Anesthesia and Analgesia for High-Risk Pulmonary Patients

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Anesthesiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 March 2023) | Viewed by 4775

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
2. Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Interests: regional anesthesia; ambulatory anesthesia; orthopedic anesthesia; ambulatory joints; acute pain

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease with a prevalence of 10.1% worldwide. According to the WHO, it has become the third leading cause of mortality in the world. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2007-8, N = 468,795), a study by the BOLD collaboration group revealed that patients with COPD (n = 22,576) who underwent surgery were found to have a higher morbidity (25.8%), 30-day mortality (6.7%), and longer length of stay (4 days) than patients without COPD (10.2%, 1.4%, and 1 day, respectively; p < 0.0001). Surgical patients with COPD were found to have an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia, sepsis, respiratory failure, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, and renal failure.

It is widely known that general anesthesia in patients with COPD is associated with adverse outcomes, particularly when administered with an endotracheal tube and intermittent positive pressure ventilation. COPD patients under general anesthesia are more likely to have postoperative pulmonary complications and are prone to laryngospasm, bronchospasm, barotrauma, and hypoxemia. For these reasons, with increasing supportive evidence in the literature, it is recommended to use regional anesthesia instead of general anesthesia. However, the interscalene brachial plexus block remains a relative contraindication since it is associated with phrenic nerve palsy and diminished respiratory function.

Shoulder pain is a common pathology that carries a prevalence of up to 26%. Major shoulder surgery is known to cause moderate to severe postoperative pain. Peripheral nerve blocks have become the mainstay and proven effective modality for treating postoperative shoulder pain. The interscalene block is still considered the gold standard in providing surgical anesthesia as well as analgesia for most shoulder surgery. However, the inherent risk of blocking the phrenic nerve when performing the interscalene block has prohibited its use among high-risk patients with severe pulmonary disease.

Recent advances in regional anesthesia have widened the usability of peripheral nerve blocks, even to certain high-risk patients that were once precluded due to the frailty of their respiratory condition. Compromised pulmonary patients would be subjected to general anesthesia and higher opioid usage, leading to an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Due to the innovations of ultrasonography, regional blocks have recently been refined to target select nerves supplying the shoulder that do not lead to adverse events, such as the suprascapular and axillary nerves. These novel phrenic-sparing blocks may be effective alternatives to the interscalene block and provide anesthesia and analgesia to these high-risk patients.

This Special Issue will identify the gaps in the novel regional techniques that are diaphragm sparing based on original research and review papers.

Topics will include:

  • The use of novel regional techniques that are diaphragm sparing
  • Comparison between novel techniques to the interscalene block
  • Postoperative complications of patients with pulmonary disease
  • Regional versus general anesthesia in patients with pulmonary disease

Dr. David H. Kim
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • diaphragm-sparing
  • phrenic nerve sparing
  • shoulder surgery
  • COPD
  • brachial plexus block

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 1157 KiB  
Article
Risk Factors for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Leading to Increased In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy for Primary Lung Cancer Resection: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study of the German Thorax Registry
by Wolfgang Baar, Axel Semmelmann, Julian Knoerlein, Frederike Weber, Sebastian Heinrich and Torsten Loop
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(19), 5774; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195774 - 29 Sep 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 1992
Abstract
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) represent the most frequent complications after lung surgery, and they increase postoperative mortality. This study investigated the incidence of PPCs, in-hospital mortality rate, and risk factors leading to PPCs in patients undergoing open thoracotomy lung resections (OTLRs) for primary [...] Read more.
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) represent the most frequent complications after lung surgery, and they increase postoperative mortality. This study investigated the incidence of PPCs, in-hospital mortality rate, and risk factors leading to PPCs in patients undergoing open thoracotomy lung resections (OTLRs) for primary lung cancer. The data from 1426 patients in this multicentre retrospective study were extracted from the German Thorax Registry and presented after univariate and multivariate statistical processing. A total of 472 patients showed at least one PPC. The presence of two PPCs was associated with a significantly increased mortality rate of 7% (p < 0.001) compared to that of patients without or with a single PPC. Three or more PPCs increased the mortality rate to 33% (p < 0.001). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed male gender (OR 1.4), age > 60 years (OR 1.8), and current or previous smoking (OR 1.6), while the pre-operative risk factors were still CRP levels > 3 mg/dl (OR 1.7) and FEV1 < 60% (OR 1.4). Procedural independent risk factors for PPCs were: duration of surgery exceeding 195 min (OR 1.6), the amount of intraoperative blood loss (OR 1.6), partial ligation of the pulmonary artery (OR 1.5), continuing invasive ventilation after surgery (OR 2.9), and infusion of intraoperative crystalloids exceeding 6 mL/kg/h (OR 1.9). The incidence of PPCs was significantly lower in patients with continuous epidural or paravertebral analgesia (OR 0.7). Optimising perioperative management by implementing continuous neuroaxial techniques and optimised fluid therapy may reduce the incidence of PPCs and associated mortality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anesthesia and Analgesia for High-Risk Pulmonary Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

10 pages, 1263 KiB  
Review
Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Shoulder Surgery in High-Risk Pulmonary Patients
by Bradley H. Lee, William P. Qiao, Stephen McCracken, Michael N. Singleton and Mikhail Goman
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(10), 3483; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103483 - 16 May 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2327
Abstract
Patients with pre-existing pulmonary conditions are at risk for experiencing perioperative complications and increased morbidity. General anesthesia has historically been used for shoulder surgery, though regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly used to provide anesthesia and improved pain control after surgery. Relative to regional [...] Read more.
Patients with pre-existing pulmonary conditions are at risk for experiencing perioperative complications and increased morbidity. General anesthesia has historically been used for shoulder surgery, though regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly used to provide anesthesia and improved pain control after surgery. Relative to regional anesthesia, patients who undergo general anesthesia may be more prone to risks of barotrauma, postoperative hypoxemia, and pneumonia. High-risk pulmonary patients, in particular, may be exposed to these risks of general anesthesia. Traditional regional anesthesia techniques for shoulder surgery are associated with high rates of phrenic nerve paralysis which significantly impairs pulmonary function. Newer regional anesthesia techniques have been developed, however, that provide effective analgesia and surgical anesthesia while having much lower rates of phrenic nerve paralysis, thereby preserving pulmonary function. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anesthesia and Analgesia for High-Risk Pulmonary Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop