; Potaphos: Piracicaba, Brazil, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fernandes, A.C. Calculations in the Sugarcane Agroindustry; STAB: Piracicaba, Brazil, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ferreira, D.F. Sisvar: A computer analysis system to fixed effects split plot type designs. Braz. J. Biom. 2019, 37, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Plants 12 02699 g001 550
Figure 1. Interaction of residual P2O5 doses within inoculations for leaf phosphorus (P) concentration of the second ratoon sugarcane crop (Mean values ± standard deviation). N.I (non-inoculation), Azo (Azospirillum brasilense); Bac (Bacillus subtilis); Pseud (Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac (Azospirillum brasilense + B. subtilis); Azo + Pseud (Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Bac + Pseud (Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac + Pseud (Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens). Error bars indicate standard deviation of the means (n = 4 replications). Different letters in each P2O5 dose are statistically different according to the Scott–Knott test at 5% probability.
Figure 1. Interaction of residual P2O5 doses within inoculations for leaf phosphorus (P) concentration of the second ratoon sugarcane crop (Mean values ± standard deviation). N.I (non-inoculation), Azo (Azospirillum brasilense); Bac (Bacillus subtilis); Pseud (Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac (Azospirillum brasilense + B. subtilis); Azo + Pseud (Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Bac + Pseud (Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac + Pseud (Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens). Error bars indicate standard deviation of the means (n = 4 replications). Different letters in each P2O5 dose are statistically different according to the Scott–Knott test at 5% probability.
Plants 12 02699 g001
Plants 12 02699 g002 550
Figure 2. Interaction of residual P2O5 doses within inoculations for Fiber (A), brix (B) and Pol (C) of the second ratoon variety RB92579 (Mean values ± standard deviation). NI (non-inoculation); Azo (Azospirillum brasilense); Bac (Bacillus subtilis); Pseud (Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac (Azospirillum brasilense + B. subtilis); Azo + Pseud (Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Bac + Pseud (Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac + Pseud (Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens). Error bars indicate standard deviation of the means (n = 4 replications). Different letter in each P2O5 dose were statistically different according to the Scott–Knott test at 5% probability.
Figure 2. Interaction of residual P2O5 doses within inoculations for Fiber (A), brix (B) and Pol (C) of the second ratoon variety RB92579 (Mean values ± standard deviation). NI (non-inoculation); Azo (Azospirillum brasilense); Bac (Bacillus subtilis); Pseud (Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac (Azospirillum brasilense + B. subtilis); Azo + Pseud (Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Bac + Pseud (Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac + Pseud (Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens). Error bars indicate standard deviation of the means (n = 4 replications). Different letter in each P2O5 dose were statistically different according to the Scott–Knott test at 5% probability.
Plants 12 02699 g002
Plants 12 02699 g003 550
Figure 3. Interaction of residual P2O5 doses within inoculations for total recoverable sugar—TRS (A), stalk yield—STY (B) and sugar yield—SUY (C) of the second ratoon cane variety RB92579 (Mean values ± standard deviation). NI (non-inoculation); Azo (Azospirillum brasilense); Bac (Bacillus subtilis); Pseud (Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac (Azospirillum brasilense + B. subtilis); Azo + Pseud (Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Bac + Pseud (Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac + Pseud (A. brasilense + Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens). Error bars indicate standard deviation of the means (n = 4 replications). Different letters in each P2O5 dose are statistically different according to the Scott–Knott test at 5% probability.
Figure 3. Interaction of residual P2O5 doses within inoculations for total recoverable sugar—TRS (A), stalk yield—STY (B) and sugar yield—SUY (C) of the second ratoon cane variety RB92579 (Mean values ± standard deviation). NI (non-inoculation); Azo (Azospirillum brasilense); Bac (Bacillus subtilis); Pseud (Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac (Azospirillum brasilense + B. subtilis); Azo + Pseud (Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Bac + Pseud (Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens); Azo + Bac + Pseud (A. brasilense + Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens). Error bars indicate standard deviation of the means (n = 4 replications). Different letters in each P2O5 dose are statistically different according to the Scott–Knott test at 5% probability.
Plants 12 02699 g003
Plants 12 02699 g004 550
Figure 4. Monthly average precipitation, maximum, average and minimum temperatures during the period of experiment. This data was collected from the automated weather station at experimental location. Ilha Solteira, SP, 2019/2020.
Figure 4. Monthly average precipitation, maximum, average and minimum temperatures during the period of experiment. This data was collected from the automated weather station at experimental location. Ilha Solteira, SP, 2019/2020.
Plants 12 02699 g004
Table
Table 1. Leaf nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations of second ratoon cane of the RB92579 variety as a function of inoculations and P doses.
Table 1. Leaf nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations of second ratoon cane of the RB92579 variety as a function of inoculations and P doses.
P2O5 Doses
(Kg ha−1)		Leaf N
Concentration		Leaf P
Concentration
g kg−1
019.421.43
4519.231.48
9019.971.50
13519.331.69
18020.151.82
Inoculations
Without inoculation17.35 b1.48
Azospirillum brasilense20.03 a1.55
Bacillus subtilis19.97 a1.49
Pseudomonas fluorescens19.78 a1.61
Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis20.20 a1.65
Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens19.73 a1.72
Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens20.12 a1.61
Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens19.76 a1.56
Test F
P2O5 doses (D)ns**
Inoculation (I)**
D × Ins*
Overall Means19.621.58
standard Error0.620.05
CV (%)9.939.84
Means followed by the same letter in the column were statistically not different according to the Scott–Knott test at 5% probability. TRS: total recoverable sugar, STY: stalk yield and SUY: sugar yield. CV: coefficient of variance. **, * and ns: significant at 1% and 5% at p < 0.01, p < 0.05 and non-significant, respectively. n = 4 replications.
Table
Table 2. Indicators of technological quality, stalk yield (STY) and sugar yield (SUY) of the second ratoon cane of the RB92579 variety as a function of P dose and inoculations.
Table 2. Indicators of technological quality, stalk yield (STY) and sugar yield (SUY) of the second ratoon cane of the RB92579 variety as a function of P dose and inoculations.
P2O5 Doses
(Kg ha−1)		FiberPurityBrixPolTRSSTYSUY
%%%%kg Sugar t−1 Canet ha−1t ha−1
011.1687.2721.1918.47156.3389.3713.94
4511.1287.5321.1818.59157.8093.1914.72
9010.9887.8420.9918.56157.1095.9115.05
13511.2286.9321.0418.14153.0398.1915.04
18011.1486.9321.0818.35154.9997.3917.10
Inoculation
Without inoculation11.0187.74 a21.2718.54157.0087.2113.72
Azospirillum brasilense11.0787.72 a20.9618.35154.44101.5215.66
Bacillus subtilis10.9986.56 a21.2918.47156.6997.2215.25
Pseudomonas fluorescens11.1787.41 a20.7718.09153.2399.5315.23
Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis11.1187.38 a21.2118.57157.7092.8214.62
Azospirillum brasilense + Pseudomonas fluorescens11.1586.84 a21.0518.60157.0793.7514.69
Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens11.1187.49 a21.1518.42155.7293.3914.56
Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus subtilis + Pseudomonas fluorescens11.3987.25 a21.0618.36154.9693.0414.44
Test F
P2O5 doses (D)nsnsnsnsns***
Inoculation (I)*ns*nsns***
D × I**ns**********
Overall Means11.1287.2909.2118.42155.8594.8114.77
Standard Error0.0780.410.120.201.662.290.37
CV (%)3.122.122.554.874.7710.8311.34
Means followed by the same letter in the column were statistically not different according to the Scott–Knott test at 5% probability. TRS: total recoverable sugar, STY: stalk yield and SUY: sugar yield. CV: coefficient of variance. **, * and ns: significant at 1% and 5% at p < 0.01, p < 0.05 and non-significant, respectively. n = 4 replications.
Table
Table 3. Chemical characterization of the soil in the experimental area before planting sugarcane and regrowth of the second ratoon cane in the 0.00–0.25 and 0.25–0.50 m layers.
Table 3. Chemical characterization of the soil in the experimental area before planting sugarcane and regrowth of the second ratoon cane in the 0.00–0.25 and 0.25–0.50 m layers.
Before Planting Sugarcane
Layers
(m)		PS-SO4OMpHKCaMgH + AlAlSb
mg dm−3g dm−3CaCl2mmolc dm−3
0.00–0.2523134.72.68620116.6
0.25–0.5022124.82.49720218.4
Layers
(m)		B aCu bFe bMn bZnbCECVm
mg dm−3mmolc dm−3%%
0.00–0.250.220.81416.20.636.6456
0.25–0.500.221.078.30.338.44810
Before regrowth of 2nd ratoon cane
Layers
(m)		PS-SO4OMpHKCaMgH + AlAlSb
mg dm−3g dm−3CaCl2mmolc dm−3
0.00–0.257216519723218
0.25–0.505211519620217
Layers
(m)		B aCu bFe bMn bZn bCECVM
mg dm−3mmolc dm−3%%
0.00–0.250125211414410
0.25–0.500116121374513
a Determined in hot water, b Determined in DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetc acid). OM: organic matter. CEC: cation exchange capacity, SB: sum of bases, V: base saturation, M: Al saturation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandes, G.C.; Rosa, P.A.L.; Jalal, A.; Oliveira, C.E.d.S.; Galindo, F.S.; Viana, R.d.S.; De Carvalho, P.H.G.; Silva, E.C.d.; Nogueira, T.A.R.; Al-Askar, A.A.; et al. Technological Quality of Sugarcane Inoculated with Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria and Residual Effect of Phosphorus Rates. Plants 2023, 12, 2699. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142699

AMA Style

Fernandes GC, Rosa PAL, Jalal A, Oliveira CEdS, Galindo FS, Viana RdS, De Carvalho PHG, Silva ECd, Nogueira TAR, Al-Askar AA, et al. Technological Quality of Sugarcane Inoculated with Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria and Residual Effect of Phosphorus Rates. Plants. 2023; 12(14):2699. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142699

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandes, Guilherme Carlos, Poliana Aparecida Leonel Rosa, Arshad Jalal, Carlos Eduardo da Silva Oliveira, Fernando Shintate Galindo, Ronaldo da Silva Viana, Pedro Henrique Gomes De Carvalho, Edson Cabral da Silva, Thiago Assis Rodrigues Nogueira, Abdulaziz A. Al-Askar, and et al. 2023. "Technological Quality of Sugarcane Inoculated with Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria and Residual Effect of Phosphorus Rates" Plants 12, no. 14: 2699. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142699

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop