PARP Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2021) | Viewed by 11637

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA
Interests: Epigenetics in normal development and pathogenesis; chromatin regulation; role of poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism in transcription regulation and oncogenesis; PARP-1 inhibitors in oncology; Drosophila and mammalian model organisms

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

During the past few years, the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) protein has become a very popular target for anti-cancer treatment. PARP1 is a constitutive component of chromatin, crucial for both DNA repair and transcription (D’Amours et al., 1999; Satoh and Lindahl 1992; and Tulin et al., 2003). PARP1 takes an active part in the DNA repair process by binding to breaks in DNA and catalyzing the transfer of ADP-ribose from NAD to the glutamic acids of protein-acceptors and the polymerization of ADP-ribose into long chains (pADPr) (D’Amours et al., 1999). Many nuclear proteins—such as histones, transcription factors, and PARP1 itself (D’Amours et al., 1999)—are acceptors of pADPr in vivo and in vitro. The activation of the PARP1 protein in chromatin in response to developmental and environmental stress is known to mediate changes in chromatin and stimulate transcription (Kim et al., 2004; Petesch and Lis 2008; and Tulin and Spradling 2003). Although the PARP1 protein is abundant in the nucleus, its localization in chromatin is not uniform and is restricted to the promoters of a specific subset of genes (Krishnakumar et al., 2008; and Tulin et al., 2002). PARP1 has been of interest since a publication in Nature described the protein’s inhibition as having synthetic lethality in BRCA-2 deficient tumor cells (Bryant et al., 2005). Several lines of evidence indicate that PARP1 deregulation is involved in the onset of malignancy. Inhibitors of PARP1 are known to obstruct tumor development. The anticancer action of PARP-1 inhibitors is generally attributed to their role in preventing PARP1-driven DNA repair in tumorigenic cells, eventually leading to cell death. In the past 40 years, many PARP1 inhibitors have been identified, and their effectiveness has been shown in the treatment of aggressive and non-responsive tumors, such as triple-negative breast cancer (-BRCA, –HER, and -PR) (Curtin 2005). This Special Issue of the open access journal “Cancers” is focused on most recent advances in “PARP Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy”.

Prof. Dr. Alexei Tulin
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • PARP-1
  • PARG
  • PARP-1 inhibitors
  • PARP-1 roles in cancer
  • poly(ADP-ribose)
  • cancer models

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 14278 KiB  
Article
Candidate Markers of Olaparib Response from Genomic Data Analyses of Human Cancer Cell Lines
by Setor Amuzu, Euridice Carmona, Anne-Marie Mes-Masson, Celia M. T. Greenwood, Patricia N. Tonin and Jiannis Ragoussis
Cancers 2021, 13(6), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061296 - 15 Mar 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4056
Abstract
The benefit of PARP inhibitor olaparib in relapsed and advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is well established especially in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Identification of additional biomarkers can help expand the population of patients most likely to benefit from olaparib treatment. To identify [...] Read more.
The benefit of PARP inhibitor olaparib in relapsed and advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is well established especially in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Identification of additional biomarkers can help expand the population of patients most likely to benefit from olaparib treatment. To identify candidate markers of olaparib response we analyzed genomic and in vitro olaparib response data from two independent groups of cancer cell lines. Using pan-cancer cell lines (n = 896) from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer database, we applied linear regression methods to identify statistically significant gene predictors of olaparib response based on mRNA expression. We then analyzed whole exome sequencing and mRNA gene expression data from our collection of 18 HGSOC cell lines previously classified as sensitive, intermediate, or resistant based on in vitro olaparib response for mutations, copy number variation and differential expression of candidate olaparib response genes. We identify genes previously associated with olaparib response (SLFN11, ABCB1), and discover novel candidate olaparib sensitivity genes with known functions including interaction with PARP1 (PUM3, EEF1A1) and involvement in homologous recombination DNA repair (ELP4). Further investigations at experimental and clinical levels are required to validate novel candidates, and ultimately determine their efficacy as potential biomarkers of olaparib sensitivity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue PARP Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 30785 KiB  
Article
Bioinformatic Analysis of the Nicotinamide Binding Site in Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Family Proteins
by Garri Manasaryan, Dmitry Suplatov, Sergey Pushkarev, Viktor Drobot, Alexander Kuimov, Vytas Švedas and Dmitry Nilov
Cancers 2021, 13(6), 1201; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061201 - 10 Mar 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2959
Abstract
The PARP family consists of 17 members with diverse functions, including those related to cancer cells’ viability. Several PARP inhibitors are of great interest as innovative anticancer drugs, but they have low selectivity towards distinct PARP family members and exert serious adverse effects. [...] Read more.
The PARP family consists of 17 members with diverse functions, including those related to cancer cells’ viability. Several PARP inhibitors are of great interest as innovative anticancer drugs, but they have low selectivity towards distinct PARP family members and exert serious adverse effects. We describe a family-wide study of the nicotinamide (NA) binding site, an important functional region in the PARP structure, using comparative bioinformatic analysis and molecular modeling. Mutations in the NA site and D-loop mobility around the NA site were identified as factors that can guide the design of selective PARP inhibitors. Our findings are of particular importance for the development of novel tankyrase (PARPs 5a and 5b) inhibitors for cancer therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue PARP Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 4926 KiB  
Article
The Paradoxical Effect of PARP Inhibitor BGP-15 on Irinotecan-Induced Cachexia and Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction
by Dean G. Campelj, Cara A. Timpani, Aaron C. Petersen, Alan Hayes, Craig A. Goodman and Emma Rybalka
Cancers 2020, 12(12), 3810; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123810 - 17 Dec 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4004
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced muscle wasting and dysfunction is a contributing factor to cachexia alongside cancer and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Here, we investigate the effects of the chemotherapeutic agent irinotecan (IRI) on skeletal muscle mass and function and whether BGP-15 (a poly-(ADP-ribose) [...] Read more.
Chemotherapy-induced muscle wasting and dysfunction is a contributing factor to cachexia alongside cancer and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Here, we investigate the effects of the chemotherapeutic agent irinotecan (IRI) on skeletal muscle mass and function and whether BGP-15 (a poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) inhibitor and heat shock protein co-inducer) adjuvant therapy could protect against IRI-induced skeletal myopathy. Healthy 6-week-old male Balb/C mice (n = 24; 8/group) were treated with six intraperitoneal injections of either vehicle, IRI (30 mg/kg) or BGP-15 adjuvant therapy (IRI+BGP; 15 mg/kg) over two weeks. IRI reduced lean and tibialis anterior mass, which were attenuated by IRI+BGP treatment. Remarkably, IRI reduced muscle protein synthesis, while IRI+BGP reduced protein synthesis further. These changes occurred in the absence of a change in crude markers of mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) Complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling and protein degradation. Interestingly, the cytoskeletal protein dystrophin was reduced in both IRI- and IRI+BGP-treated mice, while IRI+BGP treatment also decreased β-dystroglycan, suggesting significant remodeling of the cytoskeleton. IRI reduced absolute force production of the soleus and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles, while IRI+BGP rescued absolute force production of the soleus and strongly trended to rescue force output of the EDL (p = 0.06), which was associated with improvements in mass. During the fatiguing stimulation, IRI+BGP-treated EDL muscles were somewhat susceptible to rupture at the musculotendinous junction, likely due to BGP-15’s capacity to maintain the rate of force development within a weakened environment characterized by significant structural remodeling. Our paradoxical data highlight that BGP-15 has some therapeutic advantage by attenuating IRI-induced skeletal myopathy; however, its effects on the remodeling of the cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix, which appear to make fast-twitch muscles more prone to tearing during contraction, could suggest the induction of muscular dystrophy and, thus, require further characterization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue PARP Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop