Submit to Medicina Review for Medicina Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser

New Insights and Perspectives in Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Special Issue Editors
Special Issue Information
Keywords
Published Papers

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Obstetrics and Gynecology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 December 2022) | Viewed by 21067

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Marco Torella

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, Naples, Italy
Interests: urogynecology and female urology; gynecology; urodynamics; obstetric delivery
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Dr. Gaetano Riemma

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
Interests: endometrial cancer
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the last twenty years, minimally invasive gynecology has experienced several clinical and technical upgrades. The advent of robotic surgery, ultra-minimally invasive laparoscopy and vNOTES has improved the surgical, clinical and reproductive performances of the procedures. Moreover, tailored fertility preservation therapies have been developed to meet the childbearing demand from more than half of women between 18 and 40 years with a diagnosis of gynecological cancer. As a matter of fact, the potential loss of fertility could be more distressing than the malignancy itself.

Similarly, in-office hysteroscopy has been proposed as a novel gold-standard approach for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathologies, including the conservative approach for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial carcinoma.

On the other hand, varied progress has been achieved in the field of urogynecology, revolutionizing the treatment and follow-up of women with genital prolapse and urinary incontinence.

This focused Special Issue aims to provide an update about the current cutting of diagnosis management, treatment and outcomes of gynecological malignancies and benign pathologies, from basic science to translation, clinical and surgical approaches, with a special focus on novel minimally invasive surgical techniques and postsurgical quality of life.

Several experts in the field will participate in this upcoming Special Issue, providing up-to-date knowledge regarding hot topics in gynecology and urogynecology. Potential topics include but are not limited to the following:

Technological innovations in the field of gynecological laparoscopy
Robotic approach for uterine fibroids: why, when and how?
Conservative management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer in childbearing age
Reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for ovarian neoplasms: an up-to-date review
Hysteroscopic and molecular diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Diagnostic cornerstones and up-to-date approaches for uterine prolapse
Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: current strategies and future perspectives
The new era of in-office hysteroscopy: feasibility and current limits
Training and simulation for gynecological laparoscopy: strengths and limitations
Quality of life, psychological wellbeing and sexuality in women with urinary incontinence—where are we now.

Comprehensive, updated and concise reviews, as well as recently developed original articles, will be welcomed for submission.

Prof. Dr. Marco Torella
Dr. Gaetano Riemma
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

minimally invasive gynecology
urogynecology
reproductive surgery
hysteroscopy
endometrial cancer
ovarian neoplasms

Published Papers (8 papers)

Download All Papers

Order results

Result details

Show export options Show export options

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

8 pages, 779 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Pre- versus Post-Menopausal Onset of Overactive Bladder and the Response to Vaginal Estrogen Therapy: A Prospective Study

by Yoav Baruch, Marco Torella, Sarah De Bastiani, Michele Meschia, Massimo Candiani, Nicola Colacurci and Stefano Salvatore

Medicina 2023, 59(2), 245; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020245 - 27 Jan 2023

Viewed by 2158

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study examined the utility of local estrogen therapy for improving urinary symptoms in women diagnosed with Overactive Bladder allied to the time of onset of urinary symptoms whether pre- or post-menopausal. Materials and Methods: Subject to informed consent, menopausal women diagnosed with Overactive Bladder (OAB) and Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) were enrolled at three urogynecological units. OAB symptoms were scored using the Global Pelvic Floor Symptoms Bother Questionnaire (GPFSBQ), with explicit attention to question number 3 that specifically addresses the presence or absence of urgency and the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS). The Vaginal Health Index (VHI) was used to assess the vaginal mucosa trophism. Exclusion criteria included: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) ≥ stage II, urinary tract infection or disease, diabetes, inflammatory diseases, use of diuretics, alcohol or drug addictions, neurological and/or psychiatric disorders, and other precluding conditions. Women were treated with local estrogens for 3 months and re-evaluated. Results: Forty-three post-menopausal women were enrolled. Of these, ten women developed OAB symptoms before menopause (Group I) and 33 developed symptoms after menopause (Group II). Following local estrogen therapy, based on the Global Pelvic Floor Symptoms Bother Questionnaire, improvement of OAB symptoms was reported by 20% of patients in Group I (p = 0.414) and 64% of patients in Group II, (p = 0.002). Based on the PPIUS scale, diminution in urinary urgency was experienced by 20% of patients in Group I (p = 0.68) and 66% of patients in Group II (p = 0.036). Improved VHI scores were graded statisticaly significant in both groups (Group I in 100% of women, p = 0.005 vs. 76% in Group II, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Our results indicate that local estrogen therapy is more effective in women who develop OAB after menopause. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights and Perspectives in Minimally Invasive Gynecology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 671 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Unilateral Uterine Artery Embolization as a Treatment for Patients with Symptomatic Fibroids—Experience in a Case Series

by Krzysztof Pyra, Maciej Szmygin, Hanna Szmygin, Sławomir Woźniak and Tomasz Jargiełło

Medicina 2022, 58(12), 1732; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58121732 - 27 Nov 2022

Viewed by 1637

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) has become an accepted and widely performed therapy for patients with symptomatic (reporting at least two of the following symptoms: severe or prolonged menstrual bleeding, abdominal pain, tension in abdomen, problems with urination, constipation or anemia) uterine fibroids. Although in the majority of cases, bilateral occlusion is required to obtain a successful clinical outcome, there are patients in whom treatment of only one uterine artery could be attempted. There are several reasons for unilateral UAE: hemodynamic conditions, technical difficulties, anatomical variants and unilateral dominancy of blood supply to the fibroid. Our aim is to present our 10-year experience with unilateral UAE and evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: Records of 369 patients with fibroids who underwent UAE from 2010 to 2021 were analyzed. We identified 26 patients treated with unilateral uterine artery embolization and analyzed the data of these patients. All patients attended medical consultation, were assessed using a five-grade symptom scale and underwent MRI examination. Clinical response was evaluated at least 6 months after the procedure and was categorized to one of the following groups: complete improvement, partial improvement, no change and a worsening in symptoms. Results: Twenty-two patients (85%) reported at least partial improvement 6 months following the procedure. One patient required secondary embolization due to recanalization. The secondary procedure was successful, and complete improvement was achieved. One patient did not observe any clinical improvement, and in two cases, symptom recurrence was observed. All three patients were referred for surgical treatment. No major complications were noted. Overall, the success rate was 88%. Conclusions: The results of our study support the statement that elective unilateral embolization is an appropriate treatment in patients with a dominant uterine artery. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights and Perspectives in Minimally Invasive Gynecology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 601 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Characteristics of Submucous Myomas and the Risk of Anemia

by Giuseppe Ricci, Federica Scrimin, Andrea Sartore, Massimo Borelli, Gabriella Zito, Federico Romano and Guglielmo Stabile

Medicina 2022, 58(11), 1652; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111652 - 15 Nov 2022

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4654

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Uterine fibroids still represent the most common indication for hysterectomy for benign pathologies. In the United States, more than 479,000 hysterectomies are performed annually, 46.6% for myomas and 47.7% in women aged from 18 to 44 years. By applying appropriateness criteria to this procedure, it has been estimated that overuse ranges from 16 to 70%. One of the main reasons that induce patients and gynecologists to consider hysterectomy is represented by severe anemia. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 202 patients with uterine fibroids diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound who underwent a hysteroscopic procedure. Myoma grade, size, location, and number were assessed by transvaginal scan and office hysteroscopy and correlated to the pre-treatment hemoglobin level. Results: Univariate analysis showed that anemia does not have a statistically significant association with myoma number and with age considered as a numerical predictor. In the patients with myoma type 0, there is a possibility of 81% having anemia regardless of menorrhagia. On the contrary, in patients with myoma type 1 or type 2, the possibility of having anemia varies according to the presence or absence of menorrhagia. If there is menorrhagia, the risk of moderate anemia is only present for myomas >60 mm. Conclusions: The results of this study may contribute to defining objective criteria for the management of submucous myomas and anemia. Our data suggest that submucosal myomas type 0 >10 mm should always be treated, putting patients at risk for anemia. Myomas type 2 and 3 should be treated for the risk of anemia in the presence of menorrhagia episodes or if > of 60 mm. Adequate management of anemia and myomas could reduce the rate of unnecessary hysterectomies. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights and Perspectives in Minimally Invasive Gynecology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 508 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Echinacea angustifolia and Echinacea purpurea Supplementation Combined with Vaginal Hyaluronic Acid to Boost the Remission of Cervical Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (L-SILs): A Randomized Controlled Trial

by Gaetano Riemma, Maria Teresa Schettino, Gaetano Maria Munno, Diego Domenico Fasulo, Lucia Sandullo, Emanuele Amabile, Marco La Verde and Marco Torella

Medicina 2022, 58(5), 646; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58050646 - 9 May 2022

Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3016

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Echinacea angustifolia and purpurea have known immunomodulatory effects which boost viral clearance, including HPV infection. However, evidence regarding the improvement due to Echinacea-based supplements of cervical HPV-related pathologies is still lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Echinacea supplementation on the remission of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (L-SIL). Materials and Methods: A single-blind 1:1:1 parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Colposcopy Unit of a tertiary care referral center. Reproductive-aged women were allocated either to (a) an oral supplement based on Echinacea extracts plus vaginal hyaluronic acid-based soft gel capsules, (b) the Echinacea supplement alone, or (c) vaginal hyaluronic acid-based soft gel capsules alone for 3 months. The primary outcome was the regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)-1 for each treatment arm at 3, 6 and 12 months after the diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included changes in the epithelialization, pap smear, colposcopic parameters, histological reports, and vaginal health indexes (VHI) in the study groups. Results: 153 women (52 for arm A, 50 for arm B and 51 for arm C) completed the follow-up and were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in both primary and secondary outcomes for the three groups after 3 months. At the 6-month follow-up, the number of persistent CIN-1 diagnoses was significantly lower in arm A (15/51), rather than in arm B (23/48, p = 0.03) and C (27/49, p = 0.03). Similarly, the same effect was seen after 12 months for treatment A (5/51) relative to B (15/48, p = 0.03) and C (14/48, p = 0.03). Colposcopic, histological and vaginal parameters were all significantly improved at 6 and 12 months for arm A relative to B and C, while no beneficial effects were seen after 3 months. Conclusions: Echinacea extracts supplementation in women with L-SIL/CIN-1 significantly boosts HPV lesion clearance, reducing the overall amount of diagnosis, histological, colposcopic and vaginal parameters after 6 and 12 months. However, a limited sample size reduces the quality of evaluated evidence, emphasizing the need for additional studies to validate these findings. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights and Perspectives in Minimally Invasive Gynecology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 278 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Ascertaining the Effects of Tissue Sealers on Minor Laparoscopic Procedures between Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents: A Prospective Cohort Study

by Pasquale De Franciscis, Marco La Verde, Luigi Cobellis, Antonio Mollo, Marco Torella, Fulvio De Simone, Gaetano Maria Munno, Emanuele Amabile, Carla Loreto, Angela Celardo, Nicola Fortunato and Gaetano Riemma

Medicina 2022, 58(5), 578; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58050578 - 23 Apr 2022

Viewed by 1743

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The type of instrumentation used during laparoscopic surgery might impact on the learning curve of resident surgeons. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in operator satisfaction and surgical outcomes between tissue sealers and classic bipolar instruments during gynecological laparoscopies performed by residents. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study conducted at two tertiary university hospitals between March 2019 and March 2021, on consecutive procedures: salpingo-oophorectomies (Group 1) and salpingectomies (Group 2), subdivided according to the utilized device: radiofrequency tissue sealers (Groups A1 and A2) or bipolar forceps (Groups B1 and B2). Results: 80 procedures were included. Concerning salpingo-oophorectomies, better visibility (8.4 ± 0.8 vs. 7.3 ± 0.9; p = 0.03), reduced difficulty (5.4 ± 1.2 vs. 7.0 ± 1.4; p = 0.02), improved overall satisfaction (9.2 ± 0.4 vs. 7.6 ± 1.0; p = 0.02) and reduced procedure time (7.8 ± 3.4 vs. 12.6 ± 3.1; p = 0.01) were reported by residents using tissue sealers. Intraoperative blood loss (12.2 ± 4.7 mL vs. 33.2 ± 9.7 mL; p = 0.01) and 24 h postoperative pain (4.5 ± 1.1 vs. 5.7 ± 1.8; p = 0.03) were lower in group A1 than B1. For salpingectomies, a significant reduction in duration was found in A2 compared to B2 (7.2 ± 3.4 min vs. 13.8 ± 2.2 min; p = 0.02). Tissue sealers enhanced visibility (8.1 ± 1.1 vs. 6.7 ± 1.4; p = 0.01), difficulty (6.5 ± 1.1 vs. 7.5 ± 0.9; p = 0.04) and improved satisfaction (9.3 ± 0.5 vs. 7.5 ± 0.6; p = 0.01). Moreover, hemoglobin loss and postoperative pain were reduced in A2 relative to B2 [(8.1 ± 4.2 % vs. 4.5 ± 1.1%; p = 0.02) and (5.1 ± 0.9 vs. 4.1 ± 0.8; p = 0.03), respectively] Conclusions: The use of sealing devices by residents was related to reduced difficulty as well improved visibility and overall satisfaction, with improved surgical outcomes. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights and Perspectives in Minimally Invasive Gynecology)

9 pages, 509 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Intrapartum Analgesia—Have Women’s Preferences Changed over the Last Decade?

by Agnieszka Jodzis, Maciej Walędziak, Krzysztof Czajkowski and Anna Różańska-Walędziak

Medicina 2022, 58(1), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010087 - 7 Jan 2022

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1904

Abstract

Background: Global access to social media has supposedly changed women’s awareness about the pharmacological and alternative methods of pain relief during vaginal delivery. The purpose of the study was to analyze changes in women’s preference and opinion about different forms of labor analgesia over the past decade. Materials and methods: The study was designed as an anonymous survey with questions about women’s knowledge and preference of different forms of pain relief in labor. The survey was conducted in 2010 and 2020, with data collected from 1175 women in 2010 and 1033 in 2020. Results: There were no differences between 2010 and 2020 in the proportion of women who wanted to receive analgesia in labor, at, respectively 67.9% of women in 2010 and 73.9% in 2020. About 50% of women chose epidural analgesia as the only efficacious method of pain relief in labor both in 2010 and 2020. There were no differences between the two time-points in the distribution of chosen methods of pain relief. In total, 92.3% of women in 2010 and 94.9% in 2020 thought that they should have the possibility of independent choice of analgesia method before the delivery (p < 0.04). Conclusions: A high proportion of Polish women choose EDA over other pharmacological and nonpharmacological methods of pain relief in labor, and this preference has not changed over the last decade. Increasing women’s knowledge about different methods of intrapartum pain relief may lead to wider use of nonpharmacological methods of pain relief. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights and Perspectives in Minimally Invasive Gynecology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

9 pages, 563 KiB

Open AccessSystematic Review

Hysteroscopic Removal of Intrauterine Device in Pregnancy: A Scoping Review to Guide Personalized Care

by Guglielmo Stabile, Francesco Cracco, Luigi Nappi, Felice Sorrentino, Salvatore Giovanni Vitale, Stefano Angioni, Stefania Carlucci and Giuseppe Ricci

Medicina 2022, 58(11), 1688; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111688 - 21 Nov 2022

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2366

Abstract

Background and objectives: Pregnancies that occur with an intrauterine device (IUD) in situ are at increased risk for developing severe conditions which may affect the fetus and the mother. The incidence of such adverse consequences significantly drops after device removal. A scoping review of the literature was performed to highlight the risks, benefits, and outcomes of hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices in early pregnancy. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. The review included all reports from 1990 to October 2022. The research strategy adopted included different combinations of the following terms: (“hysteroscopy”) AND (“pregnancy”) AND (“intrauterine device” or “IUD”) AND (“intrauterine system” or “IUS”). A scoping review of the hysteroscopic removal of IUDs during pregnancy was performed. All studies identified were listed by citation, title, authors, and abstract. Duplicates were identified by an independent manual screening performed by two researchers and then removed. For the eligibility process, two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of all non-duplicated papers and excluded those not pertinent to the topic. Results: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Nine manuscripts were detected, accounting for 153 patients. Most IUD removals occurred during the first trimester of pregnancy. Most of the time, the procedure was safe and without consequences. Conclusions: This review highlights the safety and efficacy of operative hysteroscopy as a method of IUD removal in early pregnancy. We recommend using a 3 to 5 mm hysteroscope, avoiding cervical dilation, and maintaining low infusion pressure during the procedure to avoid potential damage to the gestational sac and IUD fragment displacement. Heating the distension media to 30 °C should be considered. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights and Perspectives in Minimally Invasive Gynecology)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

5 pages, 3739 KiB

Open AccessCase Report

Scar-Free Laparoscopy in BRCA-Mutated Women

by Stefano Restaino, Angelo Finelli, Giulia Pellecchia, Anna Biasioli, Jessica Mauro, Carlo Ronsini, Monica della Martina, Martina Arcieri, Luigi Della Corte, Felice Sorrentino, Lorenza Driul and Giuseppe Vizzielli

Medicina 2022, 58(7), 943; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58070943 - 17 Jul 2022

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2044

Abstract

Background and Objectives: BRCA 1 and 2 mutations have a cumulative risk of developing ovarian cancer at 70 years of 41% and 15%, respectively, while a cumulative risk of breast cancer by 80 years of age was 72% for BRCA1 mutation carriers and 69% for BRCA2 mutation carriers. The NCCN recommends risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), typically between 35 and 40 years, and upon completion of childbearing in BRCA1 mutation, while it is reasonable to delay RRSO for management of ovarian cancer risk until age 40–45 years in patients with BRCA2. In recent years there have been two main lines of evolution in laparoscopy. The former concerning the development of a single-site laparoscopic and the latter concerning the miniaturisation of laparoscopic instruments (mini/micro-laparoscopy). Materials and Methods: In this case report, we show our experience in prophylactic adnexectomy, on a mutated-BRCA patient, using the MiniLap^® percutaneous surgical system. Results: This type of technique is safe and effective and does not require a particular learning curve compared to single-port laparoscopy. Conclusions: The considerable aesthetic advantage of the scars, we believe, albeit to a lesser extent, is useful to find in these patients burdened by an important stress load. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights and Perspectives in Minimally Invasive Gynecology)

► Show Figures

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

New Insights and Perspectives in Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Published Papers (8 papers)

Research

Other

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI