sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Food".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2023) | Viewed by 30184

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK
Interests: sustainability; sustainable consumption; food marketing and agribusiness; sustainable food supply chain; circularity and sustainability in the food industry

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dept Business Management, GIMPA Businesss School, Ghana Institute of Managment and Public Administration, Box AH 50, Achimota, Accra, Ghana
Interests: food marketing and agribusines; sustainability; marketing research; agribusiness; international food value chains; marketing strategy; capacity building; graduate employability

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

A salient rationale toward advocating for a sustainable food supply chain is to enable stakeholders to configure, promote, and maintain food supply systems that deliver value in terms of profit and the wellbeing of people [1] and the planet [2]. Despite efforts to ensure a more efficient food production and distribution globally, achieving sustainable food supply chains remains a constant global challenge [3] that has received research attention in various disciplines, including organizational theory scholarship. The resource-based view, institutional and transactional cost theory, dynamic capabilities theory, and stakeholder theory are all examples of the dominant organizational theories that have been pursued in the sustainable food supply chain domain [4,5]. Whereas Govindan (2018) [4] provided indicators, drivers, and barriers based on the stakeholder theory toward the attainment of a sustainable food supply chain, Dong et al. (2014) [6] highlighted the persistent social and environmental challenges of the food supply chain and outlined the essence of stakeholder collaboration outside organizational boundaries to develop a sustainable food supply chain. Beyond these dominant organizational theories, other strands of sustainable food supply chain research have also engaged and interrogated the resource-based view [7] systems theory for modeling sustainable food systems [2], actor network theory, co-creation, and collaboration on platforms for collaboration and co-creation [8]; justice and fairness theory for food retailer–supplier relationships [9,1]; and the attitude–behavior gap on sustainable food consumption [10], among others.

The extant scholarship on the sustainable food supply chain has evolved in different directions as a response to difference food industry dynamics. However, a consistent catalyst to such an evolution has been environmental variability and shock events that manifest as extreme climatic changes and natural hazards [11] that are felt to different degrees in various geographical areas. The effects of environmental variability on food supply chains can be experienced at the local, regional, national, and global scales, but the supply chain disruptions due to the current COVID-19 pandemic cut across global and local food supply chains, and recovery strategies are being explored [12]. Seeking to understand the dynamic ramifications of the pandemic to sustainable food supply chains to improve resilience is a laudable objective for this call for papers. Indeed, scholars have made urgent calls for a more nuanced understanding of the extent of disruption to food supply chains actors’ businesses and livelihoods to help to ameliorate food and nutrition security risks and build resilience [13,14]. Additionally, of special interest to this call for papers is the need to map the state of the art of sustainable food supply chain research pre- and during the pandemic as an essential benchmark to enable sustainable food research academics and practitioners to gauge the trajectory of sustainable food supply chain research post-COVID-19. It is envisaged that this Special Issue will provide a systematic view of current research on the sustainable food supply chain to serve as a useful seminar reference for future research post-COVID-19.

Against the above background, this Special Issue calls for empirical and conceptual papers that explore issues around the sustainable food supply chain. Specifically, this Special Issue welcomes papers on the following or any other relevant research themes:

  • Challenges and opportunities in sustainable food supply chains;
  • Food supply chain resilience during pandemics;
  • Agility and sustainable food supply chain;
  • Governance in sustainable food supply chain;
  • Stakeholder collaboration in sustainable food supply chain;
  • Food supply chain justice and fairness;
  • Incentives/drivers/enablers and inhibitors to sustainable food supply chain adoption;
  • Technology and sustainable food supply chain;
  • Operations management in sustainable food supply chains;
  • Life cycle assessment and sustainable food supply chains;
  • Green packaging in sustainable food supply chains;
  • Quality and safety in sustainable food supply chains;
  • Sustainable food supply chain policy and strategy;
  • Responsible sourcing in sustainable food supply chains;
  • Sustainable food supply chains and the sustainable development goals (SDGs);
  • Food waste and circularity in sustainable food supply chains.

Reference:

  1. Fearne, A., Yawson, D., Buxton, A. & Tait, J. (2012) Measuring fairness in supply chain trading relationships: A methodology guide, International Institute of Environment and Development, London, UK.  (IIED code:16042IIED) ISBN 978-1-84369-876-0
  2. Allen, T., & Prosperi, P. (2016) Modeling Sustainable Food Systems. Environmental Management 57, 956–975 .DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0664-8
  3. Yawson, D.E.& Yamoah, F.A. (2013) “African Exports Supply Chain Agility: A Case of the Ghanaian International Pineapple Export Supply Chain”, International Academy of African Business and Development (IAABD) Conference Proceedings, Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA), Accra, Ghana, May 14-18,2013.
  4. Govindan, K. (2018). Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 419-431.
  5. Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015). Theories in sustainable supply chain management: a structured literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45, 16-42.
  6. Dong Li, Xiaojun Wang, Hing Kai Chan, Riccardo Manzini, (2014) Sustainable food supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics, 152, pp. 1-8.
  7. Pullman, M. E., Maloni, M. J., & Carter, C. R. (2009). Food for thought: social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. Journal of supply chain management, 45(4), 38-54.
  8. Scandelius, C., & Cohen, G. (2016). Sustainability program brands: Platforms for collaboration and co-creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 166-176.
  9. Duffy, R., Fearne, A., Hornibrook, S., Hutchinson, K., & Reid, A. (2013). Engaging suppliers in CRM: The role of justice in buyer–supplier relationships. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 20-27.
  10. Yamoah, F. A., & Acquaye, A. (2019). Unravelling the attitude-behaviour gap paradox for sustainable food consumption: Insight from the UK apple market. Journal of cleaner production, 217, 172-184.
  11. Davis, K. F., Downs, S., & Gephart, J. A. (2021). Towards food supply chain resilience to environmental shocks. Nature Food, 2(1), 54-65.
  12. Barman, A., Das, R., & De, P. K. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 in food supply chain: Disruptions and recovery strategy. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100017.
  13. Reardon, T., Bellemare, M. F. & Zilberman, D. (2020) How COVID-19 may disrupt food supply chains in developing countries. IFPRI Blog https://www.ifpri. org/blog/how-covid-19-may-disrupt-food-supply-chains-developing-countries (2020).
  14. Challinor, A., Dinesh, D., Läderach, P. & Van Epp, M. (2020) How we can use the COVID-19 disruption to improve food systems and address the climate emergency. CGIAR Blog https://ccafs.cgiar.org/blog/how-we-can-use-covid-19-disruption-improve-food-systems-and-address-climate-emergency#. Xp5iUpl7lPY (2020).

Dr. Fred Amofa Yamoah
Dr. David Eshun Yawson
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • resilience
  • sustainable supply chain governance
  • sustainable supply chain policy and strategy
  • sustainable food supply chains
  • green food supply chains
  • quality and safety in sustainable supply chains
  • technology in sustainable food supply chains
  • operations management in sustainable food supply chains

Published Papers (11 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review, Other

3 pages, 184 KiB  
Editorial
Special Issue: Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research
by Fred Amofa Yamoah and David Eshun Yawson
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 4737; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064737 - 7 Mar 2023
Viewed by 1219
Abstract
The persistent advocacy for a sustainable food supply chain is to enable stakeholders to configure, promote, and maintain food supply systems that deliver value in terms of profit and the well-being of people [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review, Other

12 pages, 275 KiB  
Article
Sustainability in Logistics Service Quality: Evidence from Agri-Food Supply Chain in Ukraine
by Irina Dovbischuk
Sustainability 2023, 15(4), 3534; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043534 - 14 Feb 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2435
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore which attributes of logistics service quality (LSQ) are associated with the superior LSQ in rural territories of the developing economy of Ukraine. The data were collected from 52 Ukrainian agrarian companies. Ukraine was chosen because [...] Read more.
The purpose of this paper is to explore which attributes of logistics service quality (LSQ) are associated with the superior LSQ in rural territories of the developing economy of Ukraine. The data were collected from 52 Ukrainian agrarian companies. Ukraine was chosen because of the high potential of its agricultural sector, which has been one of the world’s largest exporters of agricultural goods for years. This paper investigates LSQ from the perspective of agri-businesses and addresses sustainability. The primary data were obtained in a survey of clustered samples of agri-businesses in rural Ukraine. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted with the Stata 16 software to test one hypothesis. This study builds on the expectancy–disconfirmation paradigm in service management research and the related service quality in order to compare the perceived and expected quality of social and environmental sustainability-related aspects of LSQ to test two hypotheses. The findings revealed that service quality in agricultural logistics is a five-dimensional construct. Its five dimensions are reliability, digital transformation, corporate image, environmental sustainability, and quality of customer focus. Furthermore, the study delivers evidence that the perceived and expected quality of the social sustainability-related aspects of LSQ are substantially different. As the study’s data collection process was interrupted by the Russian–Ukrainian war, the proposed model was only tested with 52 enterprises in an agri-food supply chain in rural Ukraine. Such a small sample is one of the study’s limitations. The research has great managerial implications as managers can use the explored attributes as a basis for customer satisfaction analyses or benchmarking in agricultural logistics. This is the first work exploring LSQ in rural Ukraine. The major contributions of this paper are the explored dimensions of LSQ with EFA. The study presents the first and most current data about LSQ from four united territorial communities in the rural center of Ukraine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)
17 pages, 1574 KiB  
Article
The Importance of Digitalization for the Sustainability of the Food Supply Chain
by Nebojša Zorić, Radenko Marić, Tijana Đurković-Marić and Goran Vukmirović
Sustainability 2023, 15(4), 3462; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043462 - 14 Feb 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2643
Abstract
This paper aims to define the negative impact of various indicators on the sustainability and functioning of the traditional food supply chain (FSC) in the segment of wholesale and retail activities and to propose a set of measures and incentives for the digitalization [...] Read more.
This paper aims to define the negative impact of various indicators on the sustainability and functioning of the traditional food supply chain (FSC) in the segment of wholesale and retail activities and to propose a set of measures and incentives for the digitalization of its business processes. After a systematic review of the literature, the most common indicators significant for the functioning of the FSC were defined, primarily in the segment of wholesale and retail activities. Empirical research examined the influence of given indicators on the FSC. The obtained results showed that indicators such as poor coordination and transfer of information among FSC participants, food loss, economic performance, transaction costs, external elements, chemical and microbial contamination, and control of raw material, food, and waste flows significantly complicate the sustainability and functioning of the FSC. Based on the obtained results, a set of measures and incentives is proposed that the management of the supply chain should undertake to digitalize business processes, primarily in the segment of wholesale and retail activities. This paper also lists shortcomings of the research and gives guidelines for future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1020 KiB  
Article
Power Relations in Multistakeholder Initiatives—A Case Study of the German Initiative on Sustainable Cocoa (GISCO)
by Daniel Schuster and Ivo Mossig
Sustainability 2022, 14(18), 11279; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811279 - 8 Sep 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1316
Abstract
Multistakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are formalized networks with member organizations from the private, public and not-for-profit sector. Even though members interact to achieve sustainability goals they cannot reach alone, research indicates that they are heterogeneous actors with their own and sometimes conflicting goals. There [...] Read more.
Multistakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are formalized networks with member organizations from the private, public and not-for-profit sector. Even though members interact to achieve sustainability goals they cannot reach alone, research indicates that they are heterogeneous actors with their own and sometimes conflicting goals. There is no consensus in the literature regarding how those conflicting goals are negotiated. Power is seen as an important factor affecting network governance, but various concepts exist which can be applied to MSIs to different degrees. We explore the impact of person-, organization- and network-based power relations among actors in an MSI on the achievement of its own goals. To this end, we conducted 18 qualitative expert interviews with people involved in the MSI to explore decision making. Our results show that institutionally defined subgroups with similar actors (stakeholder groups) collectively represent their interest in the MSI. All stakeholder groups thus have a specific form of group-based organizational power. Our study shows that these are not negotiated; consequently, the MSI faces constraints in terms of dysfunctional power relations, as well as obstacles to finding solutions for sustainability issues on a global scale. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 640 KiB  
Article
Sustainability Governance: Insights from a Cocoa Supply Chain
by Jakob Keller, Martin Jung and Rainer Lasch
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10763; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710763 - 29 Aug 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2639
Abstract
The food industry is one of the main drivers of climate change, with serious impacts on the living and working conditions in developing countries. Due to these sustainability issues, consumers, governments, and non-governmental organizations are pressuring food companies to rethink their current business [...] Read more.
The food industry is one of the main drivers of climate change, with serious impacts on the living and working conditions in developing countries. Due to these sustainability issues, consumers, governments, and non-governmental organizations are pressuring food companies to rethink their current business concepts of food production. Food companies rely on supply chain governance and its mechanisms to implement sustainability standards across all tiers of their supply chains. This study examines the sustainability governance at all stages of a cocoa supply chain, from the raw material production to the retailer, by using a qualitative case study approach. The results show a differentiation of the sustainability governance according to the different supply chain stages. At the raw material production stage, sustainability is mainly improved using contracts, extensive and frequent knowledge sharing, and audits. After the raw material production stage, environmental and social sustainability is almost exclusively coordinated by certificates, while other governance mechanisms are used to foster long-term economic business relationships. This study gives detailed insights into the application intentions and the functioning of sustainability governance mechanisms and provides propositions on how to efficiently improve sustainability in food supply chains. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 794 KiB  
Article
Consumer Psychology on Food Choice Editing in Favor of Sustainability
by Fred A. Yamoah, Adnan ul Haque and David Eshun Yawson
Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 10130; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610130 - 16 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2119
Abstract
This article examines rationale behind consumers’ vote for or against choice editing (reducing food choice) in favor of sustainable consumption to inform marketing communication strategies and sustainability policies. Based on a Qualitative analysis of free-text comments in a UK nationwide survey on sustainable [...] Read more.
This article examines rationale behind consumers’ vote for or against choice editing (reducing food choice) in favor of sustainable consumption to inform marketing communication strategies and sustainability policies. Based on a Qualitative analysis of free-text comments in a UK nationwide survey on sustainable healthy food consumption using inductive thematic analysis, we found that the majority (55.4%) disagreed with governments being given the right to minimize food choice options available to consumers by requesting that food industry players supply only sustainable food products whereas only 44.6% agreed with the idea. In-depth thematic analysis revealed that those who disagreed with it expressed the reasons to be “Freedom of choice”, “Individual choice to decide and responsibility”; “Producers to be encouraged to develop sustainable products”; “Need for education”; “Consumers have power”; “Consumers should be made to fund health conditions they develop from unhealthy food.”; “Government should fund production of sustainable foods”; and “this will lead to less competition within the market”. On the other hand, the agreement expressed by respondents gave reasons such as, “Food industry’s notorious for selling unhealthy food”; “Need to keep the price of sustainable products down.”; “Government should legislate.”; “All food sold should be whole natural food.”; “Retailers should produce more healthy food as obesity is a problem.”; “Healthy food is good for us.”; “Government’s obligation.”; and “GMO foods, foods grown using artificial methods, harm the environment and humans.” Our analysis revealed that change interventions have slowly reduced the pace of growth in the food industry, partially because of consumer awareness at a gradual rate. Moreover, sustainable food products are viewed as ineffective in the short run while market share for sustainable items remains substantially low. The implications of the results include inclusive policies for sustainable consumption, government intervention by making it mandatory to consume and produce sustainable items, accountability measures for food producers, the introduction of a rebate system for sustainable production, and the monitoring of food prices ensuring organic food is affordable to all. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1322 KiB  
Article
Avoidance of Supermarket Food Waste—Employees’ Perspective on Causes and Measures to Reduce Fruit and Vegetables Waste
by Lisa Mattsson and Helén Williams
Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 10031; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610031 - 13 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4061
Abstract
Identifying causes of food waste at grocery retail level is crucial for the development of effective measures to reduce waste. Frontline employees manage food waste in their day-to-day operations; however, there is a paucity of research that draws attention to their knowledge of [...] Read more.
Identifying causes of food waste at grocery retail level is crucial for the development of effective measures to reduce waste. Frontline employees manage food waste in their day-to-day operations; however, there is a paucity of research that draws attention to their knowledge of and approach to causes and measures to reduce food waste. In this empirical study, a mixed methods approach is adopted, using multiple interviews and participatory observations with employees, and primary quantitative data on fruit and vegetable waste for one year from the supermarkets. The results illuminate the fact that the role of employees is central for reducing food waste, and from their perspective, the causes and measures can be divided into four different main themes covering policy, practice, people and product. The analysis involves 73 different fruit and vegetables categories, and the fruit and vegetables waste at the three supermarkets is 60 tonnes. The results also reveal different causes for different fruit and vegetables categories, implying that generic descriptions of causes are not enough to use as bases for planning reduction measures. The paper provides a base for planning and implementing reduction measures for the grocery retail sector, which contribute to a sustainable food supply chain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1170 KiB  
Article
Redefining Quality in Food Supply Chains via the Natural Resource Based View and Convention Theory
by Tracy D. Johnson-Hall and David C. Hall
Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9456; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159456 - 2 Aug 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2469
Abstract
This study develops and tests a novel product quality framework for food supply chains (FSCs) that addresses sustainability. Issues including climate change, population growth, and the resources required by industrialized agriculture, as well as changing consumer preferences contribute to concerns about the social, [...] Read more.
This study develops and tests a novel product quality framework for food supply chains (FSCs) that addresses sustainability. Issues including climate change, population growth, and the resources required by industrialized agriculture, as well as changing consumer preferences contribute to concerns about the social, ecological, and economic sustainability of FSCs. FSCs, therefore, need to be adapted to address changing supply and demand characteristics. We integrate the natural resource-based view (NRBV) with convention theory (CT) to develop a new set of quality dimensions. Placing social and ecological considerations within the domain of quality management advances theory in two ways. First, while social and ecological considerations are typically peripheral to business models, this framework allows social responsibility and the natural environment to occupy a central place within FSC operations. Second, the framework reflects the fundamentally socially embedded nature of FSCs, including the geographic, historical, and cultural associations of food quality. We then construct a typology of quality conventions and FSCs. We empirically test the typology using a case study methodology with cases from the United States of America (USA). The analysis explores how firms bundle quality conventions across FSCs for competitive advantage. We also find a set of paths through which FSCs transition via exploitation, exploration and organizational ambidexterity to generate competitive advantage, highlighting tradeoffs that may arise as FSCs evolve. These tradeoffs, which relate to maintaining or adapting quality conventions, are practically important because, if not managed appropriately, may result in lower performance and less sustainable FSCs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1162 KiB  
Article
The 2020 Maize Production Failure in Ghana: A Case Study of Ejura-Sekyedumase Municipality
by Peter Bilson Obour, Isaac Kwamena Arthur and Kwadwo Owusu
Sustainability 2022, 14(6), 3514; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063514 - 17 Mar 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4731
Abstract
This paper examines the causes of widespread maize production failure in Ghana during the 2020 minor growing season. A mixed-methods approach was used to study smallholder maize farmers in the Ejura-Sekyedumase Municipality to provide a holistic understanding of the factors behind the maize [...] Read more.
This paper examines the causes of widespread maize production failure in Ghana during the 2020 minor growing season. A mixed-methods approach was used to study smallholder maize farmers in the Ejura-Sekyedumase Municipality to provide a holistic understanding of the factors behind the maize production failure and to inform policy interventions. The results show that the decline in maize grain yield was caused by the failure of the minor season rains and, more importantly, the destruction of maize plants by fall armyworms. Other factors including poor soils and inadequate farm inputs contributed minimally to the observed maize failures. The agronomic practices adopted by the farmers to mitigate crop failures were undermined by their inability to master the onset and cessation of rainfall, the ineffectiveness of pesticides to control the fall armyworms and financial challenges. It is recommended that the government promotes and supports rainwater harvesting to address the impacts of drought and pests on food crop production. Furthermore, to ensure sustainable food production, a combination of indigenous knowledge and scientific farm practices are crucial to accurately forecast the weather and to control the fall armyworms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research, Other

15 pages, 910 KiB  
Review
Review of Strategic Agility: A Holistic Framework for Fresh Produce Supply Chain Disruptions
by David Eshun Yawson and Fred A. Yamoah
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 14977; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214977 - 12 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1743
Abstract
The influence of the rapidly changing business environment due to the COVID-19 global pandemic presents an important organizational challenge to fresh produce export supply chains in developing countries such as Ghana. Such an inimical supply chain problem highlights the relevance of supply chain [...] Read more.
The influence of the rapidly changing business environment due to the COVID-19 global pandemic presents an important organizational challenge to fresh produce export supply chains in developing countries such as Ghana. Such an inimical supply chain problem highlights the relevance of supply chain agility as a potent methodological framework to measure, monitor and evaluate these challenges in stable as well as turbulent times. This review paper focuses on the applicability of a framework for Supply Chain Agility as a methodological framework in stable (pre-COVID-19) versus turbulent (COVID-19) business environments. We argue and propose that Supply Chain Agility Framework is a holistic framework which is efficacious in both stable and unstable supply chain environments. This is amply supported by the central plank of our proposition that the Supply Chain Agility Framework offers an adaptable tool that can serve as a panacea to fresh produce supply chain challenges not only in a stable (pre-COVID-19) business environment but also effective and applicable in a turbulent business environment, such as experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The implications of this proposition for the fresh produce export supply chain industry and relevant stakeholders are duly presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

17 pages, 1238 KiB  
Systematic Review
Who Prefers Regional Products? A Systematic Literature Review of Consumer Characteristics and Attitudes in Short Food Supply Chains
by Adrián Csordás, Péter Lengyel and István Füzesi
Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 8990; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14158990 - 22 Jul 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2280
Abstract
The present work is a selection of empirical studies focusing on the characteristics and attitudes of Short Food Supply Chain (SFSC) consumers. Using a systematic literature review approach (PRISMA), we identified five different aspects of the SFSC within the publications: producer participation, swot, [...] Read more.
The present work is a selection of empirical studies focusing on the characteristics and attitudes of Short Food Supply Chain (SFSC) consumers. Using a systematic literature review approach (PRISMA), we identified five different aspects of the SFSC within the publications: producer participation, swot, state intervention, attitude and “other”. Based on the findings of studies from the academic literature, the results are quite mixed. Though the number of SFSC-related empirical studies has risen in recent years, there is a lack of SFSC-related data, even in the European Union (EU), where a sustainable agriculture and food system must play a crucial role in the implementation of the Green Deal. Overall, it is hard to name those features that, without any doubt, affect the willingness of consumers to purchase from an SFSC. The studies mostly remarked on age and education; however, even these findings cannot be generalized. Therefore, some consumers of non-global food supply chains could be characterized very well, but these observations could differ in diverse cases because of local factors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Supply Chain Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop