sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Management".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 February 2024) | Viewed by 13052

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Management and Economics, The Academic College of Tel Aviv – Yaffo, Tel Aviv, Israel
Interests: project management; business strategy; innovation and entrepreneurship; internationalization in higher education; impact management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics and Management, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee 12208000, Israel
Interests: entrepreneurship; innovation; business strategy; regional development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
Interests: business strategy; innovation; entrepreneurship; social networks

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The dynamic world of the 21st century is characterized by a vast array of global and societal challenges faced in terms of environmental and social challenges. At the same time, in this unprecedented era, innovative and advanced technologies are continuously developed by entrepreneurs, leveraging the economy. As a result, in recent years, we have witnessed two emerging research disciplines: sustainably management and technological entrepreneurship management. However, these two fields of study are very rarely connected or integrated into complementary and coherent research.

Having been examined for many years by specialists and institutions (Polanyi, 1957), sustainability has recently received growing attention among businesses in order to adopt a strategic perspective and implement a broad range of practices addressing sustainability challenges (Eccles et al., 2014; Epstein et al., 2015). These challenges are addressed by the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in which the following four key dimensions are included: inclusive social development, inclusive economic development, environmental sustainability, and peace and security (Habanik et al., 2019).

Since the 1970s, technological entrepreneurship has been developed, serving as “a vehicle that facilitates prosperity in individuals, firms, regions, and nations” (Bailetti, 2012) and stimulating economic growth (Arin et al., 2015). Studies concerning entrepreneurial and innovative activities are necessary, since they are the core competence to the survival of companies (Ha, 2022). Existing and novel scientific knowledge is needed to respond to advanced market needs. However, there is a growing trend of applying technological innovations in order to generate novel solutions to social and environmental challenges on the global, regional, or national levels (Oyedele et al., 2020; Tripathi and Brahma, 2018; Lamine at al., 2018).

The objective of this Special Issue titled “The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship” is to highlight the challenges and opportunities in conceiving, designing, building, utilizing, and commercializing novel technology solutions aiming to impact individuals and communities around the world.

This Special Issue focuses on the role of technological entrepreneurship in the ecosystem of environmental–social–economic sustainable development, both in global and local contexts. First, it aims to explore perceptions, theories, policies, strategies, and practices related to various ways in which technology can and should serve global challenges. Second, it aims to better understand whether and how novel technological initiatives can and should be conceptualized, structured, and operated in a sustainable manner in line with the double or triple bottom line, where businesses aim to create economic value as well as environmental and social value (Norman and MacDonald, 2004).

We welcome theoretical, empirical, conceptual, and experimental studies significantly contributing to the theory and practice of integrating sustainability and technological entrepreneurship. We are open to a wide range of research methods, as long as they are consistent with the aims and scope of this Special Issue.

In detail, we call for submissions focusing on, but not limited to, the following:

  • Novel business models to face global challenges;
  • Innovative technologies to increase sustainability;
  • Social technological entrepreneurship;
  • Environmental technological entrepreneurship;
  • Cryptocurrencies and FinTech entrepreneurship;
  • Triple bottom line in entrepreneurial activities;
  • Innovative technologies for sustainable impact;
  • Technological solutions to global and local challenges;
  • Sustainable technological transfer from academia to industry;
  • Incentives to foster sustainable technology;
  • Marketable outcomes of sustainable technology;
  • Sustainable technology in developing countries and emerging markets.

References:

Arin, K. P., Huang, V. Z., Minniti, M., Nandialath, A. M., and Reich, O. F. (2015). Revisiting the determinants of entrepreneurship: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Management, 41(2), 607-631.

Bailetti, T. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship: overview, definition, and distinctive aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2).

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., and Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.

Epstein, M. J., Buhovac, A. R., and Yuthas, K. (2015). Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 48(1), 35–45.

Ha, J. C. (2022). Capturing Emerging Business Opportunities through Entrepreneurial Orientation and Innovation Behavior: The Moderating Role of Leader-Member Exchange. Sustainability, 14(6), 3585.

Habanik, J., Grencikova, A., and Krajco, K. (2019). The impact of new technology on sustainable development. Engineering Economics, 30(1), 41-49.

Lamine, W., Mian, S., Fayolle, A., Wright, M., Klofsten, M., and Etzkowitz, H. (2018). Technology business incubation mechanisms and sustainable regional development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1121-1141.

Norman, W., and MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243-262.

Oyedele, O. O., Paul, I. O., Ganiyu, I. O., Derera, E., and Oyero, M. A. (2020). Technopreneurship as a pathway to sustainable business performance: Empirical evidence from SMES in Nigeria. The Journal of Accounting and Management, 10(2).

Polanyi, K. (1957). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Beacon Press: Boston, MA, USA.

Tripathi, S. S., and Brahma, M. (2018). Technology entrepreneurship in emerging markets: An exploration of entrepreneurial models prevalent in India. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(1).

Prof. Dr. Vered Holzmann
Prof. Dr. Eli Gimmon
Prof. Dr. Ying Teng
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • technological entrepreneurship and innovation
  • sustainable finance
  • environmental–social–economic ecosystem
  • social challenges
  • startups and spinoffs

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Other

5 pages, 151 KiB  
Editorial
Insights and Implications of the Special Issue Titled: “The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship”
by Vered Holzmann and Eli Gimmon
Sustainability 2024, 16(12), 5241; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125241 - 20 Jun 2024
Viewed by 328
Abstract
The objective of this Special Issue was to highlight the challenges and opportunities in conceiving, designing, building, utilizing, and commercializing novel technology solutions aiming to impact individuals and communities around the world [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Other

21 pages, 2255 KiB  
Article
Does the Rubber Meet the Road? Assessing the Potential of Devulcanization Technologies for the Innovation of Tire Rubber Recycling
by Eric Roetman, Jelle Joustra, Geert Heideman and Ruud Balkenende
Sustainability 2024, 16(7), 2900; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072900 - 30 Mar 2024
Viewed by 943
Abstract
Innovation is crucial to meet the circular economy goals for tire recycling. Devulcanization, an innovative recycling method of reprocessing tire rubber, offers a pathway towards achieving circular economy objectives. While previous research on devulcanization has primarily focused on technical aspects, this study shifts [...] Read more.
Innovation is crucial to meet the circular economy goals for tire recycling. Devulcanization, an innovative recycling method of reprocessing tire rubber, offers a pathway towards achieving circular economy objectives. While previous research on devulcanization has primarily focused on technical aspects, this study shifts the focus towards identifying opportunities and barriers for innovation through devulcanization. This research utilizes the Technological Innovation System framework as a basis to analyze the dynamics of innovation within value chains and innovation networks. Across Europe, 36 organizations were identified that develop and utilize devulcanization to transform rubber from end-of-life tires into a valuable resource for new rubber products. In this study, a semi-structured in-depth interview approach was applied to interview 12 organizations that have developed or utilize technologies for the devulcanization of tire rubber. It was found that the development of various devulcanization approaches for diverse types of products has created opportunities for upscaling. To capitalize on these opportunities, organizations need to collaborate throughout the entire value chain of tire production and recycling. Achieving this collaboration requires interventions across the industry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 5526 KiB  
Article
Participatory Geographic-Information-System-Based Citizen Science: Highland Trails Contamination due to Mountaineering Tourism in the Dolomites
by Satı Elifcan Özbek, Alberto Lanzavecchia and Francesco Ferrarese
Sustainability 2023, 15(18), 13908; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813908 - 19 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1264
Abstract
Environmental pollution is a persistent problem in terrestrial ecosystems, including remote mountain areas. This study investigates the extent and patterns of littering on three popular hiking trails among mountaineers and tourists in the Dolomites range located in northeastern Italy. The data was collected [...] Read more.
Environmental pollution is a persistent problem in terrestrial ecosystems, including remote mountain areas. This study investigates the extent and patterns of littering on three popular hiking trails among mountaineers and tourists in the Dolomites range located in northeastern Italy. The data was collected adopting a citizen science approach with the participation of university students surveying the trails and recording the macroscopic waste items through a GPS-based offline platform. The waste items were categorized according to their material type, usage, and geographical location, and the sorted data was applied to Esri GIS ArcMapTM 10.8.1. Even though littering is found to be widespread all along the trails, the outcomes of the study reveal diverse patterns based on density (cigarette butts, napkins and wet wipes, and mountain equipment littering) while highlighting the prevalence of plastic pollution. The other patterns include voluntary and involuntary littering and different hot spots of contamination, with lodge, barn, and cableway effects. The implications of littering patterns for alpine environment sustainability are discussed, and recommendations are drawn indicating the need for increased supervision for waste management and maintenance on-site, GIS tech-based participatory awareness raising, and zippered clothing and equipment design for sustainable practices of mountaineering in the area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 3056 KiB  
Article
Stepping towards the Green Transition: Challenges and Opportunities of Estonian Companies
by Aleksandra Kekkonen, Renee Pesor and Marge Täks
Sustainability 2023, 15(5), 4172; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054172 - 25 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2891
Abstract
Addressing the sustainability crisis requires innovative approaches such as sustainable technological entrepreneurship. The case of Estonia, as an example of a twin (digital and green) transition, is examined. We explored Estonian entrepreneurs’ perceptions of challenges and opportunities related to the green transition. The [...] Read more.
Addressing the sustainability crisis requires innovative approaches such as sustainable technological entrepreneurship. The case of Estonia, as an example of a twin (digital and green) transition, is examined. We explored Estonian entrepreneurs’ perceptions of challenges and opportunities related to the green transition. The data were collected via an online survey from 532 Estonian companies, focus groups, and individual semi-structured interviews with 42 experts. Survey data were analyzed using proportional odds logistic regression, and interview data were examined using thematic analysis. Based on the interview findings, the main perceived entrepreneurial opportunities related to green transitions were increasing production efficiency and favoring taxation for green products and services. The main challenges included losing competitive advantage, coping with crises, and the need for long-term planning and significant investments. Survey findings revealed that too much pressure only from politicians and a lack of innovation might increase the likelihood of perceived company cost increases. More pressure from other stakeholders and increased innovation were associated with higher odds of viewing the green transition as an opportunity. This study provides valuable insights into the perceptions of Estonian entrepreneurs regarding the challenges and opportunities of the green transition and contributes to their categorization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 2377 KiB  
Article
The Way toward Sustainability: Policy Attention Evolution of Chinese Local Governments to Promote Entrepreneurship of Returnees Based on Grounded Theory and Social Network Analysis
by Xingyu Qi and Songyan Han
Sustainability 2022, 14(20), 13283; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013283 - 15 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1969
Abstract
As an important livelihood strategy choice to promote the sustainable development of themselves and regions, returnees’ entrepreneurship has played a vital role in the governance of all-level Chinese local governments since the 21st century. The policy attention reflects the importance that the local [...] Read more.
As an important livelihood strategy choice to promote the sustainable development of themselves and regions, returnees’ entrepreneurship has played a vital role in the governance of all-level Chinese local governments since the 21st century. The policy attention reflects the importance that the local governments attach to this issue, and the evolution process also reflects relevant policies’ internal rules and characteristics. Based on this, this paper, taking 242 policy texts related to returnees’ entrepreneurship issued by local governments from 2000 to 2021 as the research objects, uses grounded theory and social network analysis in order to explore the policy attention evolution from the aspects of time, space, specific policy domains and cooperative relationship among policy subjects. Finally, this research finds the main conclusions as follows: (1) The policy attention evolution on time dimension has the characteristic of synchronism, different levels and “reciprocal U”. (2) The policy attention evolution on space dimension is closely linked to “pull” and “push” forces of local population flow and has neighborhood effects. (3) The policy attention evolution on specific policy areas will gradually spread and diversify with the change in local governance environment and stage goals. (4) The evolution trend of collaborative social network among policy objects has the characteristic of “loose-central-loose”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1935 KiB  
Article
Competition or Authorization—Manufacturers’ Choice of Remanufacturing Strategies
by Ying Wu and Youwei Li
Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 12632; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912632 - 4 Oct 2022
Viewed by 1473
Abstract
In the face of the cannibalization of remanufactured products produced by independent remanufacturers (IRs), original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) can produce remanufactured products themselves to compete with independent remanufacturers (IRs), or they can authorize the IRs to cooperate because of their seller reputation. This [...] Read more.
In the face of the cannibalization of remanufactured products produced by independent remanufacturers (IRs), original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) can produce remanufactured products themselves to compete with independent remanufacturers (IRs), or they can authorize the IRs to cooperate because of their seller reputation. This paper studies the key factors that influence OEMs’ choice of remanufacturing strategies. By establishing three two-stage models and comparing them, the thresholds for OEMs to choose different remanufacturing strategies were obtained. There is also an interesting finding that when the authorization fee is higher than a certain value, even if the remanufactured product poses a competitive threat to the new product, the OEM will help the IR improve their remanufacturing technology to save costs and achieve a win–win situation. With the increase in authorization fees, OEMs’ profits will increase first and then decrease, so it is not always better for OEMs to charge higher authorization fees. Whether it is an authorization or a competitive scenario, the improvement in remanufacturing technology by OEMs can increase the output of remanufactured products, which is conducive to environmental protection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1148 KiB  
Article
A Profit Framework Model for Digital Platforms Based on Value Sharing and Resource Complementarity
by Tianyu Deng, Limeng Qiao, Xun Yao, Shuangying Chen and Xiaowo Tang
Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 11954; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911954 - 22 Sep 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2150
Abstract
With the advent of the smart economy, Chinese digital platform companies have begun the process of digital innovation. The sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic in early 2020 has added a strong impulse to the acceleration of this process, highlighting the unique characteristics [...] Read more.
With the advent of the smart economy, Chinese digital platform companies have begun the process of digital innovation. The sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic in early 2020 has added a strong impulse to the acceleration of this process, highlighting the unique characteristics of the platform economy in resource allocation. Although digital platforms have already entered people’s daily lives, the profit mechanism of digital platforms remains a black box to be cracked for the industry. The main contribution of this paper is to propose a framework model for the profit mechanism of digital platforms, which to a certain extent solves the problems essential to the digital realm faced by many traditional enterprises in the Internet age—knowing that the profit theory of traditional monopolies is not suitable for the rapidly changing internet economy, but that most of the time people still must use it. In this new profit framework, we first use the symbiotic logic of value sharing to explain the underlying logic of platform profitability; secondly, from the perspective of resource complementarity, we find that the key to digital platform companies’ profitability lies in the symbiotic synergy between platform companies and massive userbases; lastly, our study finds that the profit condition of platform enterprises is digital capability, not system possession. This article will analyze the bottom layer of the digital economy and, by identifying the various drawbacks of the traditional industrial economic monopoly theory, propose three key factors for the profitability of platform companies in the digital age: flexible strategy, digital capabilities, and symbiotic synergy capabilities. On this basis, a theoretical model of the profit of a digital platform is constructed. Research shows that the hybrid structure of digital platforms and the need for external diversification together lead to a platform’s resilience strategy. The realization process of the platform’s strategic flexibility and the process of consumers obtaining the residual value will lead to an explosion in network effects, causing the platform and users to complete value co-creation and realize value sharing. The implementation of a flexible platform strategy also promotes the further development of a differentiation strategy and a more-refined division of labor for manufacturers, lowers the barriers-to-entry in the industry, and enables the platform and the manufacturers to realize value co-creation. On the one hand, platform enterprises can obtain greater market performance; on the other hand, users’ personalized needs can be more satisfied. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Editorial, Research

12 pages, 269 KiB  
Essay
Moral and Institutional Foundations of Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship
by Francesca Gambarotto, Marco Rangone and Stefano Solari
Sustainability 2023, 15(18), 13796; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813796 - 15 Sep 2023
Viewed by 857
Abstract
In this essay, we reflect on the conditions that allow firms to play a leading role in the ecological transition process. The essay starts with an analysis of the technological and economic features of eco-efficient technologies. We argue that they are weak levers [...] Read more.
In this essay, we reflect on the conditions that allow firms to play a leading role in the ecological transition process. The essay starts with an analysis of the technological and economic features of eco-efficient technologies. We argue that they are weak levers for the ecological transition. As eco-efficiency is based on profit-maximising goals, the pace of the transition is unlikely to peak quickly. In fact, this profit motive restrains firms from fully embedding ecological principles in their choices. Some behavioural concerns arise, as rationally bounded firms are likely to pursue uncomplicated and effortless pathways so as to safeguard profits. For instance, firms may pretend to be sustainable, while chasing opportunistic practices such as greenwashing, wokening, and cost shifting. Hence, they cannot lead the ecological transition process. A few consequences derive. First, new moral values must become pivotal criteria in firms’ decision-making processes. Second, such a big challenge must become shared and widely accepted in social discourse, so as to involve all economic actors and trigger a general process of institutional change. These are necessary conditions for the ensuing economic and social provisioning to take care of the limits of the Earth. Finally, we suggest that the teaching of economics must also be concerned with making such a change in mindset successful. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Sustainable Technological Entrepreneurship)
Back to TopTop