Next Article in Journal
The Effects of the Selective Removal of Adjacent Trees on the Diversity of Oak-Hosted Epiphytes and Tree-Related Microhabitats
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Functional and Transcriptome Analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana Overexpression BrBBX21 from Zicaitai (Brassica rapa var. purpuraria)
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals the Mechanism by Which RpACBP3 Overexpression Contributes to the Response of Robinia pseudoacacia to Pb Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Soil Conditioner (Volcanic Ash) on Yield Quality and Rhizosphere Soil Characteristics of Melon
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 21
10.3390/plants13213018
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet: From Impact Analysis to Adaptive Mechanisms and Future Research

by
Yuetong Wang
1,2,†,
Huajun Liu
3,†,
Maoqian Wang
4,
Jiahui Liu
1,2,4,*,
Gui Geng
1,2,4,* and
Yuguang Wang
1,2,4
1
Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Microbiology Technology, Ministry of Education, Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration and Resource Utilization for Cold Region, School of Life Sciences, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
2
Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Biological Fermentation Engineering for Cold Region, Key Laboratory of Microbiology, College of Heilongjiang Province, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
3
Cash Crops Research Institute of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Science (XAAS), Urumqi 830001, Xinjiang, China
4
National Sugar Crop Improvement Centre, College of Advanced Agriculture and Ecological Environment, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2024, 13(21), 3018; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213018
Submission received: 30 September 2024 / Revised: 19 October 2024 / Accepted: 23 October 2024 / Published: 28 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Growth and Development of Vegetable Crops)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The continuous global escalation of soil salinization areas presents severe challenges to the stability and growth of agricultural development across the world. In-depth research on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), an important economic and sugar crop with salt tolerance characteristics, is crucial for to determine its salt-tolerance mechanisms, which has important practical implications for production. This review summarizes the multifaceted effects of salt stress on sugar beet, ranging from individual plant responses to cellular and molecular adaptations. Sugar beet exhibits robust salt-tolerance mechanisms, including osmotic regulation, ion balance management, and the compartmentalization of toxic ions. Omics technologies, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, post-translational modification omics and metabolomics, have played crucial roles in elucidating these mechanisms. Key genes and pathways involved in salt tolerance in sugar beet have been identified, paving the way for targeted breeding strategies and biotechnological advancements. Understanding these mechanisms not only enhances our knowledge of sugar beet’s adaptation strategies but also provides insights for improving salt tolerance in other crops. Future studies should focus on analyzing gene expression changes in sugar beet under salt stress to gain insight into the molecular aspects of its salt-tolerance mechanisms. Meanwhile, the effects of different environmental conditions on sugar beet adaptation strategies should also be investigated to improve their growth potential in salinized soils.

1. Introduction

Soil salinity, a multifaceted issue arising from natural and anthropogenic factors, has led to the degradation of over 20% of the world’s farmland [1]. The saline soils in China, covering over 50 million hectares, are divided into two primary regions, namely the inland arid zones and the coastal areas [2]. They predominantly consist of sulfatic- and chloridic-type soils. Sweet beets exhibit a remarkable adaptability to moderately saline sulfatic soils, which are mainly located in the arid inland regions of Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Qinghai [3]. Salted–alkali soils in these areas are characterized by high concentrations of chlorides and sulfates of sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium [4,5]. Primary salt is the result of natural evaporation and concentration processes over geological time, forming salt deposits. Secondary salt refers to the soil salinization process caused by unreasonable tillage and irrigation [6,7]. Climate change accelerates surface water evaporation, increasing soil salt concentrations [8]. Poor irrigation practices and river diversion further bring salts to the soil surface [9]. Additionally, excessive chemical fertilizer use and declining water quality exacerbate soil salinization [10]. Soil salinization is a significant issue that affects agricultural productivity. The increasing severity of salinization leads to a decline in soil fertility, disrupting the water absorption process in crops, inhibiting photosynthesis, and hindering the accumulation of nutrients [11]. As a result, the growth capacity of crops is impaired, ultimately leading to significant impacts on agricultural production [12,13,14]. Therefore, a thorough investigation into the mechanisms of salt tolerance in plants can not only unveil the secrets of life adapting to salt stress, but also has profound implications for breeding high-yield, salt-tolerant varieties, restoring the productivity of degraded lands, and establishing sustainable agricultural ecosystems.
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), the second largest sugar crop globally, is a versatile industrial crop [15,16,17,18]. Its roots and leaves provide essential nutrients for animals [19], and yield valuable by-products like molasses and sugar beet meal, which can be converted into biofuels [20,21,22]. Sugar beet contains compounds potentially beneficial for health, aiding in disease prevention [23]. Cultivated from sea beet (Beta maritima L.), sugar beet inherits traits such as drought and salt resistance [24,25]. Efforts to understand sugar beet’s salt-tolerance mechanisms and develop tolerant varieties have progressed, although the integration of findings from morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular studies remains a challenge [26]. Sugar beet farming plays a pivotal role in sustainable agriculture. Opting for biochar or cattle manure instead of conventional fertilizers during sugar beet cultivation not only enhances sugar yields significantly but also effectively reduces greenhouse gas emissions, demonstrating sugar beet’s positive contribution to advancing sustainable agriculture. By implementing biochar application, we ensure the efficient output of sugar crops while simultaneously safeguarding the ecological environment, achieving a green transformation in agricultural production [27]. Moreover, as part of a crop rotation system, sugar beet synergizes with conservation management practices, contributing to enhanced soil quality, reduced chemical inputs, and the increased stability and productivity of agroecosystems [28]. These characteristics make sugar beet a significant crop choice in tackling challenges such as climate change and soil degradation.
In the post-genomic era, omics technologies—genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, post-translational modification omics, and metabolomics—are crucial for elucidating plant responses to salt stress [29,30,31]. In recent years, the application of these omics tools in studying plant salt stress has significantly increased, providing valuable insights into the mechanisms of plant responses and adaptations to salinity [32]. In 2013, the staff of the University of Bielefeld, the Spanish Center for Genome Control, and the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics published a high quality article on sugar beet omics. It remarks that sugar beet breeding has entered the omics era [24]. The review evaluates the impact of salt stress on sugar beet, exploring its physiological and molecular responses, and emphasizes the importance of omics tools in understanding salt-stress mechanisms. Omics analyses identify genes associated with salt tolerance and reveal gene expression patterns under stress, crucial for developing salt-tolerant sugar beet varieties and ensuring agricultural productivity.
In the context of the escalating global issue of soil salinization, the originality of this paper manifests in several aspects: Firstly, by systematically summarizing the physiological, cellular, and molecular response mechanisms of sugar beet under salt stress and integrating findings from diverse omics techniques, it furnishes a holistic perspective on its salt tolerance. Secondly, the paper underscores the identification of pivotal genes and metabolic pathways, which lays the groundwork for future precision breeding tactics and biological technology advancements. Additionally, the paper delves into the unique mechanisms of sugar beet’s adaptation to salt stress, such as ion balance regulation and osmolyte synthesis, offering novel directions for research. These innovative points not only consolidate the theoretical foundation of plant salt-tolerance studies but also provide crucial references for improving salt resistance in other crops.

2. Effect of Salinity on Sugar Beet

Sugar beet is notably tolerant to salt compared to other crops, which allows it to efficiently absorb water and nutrients from saline soils [33]. Interestingly, low salt concentrations can enhance the germination and growth rates of sugar beet [34,35]. This enhancement includes promoting root elongation and increased surface area [36] and improved physiological salt resistance indicators [37]. Previous studies found that sugar beet plants withstood a final concentration of 300 mM NaCl in hydroponics for up to 14 days [38], and sugar beet can tolerate up to 500 mM NaCl for seven days without losing viability [39]. This resilience allows sugar beet to maintain productivity on marginal lands like saline–alkali soils, expanding agricultural options. However, exceeding sugar beet salt-tolerance threshold results in salt damage. The damage inflicted by salinity stress on beet manifests across multiple levels, from the individual plant to cellular and molecular processes (Figure 1).

2.1. Effect of Salt Stress on Individual and Tissue Levels of Sugar Beet

Salt stress has a comprehensive and profound impact on the individual level of sugar beet [40]. Salt stress disrupts the entire life cycle of the plant, starting from the germination of seeds and extending through to the growth and development of the plant [41]. Germination showed high sensitivity to salt, and studies have shown that salt stress can suppress seed germination to varying degrees [42,43,44]. Even when sugar beet is able to grow under certain levels of salt stress, its growth and development are severely impaired. This is characterized by growth retardation and a reduction in overall volume and biomass [45]. As the main organ of plants undergoing photosynthesis, the leaves also undergo obvious changes under salt stress. There may be a reduction in the number of leaves [19,46]. Additionally, there are morphological changes such as a decrease in leaf area [47,48]. The leaves may also curl, become deformed, and change color to yellow or white [49]. These are the intuitive responses of sugar beet to salt stress. The root system of sugar beet is also adversely affected by high concentrations of salt stress. This can inhibit root elongation and branching, leading to root dysplasia and shorter growth [42]. The overall root distribution is also altered. Collectively, these effects can lead to a decrease in sugar beet’s biomass. It is important to recognize that the impact of salt stress on sugar beet can vary depending on factors such as the extent and timing of the stress. These factors can influence the severity of the effects observed at both the individual and tissue levels of the plant.

2.2. Effect of Salt Stress on the Cellular Levels of Sugar Beet

At the cellular level, salt stress affects sugar beet, like other plants, with the following three key stress responses: osmotic stress, oxidative stress, and toxic stress [50]. Salt stress initiates osmotic stress, where elevated external osmotic potential due to high salt concentrations prompts cellular water to move outwards in pursuit of osmotic equilibrium [51]. This leads to cell dehydration and contraction, and the separation of cell membranes and cell walls, affecting cell metabolism and normal physiological functions, and plant wilting [52]. Sugar beet plants have developed the ability to control stomatal closure through guard cells, reducing water evaporation to buffer salt stress [53].
Meanwhile, salt stress will increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants to induce oxidative stress [54]. Excessive ROS can lead to damage to protein, DNA, and other cellular components [55]. Beets, like other plants, have evolved antioxidant systems as defense mechanisms. These systems consist of enzymatic and non-enzymatic components designed to regulate the synthesis and clearance of ROS. The main antioxidant enzymes include superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and thioredoxin (Trx) [56,57]. These enzyme rises work together to help sugar beet maintain a balance of ROS levels and prevent excessive damage to targets such as protein, DNA and other cellular components.
Moreover, the toxic stress should not be ignored. Prior research has shown that in saline environments, high concentrations of Na+ and Cl− hinder the absorption of essential ions such as K+, Ca2+, and Mn2+, impacting osmoregulation and the maintenance of cellular turgor [50,58,59,60]. Studies in Arabidopsis have confirmed the inhibitory effect of salt stress on ion uptake and plant growth [61]. Salt stress also damages the cell membrane, altering its permeability and affecting the exchange of substances between the cell and its environment. Prolonged exposure to salt stress can impair the functions of organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts [62,63], with impaired mitochondrial function affecting cellular respiration, and chloroplast damage impacting photosynthesis [64], potentially leading to cell death. The severity and duration of these effects determine the extent of salt-stress impact on cells. To counteract these adverse effects, sugar beet cells produce osmoregulatory substances such as proline [65] and increase the energy consumption required by ion pumps to maintain intracellular ion balance [66].
In conclusion, salt stress profoundly impacts the physiological functions of sugar beet cells through osmotic, oxidative, and toxic stresses ultimately possibly leading to cell death.

2.3. Effects of Salt Stress on the Molecular Levels of Sugar Beet

At the molecular level, the effects of salt stress on sugar beet are multifaceted. First, it regulates the gene expression patterns [16,67,68]. An example of this is the up- or down regulation of specific genes such as BvbZIP, which affects light and ABA signaling pathways [69]. Second, salt stress affects protein synthesis, and at the molecular level, it induces a range of responses in sugar beet plants and affects a variety of vital biological processes. Initially, it regulates changes in gene expression patterns, in which the transcription factors play a central role and directly influence the plant perception and response to salt stress. For example, the downregulation of the BvbZIP gene not only changes the dynamic balance of photosynthesis and ABA signaling pathways, but also may affect the synthesis and signaling of plant hormones. Furthermore, the impact of salt stress on protein synthesis within sugar beet is significant and cannot be overlooked. Salt stress exerts a profound influence on the levels of key proteins, thereby regulating various cellular processes in sugar beet. Among these proteins, the 14-3-3 protein family stands out. As a highly conserved protein family in eukaryotic cells, 14-3-3 proteins play a crucial role in various cellular processes by modulating the activity, localization, and stability of other proteins [70,71]. Under salt stress conditions, the levels of 14-3-3 proteins in sugar beet undergo changes, significantly impacting cellular signaling and stress response mechanisms [72], followed by protein phosphorylation. Salt stress can trigger the process of protein phosphorylation, an important way in which protein modification can affect protein function and interactions. For instance, studies have found proteomic differences between salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant beet varieties under salt stress. The results have been shown to involve protein modifications and TCA recurrence. Several proteins for cell-wall synthesis and ROS clearance differ significantly between sensitive and tolerant cultivars, suggesting that these pathways may be highly associated with the salt tolerance of sugar beet [68]. Variable splicing (AS), also known as alternative splicing, is a common biological event in eukaryotes, referring to the process of generating different mRNA isoforms in an mRNA precursor, and an increased diversity of proteins. Although, it is unclear how sugar beet develops AS under salt stress. However, some studies found that among 136 differentially expressed genes identified under alkali stress, unannotated genes were found, of which 24 showed alternative splicing [73].
In addition to protein synthesis, salt stress also disrupts the metabolic process of sugar beet. By regulating the Calvin cycle, glycolysis, and the citric acid cycle, salt stress induces alterations in key metabolic pathways [74]. This disruption leads to changes in the levels of key metabolites, such as reduced sugars, and increases in the levels of compounds such as uridine and serine. These metabolic changes further highlight the complex network of molecular mechanisms that underpin sugar beet’s adaptation to salt stress, emphasizing the intricate and coordinated response of sugar beet plants to environmental challenges. These findings underscore the multifaceted nature of the molecular mechanisms involved in sugar beet’s response to salt stress. They reveal the intricate interplay between gene expression, protein regulation, and metabolic adjustments, which collectively enable sugar beet to adapt and survive under saline conditions.

2.4. Effects of Salt Stress on Photosynthesis in Sugar Beet

Salinity stress poses a significant challenge to sugar beet’s photosynthesis, manifested as stomatal closure which aims to reduce water loss; however, this concurrently restricts CO2 entry, decelerating photosynthetic rates [46]. High saline conditions induce ion imbalance within plants, particularly insufficient potassium uptake and sodium accumulation, which can be toxic to plant cells. This ion imbalance interferes with cellular functions, including enzyme activity and photopigment efficiency in photosynthesis [50,58,59,60]. Photosynthesis is the process by which plants convert light energy into chemical energy, involving photopigments. Salt stress may cause photopigments to become inactivated or damaged, obstructing light absorption and transfer, thus impairing photosynthetic efficiency [75]. Additionally, the accumulation of salts can lead to chloroplast structural damage, directly affecting chlorophyll levels and the progression of photosynthesis [74]. Salt stress adversely affects photosynthesis from multiple perspectives, and These adverse effects combined decreases in the leaf area, growth, and yield of sugar beet.

3. Salt Tolerance and Adaptation Mechanism of Sugar Beet

3.1. Basal Adaptation Mechanism of Sugar Beet to Salt Stress

Sugar beet, like other plants, undergoes adaptive morphological changes such as reducing root area and increasing leaf thickness under salt stress [56,76,77,78,79] Simultaneously, sugar beet leaves regulate stomatal opening and closing to minimize water loss through transpiration. At the physiological level, sugar beet maintains cellular osmotic pressure to prevent dehydration by synthesizing and accumulating osmoregulatory substances such as proline, soluble sugars, and organic acids. Furthermore, it enhances its antioxidant defense system to scavenge reactive oxygen species and mitigate oxidative stress-induced cell damage [80,81]. These integrated adaptations enable sugar beet to thrive in challenging environments like saline fields.

3.2. Unique Adaptation Mechanism of Sugar Beet to Salt Stress

The unique salt-tolerance mechanism of sugar beet can be categorized into three main strategies (Figure 2). Initially, upon encountering salt stress, sugar beet can rapidly synthesize and accumulate betaine. This accumulation serves a dual purpose, as it effectively regulates the intracellular water potential, alleviating the osmotic stress induced by salt stress, and it mitigates the impact of salt stress on the activity of enzymes involved in photosynthesis [82]. Under salt stress, there is a significant upregulation of genes, proteins, and enzyme activities associated with choline monooxygenase (CMO), which is the enzyme that catalyzes the first step in the synthesis of betaine [83]. These levels return to normal after the plant undergoes rehydration, indicating a direct role for betaine in the molecular response of sugar beet to salt stress for the first time. This response is a critical component of sugar beet’s overall salt-tolerance strategy. By upregulating the production of betaine, sugar beet not only manages the immediate osmotic challenges posed by high salinity but also protects the enzymes crucial for its photosynthetic processes, ensuring its survival and productivity in saline conditions.
Moreover, the plant ion balance of Na+, Cl−, K+ and NO3− is damaged, leading to ion toxicity under salt stress. However, the sugar beet can use Na+ to partially replace the K+ function. The absorption of Na+ can be significantly promoted in a low K+ environment, and 95% of K+ in sugar beet can grow normally after being replaced by Na+ without affecting the yield [84,85]. The current results show that part of the functions in K+ can be replaced by Na+, such as osmoregulation, auxiliary anion long-distance transport, the control of the stomatal opening, the regulation of enzyme activity, and chloroplast proliferation [86,87].
Finally, sugar beet can respond to salt stress through regionalization mechanisms, locking salt in specific tissues [80]. Under salt stress, sugar beet transports the salt ions absorbed from the environment to the petiole and old leaf storage; when the salt content of functional leaves is low, it has been reported that the content of Na+ and Cl− leaf petiole tissue is significantly higher than that of roots or leaves, while Cl− is mainly concentrated in the petiole at a low salt concentration, and is mainly concentrated in the leaves at a high salt concentration [49,88]. This strategy helps to protect functional leaves and enzyme activities to minimize plant damage from salt ions.

4. Omics Study of Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet

Omics analysis has become an important method in the field of plant molecular biology and is widely used to study the molecular mechanisms of stress resistance in plants. Currently, a wide range of omics approaches have been extensively applied to the study of salt-tolerance mechanisms and the functional analysis of salt-tolerance genes in sugar beet.

4.1. Transcriptomics of Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet

Through high-throughput sequencing technology, the researchers conducted a deeper analysis of the gene expression patterns of sugar beet under salt-stress conditions, and revealed a series of genes closely related to the salt-stress response and their regulation rules. Previous studies identified differential gene expression associated with salt tolerance and further identified several key genes in sugar beet in response to salt stress [89,90,91]. These include ion transport [80], osmoregulation [81], antioxidant defense [92], and signal transduction [93]. Sugar beet maintains an intracellular ion balance by upregulating the expression of ion transport genes (BvNHX1) to enhance the osmotic ability to resist external high osmotic pressure environment under salt stress [94]. In addition, sugar beet also actively responds to oxidative stress by removing excessive reactive oxygen species by upregulating the expression of the catalase gene, enhancing the activity of the antioxidant enzyme system, and reducing oxidative damage [16]. The identification of the gene BvM14-SAMS2 as a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of the polyamine precursor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) underscores its potential role in enhancing salt tolerance in sugar beet [95]. Under salt stress, genes encoding ion pump and channel proteins are also significantly upregulated, underscoring their importance in maintaining intracellular ion balance [67]. A transcriptomic study revealed significant activation of multiple salt-stress-responsive pathways, including starch and sucrose metabolism, alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and plant hormone signal transduction. These findings indicate that these pathways may play crucial roles in sugar beet’s salt tolerance [96]. Additionally, the aforementioned studies have revealed that the roots and leaves of sugar beet exhibit different adaptive mechanisms in response to salt stress. There are also other studies that can justify this conclusion [97]. Taking CAT as an example, the upregulation of the catalase gene expression in leaves, and, unlike the leaf blade, the downregulated expression of CAT encoding genes in root systems after salt stress can be observed [98]. In conclusion, the transcriptomic studies of salt tolerance in sugar beet provide us with a deep understanding of the mechanisms of sugar beet response to salt stress.

4.2. Proteomics of Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet

Proteomics, a comprehensive investigation into the protein make up and dynamics within living organisms, has greatly advanced our understanding of salt-tolerance mechanisms in sugar beet [99]. In recent years, numerous proteomic studies have shed light on how sugar beet responds to salt stress, revealing intricate molecular networks underlying its adaptability. A proteomic analysis revealed sugar beet’s complex response to salt stress by regulating key proteins, including components of the antioxidant defense system, ion transporters, photosynthetic machinery, and signal transduction proteins [100]. Furthermore, proteomics has identified changes in redox-sensitive proteins in beetroot roots under salt stress. These redox-sensitive proteins are crucial for metabolic regulation, ROS homeostasis, and various cellular functions, such as biosynthesis, signaling, transcription, and photosynthesis [101]. For instance, ferredoxin plays a key role in electron transfer during photosynthesis and helps reduce NADP+ to NADPH, thereby managing oxidative stress and supporting biosynthesis [101,102]. Meanwhile, 6-phosphofructokinase 5 (PFK5), a key enzyme in glycolysis, exhibits altered activity under salt stress, highlighting its role in energy metabolism [103]. Conversely, malate dehydrogenase (MDH) levels decrease under salt stress, indicating that salt stress may disrupt the TCA cycle and affect overall energy production [103]. Additionally, thioredoxins (such as Trx Clot and TrxH1) play a significant role in antioxidant defense by reducing disulfide bonds in target proteins, thus alleviating oxidative stress [104]. On the other hand, non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) contribute to lipid transfer, helping to maintain cell membrane stability and signal transduction, which counteracts the effects of salt stress [105]. In summary, the application of proteomics in studying beetroot root salt tolerance not only reveals the complex changes in proteins under salt stress but also highlights the intricate interactions between proteins in response to salt stress. These findings underscore potential targets for genetic engineering to enhance crop resilience and emphasize the importance of proteomic approaches in elucidating the mechanisms underlying beetroot root salt tolerance.

4.3. Post-Translational Modification Omics of Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet

The proteomics of post-translational modifications (PTMs) are crucial for diversifying protein function, localization, stability, and interaction [106]. These modifications include phosphorylation, glycosylation, ubiquitination, and methylation, among others. In the sugar beet, PTM proteomics has emerged as a powerful tool to explore the mechanisms underlying salt tolerance. The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation was used to reveal the effect of salt stress on sugar beet, with 80% of DEGs showing expression patterns negatively correlated with m6A modification. This regulation affects genes involved in energy metabolism, transport, signal transduction, transcription factor activity, and cell-wall organization [107]. The ubiquitination process serves as a critical mechanism for protein degradation and turnover, thereby maintaining cellular homeostasis under stress conditions. In sugar beet under salt stress, a large number of differentially ubiquitinated proteins were found, including those involved in cell transcription, translation, signal transduction, metabolic pathways, and the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway [76]. Additionally, reversible protein phosphorylation plays an important regulatory role in signaling, cell signal expansion, and cell cycle control. This reversible nature allows for rapid and precise adjustments to protein activity and function, enabling sugar beet to respond swiftly to environmental changes [72]. In summary, PTMs offer a profound perspective in the realm of salt tolerance in sugar beet. By unraveling the complex web of PTMs, scientists can better understand how sugar beet adapts to salt-stress conditions.

4.4. Metabolomics of Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet

Metabolomics, the comprehensive study of small-molecule metabolites within living organisms, has significantly advanced the understanding of salt-tolerance mechanisms in sugar beet [74]. Using metabolomics, a TCA-related organic acid (OA) increase in sugar beet leaves under salt stress was found, along with the accumulation of proline, mannitol, and putrescine, which contribute to salt-stress adaptation, revealing how sugar beet modulates its metabolic pathways to enhance resilience [74]. A metabolomic analysis of sugar beet treated with 300 mM Na+ for 1 d and 7 d discovered that salt stress enhances sucrose metabolism and TCA cycle activity. After 1 d of stress, sucrose levels decreased while organic acids like l-malate and 2-oxoglutarate increased. After 7 d of stress, nitrogen-containing metabolites, including amino acids, betaine, melatonin, and (S)-2-aminobutyric acid, showed significant increases [49]. Additionally, other research has also revealed that salt stress reduces key metabolites involved in the Calvin cycle, glycolysis, and citric acid cycle [74]. Under salt stress, compounds such as arabinose, glycolic acid, inositol, malate, and mannitol accumulate both inside and outside chloroplasts [108]. This accumulation supports the chloroplast’s biochemical functions and enhances photorespiration metabolism, thus improving sugar beet’s adaptation to salt stress. These metabolites help maintain cellular osmotic balance and protect cellular structures from oxidative damage. Metabolomics reveals complex metabolite interactions in sugar beet, highlighting its importance in understanding and enhancing salt tolerance.

5. Outlook and the Future

Although progress has been made in understanding sugar beet salt tolerance, it is less frequently studied compared to food crops. Consequently, research on its salt-tolerance mechanisms remains limited, resulting in an incomplete understanding of its response to high salt environments. In contrast, Tamarix, a highly salt-tolerant plant, has been extensively studied. Tamarix is a known salt-secreting halophyte. As for sugar beet, the question remains open whether, under salinity stress, its adaptive mechanisms concentrate on salt exclusion, lean towards salt secretion, or perhaps incorporate both features. Tamarix can secrete various anionic ions and possesses different abilities to secrete these ions [109,110]. Some of the literature indicates that Tamarix salt-gland secretion is influenced by factors such as circadian rhythm [111], soil salt-ion content [112], temperature, humidity, and soil moisture. Similar experiments on sugar beet showed varying responses to different neutral salts, with NaCl having a more severe impact than Na2SO4 [49]. The underlying reasons remain unclear, but it is possible that the salt resistance mechanisms in sugar beet are influenced by similar factors as in Tamarix. Therefore, further in-depth research is needed to fully understand the salt-tolerance mechanisms in sugar beet.
Current omics studies have certain limitations. In transcriptomics, advancements such as single-cell transcriptomics and spatial transcriptomics provide more detailed insights. For instance, a study using single-cell transcriptomics constructed a transcriptional map of cotton root tips responding to salt stress at single-cell resolution, revealing cell heterogeneity, root type differences, and differentiation trajectories under salt stress. Similarly, in post-translational modifications, research has focused on acetylation and other modifications. One study found that GmNFYA regulates histone acetylation modifications, promoting the expression of downstream salt-tolerance genes and thereby enhancing soybean’s salt tolerance [113]. In metabolomics, broad-target metabolomics can provide comprehensive information on metabolic changes under stress conditions. Through targeted metabolomics, researchers have deeply analyzed metabolic changes in plants under salt stress and identified key metabolic pathways and genes involved in wheat’s response to salt stress [114]. All these areas require further in-depth research on sugar beet to fully understand its response to salt stress.
Multi-omics integrates genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, post-translational modification omics, and metabolomics, fully revealing the complex biological processes in plants under salt stress. Significant progress has been made in multi-omics studies in other crops. Through genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and other multi-omics studies, research on rice salt tolerance has provided detailed mechanisms related to salt-stress tolerance, including salt sensing, ROS scavenging, cytoskeleton regulation, and protein synthesis [115]. Similarly, utilizing multi-omics approaches combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, researchers found that the phenylpropanoid pathway plays a crucial role in the relationship between growth, development, and secondary metabolites in roses under salt stress [116]. Additionally, by integrating analyses from microbiome, transcriptome, and metabolome studies, researchers identified key operational taxonomic units (OTUs), core genes, and important metabolites involved in Cynomorium songaricum’s response to salt stress [117]. These findings highlight the potential of multi-omics approaches in improving salt tolerance. Although sugar beet is more salt-tolerant than many crops, high salinity can still negatively impact its growth, yield, and quality. The application of omics technology provides new insights into the salt resistance mechanisms of sugar beet. To breed high-quality sugar beet salt-tolerance varieties, it is essential to identify salt resistance genes and understand the underlying mechanisms. Sugar beet has certain advantages in salt tolerance, such as its unique osmotic regulatory substance betaine. Revealing the salt-tolerance mechanisms of sugar beet can help us understand its adaptation strategies and provide references for improving salt tolerance in other crops. Advances in biotechnology are also noted, such as transgenic and gene-editing techniques. Transgenic and gene-editing technologies have shown tremendous potential in enhancing plant salt tolerance. These technologies allow scientists to precisely modify plant genomes by adding, deleting, or altering specific genes, thereby improving the plant’s ability to withstand environmental stress. Specifically, in staple crops like rice, extensive research has successfully used transgenic and gene editing technologies to enhance salt tolerance. For example, researchers have utilized CRISPR/Cas9 to target and edit the OsPIP1 gene in rice, significantly improving its growth under high-salt conditions [118]. Additionally, introducing salt-tolerance genes from salt-resistant plants, such as the SiMYB19 gene, into rice through transgenic techniques has significantly enhanced the growth and yield of transgenic rice under salt stress [119]. However, similar research on sugar beet has not been widely conducted. Currently, there is a lack of extensive studies applying transgenic and gene-editing technologies to improve the salt tolerance of sugar beet. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct further research in this area to fully utilize these advanced biotechnological tools to enhance the salt tolerance of sugar beet. This research is essential for the development of the sugar beet industry and for ensuring the crop’s productivity and quality in the face of increasing soil salinization and climate change challenges.
Despite a profound understanding of sugar beet responses to salinity stress at cellular and molecular levels under laboratory conditions, systematic studies on field experiments are still insufficient. Considering that laboratory tests often ignore the relationship between salt stress and sugar and yield, it is particularly critical to study how salt stress affects sugar beet sugar content, yield, and salt tolerance in field experiments. Moreover, the specific impacts of drip irrigation versus irrigation on sugar beet’s salt tolerance and disease incidence are still a largely unexplored territory. How these two irrigation methods specifically affect sugar beet’s growth, salt tolerance, and disease incidence is especially critical, given the nationwide threats posed by climate change, including potential expansions of saline soils and increased occurrences of extreme weather events, which present unprecedented challenges to sugar beet cultivation. Saline stress not only hinders sugar beet growth directly but may also indirectly elevate its disease incidence by altering the soil microenvironment and influencing pathogen activity, thereby imposing a dual threat to sugar beet production. Considering the economic value of sugar beet as a high sugar crop and its potential in saline land, exploring the effects of drip irrigation and irrigation on sugar content, yield, and disease resistance will help to optimize irrigation strategies and improve the adaptability and economic benefits of sugar beet.
As a specialized crop, sugar beet’s salt-tolerance research lags behind due to a lower academic focus and the scarcity of pertinent literature and resources, compounded by its intricate physiological mechanisms and interdisciplinary research complexities. Compared to mainstream crops, beet’s salt resistance studies appear more difficult and slow, particularly in terms of comprehensive experimentation and adaptive strategy exploration. In summary, with the severe date of soil salinity worldwide, the study of salt-tolerant crops is crucial. As an important salt-tolerance economic crop and sugar crop, sugar beet is important for its salt-tolerance gene mining and the analysis of its salt-tolerance mechanisms.

6. Conclusions

This article systematically investigates the adaptive mechanisms of sugar beet under salinity stress, elucidating its multidimensional responses at the physiological, cellular, and molecular levels. The findings reveal that sugar beet displays robust salt tolerance through mechanisms including ion regulation, enhanced antioxidant capacity, and metabolic acclimatization. Key genes and pathways identified via omics technologies pave the way for precision breeding and biotechnological applications in the future. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of sugar beet’s salt-tolerance mechanisms, we summarize major omics studies conducted using various technological platforms (Table 1).
Spanning transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, the studies not only furnish critical data underpinning a deeper insight into sugar beet’s physiological responses and adaptive strategies under saline conditions, but also offer novel strategies for enhancing sugar beet productivity and quality. These findings provide essential references for improving salt tolerance in other crops, thereby broadening the agricultural applications and resilience of various plant species against environmental stresses.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Project (32401898, 32272148), Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2023C091), National Sugar Industry Technology System (CARS-17), Basic Scientific Research Fund of Heilongjiang Province (2023-KYYWF-1503), key genes of beet drought resistance based on multi-omics analysis (xjnkywdzc-2024003-05).

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable as no new data were generated or analyzed during this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Liu, L.; Wang, B. Protection of Halophytes and Their Uses for Cultivation of Saline-Alkali Soil in China. Biology 2021, 10, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, J.; Pu, L.; Han, M.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, R.; Xiang, Y. Soil salinization research in China: Advances and prospects. J. Geogr. Sci. 2014, 24, 943–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bian, C.; Ji, L.; Xu, W.; Dong, S.; Pan, N. Research Progress on Bioactive Substances of Beets and Their Functions. Molecules 2024, 29, 4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, J.; Xu, X.; Lei, J.; Li, S. Research on chemical characteristics of soil salt crusts with saline groundwater drip-irrigation in the Tarim Desert Highway Shelterbelt. Springerplus 2013, 2 (Suppl. S1), S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Islam, A.; Hoque, M.M.; Ghosh, S.; Sarkar, B.; Mahammad, S.; Das, B.C.; Islam, A.R.M.T.; Pal, S.C.; Sarkar, M.; Khatun, M.; et al. Hydro-chemical characterization and irrigation suitability assessment of a tropical decaying river in India. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 20096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhuang, Q.; Shao, Z.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, W.; Feng, X.; Lv, X.; Ding, Q.; Cai, B.; Altan, O. Evolution of soil salinization under the background of landscape patterns in the irrigated northern slopes of Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China. Catena 2021, 206, 105561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Perri, S.; Molini, A.; Hedin, L.O.; Porporato, A. Contrasting effects of aridity and seasonality on global salinization. Nat. Geosci. 2022, 15, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bian, J.M.; Tang, J.; Lin, N.F. Relationship between saline–alkali soil formation and neotectonic movement in Songnen Plain, China. Environ. Geol. 2008, 55, 1421–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fang, H.L.; Liu, G.H.; Kearney, M. Georelational analysis of soil type, soil salt content, landform, and land use in the Yellow River Delta, China. Environ. Manag. 2005, 35, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tarolli, P.; Luo, J.; Park, E.; Barcaccia, G.; Masin, R. Soil salinization in agriculture: Mitigation and adaptation strategies combining nature-based solutions and bioengineering. iScience 2024, 27, 108830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Murtaza, G.; Usman, M.; Iqbal, J.; Tahir, M.N.; Elshikh, M.S.; Alkahtani, J.; Toleikienė, M.; Iqbal, R.; Akram, M.I.; Gruda, N.S. The impact of biochar addition on morpho-physiological characteristics, yield and water use efficiency of tomato plants under drought and salinity stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kandil, A.A.; Sharief, B.A.; Abido, W.A.; Areeg, B.; Awed, M. Effect of gibberellic acid on germination behaviour of sugar beet cultivars under salt stress conditions of Egypt. Sugar Tech 2014, 16, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chang, C.L.; Tian, L.; Tian, Z.J.; McLaughlin, N.; Tian, C.J. Change of soil microorganism communities under saline-sodic land degradation on the Songnen Plain in northeast China. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2022, 185, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, X.Q.; She, D.L.; Fei, Y.H.; Han, X.; Gao, L. An improved pore-solid fractal model for predicting coastal saline soil hydraulic properties based on change points determined by genetic algorithm-support vector regression. Soil Tillage Res. 2022, 224, 105502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Geng, G.; Yang, J. Sugar beet production and industry in China. Sugar Tech 2015, 17, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lv, X.Y.; Jin, Y.; Wang, Y.G. De novo transcriptome assembly and identification of salt-responsive genes in sugar beet M14. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2018, 75, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oliveira, R.A.; Schneider, R.; Lunelli, B.H.; Rossell, C.E.V.; Filho, R.M.; Venus, J. A simple biorefinery concept to produce 2G-lactic acid from sugar beet pulp (SBP): A high-value target approach to valorize a waste stream. Molecules 2020, 25, 2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Subrahmanyeswari, T.; Gantait, S. Advancements and prospectives of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) biotechnology. Appl. Micol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 7417–7430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, H.; Zhou, W.W.; Lv, H.F.; Liang, B. Growth, leaf morphological and physiological adaptability of leaf beet (Beta vulgaris var. cicla) to salt stress: A soil culture experiment. Agronomy 2020, 12, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moreira, L.S.G.; Fanton, S.; Cardozo, L.; Borges, N.A.; Combet, E.; Shiels, P.G.; Stenvinkel, P.; Mafra, D.; Schneider, R. Pink pressure: Beetroot (Beta vulgaris rubra) as a possible novel medical therapy for chronic kidney disease. Nutr. Rev. 2022, 80, 1041–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bušić, A.; Marđetko, N.; Kundas, S.; Morzak, G.; Belskaya, H.; Ivančić Šantek, M.; Komes, D.; Novak, S.; Šantek, B. Bioethanol production from renewable raw materials and its separation and purification: A review. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 56, 289–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhuo, W.; Le, C.; Wu, Q.; Chandramohan, G.; Sivakumar, A.; Chen, X. Betanin ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice via inhibition of inflammatory response and oxidative stress. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 104763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Geng, G.; Li, R.R.; Stevanato, P.; Lv, C.H.; Lu, Z.Y.; Yu, L.H.; Wang, Y.G. Physiological and transcriptome analysis of sugar beet reveals different mechanisms of response to neutral salt and alkaline salt stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 571864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dohm, J.C.; Minoche, A.E.; Holtgräwe, D.; Capella-Gutiérrez, S.; Zakrzewski, F.; Tafer, H.; Oruga, T.R.; Sörensen, T.R.; Stracke, R.; Reinhardt, R.; et al. The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Nature 2014, 505, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Geng, G.; Lv, C.H.; Stevanato, P.; Li, R.R.; Yu, L.H.; Wang, Y.G. Transcriptome analysis of salt-sensitive and tolerant genotypes reveals salt-tolerance metabolic pathways in sugar beet. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, Y.Q.; Guo, Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rajabi Hamedani, S.; Kuppens, T.; Malina, R.; Bocci, E.; Colantoni, A.; Villarini, M. Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Valuation of Biochar Production: Two Case Studies in Belgium. Energies 2019, 12, 2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Larney, F.J.; Pearson, D.C.; Blackshaw, R.E.; Lupwayi, N.Z.; Lynch, D.R. Conservation Management Practices and Rotations for Irrigated Processing Potato in Southern Alberta. Am. J. Potato Res. 2016, 93, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, X.C.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Li, C.; Zhang, W.; Luo, X.B.; Jiang, H.Y.; Liu, L.W. Unraveling the root proteome changes and its relationship to molecular mechanism underlying salt stress response in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lei, Y.T.; Xu, Y.X.; Hettenhausen, C.; Lu, C.K.; Shen, G.J.; Zhang, C.P.; Ji, J.; Song, J.; Lin, H.H.; Wu, J.Q. Comparative analysis of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) leaf transcriptomes reveals genotype-specific salt tolerance mechanisms. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, J.Y.; Xue, C.C.; Lin, Y.; Yan, Q.; Chen, J.B.; Wu, R.R.; Zhang, X.Y.; Chen, X.X.; Yuan, X.X. Genetic analysis and identification of VrFRO8, a salt tolerance-related gene in mungbean. Gene 2022, 836, 146658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sharma, A.; Choudhary, P.; Chakdar, H.; Shukla, P. Molecular insights and omics-based understanding of plant-microbe interactions under drought stress. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 40, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rozema, J.; Cornelisse, D.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Bruning, B.; Katschnig, D.; Broekman, R.; Ji, B.; van Bodegom, P. Comparing salt tolerance of beet cultivars and their halophytic ancestor: Consequences of domestication and breeding programmes. AoB Plants 2014, 7, plu083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, G.Q.; Liang, N.; Feng, R.J.; Zhang, J.J. Evaluation of salinity tolerance in seedlings of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars using proline, soluble sugars and cation accumulation criteria. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 2665–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ievinsh, G.; Andersone-Ozola, U.; Jēkabsone, A. Similar responses of relatively salt-tolerant plants to Na and K during chloride salinity: Comparison of growth, water content and ion accumulation. Life 2022, 12, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, H.; Wang, Q.Q.; Yu, M.M.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Wu, Y.B.; Zhang, H.X. Transgenic salt-tolerant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) constitutively expressing an Arabidopsis thaliana vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene, AtNHX3, accumulates more soluble sugar but less salt in storage roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31, 1325–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, G.Q.; Feng, R.J.; Liang, N.; Yuan, H.J.; Sun, W.B. Sodium chloride stimulates growth and alleviates sorbitol-induced osmotic stress in sugar beet seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 75, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hossain, M.S.; ElSayed, A.I.; Moore, M.; Dietz, K.J. Redox and Reactive Oxygen Species Network in Acclimation for Salinity Tolerance in Sugar Beet. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 1283–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Q.; Chen, S.; Li, H.; Ma, C.; Li, H. Functional Characterization of a Sugar Beet BvbHLH93 Transcription Factor in Salt Stress Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Al-Farsi, S.M.; Nadaf, S.K.; Al-Sadi, A.M.; Ullah, A.; Farooq, M. Evaluation of indigenous Omani alfalfa landraces for morphology and forage yield under different levels of salt stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 1763–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, H.P.; Shi, H.F.; Yang, Y.Q.; Feng, X.X.; Chen, X.; Xiao, F.; Lin, H.H.; Guo, Y. Insights into plant salt stress signaling and tolerance. J. Genet. Genom. 2024, 51, 16–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ghoulam, C.; Foursy, A.; Farès, K. Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2002, 47, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Keutgen, A.J.; Pawelzik, E. Impacts of NaCl stress on plant growth and mineral nutrient assimilation in two cultivars of strawberry. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 65, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Romano, A.; Stevanato, P.; Sorgonà, A.; Cacco, G.; Abenavoli, M.R. Dynamic response of key germination traits to NaCl stress in sugar beet seeds. Sugar Tech 2019, 21, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dadkhah, A. Response of root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) to salt stress. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2008, 150, S196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Skorupa, M.; Gołębiewski, M.; Kurnik, K.; Niedojadło, J.; Kęsy, J.; Klamkowski, K.; Wójcik, K.; Treder, W.; Tretyn, A.; Tyburski, J. Salt stress vs. salt shock—The case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alharbi, K.; Hafez, E.; Omara, A.E.; Awadalla, A.; Nehela, Y. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and silica nanoparticles stimulate sugar beet resilience to irrigation with saline water in salt-affected soils. Plants 2022, 11, 3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, L.Y.; Nguyen, N.T.; Ueda, A.; Saneoka, H. Effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid on Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris L. subsp. cicla) seedling growth under saline conditions. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 74, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Y.G.; Jiao, Z.H.; Yu, L.H.; Sun, X.W.; Sun, F.; Li, J.; Geng, G. The physiological and metabolic changes in sugar beet seedlings under different levels of salt stress. J. Plant Res. 2017, 130, 1079–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mulet, J.M.; Campos, F.; Yenush, L. Editorial: Ion homeostasis in plant stress and development. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 618273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Daoud, S.; Koyro, H.W.; Harrouni, M.C.; Schmidt, A.; Papenbrock, J. Salinity Tolerance of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Part II. Physiological and Biochemical Regulation. In Cash Crop Halophytes: Recent Studies. Tasks for Vegetation Science; Lieth, H., Mochtchenko, M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2023; Volume 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Chen, W.; Fu, Z.J.; Zhao, S.M.; E, Y.Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, B.Z.; Sun, M.Y.; Han, P.A.; et al. Integration of mRNA and miRNA analysis reveals the molecular mechanisms of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) response to salt stress. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 22074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rasouli, F.; Kiani-Pouya, A.; Li, L.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.; Hedrich, R.; Wilson, R.; Shabala, S. Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Guard Cells Responses to Salinity Stress: A Proteomic Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Li, J.; Yu, B.; Ma, C.; Li, H.; Jiang, D.; Nan, J.; Xu, M.; Liu, H.; Chen, S.; Duanmu, H.; et al. Functional Characterization of Sugar Beet M14 Antioxidant Enzymes in Plant Salt Stress Tolerance. Antioxidants 2022, 12, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhao, C.; Zhang, H.; Song, C.; Zhu, J.K.; Shabala, S. Mechanisms of Plant Responses and Adaptation to Soil Salinity. Innovation 2020, 1, 100017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, J.; Wang, J.; Pang, Q.; Yan, X. Analysis of N6-methyladenosine reveals a new important mechanism regulating the salt tolerance of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Plant Sci. 2023, 335, 111794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, L.; Zhang, P.; Feng, G.; Hou, W.; Liu, T.; Gai, Z.; Shen, Y.; Qiu, X.; Li, X. Salt priming induces low-temperature tolerance in sugar beet via xanthine metabolism. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 201, 107810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Belkjeiri, O.; Mulas, M. The effects of salt stress on growth, water relations and ion accumulation in two halophyte species. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 86, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Alam, M.A.; Juraimi, A.S.; Rafii, M.Y.; Hamid, A.A.; Aslani, F.; Alam, M.Z. Effects of salinity and salinity-induced augmented bioactive compounds in purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) for possible economical use. Food Chem. 2015, 169, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yolcu, S.; Alavilli, H.; Ganesh, P.; Panigrahy, M.; Song, K. Salt and drought stress responses in cultivated beets (Beta vulgaris L.) and wild beet (Beta maritima L.). Plants 2021, 10, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Attia, H.; Karray, N.; Rabhi, M.; Lachaâl, M. Salt-imposed restrictions on the uptake of macroelements by roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2008, 30, 723–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Affenzeller, M.J.; Darehshouri, A.; Andosch, A.; Lütz, C.; Lütz-Meindl, U. Salt stress-induced cell death in the unicellular green alga Micrasterias denticulata. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 939–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hameed, A.; Ahmed, M.Z.; Hussain, T.; Aziz, I.; Ahmad, N.; Gul, B.; Nielsen, B.L. Effects of salinity stress on chloroplast structure and function. Cells 2021, 10, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Hernández, J.A.; Álvarez, S.; Barba-Espín, G.; Sánchez-Blanco, M.J. The long-term resistance mechanisms, critical irrigation threshold and relief capacity shown by Eugenia myrtifolia plants in response to saline reclaimed water. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 111, 244–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wang, L.W.; Showalter, A.M. Cloning and salt-induced, ABA-independent expression of choline mono-oxygenase in Atriplex prostrata. Physiol. Plant. 2004, 120, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wakeel, A.; Sümer, A.; Hanstein, S.; Yan, F.; Schubert, S. In vitro effect of different Na+/K+ ratios on plasma membrane H+ -ATPase activity in maize and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) shoot. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Skorupa, M.; Gołębiewski, M.; Domagalski, K.; Kurnik, K.; Abu Nahia, K.; Złoch, M.; Tretyn, A.; Tyburski, J. Transcriptomic profiling of the salt stress response in excised leaves of the halophyte Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Plant Sci. 2016, 243, 56–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, Y.G.; Stevanato, P.; Lv, C.H.; Li, R.R.; Geng, G. Comparative physiological and proteomic analysis of two sugar beet genotypes with contrasting salt tolerance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 6056–6073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gong, Y.Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, S.X.; Li, H.L.; Duanmu, H.Z. Genome-wide identification and salt stress response analysis of the bZIP transcription factor family in sugar beet. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sheikh, A.H.; Zacharia, I.; Tabassum, N.; Hirt, H.; Ntoukakis, V. 14-3-3 proteins as a major hub for plant immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 2024. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhao, X.; Li, F.; Li, K. The 14-3-3 proteins: Regulators of plant metabolism and stress responses. Plant Biol. 2021, 23, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yu, B.; Li, J.N.; Koh, J.; Dufresne, C.; Yang, N.; Qi, S.S.; Zhang, Y.X.; Ma, C.Q.; Duong, B.V.; Chen, S.X.; et al. Quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) monosomic addition line M14 in response to salt stress. J. Proteom. 2016, 143, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zou, C.; Liu, D.; Wu, P.; Wang, Y.; Gai, Z.; Liu, L.; Yang, F.; Li, C.; Guo, G. Transcriptome analysis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in response to alkaline stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 102, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hossain, M.S.; Persicke, M.; ElSayed, A.I.; Kalinowski, J.; Dietz, K.J. Metabolite profiling at the cellular and subcellular level reveals metabolites associated with salinity tolerance in sugar beet. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5961–5976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ćirić, M.; Popović, V.; Prodanović, S.; Živanović, T.; Ikanović, J.; Bajić, I. Sugar Beet: Perspectives for the Future. Sugar Tech 2024. [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, H.; Zhang, J.L.; Li, J.N.; Yu, B.; Chen, S.X.; Ma, C.Q.; Li, H.Y. Comparative ubiquitination proteomics revealed the salt tolerance mechanism in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) monosomic addition line M14. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 16088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chi, B.J.; Guo, Z.J.; Wei, M.Y.; Song, S.W.; Zhong, Y.H.; Liu, J.W.; Zhang, Y.C.; Li, J.; Xu, C.Q.; Zhu, X.Y.; et al. Structural, developmental and functional analyses of leaf salt glands of mangrove recretohalophyte Aegiceras corniculatum. Tree Physiol. 2024, 44, tpad123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Fan, X.R.; Jiang, H.Z.; Meng, L.J.; Chen, J.G. Gene mapping, cloning and association analysis for salt tolerance in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. van Zelm, E.; Zhang, Y.; Testerink, C. Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020, 71, 403–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liu, L.; Wang, B.; Liu, D.; Zou, C.L.; Wu, P.R.; Wang, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.B.; Li, C.F. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal mechanisms of adaptation to salinity in which carbon and nitrogen metabolism is altered in sugar beet roots. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, P.; Liu, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, C. Beneficial effects of exogenous melatonin on overcoming salt stress in sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.). Plants 2021, 10, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yamada, N.; Takahashi, H.; Kitou, K.; Sahashi, K.; Tamagake, H.; Tanaka, Y.; Takabe, T. Suppressed expression of choline monooxygenase in sugar beet on the accumulation of glycine betaine. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 96, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Russell, B.L.; Rathinasabapathi, B.; Hanson, A.D. Osmotic stress induces expression of choline monooxygenase in sugar beet and amaranth. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 859–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Subbarao, G.V.; Wheeler, R.M.; Stutte, G.W.; Levine, L.H. How far can sodium substitute for potassium in red beet? J. Plant Nutr. 1999, 22, 1745–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Subbarao, G.V.; Wheeler, R.M.; Stutte, G.W.; Levine, L.H. Low potassium enhances sodium uptake in red beet under moderate saline conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2000, 23, 1449–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wakeel, A.; Steffens, D.; Schubert, S. Potassium substitution by sodium in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) nutrition on K-fixing soils. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenkd. 2010, 173, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Faust, F.; Schubert, S. In vitro protein synthesis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) and maize (Zea mays) is differentially inhibited when potassium is substituted by sodium. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 118, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, Y.G.; Zhan, Y.N.; Wu, C.; Gong, S.L.; Zhu, N.; Chen, S.X.; Li, H.Y. Cloning of a cystatin gene from sugar beet M14 that can enhance plant salt tolerance. Plant Sci. 2012, 191–192, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, X.L.; He, R.F.; He, G.C. Construction of suppression subtractive hybridization libraries and identification of brown planthopper-induced genes. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 1254–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ouyang, B.; Yang, T.; Li, H.X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.H.; Fei, Z.J.; Ye, Z.B. Identification of early salt stress response genes in tomato root by suppression subtractive hybridization and microarray analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Baldwin, J.C.; Dombrowski, J.E. Evaluation of Lolium temulentum as a model grass species for the study of salinity stress by PCR-based subtractive suppression hybridization analysis. Plant Sci. 2006, 171, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tyburski, J.; Mucha, N. Antioxidant response in the salt-acclimated red beet (Beta vulgaris) callus. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liu, L.; Gai, Z.J.; Qiu, X.; Liu, T.H.; Li, S.X.; Ye, F.; Jian, S.L.; Shen, Y.H.; Li, X.G. Salt stress improves the low-temperature tolerance in sugar beet in which carbohydrate metabolism and signal transduction are involved. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 208, 105239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Adler, G.; Blumwald, E.; Bar-Zvi, D. The sugar beet gene encoding the sodium/proton exchanger 1 (BvNHX1) is regulated by a MYB transcription factor. Planta 2010, 232, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ma, C.Q.; Wang, Y.G.; Gu, D.; Nan, J.D.; Chen, S.X.; Li, H.Y. Overexpression of S-Adenosyl-l-Methionine Synthetase 2 from sugar beet M14 increased Arabidopsis tolerance to salt and oxidative stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Cui, J.; Li, J.L.; Dai, C.H.; Li, L.P. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses revealed the response mechanism of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to salt stress of different durations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, J.L.; Cui, J.; Cheng, D.Y.; Dai, C.H.; Liu, T.J.; Wang, C.Y.; Luo, C.F. iTRAQ protein profile analysis of sugar beet under salt stress: Different coping mechanisms in leaves and roots. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cui, J.; Liu, J.L.; Li, J.L.; Cheng, D.Y.; Dai, C.H. Genome-wide sequence identification and expression analysis of N6-methyladenosine demethylase in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) under salt stress. PeerJ 2022, 10, e12719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jorrin Novo, J.V. Proteomics and plant biology: Contributions to date and a look towards the next decade. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2021, 18, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, H.Y.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.X.; Wu, C.; Ma, C.Q.; Yu, B.; Zhu, N.; Koh, J.; Chen, S.X. Salt stress response of membrane proteome of sugar beet monosomic addition line M14. J. Proteom. 2015, 127 Pt A, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, H.; Du, X.X.; Zhang, J.L.; Li, J.N.; Chen, S.X.; Duanmu, H.Z.; Li, H.Y. Quantitative redox proteomics revealed molecular mechanisms of salt tolerance in the roots of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) monosomic addition line M14. Bot. Stud. 2022, 63, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Marcus, Y.; Gurevitz, M. Ferredoxin-mediated reduction of 2-nitrothiophene inhibits photosynthesis: Mechanism and herbicidal potential. Biochem. J. 2020, 477, 1149–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Wu, G.Q.; Wang, J.L.; Feng, R.J.; Li, S.J.; Wang, C.M. iTRAQ-based comparative proteomic analysis provides insights into molecular mechanisms of salt tolerance in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Mata-Pérez, C.; Spoel, S.H. Thioredoxin-mediated redox signaling in plant immunity. Plant Sci. 2019, 279, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Li, J.N.; Wang, K.; Ji, M.C.; Zhang, T.Y.; Yang, C.; Liu, H.; Chen, S.X.; Li, H.L.; Li, H.Y. Cys-SH based quantitative redox proteomics of salt induced response in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) monosomic addition line M14. Bot. Stud. 2021, 62, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Jensen, O.N. Modification-specific proteomics: Characterization of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Li, J.L.; Pang, Q.Y.; Yan, X.F. Unique features of the m6A methylome and its response to salt stress in the roots of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Behr, J.H.; Bednarz, H.; Gödde, V.; Niehaus, K.; Zörb, C. Metabolic responses of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to the combined effect of root hypoxia and NaCl-salinity. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 267, 153545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Storey, R.; Thomson, W. An X-ray microanalysis study of the salt glands and intracellular calcium crystals of Tamarix. Ann. Bot. 1994, 73, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ramadan, T. Dynamics of salt secretion by Sporobolus spicatus (Vahl) Kunth from sites of differing salinity. Ann. Bot. 2001, 87, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Imada, S.; Acharya, K.; Yamanaka, N. Short-term and diurnal patterns of salt secretion by Tamarix ramosissima and their relationships with climatic factors. J. Arid Environ. 2012, 83, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ma, H.Y.; Tian, C.Y.; Feng, G.; Yuan, J.F. Ability of multicellular salt glands in Tamarix species to secrete Na+ and K+ selectively. Sci. China Life Sci. 2011, 54, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Lu, L.; Wei, W.; Tao, J.J.; Lu, X.; Bian, X.H.; Hu, Y.; Cheng, T.; Yin, C.C.; Zhang, W.K.; Chen, S.Y.; et al. Nuclear factor Y subunit GmNFYA competes with GmHDA13 for interaction with GmFVE to positively regulate salt tolerance in soybean. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 2362–2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Dissanayake, B.M.; Staudinger, C.; Ranathunge, K.; Munns, R.; Rupasinghe, T.W.; Taylor, N.L.; Millar, A.H. Metabolic adaptations leading to an enhanced lignification in wheat roots under salinity stress. Plant J. 2024, 119, 1800–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Hasan, M.M.; Rahman, M.A.; Corpas, F.J.; Rahman, M.M.; Jahan, M.S.; Liu, X.D.; Ghimire, S.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Wassem, M.; Alharbi, B.M.; et al. Salt stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.): A proteomic overview of recent advances and future prospects. Plant Stress 2024, 11, 100307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ren, H.R.; Yang, W.J.; Jing, W.K.; Shahid, M.O.; Liu, Y.M.; Qiu, X.H.; Choisy, P.; Xu, T.; Ma, N.; Gao, J.P.; et al. Multi-omics analysis reveals key regulatory defense pathways and genes involved in salt tolerance of rose plants. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, X.K.; Zhang, G.S.; Yan, Q.; Ahmad, B.; Pei, J.; Huang, L.F. Quality variation and salt-alkali-tolerance mechanism of Cynomorium songaricum: Interacting from microbiome-transcriptome-metabolome. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 919, 170801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tao, L.Y.; Wang, B.; Xin, S.C.; Li, W.; Huang, S.C.; Liu, L.H.; Cui, J.; Zhang, Q.R.; Cheng, X.G. A cluster of mutagenesis revealed an osmotic regulatory role of the OsPIP1 genes in enhancing rice salt tolerance. Crop J. 2023, 11, 1204–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Xu, C.J.; Luo, M.Z.; Sun, X.J.; Yan, J.J.; Shi, H.W.; Yan, H.S.; Yan, R.Y.; Wang, S.G.; Tang, W.S.; Zhou, Y.B.; et al. SiMYB19 from Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) confers transgenic rice tolerance to high salt stress in the field. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ji, M.C.; Wang, K.; Wang, L.; Chen, S.X.; Li, H.Y.; Ma, C.Q.; Wang, Y.G. Overexpression of a S-Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase from sugar beet M14 increased Arabidopsis salt tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cui, J.; Li, X.Y.; Li, J.L.; Wang, C.Y.; Cheng, D.Y.; Dai, C.H. Genome-wide sequence identification and expression analysis of ARF family in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) under salinity stresses. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 13 03018 g001
Figure 1. Effect of salt stress on sugar beet from individual growth and development to the molecular level (The figure was drawn using Figdraw: www.figdraw.com, accessed on 18 October 2024).
Figure 1. Effect of salt stress on sugar beet from individual growth and development to the molecular level (The figure was drawn using Figdraw: www.figdraw.com, accessed on 18 October 2024).
Plants 13 03018 g001
Plants 13 03018 g002
Figure 2. Overview diagram showing the specialized mechanisms of sugar beet in response to salt stress (The figure was drawn by Figdraw: www.figdraw.com, accessed on 18 October 2024).
Figure 2. Overview diagram showing the specialized mechanisms of sugar beet in response to salt stress (The figure was drawn by Figdraw: www.figdraw.com, accessed on 18 October 2024).
Plants 13 03018 g002
Table 1. Major omic studies of salt-stress tolerance in sugar beet using different technological platforms.
Table 1. Major omic studies of salt-stress tolerance in sugar beet using different technological platforms.
OmicsTissueReferenceHighlightsCommon Description
transcriptomicsLeaves[52]aldh2b7, thic and delta-oatUnder salt stress, multiple salt-tolerance-related genes in sugar beet are upregulated, particularly those associated with ion transport, antioxidant defense, and osmotic regulation, indicating its adaptive mechanisms in response to salt stress.
Leaves and roots[98]BvALKBH10B
Leaves, roots[120]BvM14-SAMDC
proteomicsLeaves[53]L-ascorbate oxidaseSalt stress significantly increases the expression of antioxidant enzymes and other key proteins, demonstrating that sugar beet responds to salt stress by enhancing its antioxidant capacity and regulating protein functions.
Leaves and roots[121]BvARF
Leaves[100]PIP
Leaves and roots[97]psbQ-like protein 1, Plastocyanin and NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase subunit U
Leaves and roots[103]6-phosphofructokinase 5 (PFK5), malate dehydrogenase (MDH)
Leaves[105]non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs)
Leaves[72]14-3-3
Roots[76]RUB1
MetabolomicsRoots[80]The metabolism of carbon and nitrogenUnder salt-stress conditions, sugar beet accumulates various organic acids, proline, and other nitrogen-containing metabolites, enhancing its salt tolerance and demonstrating its adaptability in metabolic regulation.
Leaves and roots[49]nitrogen-containing metabolites, including amino acids, betaine, melatonin, and (S)-2-aminobutyric acid
Leaves[108]arabinose, glycolic acid, inositol, malate, and mannitol
Leaves and roots[96]starch and sucrose metabolism, alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, M.; Liu, J.; Geng, G.; Wang, Y. Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet: From Impact Analysis to Adaptive Mechanisms and Future Research. Plants 2024, 13, 3018. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213018

AMA Style

Wang Y, Liu H, Wang M, Liu J, Geng G, Wang Y. Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet: From Impact Analysis to Adaptive Mechanisms and Future Research. Plants. 2024; 13(21):3018. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yuetong, Huajun Liu, Maoqian Wang, Jiahui Liu, Gui Geng, and Yuguang Wang. 2024. "Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet: From Impact Analysis to Adaptive Mechanisms and Future Research" Plants 13, no. 21: 3018. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213018

APA Style

Wang, Y., Liu, H., Wang, M., Liu, J., Geng, G., & Wang, Y. (2024). Salt Tolerance in Sugar Beet: From Impact Analysis to Adaptive Mechanisms and Future Research. Plants, 13(21), 3018. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13213018

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop