Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
7.4
4.7
Journals
Foods
Special Issues
Pesticide Residues in Food: Rapid Detection and Risk Assessment
share announcement

Pesticide Residues in Food: Rapid Detection and Risk Assessment

A special issue of Foods (ISSN 2304-8158). This special issue belongs to the section "Food Quality and Safety".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2024) | Viewed by 1794

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Svetlana Hrouzkova

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Analytical Chemistry (FCFT), Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
Interests: gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; microextraction sample preparation; pesticide residues analysis; ultratrace analysis; food and environmental analysis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The establishment of simple, sensitive, and efficient tools for the detection of ultratrace levels of contaminants in food matrices is necessary to ensure the safety of consumers. New varieties of pesticides continue to flood the market, requiring lower and lower detection limits for pesticides and therefore more sensitive, accurate, and efficient detection technology to achieve improved detection sensitivity and diversification of detection methods, shorten the response time, and improve the degree of automation of the instrument and the field detection capabilities.

To improve detection efficiency, detect potential threats in the form of pesticide residues in a targeted manner, and clarify the health risk, new, faster, easy to handle, environmentally friendly, and cheap methods are continuously needed thanks to the growing demands for legislative requirements in the area of food safety. Extraction methods should be generic to allow the detection of pesticides with different physicochemical properties. Thus, in addition to targeted pesticides, the scope of this analysis can expand if high-resolution mass spectrometry is used, performing targeted, nontargeted, and unknown analyses, including the detection of metabolites or unexpected pesticides.

The aim of this Special Issue is to provide insights into the progress and challenges in the development of analytical methods for pesticide residues in various food, plant, and nutraceutical samples. In addition to conventional targeted analysis and dissipation studies, suspect screening and unknown analysis are also welcome, applying high-resolution mass spectrometry or other suitable analytical techniques. Authors are kindly invited to contribute to this Special Issue, which I believe will have a significant impact in the field.

Dr. Svetlana Hrouzkova
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Foods is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pesticide residues analysis
  • gas or liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection
  • high resolution mass spectrometry
  • fast detection sensors
  • green sample preparation techniques
  • food analysis
  • plant materials
  • nutraceuticals
  • ultratrace analysis
  • risk assessment
  • non-target screening

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 2696 KiB  
Article
Fast DLLME-GC-MS Method for Determination of Pesticides in Carmelite Drops and Evaluation of Matrix Effects in Related Medicinal Products
by Agneša Szarka and Svetlana Hrouzková
Foods 2024, 13(11), 1745; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13111745 - 2 Jun 2024
Viewed by 431
Abstract
The production of nutraceuticals is a growing trend, as many consumers consider them an important part of the modern active lifestyle. Others rely on the use of nutraceuticals instead of prescribing pharmaceuticals to improve their health more naturally. One of the major concerns [...] Read more.
The production of nutraceuticals is a growing trend, as many consumers consider them an important part of the modern active lifestyle. Others rely on the use of nutraceuticals instead of prescribing pharmaceuticals to improve their health more naturally. One of the major concerns in the nutraceutical industry is the potential presence of contaminants. Even low concentrations of contaminant residues can be harmful, so analytical methods that are sensitive at ultratrace levels are needed. Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method combined with fast gas chromatography and mass spectrometry was developed for the inspection of pesticide residues in Carmelite drops. The most suitable recoveries are presented when the alcohol content is fixed at 20% in Carmelite drops. The method was validated; the linearity, limits of detection/quantification, the method accuracy and precision were obtained. The complex nutraceutical matrix causes significant complications in quantitative analysis; therefore, the main target of the work was placed on studying the effects of the matrix on the correct expression of the resulting concentration of contaminants in different types of samples. An in-depth study of matrix factors was carried out, and its relationship with the content of potential interferents from the medicinal products as well as other components added during the drops’ production was discussed. Related medicinal plant-derived nutraceuticals were tested, the method was applied for real-life samples, and positive findings are herein reported. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pesticide Residues in Food: Rapid Detection and Risk Assessment)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1070 KiB  
Article
Dissipation Kinetics and Risk Assessment of Diniconazole, Dinotefuran, Metconazole, and Tebuconazole in Raphanus sativus L.
by Yunseon Kwak, Min-Ho Song, Ji-Woo Yu and Ji-Ho Lee
Foods 2023, 12(15), 2846; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12152846 - 27 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 940
Abstract
This study investigated the degradation characteristics and conducted a risk assessment of four pesticides (Diniconazole, Dinotefuran, Metconazole, and Tebuconazole) in the leaves and roots of radish. Radish was cultivated in two greenhouse fields, and samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, [...] Read more.
This study investigated the degradation characteristics and conducted a risk assessment of four pesticides (Diniconazole, Dinotefuran, Metconazole, and Tebuconazole) in the leaves and roots of radish. Radish was cultivated in two greenhouse fields, and samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days after pesticide application. Sample analysis was performed using LC-MS/MS, and the recovery rates ranged from 70.1% to 118.6%. The biological half-life of Diniconazole was found to be 6.2 days (leaf and root), Dinotefuran was 5.3 days (leaf) and 4.6 days (root), Metconazole was 9.3 days (leaf) and 3.2 days (root), and Tebuconazole was 8.0 days (leaf) and 5.1 days (root). After comparing the maximum residue limits (MRL) of each pesticide in Korea with the residues during the pre-harvest interval (PHI), Diniconazole showed a Hazard quotient (HQ) exceeding 1, indicating potential risks for true consumers. Furthermore, Tebuconazole showed an HQ of 0.3 or higher, indicating a significant level of risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pesticide Residues in Food: Rapid Detection and Risk Assessment)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop