Feature Papers for the ‘Land Socio-Economic and Political Issues’ Section: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Land Socio-Economic and Political Issues".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 August 2024 | Viewed by 4467

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Land use is shaped by a complex nexus of socio-economic and political factors which significantly influence Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Economic forces such as market demand, urbanization, and resource extraction play key roles in shaping land use patterns, often leading to adverse environmental and societal impacts. In addition, political dynamics such as land tenure systems, property rights, and governance structures significantly influence land access and decision-making processes, thereby shaping land use outcomes at local, regional, and global scales. Moreover, socio-cultural elements, including cultural practices, demographics, and migration patterns, play an important role in determining the direction of land use. These factors influence a range of issues, from food security and poverty reduction to environmental sustainability and cultural heritage preservation. Understanding and addressing these sociocultural dynamics are essential for promoting resilient and inclusive land use policies and practices. Fostering sustainable and equitable land use requires a holistic, multi-stakeholder approach that engages governments, businesses, communities, and civil society organizations. Effective land use planning and management necessitate cross-sectoral collaboration, transparent decision-making processes, policy coherence, and meaningful dialogue among diverse stakeholders. By integrating diverse perspectives and expertise, policymakers can develop strategies that prioritize environmental conservation, social equity, and economic development, ensuring the long-term health and resilience of our land and communities.

Achieving SDGs is inextricably linked to how we manage and use land. This nexus is most evident in the interdependencies among several key SDGs that are directly influenced by land use dynamics. For instance, SDG 2, which advocates for "Zero Hunger", is closely connected to agronomic practices and the sustainable use of arable land. The efficient and responsible use of land resources is essential for boosting agricultural productivity, ensuring food security, and providing adequate nutrition for the growing world population. This requires innovations in sustainable farming, improved land management techniques, and the preservation of soil fertility to support food systems that are resilient to climate shocks and other external pressures. At the same time, SDG 15, "Life on Land", highlights the need to preserve and restore terrestrial ecosystems, such as forests, wetlands, and grasslands, to maintain the biodiversity and ecosystem services they provide. These services are critical for human survival and include water purification, flood protection, carbon sequestration, and the preservation of flora and fauna. Sustainable land use strategies are crucial to prevent habitat destruction, land degradation, and loss of biodiversity, which are challenges that this goal seeks to address. SDG 10, "Reduced Inequalities", incorporates the principle of equity, which extends to land use by supporting fair and just access to land resources. This includes addressing historical inequities in land distribution, ensuring land rights for marginalized communities, and implementing policies that allow for equitable sharing of the benefits derived from land use. Furthermore, SDG 13, "Climate Action", underscores the urgency of adopting sustainable land use practices to mitigate climate change. Land use decisions have a profound impact on greenhouse gas emissions, carbon sequestration, and the resilience of natural and human systems to climate-induced changes. Practices such as deforestation, land conversion, and unsustainable agriculture exacerbate climate change, while sustainable practices can mitigate its effects and contribute to the adaptation capacities of communities. The integration of these SDGs into land use policies requires a careful understanding of the trade-offs and synergies between environmental conservation, social equity, and economic development. It is imperative for policymakers to create a framework that balances these sometimes-competing objectives, enabling human prosperity while safeguarding the planet. Overall, this Special Issue (SI) seeks to catalyze interdisciplinary collaboration, uniting diverse academic disciplines ranging from environmental science, agronomy, social sciences, and economics, to urban planning and law to address the multifaceted challenges of achieving the SDGs in the context of sustainable land use. By promoting a multidisciplinary exchange of knowledge and research, the goal is to cultivate a comprehensive and inclusive understanding of land-related issues. Such an integrative approach is vital for formulating holistic strategies, policies, and practices that can navigate the complex interplay between human activities and the natural environment. Through this collaborative academic and policy-oriented endeavor, we can aspire to meet the ambitious targets of the SDGs and ensure a sustainable future for all.

We invite submissions from a diversity of disciplinary backgrounds including environmental science, economics, political economy, socio-economic, development economics, sociology, and political science. We particularly seek submissions that demonstrate a high degree of methodological rigor in their examination and analysis of land issues, and that contribute to innovative approaches for achieving the SDGs. We welcome interdisciplinary work that synthesizes multiple perspectives, methods, and data sources to provide novel insights into land issues and their relation to the SDGs.

Prof. Dr. Hossein Azadi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainable land management
  • socio-economi implications of land use
  • political dimensions of land governance
  • land tenure systems
  • land rights and access
  • equitable land distribution
  • rural development and land policies
  • land-based livelihoods
  • land use planning
  • urbanization and land use
  • land degradation and restoration
  • gender and land ownership
  • climate change adaptation and land resilience
  • ecosystem services and land management
  • land conflicts and dispute resolution
  • land-based investments and governance
  • monitoring and evaluation of land-related SDGs
  • land administration
  • zero hunger (SDG 2)
  • life on land (SDG 15)
  • reduced inequalities (SDG 10)
  • climate action (SDG 13)

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 3664 KiB  
Article
Population, Land, and the Development of the Commodity Economy: Evidence from Qing Dynasty China
by Jiale Wan, Qian Dai and Shuangyou Miao
Land 2024, 13(8), 1183; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081183 - 31 Jul 2024
Viewed by 289
Abstract
Population growth exacerbates the pressure on land carrying capacity, affecting the sustainability of agricultural production, and also impacts non-agricultural industries. This paper utilizes grain price data from southern China during the Qing Dynasty (1776–1910) to examine the impact of population and land pressure [...] Read more.
Population growth exacerbates the pressure on land carrying capacity, affecting the sustainability of agricultural production, and also impacts non-agricultural industries. This paper utilizes grain price data from southern China during the Qing Dynasty (1776–1910) to examine the impact of population and land pressure on the development of the commodity economy under the “involution” of smallholder agriculture. This study finds that under conditions of stagnant technological advancement and limited natural resources, population growth during the Qing Dynasty created significant “Malthusian” population pressure. This pressure on land first resulted in the over-concentration of agricultural labor and saturation of the farming population. Surplus labor, unable to be absorbed by agriculture, shifted to non-agricultural sectors, engaging in the transportation and trade of grain. The pressure on land carrying capacity facilitated the cultivation and processing of cash crops, and product trade was supported by efficient waterway transportation. These activities generated commercial profits that alleviated survival pressures and promoted the prosperity of the commodity economy. However, this prosperity did not accompany significant productivity improvements; instead, it was a product of “involution” agriculture under high population density pressures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 3278 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Agriculture and Its Impact on the Rural Development in EU Countries: A Multivariate Analysis
by Emilia Herman
Land 2024, 13(7), 947; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13070947 - 28 Jun 2024
Viewed by 485
Abstract
The aim of this study was to highlight the interrelationship between the environmental, social, and economic pillars of agricultural sustainability and their impact on rural development in EU countries. By considering the cumulative influence of 15 social, economic, and environmental indicators, the study [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to highlight the interrelationship between the environmental, social, and economic pillars of agricultural sustainability and their impact on rural development in EU countries. By considering the cumulative influence of 15 social, economic, and environmental indicators, the study clustered the EU countries into five homogeneous groups using principal component analysis and cluster analysis. The research findings confirm that there is a significant trade-off between the three dimensions of sustainability, particularly between the environmental dimension, on the one hand, and the socio–economic dimension, on the other. Thus, the main real challenges identified for the countries included in cluster 5 (Bulgaria, Greece, Croatia, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Romania, and Hungary) are related to the socio–economic pillar of sustainability. Moreover, for four EU countries (Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, and Ireland), included in two different clusters, achieving environmental goals such as reducing agricultural emissions (SDG 2.60) and increasing area under organic farming (SDG 2.40) represents a significant issue in sustainable agriculture. The results highlighted specific challenges to sustainability in agriculture for EU countries that can hinder its effects on rural development. Therefore, tailored measures should be designed to efficiently address these specific issues. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1582 KiB  
Article
Research on the Risk Spillover among the Real Economy, Real Estate Market, and Financial System: Evidence from China
by Yubin Huangfu, Haibo Yu, Zuoji Dong and Yingman Wang
Land 2024, 13(6), 890; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060890 - 19 Jun 2024
Viewed by 678
Abstract
Amidst escalating global policy uncertainties and the painful transformation phase of the Chinese economy, studying the time-varying characteristics of risk spillover among the real economy, real estate market, and financial system holds substantial practical relevance for preventing and resolving significant systemic risks. This [...] Read more.
Amidst escalating global policy uncertainties and the painful transformation phase of the Chinese economy, studying the time-varying characteristics of risk spillover among the real economy, real estate market, and financial system holds substantial practical relevance for preventing and resolving significant systemic risks. This paper employs the TVP-VAR-DY model, selects indices from the real sectors to construct a risk spillover index for the real economy, and incorporates indices from the real estate and financial sectors to develop a trivariate SV-TVP-VAR model for empirically analyzing the time-varying nature of risk spillover relationships among these variables. This study reveals that risk spillover among different sectors of the real economy exhibits asymmetry and volatility, with the industrial sector experiencing the highest degree of risk spillover. The prosperity of the real estate market consistently aligns with that of the financial system; however, shocks during periods of risk accumulation in the real estate market significantly amplify risks in the real economy. The financial system serves the real economy, which suffers lesser impacts. Nonetheless, post-2008, the financial system’s support for the real estate market has gradually diminished. Crises exacerbate the extent of risk spillover, but the causative factors and socio-economic context create heterogeneity in fluctuations. Based on these findings, in response to the current real estate shock, the Chinese government should discuss the real economy, the real estate industry, and the financial system within the same research framework. Policies should primarily focus on fiscal measures to promote the recovery of the real economy more rapidly. Additionally, by allowing local governments to implement tailored policies based on local conditions, potential homebuying demand has been effectively stimulated. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 937 KiB  
Article
Has China’s Pilot Policy of Farmland Management Right Mortgage Loan Promoted County Agricultural Economic Growth?
by Jinqian Deng, Yue Gu and Na Zhang
Land 2024, 13(6), 869; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060869 - 16 Jun 2024
Viewed by 845
Abstract
Farmland mortgages are expected to drive county agricultural economic growth (CAEG) as a crucial component of furthering the reform of the rural land system and the reform of the rural financial system against the new backdrop of the new era. This study gathers [...] Read more.
Farmland mortgages are expected to drive county agricultural economic growth (CAEG) as a crucial component of furthering the reform of the rural land system and the reform of the rural financial system against the new backdrop of the new era. This study gathers panel data from 2045 Chinese counties from 2011 to 2020 and uses the difference-in-differences method and the synthetic control method to systematically examine the effects of China’s farmland management right mortgage loan (FMRML) pilot program on CAEG. The FMRML pilot program was implemented in 2016, and this research is presented as a quasi-natural experiment. The findings indicate that there is a “policy trap” and that CAEG has not been successfully promoted by the FMRML pilot program. The reason for this is because the pilot program has made county resource mismatch worse, making it unable to fully realize the promotional effect on CAEG, rather than significantly activating the three key drivers of agricultural economic growth: people, land, and money. The impact of the FMRML pilot policy on CAEG is not uniform, according to the results of the heterogeneity study, with a substantial “blocking” effect only in the central region and no significant influence in the western, northeastern, or eastern regions. The findings propose that in order to optimize agricultural mortgage policy and advance CAEG, China and other emerging nations can benefit greatly from the insights this study offers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2106 KiB  
Article
Can Urban Sprawl Promote Enterprise Innovation? Evidence from A-Share Listed Companies in China
by Zeru Jiang, Bo Zhang, Chunlai Yuan, Zhaojie Han and Jiangtao Liu
Land 2024, 13(5), 710; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050710 - 18 May 2024
Viewed by 694
Abstract
Urban sprawl does not invariably impede factor agglomeration; rather, it can foster polycentric urban configurations, thereby enhancing productivity and encouraging enterprise innovation. This study investigates the effect of urban sprawl on enterprise innovation using data for A-share listed Chinese companies from 2010 to [...] Read more.
Urban sprawl does not invariably impede factor agglomeration; rather, it can foster polycentric urban configurations, thereby enhancing productivity and encouraging enterprise innovation. This study investigates the effect of urban sprawl on enterprise innovation using data for A-share listed Chinese companies from 2010 to 2020. The results reveal a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between urban sprawl and enterprise innovation, particularly among large enterprises, well-established entities, non-state-owned enterprises, and those operating in non-manufacturing sectors. Additionally, the effects of urban sprawl on the inverted U-shaped relationship are more pronounced in the north-eastern regions and small cities. Regional integration significantly moderates the inverted U-shaped relationship between urban sprawl and enterprise innovation. This research contributes new insights to the field of enterprise innovation, offering theoretical and empirical support for analyzing the economic implications of urban sprawl. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5214 KiB  
Article
Examining the Relationship between Geographic Groupings and Perspective of Critical Community Issues: An Audience Segmentation Analysis
by Alyssa Schmidt, Kevan W. Lamm, Abigail Borron and Alexa J. Lamm
Land 2024, 13(5), 681; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050681 - 14 May 2024
Viewed by 735
Abstract
The present study examined whether perception of critical community issues was dependent on respondents’ rurality, geographic region, or extension district in the state of Georgia, located in the southeastern United States. A non-probability sampling procedure was employed. A total of 3,374 responses were [...] Read more.
The present study examined whether perception of critical community issues was dependent on respondents’ rurality, geographic region, or extension district in the state of Georgia, located in the southeastern United States. A non-probability sampling procedure was employed. A total of 3,374 responses were collected. Five critical community issue themes were analyzed: (1) youth and family development, (2) civic engagement and community development, (3) agriculture and economic development, (4) nutrition education and food availability, and (5) water. Descriptive statistics were analyzed. A series of chi-squared tests of independence were used to test for significant relationships between perception of critical community issues and geographic grouping. Statistically significant differences were observed between all groups (rurality, region, and district). Specifically, significant relationships were observed between all groups and perception of youth and family development and agriculture and economic development. A significant relationship between region and perception of civic engagement and community leadership was observed. Additionally, there was a significant relationship between rurality and water observed. The results indicate that programming efforts should be informed both by proximal communities as well as non-proximal communities sharing common characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop