Next Article in Journal
QTL Mapping and Candidate Gene Analysis for Cotton Fiber Quality and Early Maturity Using F2 and F3 Generations
Previous Article in Journal
Multiple Dataset-Based Insights into the Phylogeny and Phylogeography of the Genus Exbucklandia (Hamamelidaceae): Additional Evidence on the Evolutionary History of Tropical Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Bauhinia bowkeri Extracts on Hypercholesterolemia: Insights from In Vitro and In Silico Investigations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Essential Oil from the Roots of Valeriana rigida Ruiz & Pav. Growing in the Paramos of Chimborazo (Ecuador): Chemical Analysis, Enantioselective Profile, and Preliminary Biological Activity

1
Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Panamericana Sur Km 1 ½, Riobamba 060155, Ecuador
2
Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus Fuentenueva, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
3
Departamento de Química, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL), Calle Paris s/n y Praga, Loja 110107, Ecuador
4
Programa de Doctorado en Química, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL), Calle Paris s/n y Praga, Loja 110107, Ecuador
5
Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus Fuentenueva, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(7), 1062; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14071062
Submission received: 26 February 2025 / Revised: 27 March 2025 / Accepted: 27 March 2025 / Published: 29 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Analysis and Biological Activities of Plant Essential Oils)

Abstract

:
The essential oil (EO) obtained from the roots of Valeriana rigida Ruiz & Pav. (Caprifoliaceae), collected in the moorland region of Chimborazo Province, Ecuador, was analyzed for the first time. The chemical profile was qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed using GC-MS and GC-FID, respectively. With both detectors, two stationary phases of different polarities were used. A total of 56 compounds were identified, and the most abundant components (>3% on at least one column) were a mixture of cyclosativene and α-ylangene (4.5–4.4%), α-copaene (9.0–8.8%), decanoic acid (16.0–15.6%), β-chamigrene (3.2–3.1%), δ-cadinene (9.7–9.5%), dodecanoic acid (13.4–12.3%), and 7-epi-α-eudesmol (5.0–4.9%), on a non-polar and polar stationary phase, respectively. Additionally, the enantioselective analysis showed (1S,5S)-(+)-α-pinene, (1R,4S)-(–)-camphene, (1S,5S)-(−)-β-pinene, and (1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-(–)-α-copaene as enantiomerically pure compounds, whereas germacrene D exhibited both enantiomeric forms. The anti-inflammatory activity of V. rigida EO was comparable to that of aspirin, as indicated by the IC50 values, with no significant differences observed.

1. Introduction

Human beings have maintained a close relationship with plants for a long time, which has allowed them to acquire a rich collection of botanical knowledge. The use of plant-derived bioactive compounds has been essential for the development and application of pharmaceuticals throughout history. Most research on active molecules has been conducted in subtropical regions. However, tropical areas exhibit greater biological diversity, as is the case in Ecuador. This is why our studies focus on regions with high biological diversity, and the paramos, due to their harsh conditions, may be a valuable source of secondary metabolites of interest.
Ecuador is considered a megadiverse country [1], with a wide variety of plant species, due to a combination of geological, ecological, and evolutionary factors. It hosts approximately 10% of the world’s plant species [2], distributed across four regions, at altitudes ranging from the sea level to 6300 m. The vegetation varies from xerophilous shrubs to rainforests and high-altitude moorlands, which has sparked interest in the analysis of its secondary metabolites [3,4,5]. As of 2016, 263 molecules were reported, isolated from 58 families, with notable examples including Asteraceae, Solanaceae, Orchidaceae, and Lamiaceae, among others [6].
Andean moorlands or paramos are humid tropical ecosystems, found in the high-altitude regions of mountains, ranging from 3000 to 4700 m above sea level. Like the alpine tundra, it is characterized by herbaceous vegetation and shrubs [7]. They contain approximately 6.7% of the world’s endemic species [8]. Paramos are capable of supplying water and capturing carbon [9,10], due to the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning [11]. Ecuadorian paramos host approximately 628 endemic plant species, representing 4% of the country’s total flora [12]. They are located along the Andean corridor [13], covering an area of 1,833,834 hectares, which represents about 5% of the national territory [14]. It extends from the northern border with Colombia to the southern border with Peru, spanning about 600 km in length. Due to the harsh conditions in these areas, plants have developed survival mechanisms [15]. The Chimborazo province has an area of 649,970 hectares, of which 42% (273,660 hectares) belong to the high-altitude moorland ecosystem [16].
In 2009, the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG III) classified flowering plants, placing the family Valerianaceae within Caprifoliaceae [17]. Years later, in 2016, the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG IV) reaffirmed the classification of Valerianaceae as part of Caprifoliaceae [18]. A total of 960 species are currently classified within Caprifoliaceae [19], distributed worldwide, with the highest diversity found in East Asia and North America. [20].
Among the many Ecuadorian plants for which secondary metabolism is still unstudied, the highlander species Valeriana rigida Ruiz & Pav. must be mentioned. This taxon is also registered with the synonym Phyllactis rigida (Ruiz & Pav.) Pers [21], of which the genus includes the three species P. rigida, P. pulvinata, and P. dorotheae.[22]. The species V. rigida, commonly known as “Valeriana estrella”, is widely distributed in the high-altitude regions of Ecuador, ranging from 2500 to 4000 a.s.l., across the provinces of Azuay, Bolívar, Carchi, Chimborazo, Cotopaxi, Imbabura, Loja, Napo, and Pichincha [23]. The traditional uses of V. rigida include infusions to treat conditions, such as insomnia, relaxation, nervous disorders, headaches, and menopause [24,25]. These uses align with the sedative and anxiolytic properties reported in several species of the same genus [26,27,28]. The iridoid compounds responsible for the sedative effect found in Valeriana spp. are known as valepotriates, such as valtrate, isovaltrate, acevaltrate, and dihydrovaltrate [29]. Previous studies on the essential oils (EOs) from different species of the genus Valeriana have shown anti-inflammatory activity, like in the case V. jatamansi [30]. Aqueous leaf extracts of V. wallichii at a dose of 200 mg/kg have also demonstrated effectiveness in anti-inflammatory activity [31]. Essential oils are oily, volatile substances with a strong and specific odor, obtained through distillation processes using boiling water, steam, or mechanical processing. They exhibit various biological activities, including antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, among others [32].
The objective of the present study is to investigate the EO distilled from the roots of V. rigida. In addition to the chemical composition of the volatile fraction, this research was complemented with the study of its anti-inflammatory activity using activated neutrophils. Finally, an enantioselective analysis of some major chiral components was performed, to determine their enantiomeric excesses and, according to the literature, their stereoselective biological properties. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first chemical and enantioselective investigation of an essential oil from V. rigida.

2. Results

2.1. Chemical Composition of the EO

The essential oil was distilled from the roots of V. rigida, with an average yield of 0.03 (w/w), calculated from three repetitions.
A total of 56 compounds were identified via GC-MS and quantified via GC-FID. The major components of the volatile fraction (>3% on at least one column) were a mixture of the inseparable cyclosativene and α-ylangene (12 and 13) (4.5–4.4%), α-copaene (14) (9.0–8.8%), decanoic acid (15) (16.0–15.6%), β-chamigrene (26) (3.2–3.1%), δ-cadinene (40) (9.7–9.5%), dodecanoic acid (46) (13.4–12.3%), and 7-epi-α-eudesmol (51) (5.0–4.9%), as shown in Figure 1. All the identified constituents represented 84.0% and 80.5% of the total EO. A standard deviation of less than 5% was obtained for the percentages of each analyte in both columns. The complete results are reported in Table 1.
Sesquiterpene compounds constituted the highest percentage of the volatile fraction, accounting for 50.7–48.9% of the total weight, followed by 0.5–0.7% of monoterpene-type compounds. Finally, other components were present in 32.8–30.9%, highlighting the presence of acids, unsaturated aliphatic aldehydes, and unidentified compounds. The chromatographic profiles on the 5% phenyl methyl polysiloxane and polyethylene glycol stationary phases are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively.

2.2. Enantioselective Analysis

The enantioselective analyses (Table 2) identified four enantiomerically pure compounds in the essential oil of V. rigida: (1S,5S)-(+)-α-pinene, (1R,4S)-(–)-camphene, (1S,5S)-(−)-β-pinene, and (1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-(–)-α-copaene. In contrast, germacrene D presented both enantiomeric forms.

2.3. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

The inhibitory effect of V. rigida essential oil on isolated activated neutrophils (superoxide anion production) is summarized at Table 3, using water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1) for detection.
The EO and aspirin (at doses ranging from 3.125 to 100 μg/mL) showed proportional anti-inflammatory effects on the tested model. The anti-inflammatory activity of the EO was comparable to that of aspirin at medium to high concentrations. Likewise, when the IC50 values were compared (38.17 ± 5.59 μg/mL for EO vs. 46.53 ± 3.50 μg/mL for aspirin), no significant differences were observed.
In addition to the anti-inflammatory activity assay, the EO was submitted to a radical scavenging, test based on the use of DPPH. Furthermore, no anti-radical activity was detected, and the DPPH assay will not be discussed further.

3. Discussion

3.1. Chemical Composition and Main Components

The average EO yield from the roots of V. rigida was 0.03 (w/w). It is important to note that the EO yield depends on various factors, including the plant species and the specific part used (buds, flowers, leaves, stems, twigs, seeds, fruits, roots, wood, or bark). According to the literature, the EO yield from the roots of V. officinalis ranges between 0.28% and 1.16%. Some studies have shown that the chemical profile of the volatile fraction obtained from V. officinalis roots can vary due to different geographical conditions in which the species developed, as well as the season in which it was collected [64,65].
For the first time, the chemical profile of the EO obtained from the roots of V. rigida was reported, with a total of 56 compounds identified. The chemical composition was compared with that of the EO from V. officinalis and V. jatamansi, as they are the most representative species of this genus.
Eight common compounds were identified in the EOs obtained from the roots of V. rigida and V. officinalis. Among them, δ-cadinene and cyclosativene exhibited a higher percentage in V. rigida (9.7–9.5% and 4.5–4.4% respectively) compared to V. officinalis (1.51–1.87% and 0.84–0.38%). Other compounds, such as α-humulene and (E)-β-caryophyllene, were present in both species at similar percentages. The former was quantified as 0.4% in V. rigida and 0.58–8.46% in V. officinalis, while the latter was present at 1.1–1.3% in V. rigida and (1.46–1.87%) in V. officinalis [66]. Finally, some compounds were found in lower percentages in V. rigida. Camphene and α-pinene were respectively present at 0.1% compared to 4.96–7.19% and 1.82–3.83% in V. officinalis. The chemical composition of essential oils varies between species and is influenced by factors, such as the geographical location [67], environmental conditions [68,69,70], maturity stage [71], and extraction method [71,72].
Four common compounds were identified in the EOs of V. rigida and V. jatamansi: α-pinene, camphene, α-humulene, and viridiflorol. The percentage of α-pinene in V. rigida was 0.1%, while in V. jatamansi, it reached an average amount of 0.59%. Camphene was present at 0.1–0.2% in V. rigida, being higher in V. jatamansi (0.77%). α-Humulene was found at 0.4% in V. rigida, significantly lower compared to the value of 2.25% in V. jatamansi. Finally, viridiflorol was slightly higher in V. jatamansi, with 0.605% compared to (0.4–0.2% in V. rigida [73]. These results highlighted a chemical relationship between both species, reflecting similar patterns despite their ecological and taxonomic differences.
It is evident that the chemical profile of these species contained monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and other compounds, with sesquiterpenes predominating and monoterpenes present in smaller percentages. It is common to find aliphatic carboxylic acids in the chemical profile of Valeriana spp. EOs [74,75,76]. Valeric acid is one of the most characteristic components; with the molecular formula C5H10O2 and a linear structure, it is one of the key acids, possibly contributing to the relaxing effect of these plants [77]. In V. officinalis, it can reach 0.2% of the whole oil mass [78]. Another characteristic acid is isovaleric acid, which is generated as a product of the hydrolysis of valepotriates [79]. The EO obtained from the roots of V. officinalis contains up to 44.6% of isovaleric acid [78], while the volatile fraction of V. pilosa has a higher percentage (2.6%) [78]. Finally, long-chain carboxylic acids are not so common in all Valeriana species; for instance, in V. officinalis they can reach 11.4%, whereas V. hardwickii EO does not contain these organic acids [80].
Another species where long-chain carboxylic acids were described is V. alliariifolia, a species from the Venezuelan paramos, in which decanoic acid (0.1%), dodecanoic acid (0.5%), and hexadecanoic acid (4.3%) have been detected [81]. On the other hand, in V. rigida EO, decanoic (16.0%) and dodecanoic (13.4%) acids were present in significantly higher percentages, whereas hexadecanoic acid did not exceed 0.5%. No species within the Valerianaceae and Caprifoliaceae families have been reported to contain decanoic and dodecanoic acids above 0.5%. Therefore, V. rigida is the first species to be documented with such high levels of these acids. Finally, there are species for which the chemical profile lacks the presence of organic acids [73,82,83].

3.2. Enantioselective GC-MS Analysis of Enantiomeric Distribution

The enantioselective GC-MS analysis was performed to determine the enantiomeric composition of five chiral compounds, present in the essential oil of V. rigida. The determination of the enantiomeric composition is a powerful tool for authenticating essential oils, as oils derived from different plants can be adulterated through the addition of foreign components [84,85].
Silva et al. evaluated the antimicrobial properties of α- and β-pinene enantiomers against C. albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, Rhizopus oryzae, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Their results revealed that the negative enantiomers showed no antimicrobial activity up to a concentration of 20 µg/mL, whereas the positive enantiomers exhibited a potent capacity, eliminating 100% of C. albicans within 60 min [86]. Dhar et al. also evaluated α-pinene enantiomers against Gram-positive bacteria (Micrococcus luteus and S. aureus), Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli), and a fungus (C. albicans), demonstrating that (+)-α-pinene exhibited a modest action against the selected microbes, while (−)-α-pinene showed no activity [87].
No information has been found in the literature regarding the enantiomeric properties of camphene, as its enantiomers are not abundant in nature. Biological research has demonstrated that camphene exhibits various biological activities both in vitro and in vivo, including antibacterial [88], antifungal [89], antioxidant [88], and anti-inflammatory effects [90]. It has also been reported that camphene possesses acetylcholinesterase inhibitory properties [91].
Despite copaene having no studies regarding the biological activity of its enantiomers, Alfonso et al. analyzed the influence of α-copaene on the susceptibility of Olea europaea L. towards the olive fly Bactrocera oleae (Rossi). In that study, the authors demonstrated that fruits with a higher amount of (+)-α-copaene favored the oviposition of B. oleae females, whereas an increase in (−)-α-copaene did not produce the same effect [92].
Finally, the effects of germacrene D on insect behavior are known [93]. It is also known that the enantiomers (+)- and (–)-germacrene D have different bioactivities. The germacrene D receptor neurons in heliothine moths exhibited a 10-fold higher affinity for (−)-germacrene D compared to (+)-germacrene D. This is due to the greater sensitivity towards (−)-germacrene D, as this enantiomer predominates in higher plants [94].

3.3. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

The anti-inflammatory activity of V. rigida essential oil was comparable to the gold-standard aspirin under the tested model conditions. This finding is supported by results from a series of previously published studies [95,96,97,98], which have reported the neuroprotective effects of various chemical compounds from related species within the Valeriana genus. Given that neuroinflammation plays a key role in the progression of neurodegenerative diseases, it is plausible that the observed neuroprotection is, at least in part, mediated by the anti-inflammatory potential of these compounds [29]. In the present study, aspirin was used as a positive control since, according to literature, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit neutrophil functions, through mechanisms independent of their effects on prostaglandin biosynthesis [98].
Although the anti-inflammatory activity of Valeriana species has been well-documented, this study represents the first report recognizing the anti-inflammatory properties of V. rigida essential oil. Among the key compounds identified, cyclosativene has been proposed as a natural product with antioxidant properties that may help mitigate oxidative damage in the context of neurodegenerative disorders [99].
While the activity of α-ylangene has not been extensively reported as an isolated compound, studies have shown that essential oils enriched in this chemical possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and antimicrobial activities [100]. Similarly, α-copaene and δ-cadinene are common compounds found in the essential oils of various plants known for their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticancer [101,102,103], and neuroprotective properties [104,105,106].
Studies on β-chamigrene, often derived from the synthesis of this compound, have shown its correlation with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic effects when found in extracts from Mango stem bark [107]. Furthermore, its antioxidant and antibacterial properties have been documented [108], as well as its antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects on cancer cell lines [109]. Additionally, 7-epi-α-eudesmol, a constituent of essential oils, has demonstrated antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytotoxic properties [110], as well as anti-acetylcholinesterase activity [111].
While several isolated compounds from V. rigida essential oil have shown anti-inflammatory effects, which have been reported to reduce the production of nitric oxide (NO), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [112], the observed biological activity could more precisely be attributed to a phytocomplex with synergistic effects [113].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

The roots of V. rigida were collected on January 15, 2024, within a 200 m range around a reference point with coordinates of 1°29′2.79″ S and 78°45′34.95″ W, at an altitude of 4200 m above sea level. After collection, the roots were dried at 35 °C for 48 h and stored in a dark, cool place until further use. After identification, a botanical specimen was deposited at the herbarium of the Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH) under the reference code No. 0.15. CHEP. 2024. This research was conducted with permission from the Ministry of Environment, Water, and Ecological Transition of Ecuador, under registration number MAATE-ARSFC-2024-0161.

4.2. Sample Preparation and EO Distillation

An amount of 2.1 kg of dried root was ground and divided into three samples of 700 g each, which were subjected to a 5 h steam distillation in a modified Dean–Stark apparatus. At the end of the process, 0.188 g, 0.211 g, and 0.193 g of essential oil were obtained. The oils were dehydrated with anhydrous sodium sulfate, purchased from Merck (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and stored at −15 °C for further use. Analytical samples for GC analysis were prepared following the methods described in the literature, using n-nonane as an internal standard [114,115,116,117,118].

4.3. Qualitative Chemical Analysis

The qualitative analysis was carried out using a gas chromatography (GC) instrument model Trace 1310, equipped with a single quadrupole ISQ 7000 mass spectrometry (MS) detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). In this GC, 1 µL of the analytical sample was injected in split mode (split ratio 40:1). The injector temperature was set at 250 °C, with helium (provided by Indura S.A., Guayaquil, Ecuador) as the carrier gas, programmed at the constant flow of 1 mL/min. The ionization was conducted based on electron impact, at an ionization energy of 70 eV. The mass analyzer was operated in SCAN mode, with a mass range of 40–400 m/z. This analysis was repeated on two columns with stationary phases of different polarities: the non-polar 5%-phenyl methyl polysiloxane (TR-5ms) and the polar polyethylene glycol (TR-WAX), both purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The two columns were 30 m long, with an internal diameter of 0.25 mm and a film thickness of 0.25 μm. The TR-5ms column operated under the following thermal conditions: it started at 60 °C for 5 min, followed by a first thermal gradient reaching 100 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min, a second gradient reaching 150 °C at 3 °C/min, and a third gradient reaching 200 °C at 5 °C/min. Finally, the oven was maintained at a temperature of 250 °C for 15 min after a thermal gradient of 15 °C/min. For the TR-WAX column, the same thermal conditions and oven program were applied, except for the final temperature, which was set at 230 °C. For the identification of the components present in the EO of V. rigida, each mass spectrum was compared, along with its linear retention index (LRI), with data from literature. A series of n-alkanes from C9 to C25 (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to calculate the LRI of each component, according to Van Den Dool and Kratz [119].

4.4. GC-FID Quantitative Analyses

The quantitative analysis was performed using the same GC instrument as the qualitative one, but with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID). The thermal conditions, columns, gas flow, and injection parameters were the same as in the qualitative analysis. For quantification, the relative response factor (RRF) of each component was calculated against isopropyl caproate, based on the combustion enthalpy [120,121]. A six-point calibration curve was constructed for each column, using isopropyl caproate (synthesized and purified by the authors with a GC purity of 98.8%) as the calibration standard and n-nonane (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as the internal standard, according to the literature [122]. Both curves yielded a correlation coefficient > 0.999.

4.5. Enantioselective Analysis of the EO

For the enantioselective analysis, GC-MS was also used with two enantioselective columns, of which the stationary phases were based on 2,3-diacetyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin and 2,3-diethyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin (Mega, Milan, Italy). Both columns were 25 m in length, 250 μm in internal diameter, and 0.25 μm in phase thickness. The injector temperature, carrier gas flow, and MS parameters were the same as the ones used in the qualitative analysis, while the injector was operated in split mode (split ratio 50:1). The following thermal program was applied: an initial temperature of 60 °C for 2 min, followed by a temperature gradient of 2 °C/min up to 220 °C, which was maintained for 2 min. To determine the LRIs, a mixture of n-alkanes from C9 to C25 (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was also injected, according to Van den Dool and Kratz. The enantiomers were identified based on their mass spectra and elution order, after injecting enantiomerically pure standards.

4.6. Oxidative-Burst Assay (Antiinflammatory)

To screen the anti-inflammatory activity of V. rigida essential oil, the oxidative burst assay developed by Tan and Berridge [110] was utilized, with slight modifications by Vinueza et al. [111]. Briefly, after a heparinized fresh venous blood sample was drawn from a healthy volunteer, the whole blood was diluted at a ratio (1:1) with Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS). Later, ficoll paque™ PLUS was added at a ratio (3:4) regarding the diluted blood sample; then, it was centrifuged for 30 min at 1500 rpm. After discarding the supernatant, red blood cell traces were lysed by mixing with a hypotonic ammonium chloride solution (0.83% w/v). Finally, the sample was centrifuged again, and the neutrophils were washed with HBSS pH 7.4 and resuspended at a concentration of 107 cells/mL in an appropriate volume of HBSS.
Anti-inflammatory activity was determined as a function of the reduction of water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1) in the presence of activated neutrophils. The assay was carried out in a total volume of 250 µL of HBSS (pH 7.4) containing 107 neutrophils/mL, 500 µM WST-1, and various concentrations of essential oil (3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 µg/mL) or aspirin, which was used as the reference compound, both dissolved with HBSS enrichment with DMSO, such that the final concentration of DMSO in each well was 0.05%. The control contained HBSS, a neutrophil suspension, and WST-1. All compounds were equilibrated at 37 °C and the reaction was initiated by adding opsonized Zymosan A (15 mg/mL), which was prepared by mixing it with human pooled serum, followed by centrifugation at 3000 rpm, and the pellet was suspended in HBSS. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm. DMSO (0.05% v/v) together with the neutrophil suspension and opsonized Zymosan A aliquot were used as a blank, and the anti-inflammatory activity was expressed as the produced superoxide anion inhibition percent.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M.F.; investigation, L.M.F. and D.R.V.; data curation, G.G. and O.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.F.; writing—review and editing, L.M.F., G.G. and O.M.; supervision, A.J.M. and O.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because they are part of an ongoing study. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the Universidad de Granada (UGR), Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH) and Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL) for supporting this investigation and open-access publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Biodiversity A–Z. Megadiverse Countries Definition. Available online: https://www.biodiversitya-z.org/content/megadiverse-countries (accessed on 17 July 2023).
  2. Armijos, C.; Ramírez, J.; Salinas, M.; Vidari, G.; Suárez, A.I. Pharmacology and Phytochemistry of Ecuadorian Medicinal Plants: An Update and Perspectives. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Calvopiña, K.; Malagón, O.; Capetti, F.; Sgorbini, B.; Verdugo, V.; Gilardoni, G. A New Sesquiterpene Essential Oil from the Native Andean Species Jungia Rugosa Less (Asteraceae): Chemical Analysis, Enantiomeric Evaluation, and Cholinergic Activity. Plants 2021, 10, 2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Armijos, C.; Gilardoni, G.; Amay, L.; Lozano, A.; Bracco, F.; Ramirez, J.; Bec, N.; Larroque, C.; Finzi, P.V.; Vidari, G. Phytochemical and Ethnomedicinal Study of Huperzia Species Used in the Traditional Medicine of Saraguros in Southern Ecuador; AChE and MAO Inhibitory Activity. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 193, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Armijos, C.; Valarezo, E.; Cartuche, L.; Zaragoza, T.; Finzi, P.V.; Mellerio, G.G.; Vidari, G. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Myrcianthes Fragrans Essential Oil, a Natural Aromatizer of the Traditional Ecuadorian Beverage Colada Morada. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 225, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Malagón, O.; Ramírez, J.; Andrade, J.M.; Morocho, V.; Armijos, C.; Gilardoni, G. Phytochemistry and Ethnopharmacology of the Ecuadorian Flora. A Review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 297–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. García, V.J.; Márquez, C.O.; Rodríguez, M.V.; Orozco, J.J.; Aguilar, C.D.; Ríos, A.C. Páramo Ecosystems in Ecuador’s Southern Region: Conservation State and Restoration. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Morocho, C.C.; Chuncho, G. Paramos of Ecuador, importance and effects: A review. Zero Latit. For. 2019, 9, 71–83. [Google Scholar]
  9. Calderón-Loor, M.; Cuesta, F.; Pinto, E.; Gosling, W.D. Carbon Sequestration Rates Indicate Ecosystem Recovery Following Human Disturbance in the Equatorial Andes. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Poulenard, J.; Podwojewski, P.; Janeau, J.-L. Runoff and Soil Erosion under Rainfall Simulation of Andisols from the Ecuadorian Paramo: Effect of Tillage and Burning. Catena 2001, 45, 185–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Binder, S.; Isbell, F.; Polasky, S.; Catford, J.A.; Tilman, D. Grassland Biodiversity Can Pay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 3876–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sklenář, P.; Jørgensen, P.M. Distribution Patterns of Páramo Plants in Ecuador. J. Biogeogr. 1999, 26, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Joslin, A.J.; Jepson, W.E. Territory and Authority of Water Fund Payments for Ecosystem Services in Ecuador’s Andes. Geoforum 2018, 91, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brück, S.A.; Medina Torres, B.D.; Teixeira de Moraes Polizeli, M. de L. The Ecuadorian Paramo in Danger: What We Know and What Might Be Learned from Northern Wetlands. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2023, 47, e02639. [Google Scholar]
  15. Barta, B.; Mouillet, C.; Espinosa, R.; Andino, P.; Jacobsen, D.; Christoffersen, K.S. Glacial-Fed and Páramo Lake Ecosystems in the Tropical High Andes. Hydrobiologia 2018, 813, 19–32. [Google Scholar]
  16. García, V.J.; Márquez, C.O.; Isenhart, T.M.; Rodríguez, M.; Crespo, S.D.; Cifuentes, A.G. Evaluating the Conservation State of the Páramo Ecosystem: An Object-Based Image Analysis and CART Algorithm Approach for Central Ecuador. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the Orders and Families of Flowering Plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 161, 105–121. [Google Scholar]
  18. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group; Chase, M.W.; Christenhusz, M.J.M.; Fay, M.F.; Byng, J.W.; Judd, W.S.; Soltis, D.E.; Mabberley, D.J.; Sennikov, A.N.; Soltis, P.S.; et al. An Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the Orders and Families of Flowering Plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 181, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, H.-X.; Liu, H.; Moore, M.J.; Landrein, S.; Liu, B.; Zhu, Z.-X.; Wang, H.-F. Plastid Phylogenomic Insights into the Evolution of the Caprifoliaceae (Dipsacales). Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2020, 142, 2–51. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu, Z.; Chang, L. Caprifoliaceae. Identif. Control. Common Weeds 2017, 3, 405–416. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tropicos. Home. Available online: https://www.tropicos.org/home (accessed on 14 August 2024).
  22. Larsen, B.B. A Taxonomic Revision of Phyllactis and Valeriana Sect. Bracteata (Valerianaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 1986, 6, 427–446. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jorgensen, P.; Leon-Yanez, S. Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of Ecuador; Missouri Botanical Garden Press: St. Louis, MO, USA, 1999; pp. 286–288. [Google Scholar]
  24. View of Medicinal Plants of the Andes and the Amazon—The Magic and Medicinal Flora of Northern Peru. Available online: https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/1283/759 (accessed on 22 January 2025).
  25. Bussmann, R.W.; Sharon, D.; Garcia, M. From Chamomile to Aspirin? Medicinal Plant Use among Clients at Laboratorios Beal in Trujillo, Peru. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2009, 7, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Choi, H.-S.; Hong, K.-B.; Han, S.H.; Suh, H.J. Valerian/Cascade Mixture Promotes Sleep by Increasing Non-Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) in Rodent Model. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 99, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tammadon, M.R.; Nobahar, M.; Hydarinia-Naieni, Z.; Ebrahimian, A.; Ghorbani, R.; Vafaei, A.A. The Effects of Valerian on Sleep Quality, Depression, and State Anxiety in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Clinical Trial. Oman Med. J. 2021, 36, e255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dominguez, R.A.; Bravo-Valverde, R.L.; Kaplowitz, B.R.; Cott, J.M. Valerian as a Hypnotic for Hispanic Patients. Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 2000, 6, 84–92. [Google Scholar]
  29. Das, G.; Shin, H.-S.; Tundis, R.; Gonçalves, S.; Tantengco, O.A.G.; Campos, M.G.; Acquaviva, R.; Malfa, G.A.; Romano, A.; Robles, J.A.H.; et al. Plant Species of Sub-Family Valerianaceae—A Review on Its Effect on the Central Nervous System. Plants 2021, 10, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Agnihotri, S.; Wakode, S.; Ali, M. Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial and Topical Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Valeriana Jatamansi Jones. Essential Oil. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2011, 14, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khuda, F.; Iqbal, Z.; Zakiullah; Khan, A.; Nasir, F. Antimicrobial and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Leaf Extract of Valeriana Wallichii DC. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 25, 715–719. [Google Scholar]
  32. Siddiqui, T.; Khan, M.U.; Sharma, V.; Gupta, K. Terpenoids in Essential Oils: Chemistry, Classification, and Potential Impact on Human Health and Industry. Phytomedicine Plus 2024, 4, 100549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cho, I.H.; Namgung, H.-J.; Choi, H.-K.; Kim, Y.-S. Volatiles and Key Odorants in the Pileus and Stipe of Pine-Mushroom (Tricholoma Matsutake Sing.). Food Chem. 2008, 106, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Grujic-Jovanovic, S.; Skaltsa, H.D.; Marin, P.; Sokovic, M. Composition and Antibacterial Activity of the Essential Oil of Six Stachys Species from Serbia. Flavour Fragr. J. 2004, 19, 139–144. [Google Scholar]
  35. Beck, J.J.; Higbee, B.S.; Merrill, G.B.; Roitman, J.N. Comparison of Volatile Emissions from Undamaged and Mechanically Damaged Almonds. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 1363–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Escudero, A.; Campo, E.; Fariña, L.; Cacho, J.; Ferreira, V. Analytical Characterization of the Aroma of Five Premium Red Wines. Insights into the Role of Odor Families and the Concept of Fruitiness of Wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4501–4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Stashenko, E.E.; Puertas, M.A.; Combariza, M.Y. Volatile Secondary Metabolites from Spilanthes Americana Obtained by Simultaneous Steam Distillation-Solvent Extraction and Supercritical Fluid Extraction. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 752, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lin, J.; Rouseff, R.L.; Barros, S.; Naim, M. Aroma Composition Changes in Early Season Grapefruit Juice Produced from Thermal Concentration. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 813–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chisholm, M.G.; Jell, J.A.; Cass, D.M. Characterization of the Major Odorants Found in the Peel Oil of Citrus Reticulata Blanco Cv. Clementine Using Gas Chromatography–Olfactometry. Flavour Fragr. J. 2003, 18, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cavalli, J.; Tomi, F.; Bernardini, A.; Casanova, J. Composition and Chemical Variability of the Bark Oil of Cedrelopsis Grevei H. Baillon from Madagascar. Flavour Fragr. J. 2003, 18, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mondello, L.; Zappia, G.; Cotroneo, A.; Bonaccorsi, I.; Chowdhury, J.U.; Yusuf, M.; Dugo, G. Studies on the Essential Oil-Bearing Plants of Bangladesh. Part VIII. Composition of Some Ocimum Oils O. Basilicum L. Var. Purpurascens; O. Sanctum L. Green; O. Sanctum L. Purple; O. Americanum L., Citral Type; O. Americanum L., Camphor Type. Flavour Fragr. J. 2002, 17, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gancel, A.-L.; Ollitrault, P.; Froelicher, Y.; Tomi, F.; Jacquemond, C.; Luro, F.; Brillouet, J.-M. Leaf Volatile Compounds of Six Citrus Somatic Allotetraploid Hybrids Originating from Various Combinations of Lime, Lemon, Citron, Sweet Orange, and Grapefruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 2224–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Blanc, M.-C.; Bradesi, P.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Salgueiro, L.; Casanova, J. Essential Oil of Dittrichia Viscosa Ssp.Viscosa: Analysis by13C-NMR and Antimicrobial Activity. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mahajan, S.S.; Goddik, L.; Qian, M.C. Aroma Compounds in Sweet Whey Powder. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 4057–4063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gauvin, A.; Ravaomanarivo, H.; Smadja, J. Comparative Analysis by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry of the Essential Oils from Bark and Leaves of Cedrelopsis Grevei Baill, an Aromatic and Medicinal Plant from Madagascar. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1029, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Duquesnoy, E.; Dinh, N.H.; Castola, V.; Casanova, J. Composition of a Pyrolytic Oil from Cupressus Funebris Endl. of Vietnamese Origin. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Boti, J.B.; Bighelli, A.; Cavaleiro, C.; Salgueiro, L.; Casanova, J. Chemical Variability ofJuniperus Oxycedrus Ssp.Oxycedrus Berry and Leaf Oils from Corsica, Analysed by Combination of GC, GC–MS and13C-NMR. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 268–273. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pollak, F.C.; Berger, R.G. Geosmin and Related Volatiles in Bioreactor-Cultured Streptomyces Citreus CBS 109.60. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tamura, H.; Boonbumrung, S.; Yoshizawa, T.; Varanyanond, W. Volatile Components of the Essential Oils in the Pulp of Four Yellow Mangoes (Mangifera Indica L.) in Thailand. FSTR 2000, 6, 68–73. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lee, J.-G.; Lee, C.-G.; Kwag, J.-J.; Buglass, A.J.; Lee, G.-H. Determination of Optimum Conditions for the Analysis of Volatile Components in Pine Needles by Double-Shot Pyrolysis–Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1089, 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  51. Paolini, J.; Muselli, A.; Bernardini, A.; Bighelli, A.; Casanova, J.; Costa, J. Thymol Derivatives from Essential Oil of Doronicum Corsicum L. Flavour Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 479–487. [Google Scholar]
  52. Couladis, M.; Chinou, I.B.; Tzakou, O.; Loukis, A. Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil of Ballota Pseudodictamnus L. Bentham. Phytother. Res. 2002, 16, 723–726. [Google Scholar]
  53. Brat, P.; Rega, B.; Alter, P.; Reynes, M.; Brillouet, J.-M. Distribution of Volatile Compounds in the Pulp, Cloud, and Serum of Freshly Squeezed Orange Juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3442–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Umano, K.; Hagi, Y.; Nakahara, K.; Shoji, A.; Shibamoto, T. Volatile Chemicals Identified in Extracts from Leaves of Japanese Mugwort (Artemisia Princeps Pamp.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3463–3469. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hachicha, S.F.; Skanji, T.; Barrek, S.; Ghrabi, Z.G.; Zarrouk, H. Composition of the Essential Oil of Teucrium Ramosissimum Desf. (Lamiaceae) from Tunisia. Flavour Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  56. Paolini, J.; Tomi, P.; Bernardini, A.-F.; Bradesi, P.; Casanova, J.; Kaloustian, J. Detailed Analysis of the Essential Oil from Cistus Albidus L. by Combination of GC/RI, GC/MS and C-NMR Spectroscopy. Nat. Prod. Res. 2008, 22, 1270–1278. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Muselli, A.; Rossi, P.; Desjobert, J.; Bernardini, A.; Berti, L.; Costa, J. Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Otanthus Maritimus (L.) Hoffmanns. & Link Essential Oils from Corsica. Flavour Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 217–223. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ngassoum, M.B.; Yonkeu, S.; Jirovetz, L.; Buchbauer, G.; Schmaus, G.; Hammerschmidt, F.-J. Chemical Composition of Essential Oils ofLantana Camara Leaves and Flowers from Cameroon and Madagascar. Flavour Fragr. J. 1999, 14, 245–250. [Google Scholar]
  59. Aicha, N.; Skandrani, I.; Kilani, S. Chemical Composition, Mutagenic and Antimutagenic Activities of Essential Oils from (Tunisian) Artemisia Campestris and Artemisia Herba-Alba. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2008, 20, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  60. Njoroge, S.M.; Koaze, H.; Karanja, P.N.; Sawamura, M. Essential Oil Constituents of Three Varieties of Kenyan Sweet Oranges Citrus Sinensis. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005, 20, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ledauphin, J.; Guichard, H.; Saint-Clair, J.-F.; Picoche, B.; Barillier, D. Chemical and Sensorial Aroma Characterization of Freshly Distilled Calvados. 2. Identification of Volatile Compounds and Key Odorants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 433–442. [Google Scholar]
  62. Shimoda, M.; Yoshimura, Y.; Yoshimura, T.; Noda, K.; Osajima, Y. Volatile Flavor Compounds of Sweetened Condensed Milk. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66, 804–807. [Google Scholar]
  63. Adams, D.R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography; Allured Publishing Corporation: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  64. Raal, A.; Arak, E.; Orav, A.; Kailas, T.; Müürisepp, M. Variation in the Composition of the Essential Oil of Commercial Valeriana Officinalis L. Roots from Different Countries. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2008, 20, 524–529. [Google Scholar]
  65. Feng, Y.-X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.-Y.; Guo, S.-S.; You, C.-X.; Du, S.-S. Efficacy of Bornyl Acetate and Camphene from Valeriana Officinalis Essential Oil against Two Storage Insects. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 16157–16165. [Google Scholar]
  66. Letchamo, W.; Ward, W.; Heard, B.; Heard, D. Essential Oil of Valeriana Officinalis L. Cultivars and Their Antimicrobial Activity As Influenced by Harvesting Time under Commercial Organic Cultivation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 3915–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Castillo, L.N.; Calva, J.; Ramírez, J.; Vidari, G.; Armijos, C. Chemical Analysis of the Essential Oils from Three Populations of Lippia Dulcis Trevir. Grown at Different Locations in Southern Ecuador. Plants 2024, 13, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Espinosa, S.; Bec, N.; Larroque, C.; Ramírez, J.; Sgorbini, B.; Bicchi, C.; Cumbicus, N.; Gilardoni, G. A Novel Chemical Profile of a Selective In Vitro Cholinergic Essential Oil from Clinopodium Taxifolium (Kunth) Govaerts (Lamiaceae), a Native Andean Species of Ecuador. Molecules 2021, 26, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Andrade, J.M.; Lucero Mosquera, H.; Armijos, C. Ethnobotany of Indigenous Saraguros: Medicinal Plants Used by Community Healers “Hampiyachakkuna” in the San Lucas Parish, Southern Ecuador. BioMed. Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9343724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ramírez, J.; Andrade, M.D.; Vidari, G.; Gilardoni, G. Essential Oil and Major Non-Volatile Secondary Metabolites from the Leaves of Amazonian Piper Subscutatum. Plants 2021, 10, 1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Eiasu, B.K.; Dyafta, V.; Araya, H.T. Effect of Leaf Age on Essential Oil Yield and Composition in Rose-Scented Geranium. HortScience 2022, 57, 1524–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Muhammad, S.; Nasshorudin, D. Novel Closed System Extraction of Essential Oil: Impact on Yield and Physical Characterization. Int. Conf. Biotechnol. Environ. Manag. 2014, 75, 6. [Google Scholar]
  73. Bhatt, I.D.; Dauthal, P.; Rawat, S.; Gaira, K.S.; Jugran, A.; Rawal, R.S.; Dhar, U. Characterization of Essential Oil Composition, Phenolic Content, and Antioxidant Properties in Wild and Planted Individuals of Valeriana Jatamansi Jones. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 136, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Seidler-Lozykowska, K.; Mielcarek, S.; Baraniak, M. Content of Essential Oil and Valerenic Acids in Valerian (Valeriana Offcinalis L.) Roots at the Selected Developmental Phases. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2009, 21, 413–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Verma, R.S.; Padalia, R.C. Chemical Differentiation of Rhizome and Root Essential Oils of Indian Valerian (Valeriana Jatamansi Jones). J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2012, 16, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pokharel, B.R.; Pandey, S.; Manandhar, M.D.; Pant, B. Comparative Study of Essential Oil in Wild and in Vitro Cultures of Valeriana Jatamansi Jones in Nepal. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2023, 17, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vishwakarma, S.; Goyal, R.; Gupta, V.; Dhar, K.L. Gabaergic Effect of Valeric Acid from Valeriana Wallichii in Amelioration of ICV STZ Induced Dementia in Rats. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2016, 26, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Minchán-Herrera, P.; Ybañez-Julca, R.O.; Quispe-Díaz, I.M.; Venegas-Casanova, E.A.; Jara-Aguilar, R.; Salas, F.; Zevallos-Escobar, L.; Yáñez, O.; Pino-Rios, R.; Calderon, P.B.; et al. Valeriana Pilosa Roots Essential Oil: Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Activities, and Molecular Docking Studies on Enzymes Involved in Redox Biological Processes. Phyton-Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 93, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shinjyo, N.; Waddell, G.; Green, J. Valerian Root in Treating Sleep Problems and Associated Disorders—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Evid. Based Integr. Med. 2020, 25, 2515690X20967323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Huynh, L.; Pacher, T.; Tran, H.; Novak, J. Comparative Analysis of the Essential Oils of Valeriana Hardwickii Wall. from Vietnam and Valeriana Officinalis L. from Austria. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2013, 25, 409–414. [Google Scholar]
  81. Bardakci, H.; Demirci, B.; Yesilada, E.; Kirmizibekmez, H.; Baser, K.H.C. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil of the Subterranean Parts of Valeriana Alliariifolia. Acad. Chem. Globe Publ. 2012, 6, 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  82. Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; Liu, H.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Han, J.; Yu, Z.; Yang, F. Chemical Analysis and Biological Activity of the Essential Oils of Two Valerianaceous Species from China: Nardostachys Chinensis and Valeriana Officinalis. Molecules 2010, 15, 6411–6422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Raina, A.P.; Negi, K.S. Essential Oil Composition of Valeriana Jatamansi Jones from Himalayan Regions of India. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 77, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Paudel, P.N.; Satyal, P.; Satyal, R.; Setzer, W.N.; Gyawali, R. Chemical Composition, Enantiomeric Distribution, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Origanum Majorana L. Essential Oil from Nepal. Molecules 2022, 27, 6136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Matailo, A.; Bec, N.; Calva, J.; Ramírez, J.; Andrade, J.M.; Larroque, C.; Vidari, G.; Armijos, C. Selective BuChE Inhibitory Activity, Chemical Composition, and Enantiomer Content of the Volatile Oil from the Ecuadorian Plant Clinopodium Brownei. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2019, 29, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Rivas da Silva, A.C.; Lopes, P.M.; Barros de Azevedo, M.M.; Costa, D.C.M.; Alviano, C.S.; Alviano, D.S. Biological Activities of α-Pinene and β-Pinene Enantiomers. Molecules 2012, 17, 6305–6316. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Dhar, P.; Chan, P.; Cohen, D.T.; Khawam, F.; Gibbons, S.; Snyder-Leiby, T.; Dickstein, E.; Rai, P.K.; Watal, G. Synthesis, Antimicrobial Evaluation, and Structure–Activity Relationship of α-Pinene Derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 3548–3552. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Gehan, I.; Entsar, I. In Vitro Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Monoterpenes against Some Food-Borne Pathogens. J. Plant Prot. Path. Mansoura Univ. 2019, 10, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  89. Orhan, İ.E.; Özçelik, B.; Kartal, M.; Kan, Y. Antimicrobial and Antiviral Effects of Essential Oils from Selected Umbelliferae and Labiatae Plants and Individual Essential Oil Components. Turk. J. Biol. 2012, 36, 239–246. [Google Scholar]
  90. Tiwari, M.; Kakkar, P. Plant Derived Antioxidants—Geraniol and Camphene Protect Rat Alveolar Macrophages against t-BHP Induced Oxidative Stress. Toxicol. Vitr. 2009, 23, 295–301. [Google Scholar]
  91. Cutillas, A.-B.; Carrasco, A.; Martinez-Gutierrez, R.; Tomas, V.; Tudela, J.; Cutillas, A.-B.; Carrasco, A.; Martinez-Gutierrez, R.; Tomas, V.; Tudela, J. Rosmarinus Officinalis L. Essential Oils from Spain: Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, Lipoxygenase and Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Capacities, and Antimicrobial Activities. Plant Biosyst. 2018, 152, 1282–1292. [Google Scholar]
  92. De Alfonso, I.; Vacas, S.; Primo, J. Role of α-Copaene in the Susceptibility of Olive Fruits to Bactrocera Oleae (Rossi). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 11976–11979. [Google Scholar]
  93. Mozuraitis, R.; Stranden, M.; Ramirez, M.I.; Borg-Karlson, A.-K.; Mustaparta, H. Chemical Constituents of Supercritical Extracts from Prunus Yedoensis, Saururus Chinensis, Zanthoxylum Piperitum and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Chem. Senses 2002, 27, 505–509. [Google Scholar]
  94. Mustaparta, H.; Stranden, M. Chapter Ten—Olfaction and Learning in Moths and Weevils Living on Angiosperm and Gymnosperm Hosts. In Recent Advances in Phytochemistry; Romeo, J.T., Ed.; Chemical Ecology and Phytochemistry of Forest Ecosystems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 39, pp. 269–292. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bae, G.-S.; Heo, K.-H.; Choi, S.B.; Jo, I.-J.; Kim, D.-G.; Shin, J.-Y.; Seo, S.-H.; Park, K.-C.; Lee, D.-S.; Oh, H.; et al. Beneficial Effects of Fractions of Nardostachys Jatamansi on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Response. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 837835. [Google Scholar]
  96. Wu, J.; Guo, J.; Du, X.; Mcgeer, P.L. Anti-Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Effects of Kissoone B and Extracts of Valeriana Amurensis. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2020, 30, 474–481. [Google Scholar]
  97. Yoon, C.-S.; Kim, K.-W.; Lee, S.-C.; Kim, Y.-C.; Oh, H. Anti-Neuroinflammatory Effects of Sesquiterpenoids Isolated from Nardostachys Jatamansi. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. de Almeida, T.M.; Danielli, L.J.; Apel, M.A.; Cassel, E.; Vargas, R.M.F.; Von Poser, G.L.; Müller, L.G.; Rates, S.M.K. A Valepotriate-Enriched Fraction from Valeriana Glechomifolia Meyer Inhibits Leukocytes Migration and Nociception in Formalin Test in Rodents. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2019, 29, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Turkez, H.; Togar, B.; Di Stefano, A.; Taspınar, N.; Sozio, P. Protective Effects of Cyclosativene on H2O2-Induced Injury in Cultured Rat Primary Cerebral Cortex Cells. Cytotechnology 2015, 67, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ma, L.; Dong, L.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Fu, X. Anti-Inflammatory, Antinociceptive Activity of an Essential Oil Recipe Consisting of the Supercritical Fluid CO2 Extract of White Pepper, Long Pepper, Cinnamon, Saffron and Myrrh in Vivo. J. Oleo Sci. 2014, 63, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Afoulous, S.; Ferhout, H.; Raoelison, E.G.; Valentin, A.; Moukarzel, B.; Couderc, F.; Bouajila, J. Chemical Composition and Anticancer, Antiinflammatory, Antioxidant and Antimalarial Activities of Leaves Essential Oil of Cedrelopsis Grevei. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 56, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Martins, F.T.; Doriguetto, A.C.; de Souza, T.C.; de Souza, K.R.D.; Dos Santos, M.H.; Moreira, M.E.C.; Barbosa, L.C.A. Composition, and Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Activities of the Volatile Oil from the Fruit Peel of Garcinia Brasiliensis. Chem. Biodivers. 2008, 5, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kim, C.; Lee, S.J.; Hyun, C.-G.; Lee, N.H. Chemical Constituents of Supercritical Extracts from Prunus Yedoensis, Saururus Chinensis, Zanthoxylum Piperitum and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 9, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ray, A.; Jena, S.; Sahoo, A.; Kamila, P.K.; Das, P.K.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S.; Panda, P.C. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory and Anticancer Activities of Bark Essential Oil of Cryptocarya Amygdalina from India. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2021, 24, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Costaa, E.V.; Brasil da Silva, T.; Pereira Soares, M.B. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil from the Fresh Fruits of Xylopia Laevigata and Its Cytotoxic Evaluation. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 417–418. [Google Scholar]
  106. Alitonou, G.; Avlessi, F.; Sohounhloue, D.C.K.; Bessière, J.M.; Menut, C. Chemical and Biological Investigation on Volatile Constituents of Pentadesma Butyracea Sabine (Clusiaceae) From Benin. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2010, 22, 138–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Núñez Sellés, A.J.; Agüero, J.A.; Paz, L.N. GC-MS Analysis of Mango Stem Bark Extracts (Mangifera Indica L.), Haden Variety. Possible Contribution of Volatile Compounds to Its Health Effects. Open Chem. 2021, 19, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zu, Y.; Fu, Y.; Wang, W. Composition and Biological Activities of the Essential Oil from Schisandra Chinensis Obtained by Solvent-Free Microwave Extraction. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 2047–2052. [Google Scholar]
  109. Lai, P.; Su, X.-D.; Gao, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Lai, P.; Xing, X. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of the Essential Oil from Aristolochia Fordiana Hemsl. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2019, 13, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dong, T.; Thuan Lee, A.; Van Tran, D. Essential Oil of the Leaves of Psychotria Asiatica L.: Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Cytotoxic Properties. Nat. Prod. Res. 2024, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  111. Calva, J.; Silva, M.; Morocho, V. Composition and Anti-Acetylcholinesterase Properties of the Essential Oil of the Ecuadorian Endemic Species Eugenia Valvata McVaugh. Molecules 2023, 28, 8112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cho, K.S.; Lim, Y.; Lee, K.; Lee, J.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, I.-S. Terpenes from Forests and Human Health. Toxicol. Res. 2017, 33, 97–106. [Google Scholar]
  113. Stojanović, N.M.; Ranđelović, P.J.; Simonović, M.; Radić, M.; Todorović, S.; Corrigan, M.; Harkin, A.; Boylan, F. Essential Oil Constituents as Anti-Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Agents: An Insight through Microglia Modulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bichão, H.; Borg-Karlson, A.K.; Wibe, A.; Araújo, J.; Mustaparta, H. Molecular Receptive Ranges of Olfactory Receptor Neurones Responding Selectively to Terpenoids, Aliphatic Green Leaf Volatiles and Aromatic Compounds, in the Strawberry Blossom Weevil Anthonomus Rubi. Chemoecology 2005, 15, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ramírez, J.; Gilardoni, G.; Jácome, M.; Montesinos, J.; Rodolfi, M.; Guglielminetti, M.L.; Cagliero, C.; Bicchi, C.; Vidari, G. Chemical Composition, Enantiomeric Analysis, AEDA Sensorial Evaluation and Antifungal Activity of the Essential Oil from the Ecuadorian Plant Lepechinia Mutica Benth (Lamiaceae). Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1700292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Montalván, M.; Peñafiel, M.A.; Ramírez, J.; Cumbicus, N.; Bec, N.; Larroque, C.; Bicchi, C.; Gilardoni, G. Chemical Composition, Enantiomeric Distribution, and Sensory Evaluation of the Essential Oils Distilled from the Ecuadorian Species Myrcianthes Myrsinoides (Kunth) Grifo and Myrcia Mollis (Kunth) DC. (Myrtaceae). Plants 2019, 8, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Espinosa, S.; Bec, N.; Larroque, C.; Ramírez, J.; Sgorbini, B.; Bicchi, C.; Gilardoni, G. Chemical, Enantioselective, and Sensory Analysis of a Cholinesterase Inhibitor Essential Oil from Coreopsis Triloba S.F. Blake (Asteraceae). Plants 2019, 8, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gilardoni, G.; Montalván, M.; Ortiz, M.; Vinueza, D.; Montesinos, J.V. The Flower Essential Oil of Dalea Mutisii Kunth (Fabaceae) from Ecuador: Chemical, Enantioselective, and Olfactometric Analyses. Plants 2020, 9, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. van Den Dool, H.; Kratz, P.D. A Generalization of the Retention Index System Including Linear Temperature Programmed Gas—Liquid Partition Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1963, 11, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. de Saint Laumer, J.-Y.; Cicchetti, E.; Merle, P. Quantification in Gas Chromatography: Prediction of Flame Ionization Detector Response Factors from Combustion Enthalpies and Molecular Structures. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6457–6462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Tissot, E.; Rochat, S.; Debonneville, C.; Chaintreau, A. Rapid GC-FID Quantification Technique without Authentic Samples Using Predicted Response Factors. Flavour Fragr. J. 2012, 27, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Maldonado, Y.E.; Malagón, O.; Cumbicus, N.; Gilardoni, G. A New Essential Oil from the Native Ecuadorian Species Steiractinia Sodiroi (Hieron.) S.F. Blake (Asteraceae): Chemical and Enantioselective Analyses. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 17180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Main compounds identified in the root essential oil of V. rigida: cyclosativene, α-ylangene (12,13), α-copaene (14), decanoic acid (15), β-chamigrene (26), δ-cadinene (40), dodecanoic acid (46), and 7-epi-α-eudesmol (51).
Figure 1. Main compounds identified in the root essential oil of V. rigida: cyclosativene, α-ylangene (12,13), α-copaene (14), decanoic acid (15), β-chamigrene (26), δ-cadinene (40), dodecanoic acid (46), and 7-epi-α-eudesmol (51).
Plants 14 01062 g001
Figure 2. GC–MS chromatogram of the EO from the roots of V. rigida in a 5% phenyl-methylpolysiloxane-based column. The main components are presented in Table 1, according to the number corresponding to each peak.
Figure 2. GC–MS chromatogram of the EO from the roots of V. rigida in a 5% phenyl-methylpolysiloxane-based column. The main components are presented in Table 1, according to the number corresponding to each peak.
Plants 14 01062 g002
Figure 3. GC–MS chromatogram of the EO from the roots of V. rigida in a polyethylene glycol-based column. The main components are presented in Table 1, according to the number corresponding to each peak.
Figure 3. GC–MS chromatogram of the EO from the roots of V. rigida in a polyethylene glycol-based column. The main components are presented in Table 1, according to the number corresponding to each peak.
Plants 14 01062 g003
Table 1. Chemical analysis of V. rigida root essential oil on two stationary phases of different polarities.
Table 1. Chemical analysis of V. rigida root essential oil on two stationary phases of different polarities.
Compounds5% Phenyl Methyl PolysiloxanePolyethylene GlycolReference
LRI aLRI b%σLRI aLRI c%σ
1α-pinene9299320.10.0310191026Trace-[33]
2camphene 9439460.10.07106010600.20.05[34]
3valeric acid 9469390.10.061693-0.20.08§
4β-pinene970974Trace-110611050.00.01[35]
52-methoxy-3-(1-methylpropyl)-pyrazine116811680.10.05150515090.10.01[36]
6isobornyl acetate 128012830.30.12158215770.50.10[37]
7(2E,4Z)-decadienal128712920.10.01177617790.20.02[38]
8(E,E)-2,4-decadienal130913150.20.14181018140.20.01[39]
9unidentified (MW = 196)1315-0.20.091587-0.50.12§
108,9-didehydrocycloisolongifolene132113170.10.071436-0.10.02§
11α-cubebene134513480.50.09145014500.30.03[40]
12cyclosativene136013694.50.80146614654.40.70[41]
13α-ylangene 1362137314681470[42]
14α-copaene137313749.02.44148114838.82.20[43]
15decanoic acid1378138216.00.022297229415.63.57[44]
16β-cubebene138613872.90.19153015272.80.16[42]
177-epi-sesquithujene139013900.40.091570-0.30.06§
18cyperene139413981.10.42151015141.10.25[45]
19β-longipinene140414000.40.131516-0.20.05§
20β-funebrene141014130.20.0715321618Trace-[46]
21(E)-β-caryophyllene141314201.10.52158315851.30.29[47]
22β-gurjunene142314310.10.03157815800.10.01[48]
23α-guayen144414370.30.12160416040.30.06[49]
24α-humulene144714520.40.06165616560.40.09[50]
25alloaromadendrene145514581.10.25163116310.90.20[51]
26β-chamigrene146914763.21.011650-3.10.97§
27γ-muurolene147214780.10.06169917020.50.13[52]
28germacrene D147514800.80.30167916780.90.16[53]
29widdra-2,4(14)-diene147814810.20.051568-0.30.07§
30unidentified (MW = 204)1480-0.20.071705-0.10.07-
31unidentified (MW = 204)1485-0.20.14--Trace--
32cis-β-guaiene148714920.30.03167816710.30.05[54]
33epicubebol148914930.40.05193819280.50.09[55]
34eciphyllene149415012.10.801705-1.10.31§
35trans-β-guaiene149516391474-0.80.36§
36premnaspirodiene149915050.40.121664-0.30.07§
37unidentified (MW = 204)1502-0.10.041794-0.20.02-
38cubebol151015140.30.14193919300.80.13[56]
39unidentified (MW = 220)1512-1.70.352000-1.30.11-
40 δ-cadinene152015229.70.70175017529.51.25[57]
41(E)-iso-γ-bisabolene152215290.70.20176017620.40.08[58]
42γ-cuprenene 152715320.20.022060-0.20.02§
43α-copaen-11-ol153515390.90.122053-0.70.11§
44silphiperfol-5-en-3-one B154115500.20.031944-0.30.07§
45β-calacorene155715640.10.04190719120.10.04[59]
46dodecanoic acid1569156713.40.952485248712.31.33[60]
47viridiflorol159715920.40.032183-0.20.02§
48silphiperfol-6-en-5-one162216240.70.132080-0.50.03§
49alloaromadendrene oxide163616390.80.202065-0.30.02§
50unidentified (MW = 202)1666-0.20.222008-0.40.04-
517-epi-α-eudesmol166916625.00.871740-4.90.77§
52pentadecanal171017160.50.07202920240.20.04[61]
53unidentified (MW = 200)1723-0.40.282201-0.40.04-
54unidentified (MW = 204)1746-0.10.002141-0.40.02-
55hexadecanoic acid195919590.50.18292329280.30.12[62]
563-(Z)-cembrene A196619650.90.112242-0.70.11§
monoterpene hydrocarbons 0.2 0.2
oxygenated monoterpenes 0.3 0.5
sesquiterpene hydrocarbons 41.5 40.5
oxygenated sesquiterpenes 8.3 7.7
diterpene sesquiterpenes 0.9 0.7
others 32.8 30.9
total 84.0 80.5
a Calculated linear retention index; b linear retention index according to [63]; c linear retention index based on reference (Ref.); trace < 0.1%; MW = molecular weight; § = identification based on MS only.
Table 2. Enantiomeric separations with two cyclodextrin-based enantioselective columns.
Table 2. Enantiomeric separations with two cyclodextrin-based enantioselective columns.
Chiral SelectorEnantiomerLRIEnantiomeric Distribution %e.e. %
DAC(1S,5S)-(−)-α-pinene926-100
DAC(1S,5S)-(+)-α-pinene929100
DET(1R,4S)-(+)-camphene932-100
DET(1R,4S)-(–)-camphene922100
DET(1S,5S)-(−)-β-pinene961100100
DET(1S,5S)-(+)-β-pinene944-
DET(1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-(–)-α-copaene1323100100
DET(1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-(+)-α-copaene1319-
DET(R)-(+)-germacrene D146122.5854.83
DET(S)-(−)-germacrene D146777.42
DAC = 2,3-diacetyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin; DET = 2,3-diethyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin; LRI = linear retention index; e.e. = enantiomeric excess.
Table 3. Anti-inflammatory effect of V. rigida essential oil based on an isolated neutrophil model using water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1).
Table 3. Anti-inflammatory effect of V. rigida essential oil based on an isolated neutrophil model using water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1).
Concentration (µg/mL)V. rigida
Essential Oil
Aspirin
3.12.32 ± 0.2815.12 ± 2.07 **
6.26.26 ± 0.9723.81 ± 3.21 **
12.524.46 ± 1.9131.16 ± 2.97 *
25.046.39 ± 1.4044.75 ± 4.74
50.051.42 ± 1.0755.28 ± 2.30
100.061.42 ± 2.1368.52 ± 5.28
The values represent the mean ± SD, n = 3. Significant values, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, using Student’s t-test; V. rigida essential oil versus aspirin.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Flores, L.M.; Vinueza, D.R.; Gilardoni, G.; Mota, A.J.; Malagón, O. The Essential Oil from the Roots of Valeriana rigida Ruiz & Pav. Growing in the Paramos of Chimborazo (Ecuador): Chemical Analysis, Enantioselective Profile, and Preliminary Biological Activity. Plants 2025, 14, 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14071062

AMA Style

Flores LM, Vinueza DR, Gilardoni G, Mota AJ, Malagón O. The Essential Oil from the Roots of Valeriana rigida Ruiz & Pav. Growing in the Paramos of Chimborazo (Ecuador): Chemical Analysis, Enantioselective Profile, and Preliminary Biological Activity. Plants. 2025; 14(7):1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14071062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Flores, Linda M., Diego R. Vinueza, Gianluca Gilardoni, Antonio J. Mota, and Omar Malagón. 2025. "The Essential Oil from the Roots of Valeriana rigida Ruiz & Pav. Growing in the Paramos of Chimborazo (Ecuador): Chemical Analysis, Enantioselective Profile, and Preliminary Biological Activity" Plants 14, no. 7: 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14071062

APA Style

Flores, L. M., Vinueza, D. R., Gilardoni, G., Mota, A. J., & Malagón, O. (2025). The Essential Oil from the Roots of Valeriana rigida Ruiz & Pav. Growing in the Paramos of Chimborazo (Ecuador): Chemical Analysis, Enantioselective Profile, and Preliminary Biological Activity. Plants, 14(7), 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14071062

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop