Next Article in Journal
Age at Tumor Diagnosis in 14,636 Canine Cases from the Pathology-Based UNIPI Animal Cancer Registry, Italy: One Size Doesn’t Fit All
Previous Article in Journal
Monoclonal Antibody against Porcine LAG3 Inhibits Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Infection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Citric Acid by-Product Fermentation by Bacillus subtilis I9: A Promising Path to Sustainable Animal Feed

by
Sirisak Tanpong
1,
Nalisa Khochamit
2,
Padsakorn Pootthachaya
1,
Wilailak Siripornadulsil
2,
Narirat Unnawong
1,
Anusorn Cherdthong
1,
Bundit Tengjaroenkul
3 and
Sawitree Wongtangtintharn
1,*
1
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
3
Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2024, 11(10), 484; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11100484
Submission received: 4 September 2024 / Revised: 5 October 2024 / Accepted: 6 October 2024 / Published: 8 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional Health of Monogastric Animals)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Utilizing food industry by-products for animal feed is challenging due to their low nutrient content. Citric acid by-products have potential as feed, but their high fiber content limits their use. In this study, we used Bacillus subtilis I9 to improve citric acid by-product quality. Fermentation reduced fiber, increased protein by 21.89%, and improved amino acid ratios. Structural changes were observed using scanning electron microscopy. Using B. subtilis I9 to process citric acid waste enhances its nutritional value, making it a healthier choice for animal consumption and aiding sustainability.

Abstract

Citric acid by-products in animal feed pose a sustainability challenge. Bacillus species are commonly used for fermenting and improving the nutritional quality of feedstuffs or by-products. An experiment was conducted to enhance the nutritional value of citric acid by-products through fermentation with Bacillus subtilis I9 for animal feed. The experiment was carried out in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 50 g of substrate and 200 mL of sterile water. Groups were either uninoculated or inoculated with B. subtilis I9 at 107 CFU/mL. Incubation occurred at 37 °C with automatic shaking at 150 rpm under aerobic conditions for 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Inoculation with B. subtilis I9 significantly increased Bacillus density to 9.3 log CFU/mL at 24 h (p < 0.05). CMCase activity gradually increased, reaching a maximum of 9.77 U/mL at 72 h. After 96 h of fermentation with inoculated B. subtilis I9, the citric acid by-product exhibited a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in crude fiber by 10.86%, hemicellulose by 20.23%, and cellulose by 5.98%, but an increase in crude protein by 21.89%. Gross energy decreased by 4% after inoculation with B. subtilis in comparison to the uninoculated control (p < 0.05). Additionally, the non-starch polysaccharide (NSP) degradation due to inoculation with B. subtilis I9 significantly reduced (p < 0.05) NSP by 24.37%, while galactose, glucose, and uronic acid decreased by 22.53%, 32.21%, and 18.11%, respectively. Amino acid profile content increased significantly by more than 12% (p < 0.05), including indispensable amino acids such as histidine, isoleucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, and valine and dispensable amino acids like alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, glutamine, glycine, proline, and tyrosine. Furthermore, citric acid by-products inoculated with B. subtilis I9 exhibited changes in the cell wall structure under scanning electron microscopy, including fragmentation and cracking. These results suggest that fermenting citric acid by-products with B. subtilis I9 effectively reduces dietary fiber content and improves the nutritional characteristics of citric acid by-products for use in animal feed.

1. Introduction

Citric acid is a vital organic acid produced by the biological fermentation of starch using Aspergillus niger. This fermentation process typically utilizes substrates such as rice, corn, cassava, or cassava pulp. The by-products, often referred to as “spent cassava”, are the remaining residues after the citric acid extraction process [1]. These by-products can contain a significant amount of organic matter, including residual sugars, proteins, and fibers, making them potential feed ingredients for livestock or substrates for further processing. The annual production of citric acid surpasses 1.7 million tons. The global market demand for citric acid is rising at about 5% per year [1,2]. However, citric acid production by fermentation typically results in waste residues amounting to approximately 1.6–2 times the weight of the substrate, leading to environmental pollution, and citric acid production by-products, as waste, account for 70.0 to 80% of the total production [3]. There is an urgent need to adopt environmentally friendly citric acid production and discover ways to convert these by-product residues into animal feed, a highly sought-after resource for animal nutrition [4]. Incorporating food industry by-products into animal feed poses a sustainable management challenge due to their low nutrient content and limited animal digestibility. Citric acid by-products contain cellulose, hemicellulose, sugars, starch, and protein. For instance, Tanpong et al. [5] reported that the chemical composition of citric acid by-products contained 6.11% crude protein (CP), 2.39% ether extract (EE), 18.26% nitrogen-free extract (NFE), and 52.73% crude fiber (CF) and had a gross energy (GE) of 3.59 Mcal/kg, making them a valuable energy source for animals. Oryza et al. [6] also reported the chemical composition of citric acid by-products from rice, which included 19.80% CP, 3.98% EE, 46.64% NFE, 11.97% CF, and a GE of 4.00 Mcal/kg. One notable advantage of these by-products is their affordability, which can help reduce feed costs. However, Tanpong et al. [7] found that using citric acid by-products at 9% in quail diets can negatively impact growth performance due to their high fiber content, which affects nutrient digestibility and growth. There have been attempts to use microbial fermentation to deal with the dietary fiber component. In the process of metabolism, microbes may release specific enzymes that reduce the molecular weight of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose [8]. Bacillus, a well-known cellulose-degrading microorganism, has been utilized to enhance the nutritive value of various substrates, including soybean, fruit by-products, corn ethanol by-products, and cassava [9,10].
Bacillus subtilis has shown that it can make cellulolytic enzymes, such as cellobiase-rich cellulase and endo-glucanase, using agricultural waste as its only carbon source [11]. Bacillus spp. can ferment substrates to release hydrolytic enzymes that help break down and use oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, and antinutrients that the body cannot digest. These enzymes also help break down proteins, amino acids, and phytochemicals, making the substrate more suitable for animal nutrition [12].
In recent years, microorganisms have played a crucial role in enhancing the nutritional quality of feed ingredients and by-products used in animal nutrition through fermentation. This study hypothesizes that B. subtilis fermentation will improve citric acid by-products’ nutritional quality and chemical composition, making them more useful for animal feed. This study aims to use B. subtilis fermentation to add value to citric acid by-products from the industry and improve their chemical composition characteristics, making them a viable option for animal feed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling of Citric Acid By-Product

The study was conducted in a laboratory at the Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, and the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. The samples were collected through surveys, and sampling was used to collect by-products from citric acid producers in the eastern region of Thailand. The starting material consisted of citric acid by-products, derived from cassava. Citric acid was extracted from cassava root through a fermentation process utilizing Aspergillus niger. The remaining residues after citric acid extraction constituted the citric acid by-products. The total weight of each sample (5 kg) was collected by random sampling of ten bags (50 kg/bag) using a tapered bag trier. The samples were carefully handled to maintain their original integrity and preserve the nutrient contents of the by-products before conducting fermentation. Prior to use, the citric acid by-products were stored in plastic bags at a controlled temperature of 25 °C to preserve their integrity and prevent spoilage.

2.2. Microorganisms

2.2.1. Bacterial Strain

The Bacillus strain was isolated from the small intestine of the broiler in a laboratory at the Faculty of Science, Khon Kean University, Thailand. Bacillus strain was confirmed for B. subtilis isolation 9 (B. subtilis I9) by gram stain, enzyme activity, and biochemical tests.

2.2.2. 16S rDNA Sequencing and Data Analysis

To confirm B. subtilis I9 by molecular sequencing technique, B. subtilis I9 was cross streak onto Luria–Bertani (LB) medium (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt, Ltd., Mumbai, India). The LB plates were incubated at 37 °C for 36–48 h and re-streaked on LB plates again. A single colony was transferred into LB broth for DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using 27F/1492R universal primers, with a product size of 1496 bp. Then 785F and 907R primers were used for sequencing as forward and reverse sequences, respectively. B. subtilis was confirmed with 16S rRNA sequencing. The primers used for PCR amplification were 27F 5′ (AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG) 3′ and 1492R 5′ (TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T) 3′. The primers used for sequencing were 785F 5′ (GGA TTA GAT ACC CTG GTA) 3 and 907R 5′ (CCG TCA ATT CMT TTR AGT TT) 3′ for forward and reverse sequences, respectively. The computer analysis of the 16S rRNA sequences was performed by comparing them with sequences in GenBank.

2.3. Preparation of Inoculated Mixed By-Product

We grew B. subtilis I9 on Luria Bertani (LB) plates, which were previously sterilized in LB broth at 37 °C overnight with shaking (150 rpm) for 24 h. Ten replicate plates were prepared for each. We diluted the cultures at a ratio of 1:10 in LB and allowed them to grow at 37 °C under agitation (150 rpm), regularly measuring the optical density (OD) at 600 nm. The total bacteria count was represented by colony-forming units (CFU), determined through serial dilution using a drop plate method at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h of incubation.
B. subtilis I9 was cultured and incubated in LB broth medium at 37 °C for 24 h before fermentation. Before fermentation, the by-product substrates were sterilized to reduce the effects of exogenous microorganisms during the fermentation process. Each substrate contained 50 g and was combined with 200 mL of sterile water in a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask, which was covered with cotton plugs. The groups consisted of either uninoculated or inoculated samples (B. subtilis I9 at 107 CFU/mL) incubated at 37 °C in an auto-shaking incubator (150 rpm) under aerobic conditions. Fermentation times were set at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, with five replications for each fermentation time. The decision to use an initial density of 7 log CFU/mL for Bacillus subtilis I9 was based on recommendations from previous studies, which have demonstrated that this concentration is particularly effective in various applications [11,12].
Samples were collected for analyses, such as reducing sugar, enzyme assay, and bacterial count. After incubation, wet samples were collected and treated at 105 °C for 30 min to stop fermentation. The samples were dried in a hot air oven at 60 °C for 48 h to analyze chemical compositions, amino acid profiles, and non-starch polysaccharides of by-products. Prior to use, the citric acid by-products were stored in plastic bags at a controlled temperature of 25 °C to preserve their integrity and prevent spoilage.

2.4. Enzyme Assay

After incubation, the collected samples were inoculated and centrifuged at 15,000× g for 10 min to obtain the supernatant for the enzyme assay. The enzyme activity assay, as described by Malik et al. [13], used 1% carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) in 0.05 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.8), which was incubated for 30 min at 50 °C. The reducing sugar concentration was measured using the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) described by Chen et al. [14]. One unit (U) of enzyme was defined as the amount of enzyme that produces 1 µmol of glucose per minute under assay conditions.

2.5. Chemical Compositions

The samples were carefully handled to maintain their original integrity for study on chemical properties in the Laboratory of the Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. The dried samples of citric acid by-product, either uninoculated or inoculated (96 h), were analyzed for chemical composition via proximate analysis, including moisture, ash, crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), ether extract (EE), nitrogen-free extract (NFE), calcium (Ca), and phosphorus (P), as determined using the methods of AOAC [15]. Gross energy (GE) was measured using adiabatic bomb calorimeters (AC 500, Leco, Ltd., St. Joseph, MI, USA). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were assessed following the methodology outlined by Van Soest et al. [16], employing the filter bag technique (Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA). Acid detergent lignin (ADL) analysis was conducted in accordance with the procedures described by Raffrenato and Van Amburgh [17]. Hemicellulose content was calculated as the difference between NDF and ADF, and cellulose content was calculated as the difference between ADF and ADL.
Non-starch polysaccharide (NSP) components were measured on the basis of alditol acetates, as determined by gas-liquid chromatography for monosaccharides, and uronic acid was measured by a colorimetric method based on the procedure described by Toucheteau et al. [18], where 2M sulfuric acid was used for the hydrolysis of non-cellulosic polysaccharides.
The amino acid profile was extracted following the method described by Nimbalkar et al. [19]. Amino acid analysis was conducted following the method outlined by Onozato et al. [20], employing liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) systems. LC-MS/MS analysis was conducted using a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) coupled with a 1290 infinity LC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Chromatographic separation of amino acids was performed on an Atlantis Silica HILIC column measuring 4.6 mm × 100 mm, with a particle size of 3 m (Waters Corporation, Midford, MA, USA).

2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

A scanning electron microscope (JEOL-JSM 6460 LV, Tokyo, Japan) was used to examine the shape of the fermented citric acid by-product. A 3 g sample was mounted on the stub with double-sided adhesive tape carbon and sputter coated with a gold layer (40–50 nm) under high vacuum mode. Ultrastructure analysis of the samples was carried out using a scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV, following the method reported by Tanpong et al. [5] and Oryza et al. [6]. Images were captured from three replicates for each sample in the series.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using one-way analysis with the general linear models in the SAS procedure [21]. Differences among means with a p-value of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. 16S rDNA Sequencing

B. subtilis I9 sequencing is shown in Figure 1 as (I9_B_Subtilis_coting_1). Sequences producing significant alignments with a length of 1496 bp matched those of B. subtilis, such as > CP020102.1 B. subtilis strain NCIB 3610 chromosome, complete genome, length = 4215607, score = 2739 bits (1483), expect = 0.0, identities = 1483/1483 (100%), Gaps = 0/1483 (0%), strand = plus/plus. Computer analysis of the 16S rRNA sequences was performed by comparison with sequences in the GenBank of B. subtilis according to biochemical results. DNA sequencing result was 1496 bps. The DNA sequencing results indicated that Bacillus I9 was scientifically classified as Kingdom: Bacteria, Family: Bacillaceae, Genus: Bacillus, Species: B. subtilis, as shown in Figure 1.
B. subtilis I9 colonies grown on LB media exhibited an optical density at 600 nm (OD 600) and bacterial density (log CFU/mL). The lag phase of bacteria occurred within 3 h, and the log phase occurred after 12 h of incubation. B. subtilis I9 reached its maximum growth at 18 h. It then declined into the death phase, as shown in Figure 2A,B.

3.2. B. subtilis Density and Enzyme Assay during Fermentation

The effect of incubation of B. subtilis I9 growth is shown in Figure 3, where the fermentation was prolonged and inoculated with a by-product substrate. While specific time points like 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h have their appeal, our approach of using a continuous timeline offers several advantages, such as more accurately capturing growth curves, enzyme activity trends, and subtle variations, ultimately providing a clearer and more comprehensive understanding of the dynamic biological processes being studied. The initial density of the B. subtilis incubation was 7 log CFU/mL. After 24 h of inoculation, there was a maximum proliferation of 9.3 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05). The density of B. subtilis gradually decreased to 7.4, 7.0, and 6.6 log CFU/mL after 48, 72, and 96 h of inoculation.
Enzyme CMCase activity during inoculation is shown in Figure 4. The CMCase activity at the initial incubation was 0.39 U/mL. It increased to 7.82 and 9.23 U/mL after 24 and 48 h, which reached a maximum level of 9.776 U/mL after 72 h of incubation (p < 0.05). However, the CMCase activity gradually decreased to 6.19 U/mL after 96 h of inoculation.

3.3. Chemical Compositions

The analyzed chemical compositions of fermentation, both inoculated and uninoculated with by-products after 96 h of incubation, are presented in Table 1. The results showed that the inoculated by-product significantly (p < 0.05) increased CP by 21.89% and decreased CF by 10.86%, while gross energy was reduced by 4% compared with the uninoculated. NDF, ADF, hemicellulose, and cellulose of inoculated by-products showed significant (p < 0.05) decreases by 8.62, 4.47, 20.23, and 5.98%, respectively, compared with the uninoculated.
The NSP compositions of the inoculated citric acid by-product are presented in Table 2. The inoculation of B. subtilis I9 significantly (p < 0.05) degraded total NSP by 24.37%, whereas galactose, glucose, and uronic acid degraded by 22.53, 32.21, and 18.11%, respectively, compared with uninoculated.
The amino acid profiles of fermentation, both inoculated and uninoculated, are presented in Table 3. The inoculation significantly (p < 0.05) improved the indispensable amino acids, including His, Ile, Lys, Met, Phe, Trp, and Val, and dispensable amino acids, including Ala, Asp, Glu, Gln, Gly, Pro, and Tyr, compared with the uninoculated control. Notably, these amino acids increased by more than 12% in the by-products.

3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy

Microscopic images of the cell wall of the citric acid by-product after being uninoculated and inoculated were obtained by scanning electron microscopy and are presented in Figure 5. The ultrastructure morphology of the uninoculated sample’s observed surface of the cell wall is smooth, whereas the inoculated sample with B. Subtilis I9 showed the cell wall structure to be fragmental and cracked under ×50, ×500, and ×1000 magnifications.

4. Discussion

The process of citric acid production normally generates by-product residues, which cause environmental pollution. A major advantage of by-products is reduced feed costs when used as feed ingredients. However, by-products contain high fiber levels that limit the utilization of monogastric animal diets [5]. Several reports have shown negative effects of fiber content on the digestibility of proteins and lipids. Current studies have investigated whether microbial fermentation can reduce dietary fiber, degrade anti-nutritional properties, and improve nutritional characteristics. B. subtilis is a naturally occurring endospore-forming bacterium. Its spores can resist highly extreme environments. Its advantage is that it can be used in industry and the application of probiotics to improve immune function, inhibit pathogenic bacteria, maintain health, and improve nutritive value [22]. In this experiment, B. subtilis was confirmed with 16S rRNA sequencing before being inoculated with by-products for fermentation processing, which improved nutritional quality. B. subtilis I9 growth in LB was slow during the first 3 h of incubation and increased to 6.66 log CFU/mL. Then, B. subtilis exponentially increased during the 9–18 h and reached a maximum of 12.51 log CFU/mL at incubation.
At the end of the log phase at 18 h, the duration of the stationary phase was 36 h of the incubation time. However, after 48 h, the density of the bacteria slightly decreased with decreasing nutrient concentration. The fermentation by-product with B. subtilis I9 was inoculated during the fermentation process. The fermentation of the by-product with B. subtilis I9 that was inoculated during 24 h was exponentially increased and reached its maximum, and after 24–72 h, it slightly declined until it stablized. The reducing sugar concentration decreased rapidly during the exponential growth phase (0–24 h). However, the reducing sugar did not decrease after 72 h and remained at 4 mg/mL until the end of fermentation. B. subtilis demonstrated that the metabolite produced was enzyme CMCase productivity. The enzyme product was exponentially increased for 24 h, reached a maximum at 48–72 h (9.77 U/mL), and gradually declined by 96 h. Wang et al. [23] reported that the CMCase activity produced by B. paralicheniformis Y4 rapidly increased up to 72 h with a maximum CMCase activity of 8.96 U/mL. Jiménez-Leyva et al. [24] reported that B. subtilis RZ164, RS351, and RS273 isolated from corn stover produced CMCase activity that was detected after 24 h. This activity rapidly increased, reaching its highest levels at 48–72 h of incubation. Bacteria growth using carbon substrates has a dual role in biosynthesis and energy generation. The use of carbohydrates as a carbon source for microbial fermentation processes led to an increase in bacterial cell density. Additionally, this resulted in the production of metabolites and enzymes, as well as a decline in reducing sugars [25].
In this work, by-product fermentation with inoculated products contained greater crude protein and amino acid compositions when compared with uninoculated products, which showed significant differences. The inoculated B. subtilis I9 levels increased crude protein (21.89%) and total amino acid (108.04%) compared to the uninoculated samples. The amino acid profiles showed a difference between the inoculated and uninoculated groups. Our results aligned with Shi et al. [26], who observed a significant difference in the increased CP of 14.80% and total amino acid of 7.90% after fermentation by B. subtilis and E. faecium. Likewise, Chen et al. [27] reported that the fermentation by B. velezensis and L. plantarum improved nutrient composition by increasing CP by 9.90% and total amino acid (AA) by 12.10%. The reason for increased CP could be the loss of dry matter, mainly carbohydrates, during fermentation, which led to an increase in the concentration of nutrients. This is supported by Suriyapha et al. [2], who explained that dry matter loss during fermentation led to increased protein and amino acid content. However, the protein and amino acid profiles of B. subtilis I9 contained protein (46.50%) and amino acids (mostly alanine, leucine, and glutamic acid). Our results were in line with the findings of Sarabandi et al. [28], who reported that B. cereus contained protein, and the amino acids with the highest content were aspartic acid, glutamic acid, alanine, glycine, leucine, and threonine. Likewise, Munoz and Sadaie [29] revealed that the B. subtilis spore coat protein accounts for approximately 10% of the total dry weight of spores and 25% of the total protein content of B. subtilis spores. Therefore, the inoculated feed with B. subtilis can increase protein and amino acid content more than the uninoculated feed. The inoculated by-product’s improved nutritional composition, including increased essential amino acids and reduced anti-nutritional factors, might significantly benefit animals’ health [11]. This balanced amino acid profile is crucial for growth, tissue development, and immune function, enhancing nutrient utilization and performance [12].
Nevertheless, the current study demonstrated that the citric acid by-product fermented with B. subtilis exhibited reduced gross energy compared to the uninoculated sample. This may be attributed to B. subtilis fermentation, which may cause the degradation of certain nutrients, including carbohydrates, leading to a decrease in gross energy. The energy contained in these nutrients is lost during fermentation, which may lead to a loss of energy upon feed consumption [2]. Therefore, the subsequent use of citric acid by-product incubated with B. subtilis in animal feed must provide a balanced energy value to prevent suboptimal animal performance.
In the experiment, we observed that the chemical composition was altered during the fermentation with B. subtilis I9; crude fiber, hemicellulose, and cellulose levels showed significant declines of 10.86, 20.23, and 5.98%, respectively. Moreover, the fermentation showed degradation of the NSP, such as total NSP (24.37%), galactose (22.59%), glucose (32.21%), and uronic acid (18.14%), which were most significantly altered during fermentation with by-product inoculated with B. subtilis I9 compared with uninoculated. Consequently, the fermentation observed in the structural analysis of the by-product by microscopy of SEM showed cracks, small fractions, and porousness in the cell wall during the altered incubation. This demonstrated the breakdown of the cell wall of the by-product by enzymes produced by B. subtilis I9. The lower levels of crude fiber, cellulose, hemicellulose, and non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) indicated that B. subtilis I9 would produce enzymes that hydrolyze cellulose, hemicellulose, and NSP during the fermentation process. This could improve nutrient composition, crude protein, amino acids, and digestibility compared to the uninoculated by-product. Our results were in alignment with Shi et al. [26], who reported that two-stage fermentation using B. subtilis and E. faecium showed a degraded anti-nutritional factor and decreased cellulose and hemicellulose. This process enhanced levels of protein and amino acids in soybean meal, improving the digestibility of crude protein and amino acids more than in unfermented samples. Likewise, studies by Chen et al. [27] reported that B. velezensis and L. plantarum significantly declined cellulose and hemicellulose in soybean meal. Many enzymes have been produced by B. subtilis, for instance, amylases, xylanases, lichenases, β-galactosidases [28,29], cellulases [30,31], proteases [32], and many others. The cellulase group of enzymes is made up of multiple enzymes, such as endoglucanases, exoglucanases, and glycosidases, which act together to hydrolyze the cellulose molecule. Endoglucanases are widely used and comprise the endo1,4-β glucanase enzyme that hydrolyzes the cellulose chains at random [33]. Endoglucanases, which are mostly carboxymethyl cellulases (CMCases), can release small fragments of cellulose with both reducing and non-reducing ends. The next step involves exoglucanases releasing cellobiose and short oligosaccharides [34]. Hemicellulose is hydrolyzed by the enzymes 1,4-β-xylosidase, endo-1,4-β-xylanase, arabinan endo-1,5-α-l-arabinosidase, α-N-arabinofuranosidase, ara-binoxylan arabinofuranohydrolase, β-mannosidase, arabinogalactan endo-1,4-β-galactosidase, and glucuronoxylanase. Therefore, B. subtilis I9 is used in fermentation to enhance the nutrient composition of the by-product of citric acid, decrease fiber, cellulose, and hemicellulose, and improve crude protein and amino acid profiles for use as feed ingredients [35].

5. Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate the potential of citric acid by-product fermentation using B. subtilis I9 as a promising strategy for enhancing the nutritional value of agricultural by-products. B. subtilis I9, equipped with CMCase activity, effectively hydrolyzed NSP, cellulose, and hemicellulose, leading to improved protein and amino acid composition during fermentation. This balanced amino acid profile may improve the growth of animals, immunological functions, and nutrition utilization. These results highlight the potential of B. subtilis I9 to enhance the nutritional quality of by-products, making them more suitable for use as animal feed. The present work underscores the need for further research to validate and expand upon our preliminary findings. Specifically, future studies should focus on the long-term impact of CABR supplementation on the zootechnical characteristics of broiler chickens, including meat and fat quality. The study revealed that citric acid by-product fermented with B. subtilis may reduce gross energy due to nutrient degradation, highlighting the need for balanced energy values in animal feed. Additionally, optimizing the fermentation process for maximum nutritional benefits and evaluating the specific effects of fermented by-products on animal growth performance are critical steps for advancing this research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.T., N.K., W.S., N.U., A.C., B.T., and S.W.; methodology, S.T., N.K., W.S., N.U., A.C., and S.W.; validation, S.T., W.S., and S.W.; formal analysis, S.T. and N.K.; investigation, S.T., N.K., W.S., and S.W.; resources, W.S., N.U., A.C., and S.W.; data curation, S.T. and A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.T., P.P., N.U., A.C., and S.W.; writing—review and editing, S.T., P.P., N.U., A.C., and S.W.; supervision, B.T. and S.W.; project administration, S.W.; funding acquisition, B.T. and S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors express their sincerest gratitude to the Fundamental Fund of Khon Kaen University, which has received funding support from the National Science, Research, and Innovation Fund (NSRF), as well as the Program on Toxic Substances, Microorganisms, and Feed Additives in Livestock and Aquatic Animals for Food Safety at Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable. The present study is a preliminary investigation aimed at improving the quality of by-products used in animal feed, which has not yet been tested on animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, for the use of the research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Prado, F.C.; Vandenberghe, L.P.S.; Woiciechowski, A.L.; Rodrígues-León, J.A.; Soccol, C.R. Citric acid production by solid-state fermentation on a semi-pilot scale using different percentages of treated cassava bagasse. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2005, 22, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Suriyapha, C.; Suntara, C.; Wanapat, M.; Cherdthong, A. Effects of substituting agro-industrial by-products for soybean meal on beef cattle feed utilization and rumen fermentation. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. West, T.P. Citric acid production by Aspergillus niger using solid-state fermentation of agricultural processing coproducts. Appl. Biosci. 2023, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chilakamarry, C.R.; Sakinah, A.M.M.; Zularisam, A.W.; Sirohi, R.; Khilji, I.A.; Ahmad, N.; Pandey, A. Advances in solid-state fermentation for bioconversion of agricultural wastes to value-added products: Opportunities and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 343, 126065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tanpong, S.; Cherdthong, A.; Tengjaroenkul, B.; Tengjaroenkul, U.; Wongtangtintharn, S. Evaluation of physical and chemical properties of citric acid industrial waste. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 105, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oryza, S.M.; Wongtangtintharn, S.; Tengjaroenkul, B.; Cherdthong, A.; Tanpong, S.; Bunchalee, P.; Pootthachaya, P.; Reungsang, A.; Polyorach, S. Physico-chemical characteristics and amino acid content evaluation of citric acid by-product produced by microbial fermentation as a potential use in animal feed. Fermentation 2021, 7, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tanpong, S.; Cherdthong, A.; Tengjaroenkul, B.; Reungsang, A.; Sutthibak, N.; Wongtangtintharn, S. A study on citric acid by-product as an energy source for Japanese quail. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ferdeș, M.; Dinca, M.N.; Moiceanu, G.; Zabava, B.S.; Paraschiv, G. Microorganisms and enzymes used in the biological pretreatment of the substrate to enhance biogas production: A Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. do Prado, F.G.; Pagnoncelli, M.G.B.; de Melo Pereira, G.V.; Karp, S.G.; Soccol, C.R. Fermented soy products and their potential health benefits: A Review. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fang, J.; Du, Z.; Cai, Y. Fermentation regulation and ethanol production of total mixed ration containing apple pomace. Fermentation 2023, 9, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ogbuewu, I.P.; Mabelebele, M.; Sebola, N.A.; Mbajiorgu, C. Bacillus probiotics as alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and its influence on growth, serum chemistry, antioxidant status, intestinal histomorphology, and lesion scores in disease-challenged broiler chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 876725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rodrigues, R.A.; Silva, L.A.M.; Brugnera, H.C.; Pereira, N.; Casagrande, M.F.; Makino, L.C.; Bragança, C.R.S.; Schocken-Iturrino, R.P.; Cardozo, M.V. Association of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens: Minimizes the adverse effects of necrotic enteritis in the gastrointestinal tract and improves zootechnical performance in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 103394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Malik, M.S.; Rehman, A.; Khan, I.U.; Khan, T.A.; Jamil, M.; Rha, E.S.; Anees, M. Thermo-neutrophilic cellulases and chitinases characterized from a novel putative antifungal biocontrol agent: Bacillus subtilis TD11. PLoS ONE. 2023, 18, e0281102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, J.; Qin, H.; You, C.; Long, L. Improved secretory expression and characterization of thermostable xylanase and β-xylosidase from Pseudothermotoga thermarum and their application in synergistic degradation of lignocellulose. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1270805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 19th ed.; AOCP International Publisher: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Soest, P.V.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Raffrenato, E.; Van Amburgh, M.E. Technical note: Improved methodology for analyses of acid detergent fiber and acid detergent lignin. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 3613–3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Toucheteau, C.; Deffains, V.; Gaignard, C.; Rihouey, C.; Laroche, C.; Pierre, G.; Lépine, O.; Probert, I.; Le Cerf, D.; Michaud, P.; et al. Role of some structural features in EPS from microalgae stimulating collagen production by human dermal fibroblasts. Bioengineered 2023, 14, 2254027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nimbalkar, M.S.; Pai, S.R.; Pawar, N.V.; Oulkar, D.; Dixit, G.B. Free amino acid profiling in grain Amaranth using LC–MS/MS. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 2565–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Onozato, M.; Nakanoue, H.; Sakamoto, T.; Umino, M.; Fukushima, T. Determination of D- and L-amino acids in garlic foodstuffs by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Molecules 2023, 28, 1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. SAS. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 9.4.; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, F.; Stappenbeck, T.S. Microbiome control of innate reactivity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2019, 56, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Duan, Y.; Wang, Q.; Cong, X.; He, Y.; Gao, C.; Hafeez, M.; Jan, S.; Rasheed, S.M.; et al. Enhancing the activity of carboxymethyl cellulase enzyme using highly stable selenium nanoparticles biosynthesized by Bacillus paralicheniformis Y4. Molecules 2022, 27, 4585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jiménez-Leyva, M.; Beltrán-Arredondo, L.I.; Cervantes-Gámez, R.; Cervantes-Chávez, J.; López-Meyer, M.; Castro-Ochoa, D.; Calderón-Vázquez, C.L.; Castro-Martínez, C. Effect of CMC and MCC as sole carbon sources on cellulase activity and egls gene expression in three Bacillus subtilis strains isolated from corn stover. BioResources 2017, 12, 1179–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sun, Y.; Kokko, M.; Vassilev, I. Anode-assisted electro-fermentation with Bacillus subtilis under oxygen-limited conditions. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2023, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shi, C.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Wang, Y. Solid-state fermentation of corn-soybean meal mixed feed with Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium for degrading antinutritional factors and enhancing nutritional value. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 8, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, L.; Zhao, Z.; Yu, W.; Zheng, L.; Li, L.; Gu, W.; Xu, H.; Wei, B.; Yan, X. Nutritional quality improvement of soybean meal by Bacillus velezensis and Lactobacillus plantarum during two-stage solid- state fermentation. AMB Expr. 2021, 11, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sarabandi, K.; Mohammadi, M.; Akbarbaglu, Z.; Ghorbani, M.; Najafi, S.; Safaeian Laein, S.; Jafari, S.M. Technological, nutritional, and biological properties of apricot kernel protein hydrolyzates affected by various commercial proteases. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 5078–5090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Munoz, L.; Sadaie, Y.; Doi, R.H. Spore coat protein of Bacillus subtilis. Structure and precursor synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1978, 253, 6694–6701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Watzlawick, H.; Altenbuchner, J. Multiple integration of the gene ganA into the Bacillus subtilis chromosome for enhanced beta-galactosidase production using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. AMB Express. 2019, 9, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bien, T.L.T.; Tsuji, S.; Tanaka, K.; Takenaka, S.; Yoshida, K. Secretion of heterologous thermostable cellulases in Bacillus subtilis. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 60, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shah, F.; Mishra, S. In vitro optimization for enhanced cellulose degrading enzyme from Bacillus licheniformis KY962963 associated with a microalgae Chlorococcum sp. using OVAT and statistical modeling. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, J.P.; Yeh, C.M.; Tsai, Y.C. Improved subtilisin YaB production in Bacillus subtilis using engineered synthetic expression control sequences. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9405–9410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Diorio, L.A.; Forchiassin, F.; Papinutti, V.L.; Sueldo, D.V. Actividad enzimatica y degradacion de diferentes tipos de residuos organicos por Saccobolus saccoboloides (Fungi, Ascomycotina). Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2003, 20, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Olukunle, O.F.; Ayodeji, A.O.; Akinloye, P.O. Carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) from UV-irradiation mutated Bacillus cereus FOA-2 cultivated on plantain (Musa parasidiaca) stalk-based medium: Production, purification and characterization. Sci. Afr. 2021, 11, e00691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree analysis based on partial 16S rDNA sequences of B. subtilis I9.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree analysis based on partial 16S rDNA sequences of B. subtilis I9.
Vetsci 11 00484 g001
Figure 2. Growth curve of B. subtilis I9 on (A) OD 600 and (B) log CFU/mL.
Figure 2. Growth curve of B. subtilis I9 on (A) OD 600 and (B) log CFU/mL.
Vetsci 11 00484 g002
Figure 3. Growth curve of B. Subtilis during inoculation after 96 h (log CFU/mL). A–C Means within rows with different superscript letters differ at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Growth curve of B. Subtilis during inoculation after 96 h (log CFU/mL). A–C Means within rows with different superscript letters differ at p < 0.05.
Vetsci 11 00484 g003
Figure 4. Enzyme CMCase activity during inoculation after 96 h. A–D Means within rows with different superscript letters differ at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Enzyme CMCase activity during inoculation after 96 h. A–D Means within rows with different superscript letters differ at p < 0.05.
Vetsci 11 00484 g004
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy of the cell wall of citric acid by-product with samples uninoculated (A) and inoculated with B. subtilis I9 (B), after fermentation under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 96 h. All the images were taken at 50× magnification.
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy of the cell wall of citric acid by-product with samples uninoculated (A) and inoculated with B. subtilis I9 (B), after fermentation under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 96 h. All the images were taken at 50× magnification.
Vetsci 11 00484 g005
Table 1. Chemical composition of citric acid by-product fermentation with uninoculated and inoculated samples.
Table 1. Chemical composition of citric acid by-product fermentation with uninoculated and inoculated samples.
Chemical Compositions (%DM)UninoculatedInoculatedSEMp-Value
Dry matter93.2893.150.260.73
Ash13.7013.880.360.73
Crude protein7.39 b9.01 a0.26<0.01
Ether extract2.973.060.130.63
Crude fiber18.26 a16.28 b0.09<0.01
Nitrogen free extract50.9650.920.490.95
Calcium1.031.080.090.69
Phosphorus0.100.120.010.21
Gross energy (kcal/kg)3819.00 a3666.00 b17.60<0.01
Neutral detergent fiber59.75 a54.60 b0.930.02
Acid detergent fiber44.05 a42.08 b0.420.03
Acid detergent lignin14.9214.690.190.45
Hemicellulose15.71 a12.53 b0.590.02
Cellulose29.13 a27.39 b0.380.03
a,b Means within rows with different superscript letters differ at p < 0.05.; SEM: standard error of mean.
Table 2. NSP composition of citric acid by-product fermentation with uninoculated and inoculated samples.
Table 2. NSP composition of citric acid by-product fermentation with uninoculated and inoculated samples.
ParametersUninoculatedInoculatedDegradation (%)SEMp-Value
NSP25.83 a19.54 b24.370.08<0.01
Arabinose1.080.9215.320.050.09
Xylose2.131.939.700.070.09
Mannose0.490.4311.600.020.07
Galactose2.32 a1.79 b22.530.090.02
Glucose12.44 a8.43 b32.210.13<0.01
Uronic acid1.65 a1.38 b18.110.15<0.01
a,b Means within rows with different superscript letters differ at p < 0.05.; SEM: standard error of mean.
Table 3. Amino acid (AA) profiles of citric acid by-product fermentation with uninoculated and inoculated samples.
Table 3. Amino acid (AA) profiles of citric acid by-product fermentation with uninoculated and inoculated samples.
AA Compositions (%)B. Subtilis I9UninoculatedInoculatedSEMp-Value
Indispensable amino acid
Arginine (Arg)0.2900.2130.1940.0120.305
Histidine (His)1.2600.060 b0.067 a0.058<0.001
Isoleucine (Ile)4.2200.065 b0.348 a0.0250.001
Leucine (Leu)5.0900.198 b0.326 a0.0300.042
Lysine (Lys)2.6400.028 b0.190 a0.005<0.001
Methionine (Met)1.6800.008 b0.034 a0.0020.002
Phenylalanine (Phe)3.9000.054 b0.235 a0.011<0.001
Threonine (Thr)0.5300.0940.0690.0120.192
Tryptophan (Trp)0.6000.012 b0.086 a0.003<0.001
Valine (Val)2.9500.062 b0.159 a0.0070.001
Dispensable amino acid
Alanine (Ala)5.5300.167 b0.683 a0.017<0.001
Aspartic acid (Asp)0.1900.037 b0.074 a0.0030.002
Asparagine (Asn)0.1700.0210.0160.0060.886
Cystein (Cys)0.1300.0060.0060.0000.195
Glutamic acid (Glu)7.3300.146 b0.235 a0.0150.017
Glutamine (Gln)2.6400.057 b0.118 a0.0060.003
Glycine (Gly)0.6400.043 b0.059 a0.0020.008
Proline (Pro)2.8600.245 b0.608 a0.021<0.001
Serine (Ser)3.5600.0010.0010.0010.218
Tyrosine (Tyr)0.2900.470 b0.710 a0.0450.018
Total AA46.5001.990 b4.140 a0.032<0.001
a,b Means within rows with different superscript letters differ at p < 0.05.; SEM: standard error of mean.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanpong, S.; Khochamit, N.; Pootthachaya, P.; Siripornadulsil, W.; Unnawong, N.; Cherdthong, A.; Tengjaroenkul, B.; Wongtangtintharn, S. Citric Acid by-Product Fermentation by Bacillus subtilis I9: A Promising Path to Sustainable Animal Feed. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11100484

AMA Style

Tanpong S, Khochamit N, Pootthachaya P, Siripornadulsil W, Unnawong N, Cherdthong A, Tengjaroenkul B, Wongtangtintharn S. Citric Acid by-Product Fermentation by Bacillus subtilis I9: A Promising Path to Sustainable Animal Feed. Veterinary Sciences. 2024; 11(10):484. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11100484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanpong, Sirisak, Nalisa Khochamit, Padsakorn Pootthachaya, Wilailak Siripornadulsil, Narirat Unnawong, Anusorn Cherdthong, Bundit Tengjaroenkul, and Sawitree Wongtangtintharn. 2024. "Citric Acid by-Product Fermentation by Bacillus subtilis I9: A Promising Path to Sustainable Animal Feed" Veterinary Sciences 11, no. 10: 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11100484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop