Next Article in Journal
GhMAX2 Contributes to Auxin-Mediated Fiber Elongation in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
Previous Article in Journal
Eugenia calycina and Eugenia stigmatosa as Promising Sources of Antioxidant Phenolic Compounds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Treatments with Diquat Reveal the Relationship between Protein Phosphatases (PP2A) and Oxidative Stress during Mitosis in Arabidopsis thaliana Root Meristems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 15
10.3390/plants13152040
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Post-Translational Modification of WRKY Transcription Factors

by
Xiangui Zhou
1,*,†,
Zaojuan Lei
2,† and
Pengtian An
2
1
State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences and School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2
Huanghua Port Business Department, Technical Center of Shijiazhuang Customs District, Cangzhou 061113, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2024, 13(15), 2040; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152040
Submission received: 11 June 2024 / Revised: 12 July 2024 / Accepted: 22 July 2024 / Published: 25 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Post-Translational Modifications in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins are involved in numerous biological processes, including signal transduction, cell cycle regulation, growth and development, and stress responses. WRKY transcription factors (TFs) play significant roles in plant growth, development, and responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses, making them one of the largest and most vital TF families in plants. Recent studies have increasingly highlighted the importance of PTMs of WRKY TFs in various life processes. This review focuses on the recent advancements in understanding the phosphorylation and ubiquitination of WRKY TFs, particularly their roles in resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses and in plant growth and development. Future research directions and prospects in this field are also discussed.

1. Introduction

As sessile organisms, plants cannot move and are highly susceptible to external biotic and abiotic stresses. Biotic stresses include attacks by fungi, bacteria, viruses, nematodes, and insects, while abiotic stresses encompass salt, drought, cold, heat, UV-B radiation, and heavy metal exposure. These stresses significantly impact plant growth and development, ultimately leading to reduced crop yields [1]. Over long periods of interaction with their environment, plants have evolved complex and precise systems to adapt to changing conditions. The ability of plants to perceive and respond to stimuli is crucial for their survival. Stimulus perception involves sensors or receptors on the cell surface that detect various stresses and transmit these signals through multiple signaling pathways [2]. A key signaling module downstream of receptor-like protein kinases (RLKs) is the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade, which acts as a molecular switch in sensing upstream signals and responding to environmental stress. The MAPK cascade phosphorylates various downstream targets, including TFs, structural proteins, protein kinases, and other enzymes [3]. TFs are essential regulatory components in signal transduction. By binding to cis-acting elements in target gene promoters, TFs can enhance or inhibit the transcription efficiency of target genes, thereby enabling adaptive regulation in response to environmental stress. Plant TF families include MYB, bZIP, ERF, NAC, and WRKY, among others. The WRKY TF family is one of the most important and extensively studied families in the plant stress response [4].
The WRKY TF family is large, with numerous members identified across various species due to advances in genomics research. For instance, 102 WRKY TFs have been identified in Oryza sativa [5], 72 in Arabidopsis thaliana [6], 140 in Zea mays [7], and 278 in Brassica napus [8]. WRKY TFs play crucial roles in plant immunity [9,10,11,12] and are important regulators of plant growth and development [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Additionally, WRKY TFs are involved in responses to abiotic stresses [20,21,22,23]. High-density Arabidopsis protein microarrays have been used to identify downstream targets of MAPKs, revealing that TFs such as TGA, MYB, bZIP, and WRKY are potential MAPK substrates [24]. Other protein kinase families, including SnRK2 and CDPK, have also been shown to phosphorylate WRKY TFs [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Furthermore, WRKY TFs can be regulated by ubiquitination [31,32,33,34,35] and persulfidation [36,37]. In this review, we summarize recent findings on the phosphorylation and ubiquitination of WRKY TFs by various protein kinases and their roles in regulating responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as plant growth and development.

2. The Function of WRKY’s Phosphorylation in Plants

2.1. The Phosphorylation of WRKY Proteins under Biotic Stress

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades function downstream of receptors/sensors, transducing extracellular stimuli into cellular responses [38]. The core components of a MAPK cascade include a MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK or MEKK), a MAP kinase kinase (MAPKK, MKK, or MEK), and a MAP kinase [39]. In Nicotiana benthamiana, NbWRKY8 is phosphorylated at clustered proline-directed serines (SP cluster) by SIPK and WIPK (AtMPK3 and AtMPK6 orthologs, respectively). NbWRKY8 interacts with these MAPKs via a MAPK-docking (D) domain, and this interaction is required for effective phosphorylation of NbWRKY8 in plants [9] (Table 1). Moreover, the phospho-mimicking mutant of NbWRKY8 activates the downstream gene HMGR2. Group I WRKYs, including AtWRKY25 and NtWRKY1, are also in vitro substrates of MAPKs [40,41].
AtWRKY33, the closest Arabidopsis WRKY to NbWRKY8, has been identified as a classic substrate of MPK3/MPK6 [10]. MPK3/MPK6 phosphorylate multiple residues of AtWRKY33 in response to Botrytis cinerea infections. Phosphorylation of AtWRKY33 promotes the expression of PAD3 and is essential for the full induction of camalexin biosynthesis [30]. Recently, WRKY33 was reported to be cooperatively phosphorylated by protein kinases CPK5/CPK6 and MPK3/MPK6 to activate camalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, providing protection against B. cinerea infection [25], indicating that WRKY TFs function as convergent substrates of differential protein kinases. Additionally, CPK4/5/6/11 phosphorylate AtWRKY8, AtWRKY28, and AtWRKY48, enhancing their binding activity to W-box elements, thereby reprograming the transcription of immune genes [26].
Other substrates of MPK3/6 include WRKY18 and WRKY46. Recent work has revealed that MPK3/MPK6 interact with and phosphorylate WRKY18, which modulates PP2C5 expression. The MPK3/MPK6-WRKY18-PP2C5 module significantly reduces Pseudomonas syringae infection in Arabidopsis [42]. Phosphorylation by MPK3/MPK6 has been experimentally demonstrated for 36 WRKY factors [43]. WRKY46 has been identified as an MPK3/6 phospho-target mediating plant defense responses [43]. Such a large number of WRKY TFs can be phosphorylated by MPK3/6, indicating that WRKY TFs are widely involved in MAPK-mediated signaling pathways.
In rice, OsBWMK1 phosphorylates OsWRKY33, which binds to the W-box element in several PR gene promoters [44]. OsWRKY30 is a downstream target of the OsMKK3-OsMPK7 module and enhances resistance to the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) [45]. Two MAPKs, OsMPK4 and OsMPK6, phosphorylate WRKY45 proteins in vitro [46]. Upon activation by salicylic acid (SA), OsWRKY45 promotes the accumulation of its own mRNA and that of the downstream defense-related genes OsWRKY62, OsNAC4, and OsHSF1, enhancing rice disease resistance [47].
OsMKK4-OsMPK3/6, a rice fungal MAMP-responsive MAPK cascade [48], phosphorylates the multiple clustered serine-proline residues of OsWRKY53 in vitro [49]. Overexpression of the phospho-mimic form of OsWRKY53 can activate numerous defense-related gene expressions and enhance rice blast resistance [49].
WRKY also plays an essential role in plant resistance to insect infestation. Rice recognizes signals derived from chewing herbivores and activates OsMPK3 and OsMPK6, which then phosphorylate OsWRKY70. Phosphorylation of OsWRKY70 increases its transactivation activity but not its DNA-binding activity. The OsMPK3/6-OsWRKY70 module elicits the jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathway to activate defense responses and decreases gibberellin (GA) production to inhibit plant growth [50]. This strategy of prioritizing defense over growth has been reported elsewhere. OsWRKY31 plays a positive role in defending against Magnaporthe oryzae rice and affects lateral root development [51]. Phosphorylation and ubiquitination of OsWRKY31 produce an OsMKK10-2-mediated defense response in rice triggered by Magnaporthe oryzae [12]. Additionally, the OsMKK10-2-OsMPK3/6-OsWRKY31 module participates in camalexin biosynthesis to regulate defense and growth [12].
SnRK2s have been implicated in plant growth and survival under osmotic stress conditions [52]. The ABA-inducible SnRK2-type kinase SAPK10 phosphorylates WRKY72 at Thr129. SAPK10-mediated phosphorylation impairs the DNA-binding ability of WRKY72 and releases its suppression on AOS1 and JA biosynthesis [27]. Plant SUCROSE-NONFERMENTING1 (SNF1)-related kinase 1 (SnRK1) plays a central role in maintaining energy homeostasis for growth and survival [53]. In barley, SnRK1 positively regulates disease resistance by interacting with and phosphorylating WRKY3, a repressor of barley disease resistance to Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh) fungus, at Ser83 and Ser112. Phosphorylation of WRKY3 at these sites destabilizes the protein [54]. Recent work has shown that Bgh infection induces the expression of multiple MPK genes, including HvMPK4, and leads to the activation of barley MAPKs by phosphorylation. HvMPK4 negatively regulates barley resistance to powdery mildew. Further studies have identified a HvMKK1-HvMPK4-HvWRKY1 module in the barley immune system, where HvMPK4 enhances the DNA-binding ability and transcriptional inhibition activity of HvWRKY1 by phosphorylating three major amino acid sites: Ser122, Thr284, and Ser347, thereby inhibiting barley resistance to powdery fungi [55].
In other crops, including oilseed rape (Brassica napus), apple (Malus pumila), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), pepper (Capsicum annuum), and chickpea (Cicer arietinum), phosphorylation of WRKY TFs by protein kinases has been reported. The BnaMKK5-BnaA06.MPK3/BnaC03.MPK3 module phosphorylates the substrate BnWRKY33, enhancing its transcriptional activity and positively regulating resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Brassica napus [56]. In apples, the MdMEK4-MdMPK3 module interacts with and phosphorylates MdWRKY17. The MdWRKY17 phospho-mimicking mutant enhances DNA-binding activity to MdDMR6, a salicylic acid (SA) degradation gene, resulting in decreased resistance to Colletotrichum fructicola [57]. The MAP kinase MdMKK2 phosphorylates MdWRKY71 at its Thr99 and Thr102 residues. Phosphorylation of MdWRKY71 enhances its transcriptional inhibition of MdCERK1, attenuating the inhibition effect of CERK1 on JA synthesis [58]. The sweet potato WRKY TF IbSPF1 specifically interacts with IbMPK3 and IbMPK6, which phosphorylate Ser75 and Ser110 residues of IbSPF1, increasing its binding affinity to the W-box element in target gene promoters. The phospho-mimicking mutant of IbSPF1 shows enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabac [59]. The CaCDPK29-CaWRKY27b module in pepper plants enhances CaWRKY40-mediated defense responses to Ralstonia solanacearum infection and high-temperature and high-humidity stress [28]. In chickpeas, the CC-NLR protein forms homocomplexes and interacts with WRKY64, phosphorylating WRKY64 to protect it from ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated degradation. WRKY64 is phosphorylated to enhance its stability and binds to the EDS1 promoter to induce its transcription [60]. The interaction between CaMPK9 and CaWRKY40 depends on two canonical serine residues. Phosphorylation of CaWRKY40 by CaMPK9 is necessary for CaWRKY40 to resist Foc1 infection, and application of the 26S proteasomal inhibitor MG132 restores resistance in the mutated WRKY40 Ser. 224/225 to AA overexpressing chickpea, indicating that such phosphorylation can protect CaWRKY40 from ubiquitination degradation [61].
Table 1. The function of WRKY’s phosphorylation in plant biotic stress.
Table 1. The function of WRKY’s phosphorylation in plant biotic stress.
No.WRKY TFsSpeciesUpstream KinasePhosphorylation SitesTarget GenePathwayRefs
1NbWRKY8Nicotiana benthamianaNbSIPK, NbNTF4,
and NbWIPK		Ser-62, Ser-67, Ser-79, Ser-86, and Ser-98NbNADP-ME and NbHMGR2Defense response[9]
2AtWRKY25Arabidopsis thalianaAtMPK4/6- Defense response[40]
3NbWRKY1Nicotiana benthamianaNbSIPK Defense response[41]
4AtWRKY33Arabidopsis thalianaAtMPK3/4/6Ser-54, Ser-59, Ser-65, Ser-72, and Ser-85AtCYP71A13 and AtPAD3Defense response[10]
5AtWRKY33Arabidopsis thalianaAtCPK5/6 AtPAD3Camalexin biosynthesis[25]
6AtWRKY18/28
/48		Arabidopsis thalianaAtCPK4/5/6/11 AtWRKY46Defense response[26]
7AtWRKY18Arabidopsis thalianaAtMKK4-AtMPK3/MPK6 AtAP2C1 and AtPP2C5Defense response[42]
8AtWRKY46Arabidopsis thalianaAtMPK3Ser168 and Ser250AtNHL10Defense response[43]
9OsWRKY33Oryza sativaOsBWMK1 PR1Defense response[44]
10OsWRKY30Oryza sativaOsMKK3-OsMPK7 PR genesDisease resistance[45]
11OsWRKY45Oryza sativaOsMPK4 and OsMPK6 OsWRKY62, OsNAC4, OsHSF1, OsPEN3-like and P450Disease resistance[46,47]
12OsWRKY53Oryza sativaOsMKK4-OsMPK3/6Ser43, Ser72, Ser77, Ser89, Ser96, and Ser108defense-related genes/momilactone biosynthetic genesDisease resistance[49]
13OsWRKY70Oryza sativaOsMPK3/6 OsHI-LOX, OsAOS2, OsACS2, and OsICS1Insect resistance[50]
14OsWRKY31Oryza sativaOsMKK10-2-OsMPK3/4/6Ser6 and Ser101auxin-related genes/defense-related genesDisease resistance
root growth		[12]
15OsWRKY72Oryza sativaOsSAPK10Thr129AOS1Bacteria blight resistance[27]
16HvWRKY3Hordeum vulgareHvSnRK1Ser83 and Ser112 Disease resistance[54]
17HvWRKY11Hordeum vulgareHvMKK1-HvMPK4Ser122, Thr284, and Ser347PR1b, PR2, and PR5Disease resistance[55]
18BnWRKY33Brassica napusBnaA03.MKK5-BnaA06.MPK3
/BnaC03.MPK3		Ser53, Ser58, Ser64, Ser72, and Ser85BnPAD3 and BnCYP71A13Disease resistance[56]
19MdWRKY17Malus domestica BorkhMdMEK4-MdMPK3Ser61, Ser66, Thr73, Ser77, and Ser325MdDRM6Disease resistance[57]
20MdWRKY71Malus domestica BorkhMdMMK2Thr99 and Thr102MdCERK1Disease resistance[58]
21IbSPF1Ipomoea batatasIbMPK3/6Ser75 and Ser110NbPR1a, NbPR1c, NbPR2, and NbPR4Disease resistance[59]
22CaWRKY27bCapsicum annuumCaCDPK29Ser137CaWRKY40Disease resistance[28]
23CaWRKY64Cicer arietinumCC-NB-ARC-LRR proteinSer193CaEDS1Disease resistance[60]
24CaWRKY40Cicer arietinumCaMPK9Ser224 and Ser225CaDefensin and CaWRKY33Disease resistance[61]

2.2. The Phosphorylation of WRKY Proteins under Abiotic Stress

Drought significantly impacts plant growth and development and is one of the most severe abiotic stresses, leading to substantial crop yield reduction worldwide. Accumulating reports suggest that WRKY TFs are associated with drought tolerance. For example, transgenic rice lines overexpressing OsWRKY30 exhibit enhanced drought tolerance. OsWRKY30 interacts with OsMPK3, OsMPK4, OsMPK7, OsMPK14, OsMPK20-4, and OsMPK20-5 and can be phosphorylated by OsMPK3, OsMPK7, and OsMPK14. The transcriptional activation of OsWRKY30 is impaired when SP is replaced by AP, and overexpression of phospho-dead OsWRKY30 does not improve drought tolerance. These results strongly indicate that phosphorylation of OsWRKY30 by MAPKs is crucial for OsWRKY30 to perform its biological function [21] (Table 2). After wounding treatment, OsMKK4 phosphorylates OsMPK1, which then directly interacts with OsWRKY53. OsMPK1 activated by the constitutively active mutant OsMKK4DD phosphorylates OsWRKY53 [62]. OsWRKY53 is an important TF involved in various stress pathways, including salt stress, the defense response, and the wounding response.
The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) is a pivotal regulator of abiotic stress responses in plants, triggering major changes in plant physiology [63]. ABA can induce antioxidant defense-related enzymes such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and catalase (CAT) [64]. ZmWRKY104 is a positive regulator of ABA-induced antioxidant defense. ZmWRKY104 physically interacts with ZmMPK6 in vitro and in vivo, and phosphorylation of ZmWRKY104 at Thr-59 by ZmMPK6 plays a key role in the ABA-induced antioxidant defense [23]. In rice, SAPK10 interacts with and phosphorylates WRKY87 at Ser23. OsWRKY87 positively regulates drought and salt tolerance by increasing SOD, CAT, POD, and APX antioxidants [29].
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) is an important crop worldwide. A regulatory module consisting of GhMAP3K15-GhMKK4-GhMPK6-GhWRKY59-GhDREB2 is involved in controlling the cotton drought response. GhMKK4 activated by GhMAP3K15 can phosphorylate GhMPK6 in an in vitro kinase assay. GhMPK6 interacts with and phosphorylates GhWRKY59, and GhWRKY59 regulates the expression of GhDREB2, thereby positively regulating cotton drought responses [22].
In summary, the phosphorylation of WRKY TFs by a MAPK cascade or other protein kinases such as SnRK2 and CDPK is in a resting state under normal conditions (Figure 1. left). Under stress, the MAPK cascade phosphorylates the WRKY TF and enhances (Figure 1. middle) or inhibits (Figure 1. right) the transcriptional activation activity and DNA-binding activity of the WRKY TF, following which downstream target genes are upregulated or downregulated to respond to stress (Figure 1). This mechanism is widely applicable, including NbWRKY8 [9], AtWRKY33 [10,25], NbWRKY1 [41], AtWRKY18 [42], AtWRKY46 [43], OsWRKY33 [44], OsWRKY30 [45], OsWRKY45 [46], OsWRKY53 [49], OsWRKY70 [50], OsWRKY31 [12], BnWRKY33 [56], MdWRKY71 [58], IbSPF1 [59], CaWRKY40 [61], OsWRKY30 [21], ZmWRKY104 [23], GhWRKY59 [22], and OsWRKY78 [19].

2.3. The Phosphorylation of WRKYs in Plant Growth and Development

Over the past two decades, the function of WRKY TFs in plant defense responses has been extensively studied. Recent findings have revealed the important role of WRKYs in plant growth and development. As sessile organisms, plants require WRKY TFs for balanced growth, development, and stress tolerance. This section discusses the significant role of protein kinases in regulating WRKY TF phosphorylation during plant growth and development.
In Arabidopsis, a MAP kinase kinase, MEKK1, can phosphorylate senescence-related WRKY53 in vitro. This phosphorylation increases the DNA-binding activity of WRKY53 in vitro and enhances the transcription of a WRKY53 promoter-driven reporter gene in vivo [65] (Table 3). WRKY34 is phosphorylated by MPK3/6 during the early stages of pollen development, which is crucial for its function in pollen development [14]. WRKY46, WRKY54, and WRKY70 promote BR-mediated gene expression while also inhibiting drought-responsive genes. WRKY54 directly interacts with BES1 to cooperatively regulate the expression of target genes and is phosphorylated and destabilized by BIN2, a negative regulator in the BR pathway [66].
Casein kinase 1 AELs (CK1s) are highly conserved serine/threonine protein kinases in eukaryotes. CK1s regulate blue light signaling by promoting the degradation of CRY2 through phosphorylation and ethylene synthesis by phosphorylating ACS5 [67,68]. Recently, it has been reported that WRKY22 is also a target of CK1. AELs interact with and phosphorylate WRKY22 at Thr57, Thr60, and Ser69 residues to enhance transactivation activity. Increased or suppressed phosphorylation of WRKY22 results in promoted or delayed leaf senescence, respectively. WRKY22 directly binds to the promoter region and stimulates the transcription of the ACS7 gene, promoting ethylene levels and, consequently, leaf senescence [69].
In rice, OsWRKY53 positively regulates BR signaling. Overexpression of OsWRKY53 leads to enlarged leaf angles and increased grain size, while the oswrky53 mutant exhibits erect leaves and smaller seeds. OsWRKY53 interacts with and is phosphorylated by the OsMAPKK4-OsMAPK6 cascade. Phosphorylation of OsWRKY53 by MAPK6 is required for its function in BR responses [15]. A complete OsMKKK70-OsMKK4-OsMAPK6-OsWRKY53 signaling pathway regulates grain size and leaf angle in rice. Overexpression of constitutively active forms of OsMKK4, OsMAPK6, and OsWRKY53 can rescue the phenotype of osmkkk62/70 grain size and leaf angle. These results suggest that OsMKKK70-OsMKK4-OsMAPK6 may function through a common MAPK signaling pathway [16]. OsWRKY53 interacts with OsGSK2, a negative regulator of BR signaling, which reduces its protein stability by phosphorylation. Knockout of OsWRKY53 in OsGSK2-RNAi (Gi) transgenic rice restores the Gi phenotype to wild-type levels. Transcriptome analysis shows that OsWRKY53 and OsGSK2 have opposite regulatory patterns, with WRKY53 restoring the expression of genes regulated by Gi to varying degrees, suggesting that WRKY53 is indispensable for GSK2 function and acts genetically downstream of GSK2 [17].
Panicle exsertion is a crucial agronomic trait in rice, and gibberellin (GA) plays important roles in regulating panicle exsertion. OsWRKY78 affects GA content by directly regulating GA biosynthesis genes and indirectly regulating GA metabolism genes, consequently controlling panicle exsertion. OsWRKY78 interacts with and is phosphorylated by OsMAPK6, and this phosphorylation is indispensable for its biological function. Overexpression of OsWRKY78 (SD), but not OsWRKY78 (SA), can fully rescue the panicle enclosure defect of oswrky78 and largely complement the decreased height of the oswrky78 mutant [19].
BnaCPK5 and CPK6 interact with and phosphorylate BnaWSR1. Overexpression of phosphomimic BnaWSR1 in rapeseed protoplasts elicits ROS production and cell death, while its ectopic expression in Arabidopsis enhances SA and ROS levels and accelerates leaf senescence [30]. GhWRKY16 is phosphorylated by GhMPK3-1 at residues Thr130 and Ser260. Phosphorylated GhWRKY16 activates four downstream target genes for early fiber development [70]. FvWRKY50 interacts with FvMAPK3 in vitro and in vivo. FvMAPK3 promotes the degradation of the FvWRKY50 protein through the phosphorylation of FvWRKY50 at low temperatures, suggesting that FvWRKY50, as the downstream substrate of FvMAPK3, plays an important role in inhibiting anthocyanin accumulation in strawberry fruit at low temperatures [18].
Table 3. The function of WRKY’s phosphorylation in plant growth and development.
Table 3. The function of WRKY’s phosphorylation in plant growth and development.
No.WRKY TFsSpeciesUpstream KinasePhosphorylation SitesTarget GenePathwayRefs
1AtWRKY53Arabidopsis thalianaAtMEKK1- Senescence[65]
2AtWRKY34Arabidopsis thalianaAtMKK4/5-AtMPK3/6Ser-87, Ser-91, Ser-98, Ser-108, Ser-274, and Ser-544 Pollen development[14]
3AtWRKY54Arabidopsis thalianaAtBIN2 AtABI5, AtGLY17, and AtRD20Brassinosteroid-regulated plant growth and drought responses[66]
4AtWRKY22Arabidopsis thalianaAtCK1Thr57, Thr60, and Ser69AtACS7Senescence[69]
5OsWRKY53Oryza sativaOsMKKK70-OsMAPKK4-OsMAPK6Ser43, Ser72, Ser77, Ser89, and Ser96OsD2, OsDWF4, and OsD11BR signaling and plant architecture[15,16]
6OsWRKY53Oryza sativaOsGSK2Thr-236, Thr-252, Ser-322, Ser-323, Ser-373, Thr-379, and Thr-401OsD2, OsDWF4, and OsD11Rice architecture and seed size[17]
7OsWRKY78Oryza sativaOsMKK4-OsMAPK6Ser48, Ser55, Ser67, Ser74, and Ser86OsGA20ox-1, OsGA20ox-3, and OsGA3ox-1Panicle exsertion[19]
8BnaWSR1Brassica napusBnaCPK5/6Thr192 and Thr193BnaICS1, BnaRboh D, and BnaSAG14Cell death and leaf senescence[30]
9GhWRKY16Gossypium hirsutumGhMKK2-GhMPK3-1Thr130 and Ser260GhMYB25, GhMYB109, GhCesA6D-D11, and GhHOX3Fiber initiation and elongation[70]
10FvWRKY50Fragaria vescaFvMKK4/FvMAPK3 FvFT2, FvCO, FvFT3, FvSAUR36, FvCHI, and FvDFRGrowth and fruit ripening[18]

3. Ubiquitination Modifications and Other Post-Translational Modifications

Ubiquitin modifications are involved in almost all life processes of eukaryotes, and the ubiquitin–proteasome degradation pathway is a crucial mechanism regulating protein expression levels [71]. Studies have shown that ubiquitination can mediate the degradation of TFs in many stress response pathways through the ubiquitin–proteasome degradation pathway, thereby participating in stress responses [31,33,34,72,73]. Additionally, plants accumulate misfolded proteins when subjected to stress, and ubiquitination can also reduce plant damage by degrading these toxic proteins [74].
A previous study showed that PHO1 and WRKY6 play positive and negative roles under low-phosphate (Pi) stress, respectively [75]. After screening 425 homozygous E3 ligase T-DNA insertion mutants, pru1 exhibited increased sensitivity to low-Pi stress. PRU1 interacts with and polyubiquitinates WRKY6. Under low-phosphate (Pi) stress, PRU1 can ubiquitinate WRKY6 and degrade WRKY6, thereby relieving the transcriptional inhibition effect of WRKY6 on PHO1. A genetic analysis confirmed that WRKY6 functioned downstream of PRU1. These results indicated that ubiquitination degradation of WRKY6 by PRU1 was crucial for plant responses to low-Pi stress [31] (Table 4).
WRKY70 is phosphorylated by an unknown protein kinase at Thr22 and Ser34 upon pathogen infection. It binds preferentially to the WT box in the promoter of the defense gene SARD1 and induces its expression. When the infection ends, non-phosphorylated WRKY70 binds to both W (inhibitory activity site) and WT (active activity site) boxes in the promoter of SARD1, thereby shutting down its expression. This is the first report showing that a TF can activate and inhibit the same defense gene in plants. Phosphorylated WRKY70 can be ubiquitinated by the E3 ligase CHYR1 for degradation [32].
WRKY70 is phosphorylated by an unknown protein kinase at Thr22 and Ser34 upon pathogen infection. WRKY70 activates SARD1 expression by binding to the WT-BOX; phosphorylated WRKY70 was degraded by the 26S proteasome via CHYR1 when normal growth resumed after a pathogen attack. Meanwhile, non-phosphorylated WRKY70 inhibited the expression of SARD1 by binding to W-BOX (inhibitory activity site) and WT-BOX (active activity site) [32]. The WRKY33/WRKY12-RAP2.2 module plays a key role in the submergence-induced hypoxia response of Arabidopsis [76]. The Arabidopsis E3 ligase protein SUBMERGENCE RESISTANT1 (SR1) negatively regulates the submergence response by degrading phosphorylated WRKY33 [33]. CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1) mediates various cellular and physiological processes in plants by targeting numerous substrates for ubiquitination and degradation [77]. COP1 interacts with and targets WRKY32 for ubiquitination and degradation in darkness [34]. MAX1–MAX4, core components of strigolactone (SL) biosynthesis and signaling, positively regulate freezing tolerance in plants. WRKY41 is targeted for degradation by the F-box protein MAX2. WRKY41 binds to the W-box in CBF promoters and represses CBF expression during cold stress. MAX2 facilitates cold-induced degradation of WRKY41 to release the inhibition of CBFs, thereby enhancing plant freezing tolerance. These results reveal the molecular mechanisms by which SLs regulate plant freezing tolerance via MAX2-dependent degradation of WRKY41, the negative regulator of CBF expression [35].
In rice, OsWRKY7 is a multilayer-regulated disease resistance gene. Under normal conditions, the full-length OsWRKY7 proteins are degraded by the ubiquitin system to reduce adverse effects on plant growth and development. Meanwhile, the short, stable OsWRKY7 protein encoded by diORF, which is generated by alternative translation, provides a constant basal defense. Through gene editing mutation of OsWRKY7 main AUG, the inhibition of downstream diORF translation can be lifted, which leads to the increase in short and stable endogenous expression of OsWRKY7 protein, and then improves the expression of defense genes and ROS levels, and finally strengthens the basal immunity of plants [78].
In wheat, TaSDIR1-4A mediates the ubiquitination degradation of the membrane-bound TF TaWRKY29, leading to its translocation from the membrane to the nucleus, thereby regulating the ABA signaling pathway to improve drought tolerance [79]. TaWRKY74 is a positive regulator of wheat resistance to ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma tritici,’ and SWP12 is a potential effector secreted by ‘Ca. P. tritici.’ SWP12 targets and degrades TaWRKY74 via the 26S proteasome, suppressing wheat resistance [80].
EIRP1 interacts with VpWRKY11 in vitro and in vivo and mediates its ubiquitination degradation in vivo. VpWRKY11 is a negative regulator of the pathogens Golovinomyces cichoracearum and Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 [72].
In woody poplars, PalPUB79 positively regulates drought tolerance in an ABA-dependent manner. PalPUB79 forms a complex with PalWRKY77, mediates its ubiquitination for degradation, and weakens its transcriptional inhibitory effect on PalRD26 [73].
In summary, WRKY TFs can be degraded as negative or positive regulators by different E3 ubiquitin ligases to participate in various stress responses (Figure 2).
Accumulating evidence has shown that approximately 5% of proteins are persulfidated in Arabidopsis, a PTM whereby the thiol group at cysteine residues (–SH) is replaced with the persulfidation group (–SSH). A new tag-switch assay revealed that 2015 proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana are persulfidated, suggesting that at least 5% of the A. thaliana proteome may be persulfidated under non-stress conditions [81]. In tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum), WRKY71 interacts with BRG3, and both proteins are modified by persulfidation. H2S-mediated persulfidation of BRG3 and WRKY71 weakens BRG3′s ubiquitination ability and enhances WRKY71′s binding ability to CAS1, thereby delaying tomato fruit ripening [36]. Persulfidation of SlWRKY6 by H2S attenuates its transcriptional activity on target genes SlSGR1 and SlSAG12. However, phosphorylation of SlWRKY6 by SlMAPK4 activates the expression of SlSGR1 and SlSAG12, promoting tomato fruit ripening. Evidence suggests that H2S-mediated persulfidation of SlWRKY6 attenuates SlMAPK4-mediated phosphorylation of SlWRKY6, inhibiting tomato fruit ripening. This study provides a solid theoretical basis for understanding the mechanisms of persulfidation and phosphorylation of SlWRKY6 in regulating tomato fruit ripening [37].
Table 4. The function of WRKY’s ubiquitination in plant.
Table 4. The function of WRKY’s ubiquitination in plant.
No.WRKY TFsSpeciesE3 LigasePathwaysRefs
1AtWRKY6Arabidopsis thalianaAtPRU1Low-Pi stress[31]
2AtWRKY70Arabidopsis thalianaAtCHYR1Immunity and growth[32]
3AtWRKY33Arabidopsis thalianaAtSR1Submergence response[33]
4AtWRKY32Arabidopsis thalianaAtCOP1Photomorphogenesis[34]
5AtWRKY41Arabidopsis thalianaAtMAX2Freezing tolerance[35]
6OsWRKY7Oryza sativa-Disease resistance[78]
7TaWRKY29Triticum aestivumTaSDIR1-4ADrought resistance[79]
8TaWRKY74Triticum aestivumSWP12Disease resistance[80]
9VpWRKY11Vitis pseudoreticulataEIRP1Disease resistance[72]
10PalWRKY77Populus albaPalPUB79Drought tolerance[73]

4. Conclusions and Future Prospects

Following translation, the regulation of protein function primarily depends on PTMs. To date, over 400 different PTMs have been identified in eukaryotes [82]. Among them, the formation and regulatory mechanisms of some PTMs have been investigated in recent years, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitinylation, persulfidation, histone acetylation, methylation, and SUMOylation [83]. Phosphorylation stands out as a major form of PTMs, critically regulating complex signaling networks by phosphorylating a series of substrate proteins. WRKY TFs emerge as pivotal players in plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as growth and development. This review emphasizes the significant role of PTMs, especially phosphorylation and ubiquitinylation, in regulating responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as growth and development, mediated by WRKY TFs, and summarizes the target genes and signaling pathways involved. Despite the abundance of WRKY TFs in plants, most studies are focused on the model plant Arabidopsis. In future studies, more attention should be directed towards investigating WRKY genes in crops. Indeed, the utilization of transcriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics, and Chip-seq has facilitated the identification of WRKY-regulated gene networks and metabolic networks, interacting proteins, in vivo target genes, and potential signaling pathways. Among these interacting proteins, particular emphasis should be placed on protein kinases, as existing reports provide ample evidence that phosphorylated, activated forms of WRKY play a crucial role in plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses and growth and development. In the future, with the ongoing advancement of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology, targeted mutations of WRKY TF phosphorylation sites can be carried out to develop crop varieties with desirable traits such as high yield, quality, disease resistance, and stress tolerance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing original draft preparation, X.Z. Writing, review, editing, drawing figures and tables, X.Z. and Z.L. Review and editing, and supervision, P.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dan He (Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for his useful discussion and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gong, Z.; Xiong, L.; Shi, H.; Yang, S.; Herrera-Estrella, L.R.; Xu, G.; Chao, D.Y.; Li, J.; Wang, P.Y.; Qin, F.; et al. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 635–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, M.; Zhang, S. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plant signaling. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 301–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jiang, J.; Ma, S.; Ye, N.; Jiang, M.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ross, C.A.; Liu, Y.; Shen, Q.J. The WRKY Gene Family in Rice (Oryza sativa). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 827–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hu, W.; Ren, Q.; Chen, Y.; Xu, G.; Qian, Y. Genome-wide identification and analysis of WRKY gene family in maize provide insights into regulatory network in response to abiotic stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhao, T.; Yang, C.; Ding, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Mu, J.; Wang, D. Identification of WRKY transcription factors responding to abiotic stresses in Brassica napus L. Planta 2021, 255, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ishihama, N.; Yamada, R.; Yoshioka, M.; Katou, S.; Yoshioka, H. Phosphorylation of the Nicotiana benthamiana WRKY8 transcription factor by MAPK functions in the defense response. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1153–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mao, G.; Meng, X.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, S. Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by two pathogen-responsive MAPKs drives phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1639–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, J.; Chen, X.; Liang, X.; Zhou, X.; Yang, F.; Liu, J.; He, S.Y.; Guo, Z. Alternative Splicing of Rice WRKY62 and WRKY76 Transcription Factor Genes in Pathogen Defense. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1427–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, S.; Han, S.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, C.; Guo, L.; Zhang, J.; Liu, F.; Huo, Q.; Zhao, W.; Guo, Z.; et al. Phosphorylation and ubiquitination of OsWRKY31 are integral to OsMKK10-2-mediated defense responses in rice. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 2391–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cai, Y.; Chen, X.; Xie, K.; Xing, Q.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Du, C.; Sun, Z.; Guo, Z. Dlf1, a WRKY transcription factor, is involved in the control of flowering time and plant height in rice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guan, Y.; Meng, X.; Khanna, R.; LaMontagne, E.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S. Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by MAPKs is required for pollen development and function in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tian, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, W.; Ren, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Tang, J.; Tong, H.; Fang, J.; Bu, Q. Transcription Factor OsWRKY53 Positively Regulates Brassinosteroid Signaling and Plant Architecture. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 1337–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, Z.; Mei, E.; Tian, X.; He, M.; Tang, J.; Xu, M.; Liu, J.; Song, L.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; et al. OsMKKK70 regulates grain size and leaf angle in rice through the OsMKK4-OsMAPK6-OsWRKY53 signaling pathway. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 2043–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tian, X.; He, M.; Mei, E.; Zhang, B.; Tang, J.; Xu, M.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Tang, W.; et al. WRKY53 integrates classic brassinosteroid signaling and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway to regulate rice architecture and seed size. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 2753–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chen, Y.; Liu, L.; Feng, Q.; Liu, C.; Bao, Y.; Zhang, N.; Sun, R.; Yin, Z.; Zhong, C.; Wang, Y.; et al. FvWRKY50 is an important gene that regulates both vegetative growth and reproductive growth in strawberry. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mei, E.; He, M.; Xu, M.; Tang, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Hong, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Guan, Q.; et al. OsWRKY78 regulates panicle exsertion via gibberellin signaling pathway in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2024, 66, 771–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, H.; Hao, J.; Chen, X.; Hao, Z.; Wang, X.; Lou, Y.; Peng, Y.; Guo, Z. Overexpression of rice WRKY89 enhances ultraviolet B tolerance and disease resistance in rice plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 65, 799–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shen, H.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, X.; Zhou, X.; Chu, C.; Wang, X. OsWRKY30 is activated by MAP kinases to confer drought tolerance in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 80, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, F.; Li, M.; Wang, P.; Cox, K.L., Jr.; Duan, L.; Dever, J.K.; Shan, L.; Li, Z.; He, P. Regulation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) drought responses by mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade-mediated phosphorylation of GhWRKY59. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 1462–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhao, L.; Yan, J.; Xiang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, A. ZmWRKY104 Transcription Factor Phosphorylated by ZmMPK6 Functioning in ABA-Induced Antioxidant Defense and Enhance Drought Tolerance in Maize. Biology 2021, 10, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Popescu, S.C.; Popescu, G.V.; Bachan, S.; Zhang, Z.; Gerstein, M.; Snyder, M.; Dinesh-Kumar, S.P. MAPK target networks in Arabidopsis thaliana revealed using functional protein microarrays. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, J.; Wang, X.; He, Y.; Sang, T.; Wang, P.; Dai, S.; Zhang, S.; Meng, X. Differential Phosphorylation of the Transcription Factor WRKY33 by the Protein Kinases CPK5/CPK6 and MPK3/MPK6 Cooperatively Regulates Camalexin Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 2621–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gao, X.; Chen, X.; Lin, W.; Chen, S.; Lu, D.; Niu, Y.; Li, L.; Cheng, C.; McCormack, M.; Sheen, J.; et al. Bifurcation of Arabidopsis NLR immune signaling via Ca2+-dependent protein kinases. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Tang, L.; Tong, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Huang, S.; Zhang, J. SAPK10-Mediated Phosphorylation on WRKY72 Releases Its Suppression on Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis and Bacterial Blight Resistance. iScience 2019, 16, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, S.; Cai, W.; Shen, L.; Cao, J.; Liu, C.; Hu, J.; Guan, D.; He, S. A CaCDPK29-CaWRKY27b module promotes CaWRKY40-mediated thermotolerance and immunity to Ralstonia solanacearum in pepper. New Phytol. 2022, 233, 1843–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liu, Y.; Wang, B.; Li, J.; Sun, Z.; Chi, M.; Xing, Y.; Xu, B.; Yang, B.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; et al. A novel SAPK10-WRKY87-ABF1 biological pathway synergistically enhance abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 168, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cui, X.; Zhao, P.; Liang, W.; Cheng, Q.; Mu, B.; Niu, F.; Yan, J.; Liu, C.; Xie, H.; Kav, N.N.V.; et al. A Rapeseed WRKY Transcription Factor Phosphorylated by CPK Modulates Cell Death and Leaf Senescence by Regulating the Expression of ROS and SA-Synthesis-Related Genes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 7348–7359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ye, Q.; Wang, H.; Su, T.; Wu, W.H.; Chen, Y.F. The Ubiquitin E3 Ligase PRU1 Regulates WRKY6 Degradation to Modulate Phosphate Homeostasis in Response to Low-Pi Stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 1062–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, H.; Liu, B.; Lou, S.; Bi, H.; Tang, H.; Tong, S.; Song, Y.; Chen, N.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, Y.; et al. CHYR1 ubiquitinates the phosphorylated WRKY70 for degradation to balance immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 1095–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, B.; Jiang, Y.; Tang, H.; Tong, S.; Lou, S.; Shao, C.; Zhang, J.; Song, Y.; Chen, N.; Bi, H.; et al. The ubiquitin E3 ligase SR1 modulates the submergence response by degrading phosphorylated WRKY33 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 1771–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhou, H.; Zhu, W.; Wang, X.; Bian, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Yin, P.; Deng, X.W.; Xu, D. A missense mutation in WRKY32 converts its function from a positive regulator to a repressor of photomorphogenesis. New Phytol. 2022, 235, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Shi, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Gong, Z.; Yang, S. Strigolactones promote plant freezing tolerance by releasing the WRKY41-mediated inhibition of CBF/DREB1 expression. EMBO J. 2023, 42, e112999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, C.; Yao, G.F.; Li, L.X.; Li, T.T.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Hu, K.D.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, H. E3 ligase BRG3 persulfidation delays tomato ripening by reducing ubiquitination of the repressor WRKY71. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 616–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, M.; Hu, K.; Ma, L.; Geng, M.; Zhang, C.; Yao, G.; Zhang, H. Persulfidation and phosphorylation of transcription factor SlWRKY6 differentially regulate tomato fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 2024, kiae271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Widmann, C.; Gibson, S.; Jarpe, M.B.; Johnson, G.L. Mitogen-activated protein kinase: Conservation of a three-kinase module from yeast to human. Physiol. Rev. 1999, 79, 143–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, M.; Su, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, S. Conveying endogenous and exogenous signals: MAPK cascades in plant growth and defense. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Andreasson, E.; Jenkins, T.; Brodersen, P.; Thorgrimsen, S.; Petersen, N.H.; Zhu, S.; Qiu, J.L.; Micheelsen, P.; Rocher, A.; Petersen, M.; et al. The MAP kinase substrate MKS1 is a regulator of plant defense responses. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 2579–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Menke, F.L.H.; Kang, H.-G.; Chen, Z.; Park, J.M.; Kumar, D.; Klessig, D.F. Tobacco Transcription Factor WRKY1 Is Phosphorylated by the MAP Kinase SIPK and Mediates HR-Like Cell Death in Tobacco. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2005, 18, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, D.; Wei, L.; Liu, T.; Ma, J.; Huang, K.; Guo, H.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, J.; Tsuda, K.; et al. Suppression of ETI by PTI priming to balance plant growth and defense through an MPK3/MPK6-WRKYs-PP2Cs module. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 903–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sheikh, A.H.; Eschen-Lippold, L.; Pecher, P.; Hoehenwarter, W.; Sinha, A.K.; Scheel, D.; Lee, J. Regulation of WRKY46 Transcription Factor Function by Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Koo, S.C.; Moon, B.C.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, C.Y.; Sung, S.J.; Kim, M.C.; Cho, M.J.; Cheong, Y.H. OsBWMK1 mediates SA-dependent defense responses by activating the transcription factor OsWRKY33. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 387, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jalmi, S.K.; Sinha, A.K. Functional Involvement of a Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase Module, OsMKK3-OsMPK7-OsWRK30 in Mediating Resistance against Xanthomonas oryzae in Rice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ueno, Y.; Yoshida, R.; Kishi-Kaboshi, M.; Matsushita, A.; Jiang, C.J.; Goto, S.; Takahashi, A.; Hirochika, H.; Takatsuji, H. MAP kinases phosphorylate rice WRKY45. Plant Signal Behav. 2013, 8, e24510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nakayama, A.; Fukushima, S.; Goto, S.; Matsushita, A.; Shimono, M.; Sugano, S.; Jiang, C.J.; Akagi, A.; Yamazaki, M.; Inoue, H.; et al. Genome-wide identification of WRKY45-regulated genes that mediate benzothiadiazole-induced defense responses in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kishi-Kaboshi, M.; Okada, K.; Kurimoto, L.; Murakami, S.; Umezawa, T.; Shibuya, N.; Yamane, H.; Miyao, A.; Takatsuji, H.; Takahashi, A.; et al. A rice fungal MAMP-responsive MAPK cascade regulates metabolic flow to antimicrobial metabolite synthesis. Plant J. 2010, 63, 599–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chujo, T.; Miyamoto, K.; Ogawa, S.; Masuda, Y.; Shimizu, T.; Kishi-Kaboshi, M.; Takahashi, A.; Nishizawa, Y.; Minami, E.; Nojiri, H.; et al. Overexpression of phosphomimic mutated OsWRKY53 leads to enhanced blast resistance in rice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, R.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Zhou, G.; Wang, Q.; Bian, W.; Erb, M.; Lou, Y. Prioritizing plant defence over growth through WRKY regulation facilitates infestation by non-target herbivores. elife 2015, 4, e04805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, J.; Peng, Y.; Guo, Z. Constitutive expression of pathogen-inducible OsWRKY31 enhances disease resistance and affects root growth and auxin response in transgenic rice plants. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 508–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fujii, H.; Verslues, P.E.; Zhu, J.K. Arabidopsis decuple mutant reveals the importance of SnRK2 kinases in osmotic stress responses in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 1717–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Van Leene, J.; Eeckhout, D.; Gadeyne, A.; Matthijs, C.; Han, C.; De Winne, N.; Persiau, G.; Van De Slijke, E.; Persyn, F.; Mertens, T.; et al. Mapping of the plant SnRK1 kinase signalling network reveals a key regulatory role for the class II T6P synthase-like proteins. Nat. Plants 2022, 8, 1245–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Han, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, L.; Xue, P.; Qi, T.; Zhang, C.; Yuan, H.; Zhou, L.; Wang, D.; Qiu, J.; et al. SnRK1 Phosphorylates and Destabilizes WRKY3 to Enhance Barley Immunity to Powdery Mildew. Plant Commun. 2020, 1, 100083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xue, P.; Zhang, L.; Fan, R.; Li, Y.; Han, X.; Qi, T.; Zhao, L.; Yu, D.; Shen, Q.H. HvMPK4 phosphorylates HvWRKY1 to enhance its suppression of barley immunity to powdery mildew fungus. J. Genet. Genom. 2024, 51, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, K.; Liu, F.; Wang, Z.; Zhuo, C.; Hu, K.; Li, X.; Wen, J.; Yi, B.; Shen, J.; Ma, C.; et al. Transcription factor WRKY28 curbs WRKY33-mediated resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Brassica napus. Plant Physiol. 2022, 190, 2757–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shan, D.; Wang, C.; Zheng, X.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, A.; Zhang, H.; Shi, K.; Bai, Y.; et al. MKK4-MPK3-WRKY17-mediated salicylic acid degradation increases susceptibility to Glomerella leaf spot in apple. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 1202–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Pei, T.; Zhan, M.; Niu, D.; Liu, Y.; Deng, J.; Jing, Y.; Li, P.; Liu, C.; Ma, F. CERK1 compromises Fusarium solani resistance by reducing jasmonate level and undergoes a negative feedback regulation via the MMK2-WRKY71 module in apple. Plant Cell Environ. 2024, 47, 2491–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kim, H.S.; Bian, X.; Lee, C.J.; Kim, S.E.; Park, S.C.; Xie, Y.; Guo, X.; Kwak, S.S. IbMPK3/IbMPK6-mediated IbSPF1 phosphorylation promotes tolerance to bacterial pathogen in sweetpotato. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 1403–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chakraborty, J.; Priya, P.; Dastidar, S.G.; Das, S. Physical interaction between nuclear accumulated CC-NB-ARC-LRR protein and WRKY64 promotes EDS1 dependent Fusarium wilt resistance in chickpea. Plant Sci. 2018, 276, 111–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chakraborty, J.; Ghosh, P.; Sen, S.; Nandi, A.K.; Das, S. CaMPK9 increases the stability of CaWRKY40 transcription factor which triggers defense response in chickpea upon Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri Race1 infection. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 411–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yoo, S.J.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, M.J.; Ryu, C.M.; Kim, Y.C.; Cho, B.H.; Yang, K.Y. Involvement of the OsMKK4-OsMPK1 Cascade and its Downstream Transcription Factor OsWRKY53 in the Wounding Response in Rice. Plant Pathol. J. 2014, 30, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. de Zelicourt, A.; Colcombet, J.; Hirt, H. The Role of MAPK Modules and ABA during Abiotic Stress Signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gupta, S.; Dong, Y.; Dijkwel, P.P.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Gechev, T.S. Genome-Wide Analysis of ROS Antioxidant Genes in Resurrection Species Suggest an Involvement of Distinct ROS Detoxification Systems during Desiccation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Miao, Y.; Laun, T.M.; Smykowski, A.; Zentgraf, U. Arabidopsis MEKK1 can take a short cut: It can directly interact with senescence-related WRKY53 transcription factor on the protein level and can bind to its promoter. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 65, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, J.; Nolan, T.M.; Ye, H.; Zhang, M.; Tong, H.; Xin, P.; Chu, J.; Chu, C.; Li, Z.; Yin, Y. Arabidopsis WRKY46, WRKY54, and WRKY70 Transcription Factors Are Involved in Brassinosteroid-Regulated Plant Growth and Drought Responses. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1425–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tan, S.T.; Dai, C.; Liu, H.T.; Xue, H.W. Arabidopsis casein kinase1 proteins CK1.3 and CK1.4 phosphorylate cryptochrome2 to regulate blue light signaling. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 2618–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tan, S.T.; Xue, H.W. Casein kinase 1 regulates ethylene synthesis by phosphorylating and promoting the turnover of ACS5. Cell Rep. 2014, 9, 1692–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhu, G.Q.; Qu, L.; Xue, H.W. Casein kinase 1 AELs promote senescence by enhancing ethylene biosynthesis through phosphorylating WRKY22 transcription factor. New Phytol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, N.N.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.H.; Lu, R.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Li, X.B. Phosphorylation of WRKY16 by MPK3-1 is essential for its transcriptional activity during fiber initiation and elongation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Plant Cell 2021, 33, 2736–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Swatek, K.N.; Komander, D. Ubiquitin modifications. Cell Res. 2016, 26, 399–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yu, Y.; Xu, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Yao, W.; Yang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Ma, F.; Du, Y.; Wang, Y. The Chinese wild grapevine (Vitis pseudoreticulata) E3 ubiquitin ligase Erysiphe necator-induced RING finger protein 1 (EIRP1) activates plant defense responses by inducing proteolysis of the VpWRKY11 transcription factor. New Phytol. 2013, 200, 834–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tong, S.; Chen, N.; Wang, D.; Ai, F.; Liu, B.; Ren, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lou, S.; Liu, H.; et al. The U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase PalPUB79 positively regulates ABA-dependent drought tolerance via ubiquitination of PalWRKY77 in Populus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 2561–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sharma, B.; Joshi, D.; Yadav, P.K.; Gupta, A.K.; Bhatt, T.K. Role of Ubiquitin-Mediated Degradation System in Plant Biology. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chen, Y.F.; Li, L.Q.; Xu, Q.; Kong, Y.H.; Wang, H.; Wu, W.H. The WRKY6 transcription factor modulates PHOSPHATE1 expression in response to low Pi stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3554–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Tang, H.; Bi, H.; Liu, B.; Lou, S.; Song, Y.; Tong, S.; Chen, N.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, H. WRKY33 interacts with WRKY12 protein to up-regulate RAP2.2 during submergence induced hypoxia response in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 106–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Han, X.; Huang, X.; Deng, X.W. The Photomorphogenic Central Repressor COP1: Conservation and Functional Diversification during Evolution. Plant Commun. 2020, 1, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zheng, C.; Zhou, J.; Yuan, X.; Zheng, E.; Liu, X.; Cui, W.; Yan, C.; Wu, Y.; Ruan, W.; Yi, K.; et al. Elevating plant immunity by translational regulation of a rice WRKY transcription factor. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2024, 22, 1033–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Meng, Y.; Lv, Q.; Li, L.; Wang, B.; Chen, L.; Yang, W.; Lei, Y.; Xie, Y.; Li, X. E3 ubiquitin ligase TaSDIR1-4A activates membrane-bound transcription factor TaWRKY29 to positively regulate drought resistance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2024, 22, 987–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bai, B.; Zhang, G.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sujata, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhao, L.; Wu, Y. The ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma tritici’ effector SWP12 degrades the transcription factor TaWRKY74 to suppress wheat resistance. Plant J. 2022, 112, 1473–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Aroca, A.; Benito, J.M.; Gotor, C.; Romero, L.C. Persulfidation proteome reveals the regulation of protein function by hydrogen sulfide in diverse biological processes in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4915–4927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. UniProt Consortium. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, D142–D148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, P.; Fang, H.; Gao, R.; Liao, W. Protein Persulfidation in Plants: Function and Mechanism. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 13 02040 g001
Figure 1. A model of a WRKY TF regulated by protein kinase phosphorylation under stress in plants. Under normal growth conditions, the MAPK cascade signal is not activated, and the binding of WRKY TFs to downstream target gene promoters is little (left). Under stress, the activated MAPKKK phosphorylates and activates MAPKK; the activated MAPKK phosphorylates and activates MAPK; and the activated MAPK interacts with and phosphorylates WRKY TFs. The phosphorylated and activated WRKY binds to W-box sites within its target genes and upregulates (middle) or downregulates (right) the expression of these genes in response to stress.
Figure 1. A model of a WRKY TF regulated by protein kinase phosphorylation under stress in plants. Under normal growth conditions, the MAPK cascade signal is not activated, and the binding of WRKY TFs to downstream target gene promoters is little (left). Under stress, the activated MAPKKK phosphorylates and activates MAPKK; the activated MAPKK phosphorylates and activates MAPK; and the activated MAPK interacts with and phosphorylates WRKY TFs. The phosphorylated and activated WRKY binds to W-box sites within its target genes and upregulates (middle) or downregulates (right) the expression of these genes in response to stress.
Plants 13 02040 g001
Plants 13 02040 g002
Figure 2. A proposed working model for the function of a E3 ubiquitin ligase as a positive regulator (left) and a negative regulator (right) targeting a WRKY TF in modulating stress tolerance in plants. Under normal conditions, WRKY TFs acting as negative regulators bind to downstream target gene promoters and repress their expression. When exposed to stress, the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligase as a positive regulatory factor is induced and activated, and the E3 ligase degrades WRKY TFs by ubiquitination, thereby relieving the inhibitory effects of WRKY TFs on downstream target genes and improving resistance to stress (left). Under normal conditions, WRKY TFs acting as positive regulators bind to downstream target gene promoters and promote their expression. When exposed to stress, the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligase as a negative regulator is induced and activated, and the E3 ligase degrades WRKY TFs by ubiquitination, thus making WRKY TFs unable to activate downstream target genes and increasing the sensitivity to stress (right).
Figure 2. A proposed working model for the function of a E3 ubiquitin ligase as a positive regulator (left) and a negative regulator (right) targeting a WRKY TF in modulating stress tolerance in plants. Under normal conditions, WRKY TFs acting as negative regulators bind to downstream target gene promoters and repress their expression. When exposed to stress, the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligase as a positive regulatory factor is induced and activated, and the E3 ligase degrades WRKY TFs by ubiquitination, thereby relieving the inhibitory effects of WRKY TFs on downstream target genes and improving resistance to stress (left). Under normal conditions, WRKY TFs acting as positive regulators bind to downstream target gene promoters and promote their expression. When exposed to stress, the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligase as a negative regulator is induced and activated, and the E3 ligase degrades WRKY TFs by ubiquitination, thus making WRKY TFs unable to activate downstream target genes and increasing the sensitivity to stress (right).
Plants 13 02040 g002
Table 2. The function of WRKY’s phosphorylation in plant abiotic stress.
Table 2. The function of WRKY’s phosphorylation in plant abiotic stress.
No.WRKY TFsSpeciesUpstream KinasePhosphorylation SitesTarget GenePathwayRefs
1OsWRKY30Oryza sativaOsMPK3, OsMPK7, and OsMPK14Ser18, Ser20, Ser120, Ser129, Ser136, Ser148, Ser251, and Ser623WSI76, WRKY11, OsISAP1, Oshox7, HSP (LOC_Os03g16020), and HSP (LOC_Os09g31486)Drought tolerance[21]
2OsWRKY53Oryza sativaOsMKK4-OsMPK1- Wounding response[62]
3ZmWRKY104Zea maysZmMPK6Thr59 Drought tolerance[23]
4OsWRKY87Oryza sativaOsSAPK10Ser23OsABF1Drought and salinity tolerance[29]
5GhWRKY59Gossypium hirsutumGhMAP3K15-GhMKK4-GhMPK6Ser221GhDREB2Drought tolerance[22]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, X.; Lei, Z.; An, P. Post-Translational Modification of WRKY Transcription Factors. Plants 2024, 13, 2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152040

AMA Style

Zhou X, Lei Z, An P. Post-Translational Modification of WRKY Transcription Factors. Plants. 2024; 13(15):2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Xiangui, Zaojuan Lei, and Pengtian An. 2024. "Post-Translational Modification of WRKY Transcription Factors" Plants 13, no. 15: 2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152040

APA Style

Zhou, X., Lei, Z., & An, P. (2024). Post-Translational Modification of WRKY Transcription Factors. Plants, 13(15), 2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop