sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Better Product Lifetimes

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2020) | Viewed by 16351

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
LaboNFC, Department of economic and administrative sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, G7H 2B1, Canada 555, Boulevard de l’Université, Saguenay (QC) G7H 2B1, Canada
Interests: product lifetime; product lifetime extension; product lifetime extension business models; collaborative economy; new technology; consumer behavior

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Product lifetime plays an increasingly crucial role in academic, business, and policy discussions. In academia, product lifetime has become a substantive area of research, with the publication of multiple research papers, books (e.g., Cooper, 2010), reports (e.g., Norman et al., 2016), and the creation of a dedicated consortium (Product Lifetimes and the Environment (PLATE)), scientific journals, conferences, and seminars. In the business community, some organizations have championed themselves as contributors to product lifetime extension, notably, collaborative economy organizations such as Kijiji with the creation of the Kijiji Secondhand Economy Index (https://www.kijiji.ca/kijijicentral/second-hand-economy) which monitors consumers’ exchange-based product lifetime extension practices. Finally, product lifetime is a central concern in the European Commission’s action plan for the circular economy (European Commission, 2015), and the French government plans to launch a “product reparability index” applicable to (semi)durables in 2021 (Collet, 2019).

As topical research has advanced, it has become increasingly clear that the issue of shortening product lifetimes is a systemic one which requires profound changes in business models (Bocken, de Pauw, Bakker, van der Grinten, 2016), a shift toward improved product design philosophies (van Nes and Cramer, 2003; Bakker, Wang, Huisman, and den Hollander, 2014), the identification and promotion of existing product lifetime extension business models (Ertz et al., 2019a), changes in regulation (Montalvo, Peck, and Rietveld, 2016), and changes at the consumer level (Cox, Griffith, Giorgi, and King, 2013).

Private companies and other forms of organizations, regulators, and consumers must work together to improve product lifetimes by extending them for longer use. New technological approaches for extending product lifetimes such as 3D Printing (Despeisse et al., 2017), large-scale data analytics (Jabbour, Jabbour, Sarkis, and Godinho Filho, 2019), and additive manufacturing (Ford and Despeisse, 2016), but also new socioeconomic forms such as the collaborative economy, which have been shown to contribute to extend product lifetime (Ertz et al., 2019b), should also be considered.

This Special Issue will gather original research in the field of product lifetime, and how business model strategies, corporate initiatives, consumer practice, regulation, and new technology can contribute to extend product lifetimes. Suitable topics include but are not limited to the following: consumer product lifetime perception, consumer expected product lifetimes, design strategies, industry 4.0 for product lifetimes, product lifetime extension business models, collaborative economy; product lifetimes measure, refurbishment, reconditioning, reuse, repair, repackaging, remanufacturing, redistribution, mutualization, product–service systems, maintenance, recovery, access-based consumption, product advice, product training, product consultancy, donation, swapping, and secondhand marketplaces.

References

  1. Cooper, T (2010). "The significance of product longevity". In Cooper, T. (ed.). Longer Lasting Products: alternatives to the throwaway society. Farnham: Gower.
  2. Norman, J.B., Serrenho, A.C., Cooper, S.J.G., Owen, A., Sakai, M., Scott, K., Brockway, P.E., Cooper, S., Giesekam, J., Salvia, G., Cullen, J.M., Barrett, J.R., Cooper, T., Hammond, G.P. and Allwood, J.M. (2016). A whole system analysis of how industrial energy and material demand reduction can contribute to a low carbon future for the UK(PDF). CIE-MAP.
  3. European Commission (2015). Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Brussels.
  4.  Collet, S. (2019). Loi économie circulaire: l'indice de réparabilité prend forme, Actu-Environnement, 6 September 6, 2019. Available at : https://www.actu-environnement.com/ae/news/projet-loi-economie-circulaire-reparabilite-33999.php4 (accessed on 26-12-2019).
  5. Bocken, Nancy M. P.; Pauw, Ingrid de; Bakker, Conny; Grinten, Bram van der (2016). "Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy". Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering. 33 (5): 308-320.
  6. Van Nes, Nicole; Cramer, Jacqueline. "Design strategies for the lifetime optimisation of products". The Journal of Sustainable Product Design. 3 (3-4): 101-107.
  7. Bakker, Conny; Wang, Feng; Huisman, Jacob; den Hollander, Marcel. "Products that go round: exploring product life extension through design". Journal of Cleaner Production. 69: 10-16.
  8. Ertz, Myriam; Leblanc-Proulx, Sébastien; Sarigollu, Emine; Morin, Vincent (2019a). "Made to break? A taxonomy of business models on product lifetime extension". Journal of Cleaner Production. 234: 867-880.
  9. Montalvo, C., Peck, D. and Rietveld, E. (2016). A longer lifetime for products: benefits for consumers and companies (PDF). Brussels: European Parliament's Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO).
  10. Cox, Jayne; Griffith, Sarah; Giorgi, Sara; King, Geoff. "Consumer understanding of product lifetimes". Resources, Conservation & Recycling. 79: 21-29.
  11. Despeisse, M., Baumers, M., Brown, P., Charnley, F., Ford, S. J., Garmulewicz, A., & Rowley, J. (2017). Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115 : 75-84.
  12. Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Sarkis, J., & Godinho Filho, M. (2019). Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: an integrative framework and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144 : 546-552.
  13. Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016). Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137 : 1573-1587.
  14. Ertz, Myriam; Leblanc-Proulx, Sébastien; Sarigollu, Emine; Morin, Vincent (2019b). "Advancing quantitative rigor in the circular economy literature : New methodology for product lifetime extension business models". Resources, Conservation & Recycling. 150: 104437.

Dr. Myriam Ertz
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 9957 KiB  
Article
How Does the Collaborative Economy Advance Better Product Lifetimes? A Case Study of Free-Floating Bike Sharing
by Shouheng Sun
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1434; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031434 - 29 Jan 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2789
Abstract
The collaborative economy is considered to have great potential in promoting the circular economy. However, there is little empirical research in this field. Taking the Beijing free-floating bike sharing (FFBS) program as an example, this study develops a system dynamics (SD) model based [...] Read more.
The collaborative economy is considered to have great potential in promoting the circular economy. However, there is little empirical research in this field. Taking the Beijing free-floating bike sharing (FFBS) program as an example, this study develops a system dynamics (SD) model based on the product lifetime extension business model (PLEBM) framework, and the business practices of FFBS. Combined with the dynamic evolution process of the FFBS market, the impact of FFBS on bicycle lifetime and the utilization efficiency of the urban bicycle system is explored. The results show that FFBS can reduce the required supply scale of the entire bicycle system by about 21%, and increase the average daily usage of bicycles by about 27%. In addition, FFBS also can increase the average lifecycle trip volume per bike in the entire urban bicycle system from approximately 900 to 1060, an increase of 16%. In particular, this study estimates that the optimal supply scale of the FFBS market in Beijing is about 800,000. It is worth noting that although enhancing the PLE strategy can increase the contribution of FFBS to PLE, it may also deteriorate the profitability of the FFBS platform. The authorities and FFBS operators should work together to continuously improve the profitability of the platform and strengthen its innovation capabilities to promote the healthy and sustainable development of FFBS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Better Product Lifetimes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

45 pages, 4137 KiB  
Article
What Affects Garment Lifespans? International Clothing Practices Based on a Wardrobe Survey in China, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the USA
by Kirsi Laitala and Ingun Grimstad Klepp
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 9151; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219151 - 3 Nov 2020
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 12575
Abstract
Increasing the length of clothing lifespans is crucial for reducing the total environmental impacts. This article discusses which factors contribute to the length of garment lifespans by studying how long garments are used, how many times they are worn, and by how many [...] Read more.
Increasing the length of clothing lifespans is crucial for reducing the total environmental impacts. This article discusses which factors contribute to the length of garment lifespans by studying how long garments are used, how many times they are worn, and by how many users. The analysis is based on quantitative wardrobe survey data from China, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the USA. Variables were divided into four blocks related respectively to the garment, user, garment use, and clothing practices, and used in two hierarchical multiple regressions and two binary logistic regressions. The models explain between 11% and 43% of the variation in clothing lifespans. The garment use block was most indicative for the number of wears, while garment related properties contribute most to variation in the number of users. For lifespans measured in years, all four aspects were almost equally important. Some aspects that affect the lifespans of clothing cannot be easily changed (e.g., the consumer’s income, nationality, and age) but they can be used to identify where different measures can have the largest benefits. Several of the other conditions that affect lifespans can be changed (e.g., garment price and attitudes towards fashion) through quality management, marketing strategies, information, and improved consumer policies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Better Product Lifetimes)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop