Next Article in Journal
Microstructure and Impact Toughness of Laser-Arc Hybrid Welded Joint of Medium-Thick TC4 Titanium Alloy
Next Article in Special Issue
Tunable Nonlinear Optical Bistability Based on the Fabry–Perot Cavity Composed of Dirac Semimetal and Two Symmetric Photonic Crystals
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, and Lead–Bismuth Eutectic Corrosion Behaviors of FeCrAlY-Al2O3 Nanoceramic Composite Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Magnetically Tunable Goos–Hänchen Shift of Reflected Beam in Multilayer Structures Containing Anisotropic Graphene
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Nonlinear Optical Bistability Based on Surface Plasmons with Nonlinear Dirac Semimetal Substrate

Coatings 2024, 14(4), 394; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040394
by Xinghua Wu 1, Yanyan Guo 2, Xin Long 3 and Qingkai Wang 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Coatings 2024, 14(4), 394; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040394
Submission received: 29 October 2023 / Revised: 17 March 2024 / Accepted: 24 March 2024 / Published: 27 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Properties of Crystals and Thin Films, Volume II)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

What is the material here used as 3D DSM?? Graphene??

Why specifically Otto configuration/AA structure for graphene is investigated insted of AB or ABC stacking??

All the analysis beasd on some range of Fermi energy levels for graphene and 3D DSM have been tested. How authors came up to these numbers?? Prior literature? This should be explicitely mentioned. Why specifically E_F 0.75-0.90 eV has been chosen? Why specifically E_FD 0.63-0.66 eV have been chosen? What is the rationale behind the choice?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

see attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1.    The author needs to double-check all the format, letter size, layout… in manuscript.

2.    The author needs to double-check Fig. 1 because it is wrong about the path of light on the refraction face of prism.

3.    Why did author get the thickness of air layer d=3.5? Can we change this value? And what is influences of them?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop