ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Strengths-Based Perspectives on Supporting People with Mental Illnesses or Intellectual Disabilities Who Have Offended

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Care Sciences & Services".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2020) | Viewed by 4102

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Interests: strengths-based approaches; special needs education; persons who have offended; mental illness; intellectual disability

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Criminology, Criminal Law and Social Law, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Interests: criminal justice; penology; vulnerable persons; persons with mental illness who offended

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Interests: special needs education; family members of persons who have offended; social network; social support; family (group) therapy; strengths-based approaches; mental illness; intellectual disability

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) welcomes submissions to a Special Issue focusing on “Strengths-Based Perspectives on Supporting Persons with Mental Illnesses and/or Intellectual Disabilities Who Have Offended".

Persons with mental illnesses and/or intellectual disabilities (PMI/ID) are highly represented among offender populations. As these persons are considered legally unaccountable for their actions, they can be considered as “patients” as well as “offenders” (in order not to stigmatize, we opt to use the term “persons who have offended”). Due to the mental illness and/or intellectual disability (or a combination of both), these persons often have specific support needs. In general, three perspectives in order to deal with PMI/ID can be discerned: a forensic–psychiatric care perspective, a risk-oriented perspective, and a strengths-based perspective (cf. Barnao and Ward, 2015). Whilst we do not neglect the value of the first two perspectives (in light of legitimate goals, such as treating psychiatric problems or safeguarding society from persons “labeled as dangerous”), this Special Issue specifically focusses on the development and application of strengths-based approaches in the forensic field. Strengths-based perspectives highlight the persons’ own capacities, the importance of one’s natural resources, and the fact that a person should be involved in important decisions regarding support/treatment and his or her life in general. As such, it relates to personal and interpersonal competencies as well as community resources.

We are interested in the following topics related to strengths-based approaches (non-exhaustive list):

  • Aspects related to the micro-level, such as:
    • first-person perspectives on support (e.g., “patient”/client views, social network members’ accounts, etc.)
    • research related to support needs, risks and protective factors of vulnerable sub-populations among persons who have offended
    • studies on the support of family members and the broader social network
    • studies on strengths-based assessment tools
  • Aspects related to the meso-level, such as:
    • application of strengths-based approaches in different setting (forensic residential psychiatric services, jails and prisons, community-based settings, etc.)
    • development, implementation and/or evaluation of strengths-based support methods
    • innovative strengths-based practices and methods
  • Aspects related to the macro-level, such as:
    • studies related to policy, economic evaluations, cost-effectiveness studies, etc.
    • studies related to legal issues in relation to strengths-based approaches
  • Furthermore, we welcome theoretical contributions focusing on the conceptualisation and operationalisation of strengths-based approaches in forensic and judicial settings
  • We welcome contributions that apply to adolescent or adult populations.

We would like to invite researchers to contribute innovative work to be considered for publication in this Special Issue. Submissions can include original research articles, review studies (systematic reviews or meta-analyses), theoretical contributions or brief reports.

Prof. Dr. Stijn Vandevelde
Prof. Dr. Tom Vander Beken
Dr. Sara Rowaert
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • persons who have offended
  • strengths-based approach
  • good lives model
  • offender rehabilitation
  • intellectual disability
  • mental illness
  • family support
  • family experiences
  • social network

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 998 KiB  
Article
Quality of Life of People with Severe Mental Health Problems: Testing an Interactive Model
by Karen Geerts, Ilja Bongers, David Buitenweg and Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(11), 3866; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113866 - 29 May 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3768
Abstract
Improvement of subjective quality of life (QoL) is seen as an important treatment outcome in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to test the theoretical model of Cummins, which includes a homeostatic management system. According to this model, objective variables are [...] Read more.
Improvement of subjective quality of life (QoL) is seen as an important treatment outcome in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to test the theoretical model of Cummins, which includes a homeostatic management system. According to this model, objective variables are almost irrelevant to general well-being, while the feeling of having an influence on one’s circumstances (perceived deficit) is related to subjective QoL. The variables of the Cummins model were operationalised based on the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile, a structured interview to assess the subjective QoL of people with severe mental health problems. The Cummins model was tested using structural equation modelling and a mediator model between Objective QoL, Subjective QoL and Perceived Deficit. Subjective QoL and General Well-Being were significantly related and having a meaningful perspective in life was related to General Well-Being. Contrary to the Cummins model, both Objective QoL and Perceived Deficit had a significant relation to Subjective QoL and Perceived Deficit was a partial mediator between Objective QoL and Subjective QoL. Cummins’ theoretical model was partially confirmed. The current study suggests that meaningful (treatment) evaluation of subjective QoL can only be performed if objective QoL, General Well-Being and subjective evaluation (Perceived Deficit and Framework) are taken into account. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop