nutrients-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Ringing the Changes in Sports Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

A special issue of Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643). This special issue belongs to the section "Sports Nutrition".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 September 2022) | Viewed by 12150

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Interests: sport nutrition; skeletal muscle; longevity; aging; exercise metabolism

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

From the emergence of carbohydrate loading to enhance endurance performance in the late 1960s through to the abundance of dietary approaches to optimise athletic outcomes in the modern era, it is clear that sports nutrition and exercise metabolism research has evolved significantly over the last 50 years. The sports nutrition and exercise metabolism disciplines looks set to continue to advance with the emergence of new technologies and the demand from athletes to further fine tune nutritional strategies to optimise their performance. Potential topics in the current sports nutrition environment include: the use of continuous biomarker and AI technologies to fine tune diets for optimal performance outcomes, how nutrients can be utilised to enhance immunity especially in the background of the last 2 years with COVID-19, how nutrition can be used to prolong athletic careers and enhance recovery in late career athletes and the use of ketones/ketogenic diets to improve individual performance. The purpose of this special issue, Ringing the Changes in Sports Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism’, is to provide insight into the emerging issues in sports nutrition and exercise metabolism and invite contributions that describe new perceptions into managing nutrition for optimal performance.

Dr. Marita A. Wallace
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Nutrients is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • nutrition
  • sport
  • exercise
  • metabolism
  • performance
  • recovery
  • sports supplements
  • ergogenic aid
  • dietary patterns
  • carbohydrates
  • lipids
  • ketones
  • proteins
  • micronutrients
  • hydration
  • immune function
  • metabolomics
  • proteomics

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 1211 KiB  
Article
Protein Supplementation Does Not Maximize Adaptations to Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training in Sedentary, Healthy Adults: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Study
by Dejan Reljic, Nilas Zieseniss, Hans J. Herrmann, Markus F. Neurath and Yurdagül Zopf
Nutrients 2022, 14(19), 3883; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14193883 - 20 Sep 2022
Viewed by 2462
Abstract
There is ample evidence that specific nutritional strategies can enhance adaptions to resistance and endurance training. However, it is still unclear whether post-session protein supplementation may increase the effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training (LOW-HIIT). We examined the impact of LOW-HIIT combined with [...] Read more.
There is ample evidence that specific nutritional strategies can enhance adaptions to resistance and endurance training. However, it is still unclear whether post-session protein supplementation may increase the effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training (LOW-HIIT). We examined the impact of LOW-HIIT combined with protein vs. placebo supplementation on cardiometabolic health indices in sedentary healthy individuals. Forty-seven participants (31.1 ± 8.0 yrs) performed cycle ergometer LOW-HIIT (5–10x1 min at 80–95% maximum heart rate) for eight weeks and randomly received double-blinded 40 g of whey protein (PRO-HIIT, N = 24) or an isocaloric placebo (maltodextrin, PLA-HIIT, N = 23) after each session. The maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max, primary outcome) and several secondary cardiometabolic outcomes were determined pre-/post-intervention. VO2max increased in PRO-HIIT (+2.8 mL/kg/min, p = 0.003) and PLA-HIIT (+3.5 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased in PRO-HIIT (−7/3 mmHg, p < 0.05) and PLA-HIIT (−8/5 mmHg, p < 0.001). Gamma glutamyl transferase (−2 U/L, p = 0.003) decreased in PRO-HIIT and alanine aminotransferase (−3 U/L, p = 0.014) in PLA-HIIT. There were no significant between-group differences in any of the outcome changes. In conclusion, LOW-HIIT improved VO2max and other cardiometabolic markers irrespective of the supplementation condition. Post-session protein supplementation does not seem to provide any additional benefit to LOW-HIIT in improving cardiometabolic health in sedentary healthy individuals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ringing the Changes in Sports Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3071 KiB  
Article
Auditing the Representation of Female Versus Male Athletes in Sports Science and Sports Medicine Research: Evidence-Based Performance Supplements
by Ella S. Smith, Alannah K. A. McKay, Megan Kuikman, Kathryn E. Ackerman, Rachel Harris, Kirsty J. Elliott-Sale, Trent Stellingwerff and Louise M. Burke
Nutrients 2022, 14(5), 953; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14050953 - 23 Feb 2022
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 9131
Abstract
Although sports nutrition guidelines promote evidence-based practice, it is unclear whether women have been adequately included in the underpinning research. In view of the high usage rates of performance supplements by female athletes, we conducted a standardised audit of the literature supporting evidence-based [...] Read more.
Although sports nutrition guidelines promote evidence-based practice, it is unclear whether women have been adequately included in the underpinning research. In view of the high usage rates of performance supplements by female athletes, we conducted a standardised audit of the literature supporting evidence-based products: β-alanine, caffeine, creatine, glycerol, nitrate/beetroot juice and sodium bicarbonate. Within 1826 studies totalling 34,889 participants, just 23% of participants were women, although 34% of studies included at least one woman. Across different supplements, 0–8% of studies investigated women exclusively, while fewer (0–2%) were specifically designed to compare sex-based responses. The annual publication of female-specific studies was ~8 times fewer than those investigating exclusively male cohorts. Interestingly, 15% of the female participants were classified as international/world-class athletes, compared with 7% of men. Most studies investigated performance outcomes but displayed poorer representation of women (16% of participants), whereas health-focussed studies had the greatest proportion of female participants (35%). Only 14% of studies including women attempted to define menstrual status, with only three studies (~0.5%) implementing best practice methodologies to assess menstrual status. New research should target the efficacy of performance supplements in female athletes, and future sports nutrition recommendations should specifically consider how well female athletes have contributed to the evidence-base. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ringing the Changes in Sports Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop