Multidrug Therapies Containing Monoclonal Antibodies for Multiple Myeloma 2024

A special issue of Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247). This special issue belongs to the section "Pharmacology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 23 September 2024 | Viewed by 4199

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
AOU delle Marche, 60126 Torrette (AN), Italy
Interests: multiple myeloma; monoclonal gammapathy; immunotherapy; transplant
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve, and immunotherapy has now entered its therapeutic armamentarium. In particular, monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), such as elotuzumab, daratumumab, and isatuximab in combinations with proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), successfully used for relapsed–relapsed MM, have been used in frontline therapy in both transplant-eligible and -non-eligible patients. Elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), and subsequently, daratumumab with Rd and with bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) were the first to be approved for the treatment of relapsed–refractory MM (rrMM). Recently, another anti-CD38 MoAb named isatuximab was approved by the FDA in combination with pomalidomide–dexamethasone for rrMM. Daratumumab, in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) as well as with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), has just been approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed MM patients not eligible for transplantation, since these regimens have been shown to definitely induce better results compared with standard therapies. In transplant-eligible patients, many trials comparing standard treatments with regimens containing elotuzumab, daratumumab, and isatuximab are either ongoing or have concluded with very encouraging results. The new frontier of immunotherapy of MM  includes bispecific and conjugated MoAbs, a very promising active area of experimental trials for rrMM patients in which preliminary results are rather favorable. It can be argued that passive and active immunotherapy will make MM a chronic disease or will cure an increasing fraction of MM patients.

Dr. Massimo Offidani
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Pharmaceuticals is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • multiple myeloma
  • monoclonal antibodies
  • immunotherapy

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

Jump to: Other

20 pages, 563 KiB  
Review
Monoclonal Antibodies in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: Current Status and Future Directions
by Valeria Ferla, Francesca Farina, Tommaso Perini, Magda Marcatti and Fabio Ciceri
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(7), 901; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070901 - 6 Jul 2024
Viewed by 788
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) targeting several cellular receptors have significantly improved the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM). Their high effectiveness and safety raise the question of whether earlier therapeutic intervention in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) influences the [...] Read more.
Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) targeting several cellular receptors have significantly improved the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM). Their high effectiveness and safety raise the question of whether earlier therapeutic intervention in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) influences the natural course of the disease. MM is preceded by clinically recognized conditions such as MGUS and SMM. Numerous studies are investigating the disease biology and immune profile of SMM and MGUS to unravel the intricate relationship between immunosurveillance and disease progression. The standard approach to MGUS and SMM remains close observation. Early studies indicate benefits in terms of progression or even survival for promptly treating high-risk SMM patients. Ongoing debates are focused on which patients with SMM and MGUS to treat, as well as on determining the optimal therapeutic approach. The first approach aims to cure by attempting to eliminate the pathological clone, while the second approach is preventive, aiming to manage disease progression to active MM and restore the immune system. In this review, we focus on the available and emerging data on early treatment, particularly with MoAbs alone or in combination with other therapies, in SMM and MGUS patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 357 KiB  
Review
Novel Immunotherapies and Combinations: The Future Landscape of Multiple Myeloma Treatment
by Sonia Morè, Laura Corvatta, Valentina Maria Manieri, Erika Morsia, Antonella Poloni and Massimo Offidani
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(11), 1628; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16111628 - 19 Nov 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2423
Abstract
In multiple myeloma impressive outcomes have improved with the introduction of new therapeutic approaches, mainly those including naked monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and isatuximab. However, moving to earlier lines of therapy with effective anti-myeloma drugs led to an increase in the number [...] Read more.
In multiple myeloma impressive outcomes have improved with the introduction of new therapeutic approaches, mainly those including naked monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and isatuximab. However, moving to earlier lines of therapy with effective anti-myeloma drugs led to an increase in the number of patients who developed multi-refractoriness to them early on. Currently, triple- or multi-refractory MM represents an unmet medical need, and their management remains a complicated challenge. The recent approval of new immunotherapeutic approaches such as conjugated monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and CAR T cells could be a turning point for these heavily pretreated patients. Nevertheless, several issues regarding their use are unsolved, such as how to select patients for each strategy or how to sequence these therapies within the MM therapeutic landscape. Here we provide an overview of the most recent data about approved conjugated monoclonal antibody belantamab, mafodotin, bispecific antibody teclistamab, and other promising compounds under development, mainly focusing on the ongoing clinical trials with monoclonal antibody combination approaches in advanced and earlier phases of MM treatment. Full article

Other

Jump to: Review

20 pages, 933 KiB  
Systematic Review
Impact of Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy on CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization, Collection, and Engraftment in Multiple Myeloma Patients—A Systematic Review
by Flavia Bigi, Enrica Manzato, Simona Barbato, Marco Talarico, Michele Puppi, Simone Masci, Ilaria Sacchetti, Roberta Restuccia, Miriam Iezza, Ilaria Rizzello, Chiara Sartor, Katia Mancuso, Lucia Pantani, Paola Tacchetti, Michele Cavo and Elena Zamagni
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(7), 944; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070944 - 15 Jul 2024
Viewed by 555
Abstract
This systematic review examines the available clinical data on CD34+ cell mobilization, collection, and engraftment in multiple myeloma patients treated with the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and isatuximab in clinical trials and in real life. Twenty-six clinical reports were published between 2019 and [...] Read more.
This systematic review examines the available clinical data on CD34+ cell mobilization, collection, and engraftment in multiple myeloma patients treated with the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and isatuximab in clinical trials and in real life. Twenty-six clinical reports were published between 2019 and February 2024. Most studies documented lower circulating CD34+ cells after mobilization compared to controls, leading to higher plerixafor requirements. Although collection yields were significantly lower in approximately half of the studies, the collection target was achieved in similar proportions of daratumumab- and isatuximab-treated and nontreated patients, and access to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was comparable. This could be explained by the retained efficacy of plerixafor in anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-treated patients, while no chemotherapy-based or sparing mobilization protocol proved superior. Half of the studies reported slower hematopoietic reconstitution after ASCT in daratumumab- and isatuximab-treated patients, without an excess of infectious complications. While no direct effect on stem cells was observed in vitro, emerging evidence suggests possible dysregulation of CD34+ cell adhesion after daratumumab treatment. Overall, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies appear to interfere with CD34+ cell mobilization, without consistently leading to significant clinical consequences. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and define optimal mobilization strategies in this patient population. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop