Topic Editors

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0165, USA
Department of Health Sciences, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

Bone as an Endocrine Organ

Abstract submission deadline
closed (31 August 2024)
Manuscript submission deadline
closed (31 October 2024)
Viewed by
5562

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Increasing evidence shows that bone is very much an interactive organ in the body and plays an integral role in the functioning or malfunctioning of other organs and tissues. Often, it does this by releasing substances that affect metabolism in ways we could not previously imagine. Some examples of this include the roles of osteocalcin in glucose metabolism and skeletal muscle function and Transforming Growth Factor-Beta in muscle protein degradation. Yet, many questions are unanswered. For example, bone contains and releases substances that are anabolic and catabolic to other tissues. What signals bone to release them and in what quantities? What are the metabolic fates of released calcium, phosphate and magnesium in health and disease? How do these releases affect other organs in different disease states?

Prof. Dr. Gordon L. Klein
Prof. Dr. Antonio Brunetti
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • bone
  • osteocalcin
  • transforming growth factor -beta
  • oxidative stress
  • interleukin-6
  • skeletal muscle
  • heart
  • angiotensin II
  • smad signaling

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Cells
cells
5.1 9.9 2012 17 Days CHF 2700
Endocrines
endocrines
- - 2020 26.5 Days CHF 1000
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
ijms
4.9 8.1 2000 16.8 Days CHF 2900
Journal of Clinical Medicine
jcm
3.0 5.7 2012 16 Days CHF 2600
Metabolites
metabolites
3.5 5.7 2011 16.1 Days CHF 2700

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
7 pages, 654 KiB  
Case Report
Romosozumab as Treatment for Severe Osteoporosis in Heart and Lung Transplant Recipients
by Lisa M. Raven, Jacqueline R. Center and Christopher A. Muir
Endocrines 2025, 6(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/endocrines6010002 - 2 Jan 2025
Viewed by 960
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis is common in transplant recipients, and fracture risk is high. Standard treatment is with anti-resorptive medications. Despite high fracture rates, there are limited data on the use of anabolic bone therapies in transplant recipients. Aim: To evaluate skeletal outcomes after treatment [...] Read more.
Background: Osteoporosis is common in transplant recipients, and fracture risk is high. Standard treatment is with anti-resorptive medications. Despite high fracture rates, there are limited data on the use of anabolic bone therapies in transplant recipients. Aim: To evaluate skeletal outcomes after treatment with romosozumab for 12 months in heart and lung transplant recipients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of transplant recipients who completed 12 months of romosozumab treatment at a single centre. Results: Six transplant recipients completed 12 months of romosozumab treatment, commenced after a median of 3 years post transplant (range 2–20). Four patients (66%) were still receiving prednisolone treatment at the time of starting romosozumab. All patients had a history of fracture and had previously received anti-resorptive therapy (4 with zoledronate, 2 with denosumab for >2 years). Following completion of romosozumab treatment, all patients were consolidated with zoledronate or denosumab. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured prior to and after completion of romosozumab treatment. The median baseline lumbar spine (LS) T-score was −2.3 SD (range −3.1 to +0.9) and total femur T-score was −2.2 SD (range −2.9 to −1.6). Most (5/6) patients experienced an increase in BMD at the LS (median change +7.1%). Most (5/6) patients did not experience clinically significant change in total femur BMD, apart from one patient who experienced a 9% gain. Three patients (50%) experienced subsequent fractures during (1/3) or after completing (2/3) romosozumab treatment. Conclusions: These cases demonstrate severe osteoporosis in transplant recipients. Most patients in our case series had improvement in LS BMD following romosozumab treatment, yet new fractures still occurred during follow-up. The appropriate use of romosozumab in heart and lung transplant patients with osteoporosis requires further study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Bone as an Endocrine Organ)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 584 KiB  
Article
Pro-Osteogenic Effect of the Nutraceutical BlastiMin Complex® in Women with Osteoporosis or Osteopenia: An Open Intervention Clinical Trial
by Sofia Sabatelli, Emanuele-Salvatore Scarpa, Angelica Giuliani, Chiara Giordani, Jacopo Sabbatinelli, Maria Rita Rippo, Sara Cabodi, Barbara Petrini, Giancarlo Balercia and Gilberta Giacchetti
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(16), 8565; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168565 - 6 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1696
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that affects millions of patients worldwide and is characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fractures. Notably, natural molecules can increase BMD and exert pro-osteogenic effects. Noteworthily, the nutraceutical BlastiMin Complex® (Mivell, Italy, [...] Read more.
Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that affects millions of patients worldwide and is characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fractures. Notably, natural molecules can increase BMD and exert pro-osteogenic effects. Noteworthily, the nutraceutical BlastiMin Complex® (Mivell, Italy, European Patent Application EP4205733A1) can induce differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) in osteoblasts and can exert in vitro pro-osteogenic and anti-inflammatory effects. Thus, the purpose of this study was to verify the effects of BlastiMin Complex® on bone turnover markers (BTMs) and BMD in patients with senile and postmenopausal osteopenia or osteoporosis. The efficacy of BlastiMin Complex® on BTMs in serum was evaluated through biochemical assays. BMD values were analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (R.E.M.S.) techniques, and the SNPs with a role in osteoporosis development were evaluated by PCR. Clinical data obtained after 12 months of treatment showed an increase in bone turnover index, a decrease in C-reactive protein levels, and a remarkable increase in P1NP levels, indicating the induction of osteoblast proliferation and activity in the cohort of 100% female patients recruited for the study. These findings show that the nutraceutical BlastiMin Complex® could be used as an adjuvant in combination with synthetic drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis pathology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Bone as an Endocrine Organ)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 1874 KiB  
Communication
Vibration Rather than Microgravity Affects Bone Metabolism in Adult Zebrafish Scale Model
by Marta Carnovali, Stefania Zava, Giuseppe Banfi, Angela Maria Rizzo and Massimo Mariotti
Cells 2024, 13(6), 509; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13060509 - 14 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1421
Abstract
Gravity and mechanical forces cause important alterations in the human skeletal system, as demonstrated by space flights. Innovative animal models like zebrafish embryos and medaka have been introduced to study bone response in ground-based microgravity simulators. We used, for the first time, adult [...] Read more.
Gravity and mechanical forces cause important alterations in the human skeletal system, as demonstrated by space flights. Innovative animal models like zebrafish embryos and medaka have been introduced to study bone response in ground-based microgravity simulators. We used, for the first time, adult zebrafish in simulated microgravity, with a random positioning machine (RPM) to study bone remodeling in the scales. To evaluate the effects of microgravity on bone remodeling in adult bone tissue, we exposed adult zebrafish to microgravity for 14 days using RPM and we evaluated bone remodeling on explanted scales. Our data highlight bone resorption in scales in simulated microgravity fish but also in the fish exposed, in normal gravity, to the vibrations produced by the RPM. The osteoclast activation in both rotating and non-rotating samples suggest that prolonged vibrations exposure leads to bone resorption in the scales tissue. Stress levels in these fish were normal, as demonstrated by blood cortisol quantification. In conclusion, vibrational mechanical stress induced bone resorption in adult fish scales. Moreover, adult fish as an animal model for microgravity studies remains controversial since fish usually live in weightless conditions because of the buoyant force from water and do not constantly need to support their bodies against gravity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Bone as an Endocrine Organ)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop