Ancient Egyptian Art Studies: Art in Motion, a Social Tool of Power and Resistance

A special issue of Arts (ISSN 2076-0752).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (29 February 2024) | Viewed by 1581

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Interests: 21th Dynasty funerary practices and coffins reuse; robbery; innovation in times of crisis; materiality of funerary rituals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Interests: artists’ self-depictions and social-professional representations; appropriation of elite’s visual culture by the subelite; identity strategies

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will focus on ancient Egyptian Art as a dynamic. Artistic production is here envisioned as being in motion and taking part in a constant feedback loop of competing actors.

Art itself is understood as an agent, which works on multiple people: the artists, the commissioners and the consumers.

This Issue will underline how art acts upon society as a tool of power and eventually leads to identity questions, both for people who controlled human and economic resources and for those who could not afford monumental self-commemoration. Inclusion into certain parts of “high” society created opportunities and/or demands for art production; those close to but not within “high” society tried to emulate elite creations. Craftsmen/artist-producers and merchant-procurers found themselves negotiating much of this dynamic and are, thus, a part of it. In this highly competitive context, elite and non-elite were, thus, part of a never-ending competing sphere, using art production as a means of messaging their social place.

Art starts with the actors and their agenda. It is, thus, socially reactive. Commissioners both innovated newness and reverted to the past, sometimes with the same social goals in mind. Art, therefore, encapsulated the hierarchy dynamics and social changes of ancient Egyptian society while forcing its multiple actors to interact.

From this perspective, this Issue will re-examine epistemological and ontological questions about ancient Egyptian art and its fundamental actors. It will question how innovations were created, in which circumstances people manipulated past productions and how iconographic motives were put into motion for the purposes of creating useful social identities. It will underline how powerful art can be, whether put into the hands of the upper elite or their subordinates.

Prof. Dr. Kathlyn Cooney
Dr. Alisee Devillers
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Arts is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ancient Egyptian art and design
  • production/consumption
  • emulation/competition
  • privileged elite/sub-elite
  • agentivity
  • innovation/archaism
  • power and social impact
  • identity and legitimacy

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 5150 KiB  
Article
Through the Eyes of the Beholder: Motifs (Re)Interpreted in the 27th Dynasty
by Marissa Stevens
Arts 2024, 13(3), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13030076 - 23 Apr 2024
Viewed by 817
Abstract
This paper aims to highlight examples of artistic motifs common throughout Egyptian history but augmented in novel ways during the 27th Dynasty, a time when Egypt was part of the Achaemenid empire and ruled by Persian kings. These kings represented themselves as traditional [...] Read more.
This paper aims to highlight examples of artistic motifs common throughout Egyptian history but augmented in novel ways during the 27th Dynasty, a time when Egypt was part of the Achaemenid empire and ruled by Persian kings. These kings represented themselves as traditional pharaohs within Egypt’s borders and utilized longstanding Egyptian artistic motifs in their monumental constructions. These motifs, however, were manipulated in subtle ways to send targeted messages to audience(s) of this art. Art historians tend to situate visual styles and motifs within the longue durée of artistic tradition and pick a singular, official, and centralized perspective to narrate the history and reception of that art. In the case of Egypt, this perspective is often that of the king, and there is an assumption that there was a monolithic message sent to his people. But we are not dealing with a homogenous people; a diverse population would have had varied reactions to and interpretations of this visual signaling. By highlighting both the augmentation of traditional motifs undertaken by the Achaemenid administration and the multiplicity of perspectives they held for their audience(s), we can better understand ancient art as being dynamic in function and interpretation, rather than as a static snapshot of carbon-copied royal authority. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop