Next Article in Journal
Ecotoxicological Study of Tannic Acid on Soil and Water Non-Target Indicators and Its Impact on Fluvial and Edaphic Communities
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of the Ascorbic Acid–Glutathione Cycle in Young Wheat Ears’ Response to Spring Freezing Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Vegetation Indices for Early Grey Mould Detection in Lettuce Grown under Different Lighting Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Exogenous Calcium on Tolerance of Winter Wheat to Cold Stress during Stem Elongation Stage
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparison of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of the Wheat Grain Filling Stage Using RGB Images

Plants 2023, 12(23), 4043; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234043
by Yunlin Song †, Zhuangzhuang Sun †, Ruinan Zhang, Haijiang Min, Qing Li *, Jian Cai, Xiao Wang, Qin Zhou and Dong Jiang *
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Plants 2023, 12(23), 4043; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234043
Submission received: 3 November 2023 / Revised: 25 November 2023 / Accepted: 28 November 2023 / Published: 30 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Strategies and Mechanisms for Enhancing Stress Tolerance in Wheat)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

A comparison of different machine learning algorithms for predicting wheat grain-filling stage using RGB images is illustrated in this work and the following are the suggestions or comments for the improvements of this article.

Objectives of this work are presented in the introduction part but I suggest it to convert this to the key contributions of this work by highlighting the novelty of this work.

Since literature survey is not present in this article, it is necessary to strengthen the introduction part by referring to some of the past works done in the similar context.

How image based dataset is used for both ML and Deep Learning algorithms?

How images are classified with approaches like SVM or Decision Trees?

How model size is varying for different approaches?

Is there any model is proposed in this work?

How comparison alone contributes as a research article? is it not a survey?

figure 8 is not clear

MLP is a Ml algorithm not a Deep Learning algorithm?

CNN is used for feature extraction but not for model comparison?

All these technical flaws should be thoroughly corrected for further consideration of this work.

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript is very clear as to what to study and thus, it reads well. Overall, this manuscript can be published after minor revision suggested below.

-       Please provide a brief explanation on the algorithms tested in sections 3.2 – 3.4.

-       Line 286-292: this paragraph serves better if it is placed in the introduction rather than discussion.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The responses are convincing, and the changes are made according to the review comments. So, this work can be accepted in its present form.

Back to TopTop