Previous Issue
Volume 9, June
 
 

Infrastructures, Volume 9, Issue 7 (July 2024) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 23326 KiB  
Article
Fatigue Consideration for Tension Flange over Intermediate Support in Skewed Continuous Steel I-Girder Bridges
by Dariya Tabiatnejad, Seyed Saman Khedmatgozar Dolati, Armin Mehrabi and Todd A. Helwig
Infrastructures 2024, 9(7), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9070099 (registering DOI) - 26 Jun 2024
Viewed by 78
Abstract
Skewed supports complicate load paths in continuous steel I-girder bridges, causing secondary stresses and differential deformations. For a continuous bridge where tensile stresses are developed in the top flange of the steel girders over the intermediate supports, these effects may exacerbate potential fatigue [...] Read more.
Skewed supports complicate load paths in continuous steel I-girder bridges, causing secondary stresses and differential deformations. For a continuous bridge where tensile stresses are developed in the top flange of the steel girders over the intermediate supports, these effects may exacerbate potential fatigue issues for the top flanges. There is a gap in knowledge regarding the level of stress one can expect at these locations, and the stress level can render the problem either serious or trivial. This paper has been successful in providing this information, which was not available before. The study examines the fatigue performance of the top flange in girders over skewed supports. Results are presented from a detailed investigation consisting of 3D finite element modeling to evaluate 26 skewed bridges in the State of Florida that represent the wide range of geometries found in practice. The analysis focused on stress ranges in the top flanges and axial demands on end cross-frame members under fatigue truck loading. A preliminary analysis helped to select the appropriate element type and support conditions. The maximum factored stress range of 3.63 ksi obtained for the selected group of bridges remains below the 10 ksi fatigue threshold for an AASHTO Category C connection, alleviating the concerns about the fatigue performance of the continuous girder top flange over the intermediate pier. Hence, fatigue is unlikely to be a concern in the flanges at this location. Statistics on computed stress ranges and cross-frame forces that provide an understanding of the expected values and guidance for detailing practices are also presented. A limited comparative refined FE analysis on two different types of end cross-frame to girder connections also provided useful insight into the fatigue sensitivities of the skew connections. Half-Round Bearing Stiffener (HRBS) connections performed better than the customary bent plate connections. The HRBS connection reduces girder flange stress concentration range by at least 18% compared to the bent plate connection. The maximum stress concentration range in bent plate components is significantly higher than in the HRBS connection components. The work documented in this paper is important for understanding the fatigue performance of the cross-frames and girders in support regions in the upcoming 10th edition of the AASHTO Bridge Design Specifications that may include plate stiffeners oriented either normally or skewed to the girder web, or Half-Round Bearing Stiffeners. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 2715 KiB  
Review
Building Information Modelling in Hydropower Infrastructures: Design, Engineering and Management Perspectives
by Jigme Wangchuk, Saeed Banihashemi, Hamidreza Abbasianjahromi and Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari
Infrastructures 2024, 9(7), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9070098 (registering DOI) - 25 Jun 2024
Viewed by 153
Abstract
Abstract: Building Information Modelling (BIM) has emerged as a transformative force in the construction industry, gaining traction within the hydropower sector. This study critically examines the adoption and application of BIM throughout the entire lifecycle of hydropower projects, addressing a notable gap in [...] Read more.
Abstract: Building Information Modelling (BIM) has emerged as a transformative force in the construction industry, gaining traction within the hydropower sector. This study critically examines the adoption and application of BIM throughout the entire lifecycle of hydropower projects, addressing a notable gap in existing research, to encompass a holistic approach to the management and resilience of these critical infrastructures. The objective is to delineate the comprehensive range of BIM applications, use cases, and adoption, integrating technologies including Digital Twin, UAV, GIS, and simulation tools, across components of hydropower projects. Employing a systematic search paired with a critical review of the selected literature, this study meticulously evaluates significant contributions in this domain. Through thematic analysis, the multifaceted utility of BIM in hydropower structures, including an in-depth evaluation of its current adoption within the industry, is presented. This encompasses an analysis of both benefits and challenges inherent in BIM implementation for hydropower infrastructures. This study is a significant contribution to understanding how BIM can be leveraged to enhance the resilience of hydropower infrastructures. It provides a comprehensive view of BIM’s applications, challenges, and future potential, guiding stakeholders in adopting strategies that ensure these structures withstand, adapt, and recover from disruptions while maintaining sustainable and efficient operations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Construction in Infrastructure Project Development)
Previous Issue
Back to TopTop