Utilizing a Fractional-Order Grey Model to Predict the Development Trends of China’s Electronic Commerce Service Industry
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Fractional-Order One-Variable Grey Model
- Consider a non-negative series set with n observations, .
- Calculate the r-order accumulated generating coefficients series,
- Convert the original series into a monotonically increasing series by the r-order AGO. The purpose of the AGO is to discover the change patterns by converting the data dimensions, thus allowing the series to build a better fitted model.
- Obtain the background value series by calculating the average. The prerequisite for establishing a robust model is that the data cannot be affected by external factors or artificial interference. Therefore, the background value is calculated using an average to reduce randomness.
- Construct the grey differential equation.
- Expand Equation (4) into the vector–matrix form of Equation (5), where , , and .
- Calculate the pending coefficient vector using the ordinary least-squares method.
- Solve the ordinary differential equation to establish a grey prediction model based on the r-order AGO. Via this action, called the whiteness process, the ordinary differential equation is used to replace the source grey differential equation.
- Use Equation (7) to output the estimated value of the r-order accumulated generating series .
- Determine the negative r-order accumulated generating coefficients series, .
- Obtain the predicted values .
2.2. Heuristic Procedure for Determining Order
- After a prediction model is established, there is usually a gap between the actual observation value and the fitting value, which is the residual. The residuals can help analysts to examine the rationality of the model and the reliability of the data. Here, the absolute error (AE) is used as an indicator to measure the residual. If is the actual observation and is the value fitted by the model, then the calculation formula of AE is as Equation (10).
- Because new and old data should have different roles in the modeling process, the data, from newest to oldest, should be given decreasing weights to distinguish the differences between them. The weight is given by the heuristic rank sum weighting method (RSWM). Specifically, the numerator of the weight of the latest observations is the total number of observations; conversely, the numerator of the weight of the oldest observation is 1. In addition, due to the modeling mechanism of the grey model, the residual of the first observation is fixed as 0; thus, the oldest observation here refers to the second observation, and the first observation is not given a weight. If the observations used to establish the model are n, then k is the ordinal number of the observations, the value of which is larger to imply that the data are newer. Then, the weight formula of the RSWM is as Equation (11).
- To determine the order, an objective function based on residuals is designed, as given by Equation (12). The value of the order is limited to the interval between 0 and 1. After an iterative operation, the order r that can minimize the objective function is found, based on which a model for trend prediction is established.
3. Experimental Analysis
3.1. Data Description and Experimental Design
3.2. Modeling Example
3.3. Comparison and Feasibility Measurement
3.4. Future Trend of the Revenue Scale in China’s Electronic Commerce Service Industry
4. Conclusions and Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bădîrcea, R.M.; Manta, A.G.; Florea, N.M.; Popescu, J.; Manta, F.L.; Puiu, S. E-Commerce and the factors affecting its development in the age of digital technology: Empirical evidence at EU-27 level. Sustainability 2022, 14, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iglesias-Pradas, S.; Acquila-Natale, E. The Future of E-Commerce: Overview and Prospects of Multichannel and Omnichannel Retail. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 656–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Chang, C.-J.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X. An Aggregating Prediction Model for Management Decision Analysis. Complexity 2022, 2022, 6312579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.-J.; Dai, W.-L.; Li, D.-C.; Chen, C.-C.; Li, G. An Extrapolation Non-Equigap Grey Model for Operation Management. J. Grey Syst. 2023, 35, 101–112. [Google Scholar]
- Schneider, G. Electronic Commerce; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, K.; Yu, S.; Wu, L.; Wu, X.; Wang, L. Carbon emissions prediction considering environment protection investment of 30 provinces in China. Environ. Res. 2024, 244, 117914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, S.; Dong, R. A Novel Grey Seasonal Model for Natural Gas Production Forecasting. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, S.; Raut, R.D.; Rofin, T.M.; Chakraborty, S. A grey ordinal priority approach for healthcare waste disposal location selection. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 2023, 13, 767–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, N. A summary of grey forecasting models. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 2022, 12, 703–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.-C. Forecast combination using grey prediction with fuzzy integral and time-varying weighting in tourism. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 2023, 13, 808–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, A.T.; Asjad, M.; Panchal, R. Purchase decision making of garage equipment using an integrated fuzzy AHP and grey relation analysis method. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 2023, 13, 238–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şahin, U.; Chen, Y. Assessing the current and future effects of COVID-19 on energy related-CO2 emissions in the United States using seasonal fractional grey model. Energy Strategy Rev. 2023, 50, 101234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydemir, E.; Bedir, F.; Ozdemir, G. Degree of Greyness Approach for an EPQ Model with Imperfect Items in Copper Wire Industry. J. Grey Syst. 2015, 27, 13–26. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S.; Yang, Y.; Forrest, J. Grey Data Analysis: Methods, Models and Applications; Springer: Singapore, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, N.; Wang, R. A historic Review of Grey Forecasting Models. J. Grey Syst. 2017, 29, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, W.; Jian, L.; Liu, T. Grey system theory trends from 1991 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis and visualization. Scientometrics 2019, 121, 1407–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Chen, G.; Rytter, N.G.M.; Zhao, J.; Yang, D. A genetic algorithm-based grey-box model for ship fuel consumption prediction towards sustainable shipping. Ann. Oper. Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Y. An optimized Nash nonlinear grey Bernoulli model based on particle swarm optimization and its application in prediction for the incidence of Hepatitis B in Xinjiang, China. Comput. Biol. Med. 2014, 49, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, C.J.; Li, D.C.; Huang, Y.H.; Chen, C.C. A novel gray forecasting model based on the box plot for small manufacturing data sets. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 265, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.C.; Yeh, C.W.; Chang, C.J. An improved grey-based approach for early manufacturing data forecasting. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2009, 57, 1161–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, Y.-J.; Hu, Y.-C.; Jiang, P.; Xie, J.; Ken, Y.-W. A Multivariate Grey Prediction Model Using Neural Networks with Application to Carbon Dioxide Emissions Forecasting. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8829948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, N.; Liu, S. Discrete grey forecasting model and its optimization. Appl. Math. Model. 2009, 33, 1173–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; Liu, S.; Yao, L.; Yan, S.; Liu, D. Grey system model with the fractional order accumulation. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 2013, 18, 1775–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.-J.; Li, D.-C.; Chen, C.-C.; Chen, W.-C. Extrapolation-based grey model for small-data-set forecasting. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cyb. 2019, 53, 171–182. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, W.; Zeng, B.; Li, S. A Novel Fractional-Order Grey Prediction Model and Its Modeling Error Analysis. Information 2019, 10, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, L.; Ren, Y.; Wang, Y. Forecasting China’s total renewable energy capacity using a novel dynamic fractional order discrete grey model. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 239, 122019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Rao, C.; Xiao, X.; Hu, F.; Goh, M. Prediction of demand for staple food and feed grain by a novel hybrid fractional discrete multivariate grey model. Appl. Math. Model. 2024, 125, 85–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.-J.; Li, G.; Guo, J.; Yu, K.-P. Data-driven forecasting model for small data sets. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cyb. 2020, 54, 217–229. [Google Scholar]
- Witten, I.H.; Frank, E.; Hall, M.A.; Pal, C. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S.; Lin, Y. Grey Information: Theory and Practical Applications, 1st ed.; Springer: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Makridakis, S. Accuracy measures: Theoretical and practical concerns. Int. J. Forecast. 1993, 9, 527–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLurgio, S.A. Forecasting Principles and Applications; Irwin/McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
Year | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scale | 0.43 | 1.25 | 1.98 | 2.45 | 2.92 | 3.52 | 4.47 | 5.45 | 6.40 | 6.79 |
Year | Actual Values | Predicted Values | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GM | DGM | FGM | RBFN | SVR | ||
2017 | 2.92 | 3.365 | 3.408 | 2.860 | 2.599 | 3.046 |
2018 | 3.52 | 3.535 | 3.552 | 3.404 | 3.063 | 3.386 |
2019 | 4.47 | 4.198 | 4.216 | 4.198 | 3.866 | 3.856 |
2020 | 5.45 | 5.482 | 5.518 | 5.482 | 5.045 | 4.584 |
2021 | 6.40 | 6.746 | 6.791 | 6.527 | 5.952 | 6.012 |
2022 | 6.79 | 7.642 | 7.674 | 7.341 | 6.859 | 3.046 |
Methods | MAPE (%) |
---|---|
GM | 6.72 |
DGM | 7.28 |
FGM | 3.69 |
RBFN | 22.56 |
SVR | 8.69 |
MAPE | Prediction Power |
---|---|
<10% | Accurate prediction |
10–20% | Good prediction |
20–50% | Reasonable prediction |
>50% | Inaccurate prediction |
Year | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Predicted values | 7.130 | 7.322 | 7.418 | 7.445 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Guo, J.; Chang, C.-J.; Huang, Y. Utilizing a Fractional-Order Grey Model to Predict the Development Trends of China’s Electronic Commerce Service Industry. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8030169
Guo J, Chang C-J, Huang Y. Utilizing a Fractional-Order Grey Model to Predict the Development Trends of China’s Electronic Commerce Service Industry. Fractal and Fractional. 2024; 8(3):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8030169
Chicago/Turabian StyleGuo, Jianhong, Che-Jung Chang, and Yingyi Huang. 2024. "Utilizing a Fractional-Order Grey Model to Predict the Development Trends of China’s Electronic Commerce Service Industry" Fractal and Fractional 8, no. 3: 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8030169
APA StyleGuo, J., Chang, C. -J., & Huang, Y. (2024). Utilizing a Fractional-Order Grey Model to Predict the Development Trends of China’s Electronic Commerce Service Industry. Fractal and Fractional, 8(3), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8030169