One-part geopolymers (OPG) offer a low-carbon alternative to Portland cement, yet mix design remains largely empirical. This study couples machine learning with SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) to quantify how mix and curing factors govern performance in Ca-containing OPG. We trained six regressors—Random Forest,
[...] Read more.
One-part geopolymers (OPG) offer a low-carbon alternative to Portland cement, yet mix design remains largely empirical. This study couples machine learning with SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) to quantify how mix and curing factors govern performance in Ca-containing OPG. We trained six regressors—Random Forest, ExtraTrees, SVR, Ridge, KNN, and XGBoost—on a compiled dataset and selected XGBoost as the primary model based on prediction accuracy. Models were built separately for four targets: compressive strength at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days. SHAP analysis reveals four dominant variables across targets—Slag, Na
2O, Ms, and the water-to-binder ratio (w/b)—while the sand-to-binder ratio (s/b), temperature, and humidity are secondary within the tested ranges. Strength evolution follows a reaction–densification logic: at 3 days, Slag dominates as Ca accelerates C–(N)–A–S–H formation; at 7–14 days, Na
2O leads as alkalinity/soluble silicate controls dissolution–gelation; by 28 days, Slag and Na
2O jointly set the strength ceiling, with w/b continuously regulating porosity. Interactions are strongest for Slag × Na
2O (Ca–alkalinity synergy). These results provide actionable guidance: prioritize Slag and Na
2O while controlling w/b for strength. The XGBoost+SHAP workflow offers transparent, data-driven decision support for OPG mix optimization and can be extended with broader datasets and formal validation to enhance generalization.
Full article