Next Article in Journal
Hydrochemical Characteristics and Indication to Geothermal Genesis of Low–Medium-Temperature Convection Geothermal Field in Yanshan Orogenic Basin, China
Previous Article in Journal
A Newly Isolated Rhodococcus sp. S2 from Landfill Leachate Capable of Heterotrophic Nitrification and Aerobic Denitrification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Geological Significance of the Perrot Spring in Mont Avic Natural Park (NW Alps)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Fluvial Geomorphology, River Management and Restoration

by
Salvatore Ivo Giano
Dipartimento di Scienze, Basilicata University, Campus Macchia Romana via Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
Water 2024, 16(3), 432; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16030432
Submission received: 17 January 2024 / Revised: 20 January 2024 / Accepted: 26 January 2024 / Published: 29 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fluvial Geomorphology, River Management and Restoration)
This Special Issue follows a previous SI titled “Fluvial geomorphology and river management”, published in 2021, which addressed the role of fluvial geomorphology in landscape evolution and the impact produced by human activities on fluvial systems [1,2,3]. Within that SI, questions regarding river restoration and management were grappled with. At present, the fluvial system is the main morphological system strongly influencings the physical landscape. In fact, in recent decades, climatic changes have increased the discharge of rivers, thus increasing their potential erosive activity [4,5]. As a consequence, the short-term evolution of rivers is strictly controlled by climatic changes [5,6,7], and close to coastal zones, rivers interact with marine systems, thus contributing to the modification of these transitional zones [8,9,10]. The role of human activity as a geomorphic agent is also relevant to the modification and restoration of the fluvial ecosystem. In addition, the recent increases in global temperatures around the word have induced relevant modifications in fluvial discharges, with significant loss of life and infrastructures due to high-magnitude events. Human activities and climatic changes are relevant topics and represent new frontiers in fluvial system research [3,11,12].
This Special Issue is addressed to fluvial geomorphology researchers working in river restoration and management applications and who combine field surveys and modeling elaborations. Different natural and anthropogenic environments are approached by the authors, starting from rural and urban geomorphology and moving to natural river systems, particularly in mountain drainage basins. Finally, original and innovative approaches in the development of fluvial terraces and managing aquatic systems are proposed.
As a result, in this Special Issue, nearly three different research topics are raised by contributors from different parts of the world. The research papers all address the behavior of drainage basins placed at different locations from their mouth and related to different morphoclimatic regions. Three papers investigated the fluvial system of the Mediterranean area: one paper by Forno et al. (contribution 1) approached the fluvial Alpine environment of Northern Italy, and another paper by Putignano et al. (contribution 2) was related to an Apennine drainage basin in Central Italy. The third paper by Forno et al. (contribution 3) addressed the role of fluvio-glacial deposits in the urban geomorphology of Turin. Two papers are addressed the humid tropical climate of Brazil; one by Perez Filho et al. (contribution 4) concerned the development of Holocene fluvial terraces in Northeast Brazil, and the second by Basso et al. (contribution 5) detailed an assessment of water availability in rural communities in Central Brazil. Finally, the paper by Mielhaursen et al. (contribution 6) addressed a methodology for predicting fish passage in restored fluvial channels in the Ontario region in Canada.
The topics addressed by each paper are original and show interesting methods of investigation ranging from classical ones based on field surveys and sampling fluvial and glacio-fluvial deposits to modern ones such as investigating the minimum reference flow of a drainage basin or Vortex rock weirs, which provide physical channel stability, fluvial habitat enhancement and river hydromechanics.
The original paper by Mielhaursen et al. (contribution 6) uses the Vortex rock weir (WRW) methodology in order to provide a river restoration method suitable for the passage of small-bodied fish species in gap and low-water-level conditions. They realized best practices for the method, balancing channel stability and fish passage, thus contributing to management strategies in river restoration analyses. The availability of water resources in Central Brazil was addressed by Basso et al. (contribution 5) with the aim of estimating the minimum reference flow of representative hydrographic basins hosting rural communities. The authors used on-site measurements and three regionalization methods for a comparative analysis, showing, as a result, high variability between the minimum reference flows and the observed and measured minimum flows within 21 drainage basins. The enlargement of the monitoring network to sustain effective water security was proposed by the authors. In the same Brazilian region but in the northeast sector, Perez Filho et al. (contribution 4) developed a research study on the complex responses between tropical rivers and Holocene climate pulses in small river systems. In particular, the study aimed at to correlate low river terraces in different regions of Brazil with Holocene climatic changes. Based on field data, the Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) dating of sampled deposits and cluster and correlation statistical analyses, relationships between the variables controlling the spatial distribution of the terraces were investigated. The authors showed how global climate changes were not responsible for the formation of low terraces, which could be attributed to local/regional event climate pulses driving the rearrangement of fluvial deposits and the abandonment of the ancient floodplains via fluvial incision. The reconstruction of a proglacial outwash plain in the physical context of the urban geomorphology of the Turin Town area (Italy) was realized by Forno et al. (contribution 3) using about 40 drilling boreholes. They analyzed the features of fluvial sedimentary deposits present in the subsoil by using boreholes and emphasized the belonging of fluvial successions to the LGM and late glacial episodes. Rock avalanche deposits cropping out in fluvial valleys of the Central Apennines of Italy were investigated by Putignano et al. (contribution 2). Geological field mapping, well-log examination and detailed stratigraphic, sedimentologic and morphometric analyses allowed the authors to constrain the depositional episode to a cold stage of the Late Pleistocene. A restoration of the potential source area and the propagation mechanism of boulders were also investigated using GIS analyses. This represents an original contribution to the knowledge of rock avalanche processes. The relationship between water emergence and Quaternary deposits in the western Italian Alpine was investigated by Forno et al. (contribution 1) within Mont Avic Natural Park. A geological field survey of bedrock and Quaternary deposits allowed the authors to define the geometry of the rock volumes and the hydrogeology of the Perrot spring, which is located at the boundary of glaciolacustrine and landslide deposits.
In conclusion, this Special Issue containing six research articles addresses many topics ranging from the management and restoration of fluvial reaches in rural and urban communities to the role played by climate change in the development of fluvial succession during the Holocene and historical times. The works presented herein are further contributions to the comprehension of fluvial dynamics and how natural/anthropic processes can modify a fluvial environmental system. Furthermore, the collected papers have increased knowledge of and attention to the fluvial system, which represents a relevant and vulnerable natural environment for life.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Forno, M.G.; Gattiglio, M.; Ghignone, S.; De Luca, D.A.; Santillan Quiroga, L.M. Geological Significance of the Perrot Spring in Mont Avic Natural Park (NW Alps). Water 2023, 15, 3042. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15173042.
  • Putignano, M.L.; Di Luzio, E.; Schilirò, L.; Pietrosante, A.; Giano, S.I. The Pretare-Piedilama Clastic Deposit: New Evidence of a Quaternary Rock Avalanche Event in Central Apennines (Italy). Water 2023, 15, 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040753.
  • Forno, M.G.; Gianotti, F.; Storti, U. Geomorphology of the Po Fluvial Terraces in Turin Deduced by New Subsoil Data (NW Italy). Water 2022, 14, 2872. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14182872.
  • Perez Filho, A.; Moreira, V.B.; Lämmle, L.; Souza, A.O.; Torres, B.A.; Aderaldo, P.I.C.; Valezio, É.V.; Machado, D.O.B.F.; Prebianca, M.M.; Mazoni, A.F.; et al. Genesis and Distribution of Low Fluvial Terraces Formed by Holocene Climate Pulses in Brazil. Water 2022, 14, 2977. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14192977.
  • Basso, R.; Honório, M.; Costa, I.; Bezerra, N.; Baumann, L.; Silva, F.; Albuquerque, A.; Scalize, P. Comparison between Regionalized Minimum Reference Flow and On-Site Measurements in Hydrographic Basins of Rural Communities in the State of Goiás, Brazil. Water 2022, 14, 1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071016.
  • Mielhausen, J.; Cockburn, J.M.H.; Villard, P.V.; Baril, A.-M. Balancing Physical Channel Stability and Aquatic Ecological Function through River Restoration. Water 2023, 15, 1799. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15091799.

References

  1. Rosgen, D.L. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 1994, 22, 169–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Macklin, M.G.; Jones, A.F.; Lewin, J. River response to rapid Holocene environmental change: Evidence and explanation in British catchments. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2010, 29, 1555–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fryirs, K.A.; Brierley, G.J. Geomorphic Analysis of River System, An Approach to Reading 655 the Landscape, 1st ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2013; pp. 1–345. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vandenberghe, J. Climate forcing of fluvial system development: An evolution of ideas. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2003, 22, 2053–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Milly, P.; Dunne, K.; Vecchia, A. Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 2005, 438, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bentivenga, M.; Giano, S.I.; Piccarreta, M. Recent increase of flood frequency in the Ionian belt of Basilicata Region, southern Italy: Human or climatic changes? Water 2020, 12, 2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Giano, S.I.; Schiattarella, M. Drainage integration of small endorheic basins at the Pleistocene-Holocene transition: An example from southern Italy. Geomorphology 2023, 427, 108622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lewin, J.; Gibbard, P.L. Quaternary river terraces in England: Forms, sediments and 690 processes. Geomorphology 2010, 120, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pazzaglia, F.J. Fluvial Terraces. In Treatise on Geomorphology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; Volume 9, pp. 379–412. [Google Scholar]
  10. Giano, S.I.; Giannandrea, P. Late Pleistocene differential uplift inferred from the analysis of fluvial terraces (southern Apennines, Italy). Geomorphology 2014, 217, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brunsden, D.; Thornes, J.B. Landscape sensitivity and change. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 1979, 4, 463–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wohl, E.; Brierley, G.; Cadol, D.; Coulthard, T.J.; Covino, T.; Fryirs, K.A.; Grant, G.; Hilton, R.G.; Lane, S.N.; Magilligan, F.J.; et al. Connectivity as an emergent property of geomorphic systems. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2019, 44, 4–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giano, S.I. Fluvial Geomorphology, River Management and Restoration. Water 2024, 16, 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16030432

AMA Style

Giano SI. Fluvial Geomorphology, River Management and Restoration. Water. 2024; 16(3):432. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16030432

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giano, Salvatore Ivo. 2024. "Fluvial Geomorphology, River Management and Restoration" Water 16, no. 3: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16030432

APA Style

Giano, S. I. (2024). Fluvial Geomorphology, River Management and Restoration. Water, 16(3), 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16030432

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop