Next Article in Journal
Planting Geometry May Be Used to Optimize Plant Density and Yields without Changing Yield Potential per Plant in Sweet Corn
Previous Article in Journal
Checklist of Ornamental Trees, Shrubs, and Succulents of Apulia (Southern Italy)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 17
10.3390/plants13172464
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seed Priming and Biopriming in Two Squash Landraces (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) from Tunisia: A Sustainable Strategy to Promote Germination and Alleviate Salt Stress

by
Néji Tarchoun
1,
Wassim Saadaoui
1,
Khawla Hamdi
1,
Hanen Falleh
2,
Ourania Pavli
3,
Riadh Ksouri
2 and
Spyridon A. Petropoulos
4,*
1
Research Laboratory LR21AGR05, High Agronomic Institute of Chott Mariem, Sousse University, Sousse 4042, Tunisia
2
Laboratory of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants, Center of Biotechnology, Technopark of Borj Cedria, BP 901, Hammam-Lif 2050, Tunisia
3
Laboratory of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Fytokou Street, 38446 Volos, Greece
4
Laboratory of Vegetable Production, Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Fytokou Street, 38446 Volos, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(17), 2464; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13172464
Submission received: 30 July 2024 / Revised: 21 August 2024 / Accepted: 30 August 2024 / Published: 3 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Response to Abiotic Stress and Climate Change)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In recent years, seed priming has gained interest, with researchers aiming to enhance seed germination and early growth, especially under abiotic stress conditions. In this study, seeds from two squash landraces (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne; i.e., Galaoui large seeds (Galaoui hereafter) and Batati green (Batati hereafter)) were subjected to different priming methods ((a) 0.3% and 0.4% KNO3 (halopriming); (b) 0.1% and 0.2% GA3 (hormopriming); (c) inoculation with Trichoderma spp. (T. harzianum, T. viride, and T. virens), Bacillus subtilis, and Pseudomonas fluorescens (biopriming) in order to promote germination parameters and seedling growth under salinity stress (0, 100, and 200 mM of NaCl). Our findings indicate the better performance of primed seeds compared to the untreated ones in terms of germination and seedling growth traits, although a varied response depending on the priming method and the landrace was observed. The highest germination percentage (GP) and the lowest mean germination time (MGT) were observed in 0.4% KNO3-primed seeds. The positive effects of 0.4% KNO3 were also depicted in all traits related to seedling growth and the seedling vigor index (SVI), indicating its effectiveness as a priming agent in squash seeds. Under salinity stress conditions, priming with 0.4% KNO3 significantly improved the germination and seedling growth traits for both landraces, while the application of 0.2% GA3 at high salinity significantly improved photosynthetic quantum yield (Fv/Fm ratio). Regarding the effects of biopriming in germination and seedling growth traits, our results indicate that T. harzianum and B. subtilis were the most effective bioagents in promoting germination and seedling growth in Galaoui and Batati seeds, respectively. In conclusion, our findings provide important information regarding the practice of using priming and biopriming agents to enhance the germination and seedling growth capacity of squash seeds, as well to mitigate the negative effects of salinity stress at the critical stages of germination and early growth.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, changing climate conditions, involving global warming and aridity, along with poor-quality irrigation water and irrational fertilization management, have progressively led to increased soil salinization and agricultural land abandonment [1,2]. Salinity is considered to be one of the most common abiotic stresses that adversely affects plants throughout their growth cycle, leading to considerable yield losses, especially in arid and semi-arid regions [3,4]. Seed germination is considered the most sensitive stage for most plant species, and it determines crop establishment and subsequently crop performance [5]. Under salinity stress conditions, water absorption during seed imbibition and turgescence is limited [6,7], thus impairing seed germination and seedling growth due to osmotic, ionic, and oxidative stress [8,9,10]. These conditions may induce complex interactions at the morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular level that ultimately lead to germination inhibition and seedling death [11,12].
The effects of salinity stress during germination are manifested through reduced seed germination percentage and germination rate and increased germination time [13,14,15,16]. The response of salt-sensitive species to such conditions includes a series of changes in physiological processes, such as photosynthetic apparatus and the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4,17]. Chlorophyll fluorescence is routinely employed as a tool with which to assess plant tolerance to environmental stressors and determine their effects on the photosynthetic apparatus [18] since the ROS-induced damage of chloroplasts leads to reduced chlorophyll content and to the inhibition of photosynthesis [19]. Moreover, the response of plants to salinity stress involves the activation of antioxidant enzymes and the accumulation of osmolytes, which are responsible for cell membrane stability and protein structure [20,21].
Apart from stress conditions (e.g., stress duration and severity) and plant traits, sensitivity to salinity stress may be affected by the longevity of seeds, which is influenced by genetic factors as well as the pre-storage and storage conditions, mainly associated with the initial seed moisture content and the relative humidity and temperature under storage [22]. Based on their behavior under storage, seeds are classified as orthodox, intermediate. and recalcitrant, while it has been well documented that conventional storage conditions are not appropriate for short-lived and desiccation-sensitive seeds, as is the case of most horticultural crops whose seeds are characterized as orthodox seeds [23].
In recent years, seed priming has gained ground as an alternative, low-cost approach to enhancing the germination potential of orthodox seeds, as well as to mitigating abiotic stress effects in various plant species [24,25]. In this context, various chemical and physical methods have been suggested, including hydropriming, potassium nitrate, gibberellic acid-priming (GA3), cytokinin, chlorhydric acid, sodium chloride, thioredoxin, sulphuric acid, seed scraping, etc. [11,25]. Seed priming has been proven to be a valuable tool with which to enhance, accelerate, and synchronize the germination of seeds, thus leading to improved seedling and crop establishment while breaking seed dormancy and preventing seed deterioration under unfavorable conditions for seed germination [24]. More importantly, recent scientific evidence suggests that seed priming induces tolerance to stressors, such as drought and salinity, thus improving yield potential in diverse ecosystems [26,27,28]. The beneficial effects of seed priming have been reported in various crops, including summer squash (priming with GA3, KNO3, and polyethylene glycol (PEG)) [27,29], pepper (biopriming with Trichoderma harzianum, T. viride, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Bacillus subtillis, Paecilomyces lilacinus, and hydropriming) [30], green bean ((biopriming with T. harzianum, T. viride, P. fluorescens, and hydropriming) [31], tomato (priming with GA3, Napthlene acetic acid (NAA), and potassium nitrate (KNO3)) [32], and fennel (priming with priming with GA3, KNO3, and hydropriming) [33].
Seed priming involves a series of biochemical, physiological, and cellular responses that occur from seed imbibition and germination initiation up to radicle emergence. Seed germination involves a triphasic kinetic of water uptake, initialized by a rapid uptake (imbibition phase), followed by a lag phase (activation phase), and it is completed with the elongation of the embryonic axis (germination phase) [34]. Priming accelerates the second phase, increases the number of germinating seeds, synchronizes the radicle emergence, and enhances the seedling growth rate [34]. Furthermore, seed priming induces the hydrolysis of germination inhibitors and the activation of enzymes—mainly α-amylase and dehydrogenase—that hydrolyze the starch reserves into smaller sugars, providing energy to the developing embryo [24]. In general, seed priming is defined as a pre-sowing treatment, using various agents that mediate the partial hydration of seeds without allowing germination, as well as dehydration to the original moisture content [35]. The most commonly used priming treatments are hydropriming, osmopriming, halopriming, and hormopriming, referring to the use of water, osmotic agents, salts, and plant growth regulators, respectively [36]. In addition, apart from physical and chemical seed priming techniques, biopriming has emerged as a promising approach towards enhancing the germination potential of seeds, particularly of organic ones through the use of bioagents [25]. In this context, several studies underline the beneficial effect of bioagents, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Trichoderma spp., rhizobia, and plant-growth-promoting bacteria (Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp.) in seed germination of cereal and vegetable crops [37,38,39].
In Tunisia, squash (C. maxima Duch.) germplasm used for commercial cultivation, both in conventional and organic farming, is essentially derived from local landraces obtained via the open pollination or farmer mass selection and maintained by local farmers [40]. Nevertheless, the seeds of local landraces often exhibit decreased viability and germination ability, mainly as a result of inappropriate storage conditions (high temperatures and relative humidity) and extended storage period [40]. The loss of seed viability during storage reflects the onset of deterioration processes, involving irreversible cellular damage, which is manifested through delayed seedling emergence, reduced tolerance to abiotic stresses, and consequently, loss of viability [41]. C. maxima is moderately sensitive to salt stress [29]; however, the response of the species varies considerably depending on stress intensity and duration but also on factors related to genotype characteristics [8,42]. Despite the recent reports related to the beneficial effects of priming and biopriming approaches, there is a relevant gap for data addressing the interactive effect of various priming methods and salinity stress on seed germination traits of squash. Therefore, the main objectives of this study were to assess the following: (1) the effects of various priming (halopriming and hormopriming) treatments in traits related to squash germination and seedling growth in seeds grown with conventional cropping practices; (2) the effects of biopriming treatments in traits related to squash germination and seedling growth in seeds grown with organic cropping practices; and (3) the potential of using priming techniques as an eco-friendly and sustainable tool with which to mitigate the adverse effects of salinity stress on seed germination of two local squash landraces.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Seed Priming on Germination and Seedling Growth

The results of the ANOVA regarding the effects of seed priming on the germination and seedling growth of the two studied squash landraces are presented in Table 1. The obtained data revealed a significant effect of the priming treatments (p < 0.001) on the germination traits (DP and MGT) and seedling growth (RL, SL, SL/RL ratio, and SVI) of the two squash landraces. Germination potential and seedling vigor index under different priming treatments were differentially affected by landraces, which could be primarily attributed to the seed size of those landraces. A significant interaction between landrace × priming was recorded for GP, SVI, MGT, and SL (Table 1).
Germination percentage (GP) varied significantly (p < 0.001) among the priming treatments, ranging from 69.15% to 100%. The highest GP was recorded in primed seeds with 0.4% of KNO3 (100%), followed by 0.3% of KNO3 (94.28%), whereas the lowest values were noted in non-primed seeds (53.90%) (Figure 1A). Regarding the mean germination time (MGT), an average time gain of 2 days compared with the non-primed seeds was recorded (Figure 1B). Such findings are indicative of the positive effects of seed priming on both GP and MGT. Moreover, the analysis revealed the significant effect of the priming agent, as well as its concentration on GP, as evidenced by the significant differences among the studied priming treatments, whereas no differences in MGT values were recorded.
Regarding the seedling growth traits, RL, SL, SL/RL ratio, and SVI differed significantly among different priming treatments (Table 2). For RL, values ranged from 3.48 to 5.35 cm, while the lowest and highest values were recorded for non-primed (control) and seeds primed with 0.4% KNO3, respectively. Accordingly, SL ranged from 5.18 to 6.78 cm, where the most- and least- effective treatments were the application 0.4% KNO3 and 0.1% GA3, respectively. In relation to the above-mentioned values, the lowest SL/RL ratio was recorded in seeds primed with 0.2% and 0.1% GA3 (1.11 and 1.12, respectively), whereas the highest ratio was recorded in non-primed seeds due to their lowest root length values (1.52), although no significant differences were recorded from the treatment of 0.3% KNO3. Finally, the SVI values differed significantly among the priming treatments, with the lowest and highest values being recorded in the seeds treated with 0.2% GA3 and 0.4% KNO3, respectively. Our data suggest the superior performance of primed seeds in relation to seedling growth traits, yet they present variations subjected both to the type and concentration of the priming agent.

2.2. Effect of Landrace on Germination and Seedling Growth

Our findings suggest the significant effect of landrace on germination percentage and SVI, a trait also related to germination, while landraces did not differ in terms of seedling growth traits and mean germination time (Table 3). In particular, the Galaoui landrace showed higher values for both GP and SVI (87.88% and 902.52, respectively), as compared to the Batati landrace, thus indicating either a better response to the priming treatments applied or a higher innate germination ability.

2.3. Effect of Seed Priming under Saline Conditions

In non-primed seeds, the increasing salt stress level considerably affected all traits related to germination and seedling growth in both squash landraces (Table 4). Salinity stress significantly compromised the germination potential, leading to a severe decrease in the final germination percentage compared to controls (no NaCL added) 14 days after stress initiation (Galaoui: 21% and 48.6%; Batati: 5% and 48% at 100 mM and 200 mM NaCl, respectively), as well as a delay in germination, as evidenced by the MGT values (Table 4). Further, the effects of salt stress were also manifested on seedling growth, with the most profound effects being noted at 200 mM NaCl in both roots and shoots length. At 200 mM NaCl, the decrease over the control treatment was 43% and 36% for RL and SL for Galaoui seeds, respectively; while for Batati, the respective values were 29% and 22%. Consequently, the SL/RL ratio presented an increasing trend as the stress was intensified in both landraces, reaching an 84% and 21% increase over the control treatment at 200 mM NaCl in Galaoui and Batati, respectively, thus indicating the increased sensitivity of roots as compared to the shoots (Table 4).
Moreover, our results indicate the positive effects of all priming treatments on traits related to germination and seedling growth (Table 4). At moderate salinity stress (e.g., 100 mM NaCl), GP values ranged from 89.2 to 100.0% and 71.7 to 87.8% in Galaoui and Batati seeds, respectively, suggesting a significant increase both over the control and the respective treatment, where no NaCl was added. It is worth mentioning that priming with 0.4% KNO3 pronouncedly enhanced the germination potential of both landraces, especially for Galaoui seeds, where all seeds germinated, while the application of 0.1% GA3 resulted in higher GP values compared to 0.2% GA3 for both landraces (Figure 2). Similarly, GMT values were considerably decreased when seems were subjected to priming, especially for Galaoui seeds (5.31 to 6.31 days), whereas the effect was less evident in Batati seeds (7.76 to 8.59 days). On the other hand, priming alleviated the negative effects of salinity stress on seedling growth, as depicted in the RL and SL values, especially in the case of Batati seeds, where values were higher than the control and the 100 mM NaCl treatments.
At 200 mM of NaCl, both landraces showed a significant reduction in growth parameter values compared to the control treatment, while priming resulted in higher GP, RL, and SL and lower MGT and SL/RL values compared to the 200 mM NaCl treatment for both landraces (Table 4). A varied response was recorded for the tested priming agents depending on the landrace, with seeds of Galaoui showing a better response to KNO3 application in terms of SL and RL, while the same priming agent resulted in significantly increase GP values compared to the non-primed seeds subjected to 200 mM NaCl. Moreover, both priming agents reduced MGT by 29.1 to 33.5% and 8.8 to 18.5% in Galaoui and Batati seeds, respectively.
In order to investigate the potential of using priming treatments as a means to mitigate salinity stress effects further, we evaluated chlorophyll fluorescence as well as the content of Chla, Chlb, and carotenoids (Table 5). The highest overall values for pigments content were recorded for the non-stressed seedlings treated with 0.3% KNO3, whereas the lowest ones for the non-primed seeds subjected to severe salinity stress (200 mM NaCl). On the other hand, chlorophyll fluorescence was the highest for seedlings treated with 0.2% GA3 and subjected to 200 mM NaCl, whereas the lowest values were recorded under moderate salinity (100 mM NaCl) and for the application of 0.1% GA3.
For the non-stressed seedlings, most of the priming treatments improved the studied traits, except for 0.1% GA3, which differed significantly compared to the control treatment (non-primed seedlings), while no significant differences were recorded for the Fv/Fm ratio between the non-primed and primed seedlings. Moreover, the application of KNO3 significantly improved the chlorophyll and carotenoids content, regardless of the applied concentration (e.g., 0.3% or 0.4%).
Under salinity stress conditions, non-primed seedlings showed a decreased content of Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoids compared to the primed seedlings for both landraces (Table 5). In particular, the lowest overall values for the content of photosynthetic pigments were recorded in non-primed seeds subjected to 200 mM NaCl-induced salinity stress (8.73, 3.27, and 0.59 mg/g FW for Chla, Chlb, and carotenoid content, respectively). Moreover, under saline conditions and for both salinity levels, the application of 0.4% KNO3 resulted in the highest content of pigments, thus indicating the efficiency of using this priming agent as a stress mitigation tool.

2.4. Effect of Seed Bio-Priming on Germination and Seedling Growth

The effect of different bioagents on seed germination and seedling growth was investigated in two landraces, i.e., Batati and Galaoui, and the results are presented in Table 6. Our results revealed that all the tested bioagents were capable of improving the traits related to germination and seedling growth in both landraces, although a varied response between the genotypes was recorded. In particular, GP was improved in all the primed seeds, with significant differences noted among the tested bioagents and landraces, while the lowest GP values were recorded for the control treatment (non-primed seeds). On the other hand, the highest over values were recorded in seeds primed with T. harzianum and B. subtilis for Galaoui (91.65%) and Batati (81.12%) landraces, respectively, while Galaoui seeds recorded higher CP values than the Batati ones, regardless of the priming treatment. The positive effects of bio-priming were further evidenced in MGT, which was significantly reduced by all the priming treatments compared to the untreated seeds, which recorded the highest MGT values. The highest acceleration of seed germination was noted in seeds treated with T. harzianum and T. virens for Galaoui (5.12 days) and Batati (4.76 days), respectively. In contrast, the longest germination time was recorded in non-primed seeds for both Galaoui (8.68 days) and Batati (8.32 days).
Moreover, the tested bioagents were effective in promoting seedling growth in both landraces through the increase in root and shoot length compared to the control treatment, which recorded the lowest values. Among the bioagents, T. harzianum proved to be the most effective in enhancing RL in both Galaoui and Batati (10.27 and 10.01 cm, respectively), while T. virens also increased rot length in Galaoui seedlings (10.14 cm). Similarly, T. virens and T. harzianum were the most effective bioagents in enhancing SL in the Galaoui (12.78 and 12.58 cm, respectively) landrace, while the shoot length of the Batati seedlings was mostly benefited by B. subtilis (11.63 cm). Finally, all the tested bioagents resulted in higher SVI values compared to the control treatment, which recorded the lowest overall values for both landraces (Table 6). The most effective bio-agent was T. harzianum, which resulted in the highest SVI values for both landraces (988.31 and 800.17 for Batati and Galaoui landraces, respectively), whereas the lowest SVI values were recorded for B. subtilis and P. fluorescens in Galaoui (730.41) and Batati (544.00), respectively.

3. Discussion

Our results indicate that priming of seeds resulted in improved germination in both landraces, as evidenced by the increased GP and the decreased MGT compared to the non-primed (control) seeds. Among priming treatments, 0.4% KNO3 was the most efficient for both landraces, leading to a mean increase in GP by 85% and a mean decrease in MGT of 2.4 days. Moreover, the seedlings obtained from seeds primed with 0.4% KNO3 exhibited an enhanced growth potential, as indicated by the 29% and 54% increase over the control treatment for shoot and root length, respectively, as well as by the SVI values, which were also drastically increased by 75%. The positive effects of priming with KNO3, expressed by improved seed germination, seed dormancy breaking [43], and seedling growth uniformity, have been reported in various species, including tomato [44], pea [45], and rice [46]. However, the exact underlying mechanisms of action have not been yet well elucidated. According to the literature, it has been proposed that KNO3 modulates ABA metabolism or ABA signaling in developing seeds since the activation of ABA catabolism and GAs biosynthesis is required for seed germination [47]. Moreover, Moaaz Ali et al. [48] suggested that low NO3− concentration decreases ABA content, leading to the induction of the CYP707A2 gene, which encodes an ABA 8′-hydroxylase involved in ABA catabolism. In the same line, it is well documented that gibberellins play a crucial role in numerous physiological plant processes, including seed germination [49]. In our study, the seeds primed with 0.1% GA3 showed an increased GP by 55% as well as a decreased MGT of 2.1 days compared to the non-primed seeds. In accordance with our findings, several studies reported the positive impact of halopriming with KNO3, as well as of hormopriming with GA3 on seed germination and seedling growth, both under normal and stress conditions in various plant species, including soybean (seed priming with 6 g L−1 of KNO3) [49], tomato (seed priming with 0.25, 0.50, 075, 1.0, and 1.25 KNO3 (w/v)) [48], and rice (seed priming with GA3 at 5, 10, 50, and 100 mg L−1, among other priming agents) [50]. Therefore, the positive results of our study and those of the literature reports could be directly exploited to enhance the value of seeds, especially those that are self-produced by farmers and usually subjected to limiting factors such as long-term storage and seed dormancy, which contribute to poor or erratic germination.
Addressing the performance of primed seeds under salt stress conditions, our findings underline that seed priming facilitates the mitigation of salinity stress on seed germination and seedling growth. More specifically, seed priming with 0.4% KNO3 alleviated the effects of 100 mM NaCl-induced salinity stress, as manifested by the increased GP values of up to 27% and 7.6% over the control treatment for Galaoui and Batati seeds, respectively. On the other hand, priming with 0.1% GA3 resulted in increased GP values by up to 19% and 3.3% compared to the untreated seeds of Galaoui and Batati landraces, respectively. Reports in the literature have suggested that the underlying mechanism of action for GA3 priming is associated with the expression of genes that are responsible for the α-amylase mRNA transcription, which reduces starch into sucrose and glucose into the newly germinating embryo, thus providing the required energy for seed germination, as well as with the increased activity of lipase and protease enzymes, which lead to improved seed vigor and germination index [51,52].
It is worth noting that the observed varied response of Galaoui and Batati seeds to the tested priming agents could be related to differences in seed size, as it is well documented that the progress of seed water uptake during germination may vary depending on the seed size, thus affecting germination and seedling development in various plant species, such as wheat [53] and leafy vegetables [54]. However, seed size varies widely among different crop species and growth environments, especially in local landraces and populations where a significant variability in various traits is exhibited. In general, large seeds present higher seedling growth, an improved survival rate, and better field performance than small seeds under non-stressful environments [55]. Moreover, varietal differences in response to priming could be attributed to differences in the content of seeds in starch and other energy reserves, which greatly affects germination and early seedling growth [56,57].
In our study, seeds subjected to high salinity stress (e.g., 200 mM NaCl) were severely affected in terms of GP and the overall germination process in both landraces. In particular, GP was reduced in both landraces by up to 48%, while a considerable increase was also noted in MGT (up to 26%) and SL/RL ratio (up to 84%), the latter indicating the higher sensitivity of roots than shoots under salinity conditions. These findings are consistent with the reported effects of salinity stress levels on the seed germination of various plant species, including lentil [58], tomato, and soybean [59], among others. Moreover, considering that roots are responsible for water absorption and shoots for supplying aboveground tissues with water, root and shoot length are the most suitable traits by which to evaluate salinity tolerance, since they are greatly affected under saline conditions [60,61]. The high sensitivity of seeds to salinity during the germination stage is associated with a series of physiological, biochemical, and molecular adjustments resulting from the combined effect of osmotic and ionic stress, oxidative stress, and water absorption imbalance, which ultimately leads to germination inhibition [8,10,11].
Seed bio-priming has emerged as a low-cost and eco-friendly technique that may enhance seed germination potential, especially in the organic farming sector. This approach refers to pre-sowing treatment of seeds with beneficial microorganisms, especially those with low longevity [39]. In our study, Trichoderma strains and other bacterial agents, namely, P. fluorescens and B. subtilis, were investigated for their potential to promote germination and seedling growth in the organic seeds of Galaoui and Batati landraces. Although all the tested bioagents were effective in increasing the seed germination percentage of both landraces compared to the non-primed seeds, our findings suggest a varied response of landraces to the studied bioagents, thus suggesting that the bioproming technique should be optimized based on the genotype. Such findings are further supportive of previous evidence related to the beneficial effects of bio-priming on germination and seedling growth traits in several plant species, including wheat [62], soybean and maize [63], and cucumber [64]. In the same line, several reports suggested that seed coating with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, capable of producing gibberellins, may induce primary root emergence as well as the elongation of lateral roots in several species [65,66], thus improving the early growth of seedlings and providing protection to biotic and abiotic stressors [66,67].
Recently, the application of plant-growth-promoting microbes or other biostimulants in seed bio-priming has been suggested as a novel approach by which to boost seed germination, improve seedling vigor, and enable uniform seedling emergence effectively [68,69]. Moreover, bio-priming with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, such as Trichoderma spp., or certain bacterial strains may mitigate the negative effects of abiotic stressors on critical germination both during and after radicle emergence [64]. Such effects are associated with the establishment of early symbiotic relationships with plants, thus affecting nutrient and water uptake and contributing to improved resilience to abiotic stresses [70]. In our study, Trichoderma spp. has been proven to be the most efficient bio-agent in enhancing seedling growth, especially in the Galaoui landrace, where an increase by 54% and 100% was recorded in shoot and root length, respectively. On the other hand, the Batati landrace mostly benefited from priming with T. harzianum and B. subtilis, which increased root and shoot length, respectively. Several studies support that such effects of bio-priming agents on root tissues may reflect the result of cellular changes related to root morphology, cell wall composition, and the accumulation of secondary metabolites and phytohormones, which positively affect root elongation and ramification processes [71,72]. In this context, it has been reported that B. pumilus INR-7 and P. fluorescens 63–28R promote lignin deposition in the root cell wall of Pennisetum glaucum L. and Pisum sativum L. [73], while also promoting the assimilation of nutrients, such as NO3− and K+, and accelerating their cellular transport through root cells by enhancing the activity of proton pumps [73]. Moreover, cell wall modifications in roots have been associated with the induction of systemic resistance through several signaling pathways [74].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

Two local Tunisian squash landraces (Cucurbita maxima) were selected from a pool of fifteen squash landraces based on the data related to their response to salt stress, published by our team [40], in order to evaluate their response to different priming agents further, either in the absence or the presence of NaCl-induced salinity stress. The selected landraces represent the main types of early- and late-cultivated squash in Tunisia, namely, Batati green (“NGB1008”) and Galaoui large seeds (“NGB1004”), respectively. Each landrace was assigned passport data and an inventory number, according to the National Gene Bank of Tunisia (NGB), while full details are available at the Germplasm Resources Information Network-GRIN (accessed on 1 July 2024; http://www.tn-grin.nat.tn/gringlobal/search.aspx). Landrace seeds were stored in a cold room (± 4 °C and 50% Relative humidity (RH)) for a period of 3 years at the NGB. The evaluation of the response to biopriming agents was performed using the seeds of the two landraces, which were propagated by the Technical Center of Organic Agriculture (CTAB; latitude 35°54′22.21″ N and longitude 10°32′47.81″ E) Chott Mariem-Sousse and traditionally stored over a number of last years.

4.2. Seed Priming Treatments

The priming experiments were carried out at the Vegetable Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, High Agronomic Institute of Chott Mariem, Tunisia (latitude 35°54′22.21″ N and longitude 10°32′47.81″ E). The first experiment was conducted to determine the effect of different seed priming treatments on the germination percentage and the seedling characteristics of Batati and Galaoui squash landraces. The seed priming treatments included the following: (i) hormonal, using gibberellic acid (GA3) at 0.1% and 0.2% (w/v, diluted in distilled water (H2O)); and (ii) halopriming, using potassium nitrate (KNO3) at 0.3% and 0.4% (w/v, diluted in dH2O). Non-primed seeds (e.g., not treated prior to sowing) were used as the control treatment.
The required number of seeds (200 seeds per landrace in 4 replications) were selected for size homogeneity, and seeds were subsequently surface-sterilized using 1% hypochlorite/H2O solution under gentle agitation for 5 min and washed 4 times with the excess of the sterile distilled H2O. Pre-sowing treatments involved the soaking of the sterilized seeds in their respective solutions (or with distilled water in the case of non-treated seeds) and incubating them for 24 h at room temperature, according to the method described by Kamra et al. [27]. Then, seeds were air-dried until they reached the original moisture level (approximately 10%) via incubation at room temperature for 4–5 h. For seed germination assays, seeds were placed on sterile glass petri dishes (9 cm of diameter) containing two layers of filter paper and incubated under controlled conditions (25 ± 2 °C, 50 ± 5% relative humidity, and 18 h light/6 h dark photoperiod), according to the ISTA [75]. Seeds were moistened daily with 5 mL of their respective solutions (or with distilled water in the case of non-treated seeds), and seed germination was recorded daily for a period of 14 days.

4.3. Combination of Seed Priming and Salt Stress Treatments

The second experiment aimed to assess the potential of seed priming in alleviating the effects of salt stress during the germination and early-growth stages. Therefore, a combination of priming agents (0.1% and 0.2% GA3, 0.3%, and 0.4% KNO3) and salt stress levels (100 and 200 mM NaCl) was applied. In total, ten treatments were applied (T2–T11) and compared to the control, as described in Table 7. Two hundred seeds per landrace in four replications were evaluated.
For pre-sowing treatments, seeds were soaked in 5 mL of their respective solutions (or in distilled water for the control treatment) and incubated for 24 h at room temperature conditions. Seeds were subsequently sown in 104-cell honeycomb plastic trays (200 cm3) that were filled with commercial peat. The experiment was performed in three replicates, each consisting of fifteen seeds for each landrace × treatment combination. Trays were kept in a glasshouse for a period of two months (1 February–30 March 2022; mean air temperature: 21/12 °C ± 2 °C (day/night); relative humidity: 65–70%).

4.4. Seed Bio-Priming Treatments of Organic Seeds

The third experiment was conducted to determine the effect of bio-priming agents on the germination percentage and seedling characteristics of Batati and Galaoui landraces seeds obtained via organic cultivation. Initially, the required number of organic seeds (200 seeds per landrace in 4 replications) were selected for size homogeneity and surface-sterilized, as mentioned above (Section 2.1). Following seed drying to the original moisture level, seeds were soaked for 4 h in different Trichoderma spp. strains (106 cfu mL−1) and bacterial bioagents (Pseudomonas and Bacillus) (108 cfu mL−1) that were supplied by ISA-CM’s Phytopathology and Bacteriology Laboratory.

4.5. Evaluation Criteria

For all the experiments, the effects of priming agents under study were assessed on the basis of traits related to seed germination and seedling growth. In particular, germination percentage (GP), mean germination time (MGT), root and shoot length (RL, SL, respectively), and seedling vigor index (SVI) were used as the evaluation criteria. In addition, in the second experiment, where the objective was to assess the potential of seed priming in alleviating the effects of salt stress, the evaluation criteria also included physiological parameters, which are routinely employed as screening criteria for abiotic stress tolerance. More specifically, the chlorophyll fluorescence [18] and the content of chlorophyll a and b and carotenoids were determined in mature leaves of squash plants [76].

4.5.1. Evaluation of Seed Priming Effects on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth

The seed priming effects were evaluated on the basis of various traits related to seed germination and seedling growth potential, according to the following formula:
Germination percentage G P = n u m b e r   g e r m i n a t e d   s e e d s n u m b e r   o f   t o t a l   s e e d s × 100 [77]. Germination percentage was scored daily for a period of 14 days until no germinated seeds were further recorded. Seeds were considered as germinated when the radicle had emerged from the seed coat and had a length of at least 2 mm.
Mean germination time (MGT) was measured using the equation described by Ellis and Roberts [78]: MGT = ∑ D n ∑ n , where D is the number of days and n is the number of seeds germinated on day D.
For the seedling vigor index, we used the following formula: (SVI) = (Root length + Shoot length) × GP, in cm [79].
Root and shoot length (RL, SL) were measured using a thread and scale.
The ratio of shoot length to root length (SL/RL) was estimated using the respective values for shoots and roots.

4.5.2. Evaluation of Seed Priming Effects under Salinity Stress Conditions

The performance of primed seeds under salinity stress conditions was evaluated on the basis of traits related to seed germination and seedling growth, as well as physiological parameters, which serve as screening criteria for salt tolerance. Seedling emergence was recorded daily upon appearance of the hypocotyls above the substrate surface and expressed as a percentage by dividing the number of emerged seedlings by the total number of seeds sown at 14 days after sowing. Shoot and root length were determined in 15 seedlings for each landrace × treatment combination, which were transplanted in 2 L pots containing peat and soil and transferred to a greenhouse. Physiological traits, namely, chlorophyll fluorescence and content of chlorophyll a and b and carotenoids, were evaluated at 45 days after sowing, when the plants had reached the stage of having 4 true leaves.

Estimation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Chlorophyll fluorescence in the leaves of seedlings was measured on the 3rd fully expanded healthy leaf using a fluorometer (Plant Stress Kit, Opti-Sciences model, Hudson, NH, USA) based on the methodology of Maxwell and Johnson [18]. The dark adaptation period and the level of saturating light were determined before measurements. The values of the maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm quantum ratio; Fv: variable fluorescence; Fm: maximum fluorescence) were determined for each landrace × treatment combination.

Determination of Chlorophyll a,b and Carotenoids Content

Chlorophyll a and b were determined according to the method of Porcar-Castell et al. [76]. Briefly, 0.1 g of leaf tissue was ground in 10 mL of 80% acetone. Following filtration, the extracts were incubated in the dark to avoid photo-oxidation. The content of chlorophyll a (Chla) and chlorophyll b (Chlb) was measured using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Evolution 210, Thermo Scientific, Abingdon, UK) at 645 and 663 nm, respectively, whereas carotenoids (Car) content was determined at 470 nm [80]. The calibration of the apparatus was performed using 80% acetone. The relationship between concentration (mg/g FW) and optical density was determined according to the following formulae described by Arnon [81]:
Chla (mg/g) = 12.7 × D663 − 2.59 × D645,
Chlb (mg/g) = 22.9 × D645 − 4.68 × D663,
Car (mg/g) = [(5 × D470) × (3.19 × Chla)) + (130.3 × Chlb)]/200,
where D is the optical density value at the respective wavelengths.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were performed using a completely random design (CRD) with four replications (n = 4). Data were subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Means were compared using the Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS software V9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

Our work suggested that both chemical and biological processes were effective in increasing seed germination parameters (e.g., germination percentage and mean germination time) and seedling growth as expressed by root and shoot length and the seed vigor index in two Tunisian landraces of squash subjected to salinity stress and non-stress conditions. In particular, KNO3 was effective in alleviating salinity stress effects on the seeds and seedlings of both landraces, while the same priming agent showed promising results under control conditions (no salinity stress). In the same line, the tested bioagents increased germination and seedling growth parameters in a genotype-dependent manner. In conclusion, seed priming should be considered as an eco-friendly and sustainable tool with which to improve crop establishment and increase the crop performance of cultivated species, especially under unfavorable conditions (e.g., salinity stress). However, further research is needed to optimize the priming protocols in accordance with the particularities of each species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.T., R.K., and S.A.P.; methodology, W.S., K.H., H.F., and O.P.; formal analysis, W.S., K.H., and H.F.; investigation, W.S., K.H., and H.F.; data curation, W.S., K.H., H.F., and O.P.; writing—original draft preparation, N.T. and O.P.; writing—review and editing, N.T., O.P., R.K., and S.A.P.; visualization, N.T., R.K., and S.A.P.; supervision, N.T., R.K., and S.A.P.; project administration, N.T. and S.A.P.; funding acquisition, S.A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project is funded by the General Secretariat for Research and Technology of the Ministry of Development and Investments under the PRIMA Programme. PRIMA is an Art.185 initiative supported and co-funded under Horizon 2020, the European Union’s Programme for Research and Innovation (Prima2019-08). This research was also jointly founded by the Prima project and the National research laboratory LR21AGR05.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ali, S.; Liu, Y.; Ishaq, M.; Shah, T.; Abdullah; Ilyas, A.; Din, I.U. Climate change and its impact on the yield of major food crops: Evidence from Pakistan. Foods 2017, 6, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hatfield, J.L.; Dold, C. Water-use efficiency: Advances and challenges in a changing climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shahid, M.A.; Sarkhosh, A.; Khan, N.; Balal, R.M.; Ali, S.; Rossi, L.; Gómez, C.; Mattson, N.; Nasim, W.; Garcia-Sanchez, F. Insights into the physiological and biochemical impacts of salt stress on plant growth and development. Agronomy 2020, 10, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Giordano, M.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Rouphael, Y. Response and Defence Mechanisms of Vegetable Crops against Drought, Heat and Salinity Stress. Agriculture 2021, 11, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wolny, E.; Betekhtin, A.; Rojek, M.; Braszewska-Zalewska, A.; Lusinska, J.; Hasterok, R. Germination and the early stages of seedling development in Brachypodium distachyon. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Golbashy, M.; Ebrahimi, M.; Khavari khorasani, S.; Mostafavi, K. Effects of drought stress on germination indices of corn hybrids (Zea mays L.). Electrnonic J. Plant Breed. 2012, 3, 664–670. [Google Scholar]
  7. Flowers, T.J.; Munns, R.; Colmer, T.D. Sodium chloride toxicity and the cellular basis of salt tolerance in halophytes. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Ortuño, M.F.; Bernal-Vicente, A.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Sanchez-Blanco, M.J.; Hernandez, J.A. Plant responses to salt stress: Adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy 2017, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kandil, A.; Shareif, A.; Gad, M. Effect of Salinity on Germination and Seeding Parameters of Forage Cowpea Seed. Res. J. Seed Sci. 2016, 10, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Orlovsky, N.; Japakova, U.; Zhang, H.; Volis, S. Effect of salinity on seed germination, growth and ion content in dimorphic seeds of Salicornia europaea L. (Chenopodiaceae). Plant Divers. 2016, 38, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adhikari, B.; Olorunwa, O.J.; Barickman, T.C. Seed Priming Enhances Seed Germination and Morphological Traits of Lactuca sativa L. under Salt Stress. Seeds 2022, 1, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Trușcă, M.; Gâdea, Ș.; Vidican, R.; Stoian, V.; Vâtcă, A.; Balint, C.; Stoian, V.A.; Horvat, M.; Vâtcă, S. Exploring the Research Challenges and Perspectives in Ecophysiology of Plants Affected by Salinity Stress. Agriculture 2023, 13, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E.; Møller, I.; Murphy, A. Plant Physiology and Development; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015; 864p. [Google Scholar]
  14. Soliman, H.A.; El-Desouky, M.A.; Hozayen, W.G.; Ahmed, R.R.; Khaliefa, A.K. Hepatoprotective effects of parsley, basil, and chicory aqueous extracts against dexamethasone-induced in experimental rats. J. Intercult. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 5, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rahman, M.M.; E-Tajkia, J.; Hossain, A.; Kundu, P. Effect of salinity on germination and seedling growth of five wheat cultivars in hydroponic technique. Eur. Acad. Res. 2016, 4, 6199–6220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soliman, W.; Abou-Ellail, M. Growth, Yield, and Biochemicals of Dill (Anethum graveolens) and Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) Plants Under Salinity Stress. J. Plant Prod. 2016, 7, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chevilly, S.; Dolz-Edo, L.; Martínez-Sánchez, G.; Morcillo, L.; Vilagrosa, A.; López-Nicolás, J.M.; Blanca, J.; Yenush, L.; Mulet, J.M. Distinctive Traits for Drought and Salt Stress Tolerance in Melon (Cucumis melo L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 777060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maxwell, K.; Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yuan, L.L.; Zhang, M.; Yan, X.; Bian, Y.W.; Zhen, S.M.; Yan, Y.M. Dynamic phosphoproteome analysis of seedling leaves in Brachypodium distachyon L. Reveals central phosphorylated proteins involved in the drought stress response. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nalina, M.; Saroja, S.; Chakravarthi, M.; Rajkumar, R.; Radhakrishnan, B.; Chandrashekara, K.N. Water deficit-induced oxidative stress and differential response in antioxidant enzymes of tolerant and susceptible tea cultivars under field condition. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2021, 43, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, J.; Zhou, J.; Ye, H.; Ali, M.L.; Chen, P.; Nguyen, H.T. Yield estimation of soybean breeding lines under drought stress using unmanned aerial vehicle-based imagery and convolutional neural network. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 204, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ellis, R.H. Seed ageing, survival and the improved seed viability equation; forty years on. Seed Sci. Technol. 2022, 50, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hong, T.; Ellis, R. A Protocol to Determine Seed Storage Behaviour; IPGRI Technical Bulletin No 1; Department of Agriculture, The University of Reading: Reading, UK, 1996; 62p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Paul, S.; Dey, S.; Kundu, R. Seed priming: An emerging tool towards sustainable agriculture. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 97, 215–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fiodor, A.; Ajijah, N.; Dziewit, L.; Pranaw, K. Biopriming of seed with plant growth-promoting bacteria for improved germination and seedling growth. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1142966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, L.; Huo, W.; Yao, D.; Li, M. Effects of solid matrix priming (SMP)and salt stress on broccoli and cauliflower seed germination and early seedling growth. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 255, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kamra, V.; Kaur, B.; Singh, S.; Gandhi, N. Effect of Seed Priming with GA3 and KNO3 on Summer Squash (Cucurbita pepo) Nursery Raising of Ridge Gourd (Luffa acutangula) and Summer Squash (Cucurbita pepo). Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Eng. 2017, 6, 820–826. [Google Scholar]
  28. Singh, H.; Jassal, R.K.; Kang, J.S.; Sandhu, S.S.; Kang, H.; Grewal, K. Seed priming techniques in field crops—A review. Agric. Rev. 2015, 36, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shahi-Gharahlar, A.; Farhoudi, R.; Mosavi, M. Effect of Seed Pretreatment on Summer Squash (Cucurbita pepo) Seed germination and Seedling Characteristics under Salinity Condition. Seed Sci. Biotechnol. 2009, 3, 60–63. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chauhan, R.; Patel, P.R. Evaluation of Seed Bio-priming against Chilli (Capsicum frutescence L.) Diseases in vivo. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 176–181. [Google Scholar]
  31. Monalisa, S.P.; Beura, J.K.; Tarai, R.K.; Naik, M. Seed quality enhancement through biopriming in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris. L). J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2017, 9, 1740–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jyoti, B.; Gaurav, S.S.; Pant, U. Use of growth regulators as priming agent for improvement of seed vigour in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2016, 8, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hoseini, M.; Kouchebagh, S.B.; Jahandideh, E. Response of Fennel to Priming Techniques. Annu. Rev. Res. Biol. 2013, 3, 124–130. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hussain, S.; Khan, F.; Hussain, H.A.; Nie, L. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of seed priming-induced chilling tolerance in rice cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lutts, S.; Benincasa, P.; Wojtyla, L.; Kubala, S.; Pace, R.; Lechowska, K.; Quinet, M.; Garnczarska, M. Seed Priming: New Comprehensive Approaches for an Old Empirical Technique. In New Challenges in Seed Biology—Basic and Translational Research Driving Seed Technology; Araújo, S., Balestrazzi, A., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; pp. 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  36. Farooq, M.; Hussain, M.; Siddique, K.H.M. Drought Stress in Wheat during Flowering and Grain-filling Periods. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2014, 33, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qiu, Z.; Egidi, E.; Liu, H.; Kaur, S.; Singh, B.K. New frontiers in agriculture productivity: Optimised microbial inoculants and in situ microbiome engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 107371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rocha, I.; Ma, Y.; Souza-Alonso, P.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H.; Oliveira, R.S. Seed Coating: A Tool for Delivering Beneficial Microbes to Agricultural Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ranganathan, U.; Groot, S.P.C. Seed Longevity and Deterioration. In Seed Science and Technology: Biology, Production, Quality; Dadlani, M., Yadava, D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 91–108. ISBN 9789811958885. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tarchoun, N.; Saadaoui, W.; Mezghani, N.; Pavli, O.I.; Falleh, H.; Petropoulos, S.A. The Effects of Salt Stress on Germination, Seedling Growth and Biochemical Responses of Tunisian Squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) Germplasm. Plants 2022, 11, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Meng, J.; Tao, J. Deterioration of orthodox seeds during ageing: Influencing factors, physiological alterations and the role of reactive oxygen species. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 158, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sazzad Hossain, M.; Persicke, M.; Elsayed, A.I.; Kalinowski, J.; Dietz, K.J. Metabolite profiling at the cellular and subcellular level reveals metabolites associated with salinity tolerance in sugar beet. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5961–5976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Duermeyer, L.; Khodapanahi, E.; Yan, D.; Krapp, A.; Rothstein, S.J.; Nambara, E. Regulation of seed dormancy and germination by nitrate. Seed Sci. Res. 2018, 28, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lara, T.S.; Lira, J.M.S.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Rakocevic, M.; Alvarenga, A.A. Potassium Nitrate Priming Affects the Activity of Nitrate Reductase and Antioxidant Enzymes in Tomato Germination. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 6, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vidal, A.; Cantabella, D.; Bernal-Vicente, A.; Díaz-Vivancos, P.; Hernández, J.A. Nitrate- and nitric oxide-induced plant growth in pea seedlings is linked to antioxidative metabolism and the ABA/GA balance. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 230, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ruttanaruangboworn, A.; Chanprasert, W.; Tobunluepop, P.; Onwimol, D. Effect of seed priming with different concentrations of potassium nitrate on the pattern of seed imbibition and germination of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chahtane, H.; Kim, W.; Lopez-Molina, L. Primary seed dormancy: A temporally multilayered riddle waiting to be unlocked. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ali, M.M.; Javed, T.; Mauro, R.P.; Shabbir, R.; Afzal, I.; Yousef, A.F. Effect of seed priming with potassium nitrate on the performance of tomato. Agriculture 2020, 10, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ahmadvand, G.; Soleymani, F.; Saadatian, B.; Pouya, M. Effects of seed priming on seed germination and seedling emergence of cotton under salinity stress. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012, 20, 1453–1458. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Gao, G.; Ali, I.; Wu, X.; Tang, M.; Chen, L.; Jiang, L.; Liang, T. Effects of various seed priming on morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits of rice under chilling stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1146285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ahmad, F.; Kamal, A.; Singh, A.; Ashfaque, F.; Alamri, S.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Khan, M.I.R. Seed priming with gibberellic acid induces high salinity tolerance in Pisum sativum through antioxidants, secondary metabolites and up-regulation of antiporter genes. Plant Biol. 2021, 23, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tsegay, B.A.; Andargie, M. Seed Priming with Gibberellic Acid (GA3) Alleviates Salinity Induced Inhibition of Germination and Seedling Growth of of Zea mays L., Pisum sativum Var. abyssinicum A. Braun and Lathyrus sativus L. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 2018, 2018, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kristó, I.; Vályi-Nagy, M.; Rácz, A.; Irmes, K.; Szentpéteri, L.; Jolánkai, M.; Kovács, G.P.; Fodor, M.Á.; Ujj, A.; Valentinyi, K.V.; et al. Effects of Nutrient Supply and Seed Size on Germination Parameters and Yield in the Next Crop Year of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agriculture 2023, 13, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dube, P.; Struik, P.C. Seed germination and morphological characterization of traditional leafy vegetables. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2021, 17, 598–603. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ambika, S.; Manonmani, V.; Somasundaram, G. Review on effect of seed size on seedling vigour and seed yield. Res. J. Seed Sci. 2014, 7, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shahi, C.; Vibhuti, V.; Bargali, K.; Bargali, S. How Seed Size and Wate r Stress Effect the Seed Germination and Seedling Growth in Wheat Varieties? Curr. Agric. Res. J. 2015, 3, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zareian, A.; Hamidi, A.; Sadeghi, H.; Jazaeri, M.R. Effect of seed size on some germination characteristics, seedling emergence percentage and yield of three wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in laboratory and field. Middle East J. Sci. Res. 2013, 13, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar]
  58. Foti, C.; Khah, E.M.; Pavli, O.I. Germination profiling of lentil genotypes subjected to salinity stress. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Parvin, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Mohsin, S.M.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M. Coumarin improves tomato plant tolerance to salinity by enhancing antioxidant defence, glyoxalase system and ion homeostasis. Plant Biol. 2021, 23, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Azeem, A.; Javed, Q.; Sun, J.; Nawaz, M.I.; Ullah, I.; Kama, R.; Du, D. Functional traits of okra cultivars (Chinese green and Chinese red) under salt stress. Folia Hortic. 2020, 32, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shin, Y.K.; Bhandari, S.R.; Jo, J.S.; Song, J.W.; Cho, M.C.; Yang, E.Y.; Lee, J.G. Response to salt stress in lettuce: Changes in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, phytochemical contents, and antioxidant activities. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Oliveira, R.S.; Rocha, I.; Ma, Y.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H. Seed coating with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as an ecotechnologicalapproach for sustainable agricultural production of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health-Part A Curr. Issues 2016, 79, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yusnawan, E.; Inayati, A.; Baliadi, Y. Effect of soybean seed treatment with Trichoderma virens on its growth and total phenolic content. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2120, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pérez-García, L.A.; Sáenz-Mata, J.; Fortis-Hernández, M.; Navarro-Muñoz, C.E.; Palacio-Rodríguez, R.; Preciado-Rangel, P. Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Improve Germination and Bioactive Compounds in Cucumber Seedlings. Agronomy 2023, 13, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Thangavel, P.; Anjum, N.A.; Muthukumar, T.; Sridevi, G. Arbuscular mycorrhizae: Natural modulators of plant—Nutrient relation and growth in stressful environments. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Anand, K.; Pandey, G.K.; Kaur, T.; Pericak, O.; Olson, C.; Mohan, R.; Akansha, K.; Yadav, A.; Devi, R.; Kour, D.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as a potential biofertilizers for agricultural sustainability. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 90–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fusco, G.M.; Nicastro, R.; Rouphael, Y.; Carillo, P. The Effects of the Microbial Biostimulants Approved by EU Regulation 2019/1009 on Yield and Quality of Vegetable Crops. Foods 2022, 11, 2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. The importance of Rhizobium, Agrobacterium, Bradyrhizobium, Herbaspirillum, Sinorhizobium in sustainable agricultural production. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2021, 49, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chakraborti, S.; Bera, K.; Sadhukhan, S.; Dutta, P. Bio-priming of seeds: Plant stress management and its underlying cellular, biochemical and molecular mechanisms. Plant Stress 2022, 3, 100052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rozier, C.; Gerin, F.; Czarnes, S.; Legendre, L. Biopriming of maize germination by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Azospirillum lipoferum CRT1. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 237, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, H.; Yue, H.; Li, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Jiang, X. Seed biostimulant Bacillus sp. MGW9 improves the salt tolerance of maize during seed germination. AMB Express 2021, 11, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Mahmood, A.; Turgay, O.C.; Farooq, M.; Hayat, R. Seed biopriming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A review. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Benhamou, N.; Kloepper, J.W.; Quadt-Hallman, A.; Tuzun, S. Induction of defense-related ultrastructural modifications in pea root tissues inoculated with endophytic bacteria. Plant Physiol. 1996, 112, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. García-Gutiérrez, L.; Zeriouh, H.; Romero, D.; Cubero, J.; de Vicente, A.; Pérez-García, A. The antagonistic strain Bacillus subtilis UMAF6639 also confers protection to melon plants against cucurbit powdery mildew by activation of jasmonate- and salicylic acid-dependent defence responses. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. International Rules for Seed Testing; International Seed Testing Association: Wallisellen, Swizerland, 2015; pp. 1–6.
  76. Porcar-Castell, A.; Tyystjärvi, E.; Atherton, J.; Van Der Tol, C.; Flexas, J.; Pfündel, E.E.; Moreno, J.; Frankenberg, C.; Berry, J.A. Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: Mechanisms and challenges. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4065–4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Scott, S.J.; Jones, R.A.; Williams, W.A. Review of Data Analysis Methods for Seed Germination1. Crop Sci. 1984, 24, 1192–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ellis, R.A.; Roberts, E.H. The Quantification of Ageing and Survival in Orthodox Seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 1981, 9, 373–409. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ashraf, F.; Zargar, T.B.; Veres, S. Comparison Between Germinating Parameters of Basils (Ocimum basilicum L.) and Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) Under Drought Stress Conditions. Rev. Agric. Rural Dev. 2021, 10, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Curtis, O.F.; Shetty, K. Growth medium effects on vitrification, total phenolics, chlorophyll, and water content of in vitro propagated oregano clones. Acta Hortic. 1996, 426, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Arnon, D.I. Copper Enzymes in Isolated Chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 13 02464 g001
Figure 1. The effect of priming treatments on the germination percentage (GP) (A) and mean germination time (GMT) (B) of the studied squash landraces. Different Latin letters above the bars indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. The effect of priming treatments on the germination percentage (GP) (A) and mean germination time (GMT) (B) of the studied squash landraces. Different Latin letters above the bars indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p < 0.05.
Plants 13 02464 g001
Plants 13 02464 g002
Figure 2. Radicle and plumule length in non-primed seeds of Galaoui and Batati squash landraces subjected to NaCl-induced salinity stress (100 mM and 200 mM NaCl) and in 0.4% KNO3-primed seeds subjected to 100 mM NaCl-induced salt stress.
Figure 2. Radicle and plumule length in non-primed seeds of Galaoui and Batati squash landraces subjected to NaCl-induced salinity stress (100 mM and 200 mM NaCl) and in 0.4% KNO3-primed seeds subjected to 100 mM NaCl-induced salt stress.
Plants 13 02464 g002
Table 1. Analysis of variance (mean squares) results for traits related to the seed germination and seedling growth of two squash landraces under different priming treatments (control, 0.1% GA3, 0.2% GA3, 0.3% KNO3, and 0.4% KNO3).
Table 1. Analysis of variance (mean squares) results for traits related to the seed germination and seedling growth of two squash landraces under different priming treatments (control, 0.1% GA3, 0.2% GA3, 0.3% KNO3, and 0.4% KNO3).
S.O.V.DFGPMGTRLSLSL/RLSVI
Landrace1974.02 **0.05 ns0.39 ns0.07 ns0.03 ns59108.88 **
Priming41911.83 **6.01 **3.37 **3.85 **0.20 **480674.83 **
Landrace × Priming482.12 **1.49 *0.68 ns0.97 *0.03 ns52746.42 **
CV (%)-3.989.5111.528.8610.608.32
S.O.V.: source of variance; CV: coefficient of variance; DF: degrees of freedom; GP: germination percentage; RL: root length; SL: shoot length; SL/RL: shoot-length-to-root-length ratio; MGT: mean germination time; SVI: seedling vigor index. ns: non-significant; *: significant at p < 0.1; **: significant at p < 0.01.
Table 2. Mean effect of priming treatment on traits related to seedling growth of squash landraces.
Table 2. Mean effect of priming treatment on traits related to seedling growth of squash landraces.
TreatmentRL
(cm)		SL
(cm)		SL/RL RatioSVI
Control3.48 b5.26 b1.52 a692.38 d
0.1% GA34.68 a5.18 b1.12 c810.66 c
0.2% GA35.26 a5.79 b1.11 c509.05 e
0.3% KNO34.85 a6.84 a1.42 ab1065.90 b
0.4% KNO35.35 a6.78 a1.27 bc1212.67 a
F. value5.20 **6.70 **4.76 **39.18 **
RL: root length; SL: shoot length; SL/RL: shoot-length-to-root-length ratio; SVI: seedling vigor index. Values with the same letter in each column are similar according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRΤ) at p ≤ 0.05. **: significant at p < 0.01.
Table 3. Mean effect of two squash landrace on traits related to germination and seedling growth.
Table 3. Mean effect of two squash landrace on traits related to germination and seedling growth.
LandraceGP
(%)		MGT
(Days)		RL
(cm)		SL
(cm)		SL/RL RatioSVI
Galaoui87.88 a7.30 a4.61 a5.92 a1.31 a902.52 a
Batati76.49 b7.38 a4.84 a6.02 a1.25 a813.74 b
F value76.11 **5.87 ns5.20 ns6.70 ns4.76 ns39.18 **
RL: root length; SL: shoot length; SL/RL: shoot-length-to-root-length ratio; SVI: seedling vigor index. Values with the same letter in each column are similar according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRΤ) at p ≤ 0.05. ns: non-significant; **: significant at p < 0.01.
Table 4. The response of two squash landraces to different priming treatments in terms of germination and seedling growth potential under NaCl-induced salinity stress.
Table 4. The response of two squash landraces to different priming treatments in terms of germination and seedling growth potential under NaCl-induced salinity stress.
LandraceTreatmentGP (%)MGT (days)RL
(cm)		SL
(cm)		SL/RL
GalaouiControl78.66 ± 2.17 c7.61 ± 1.05 ab5.82 ± 0.65 a6.87 ± 1.04 a1.05 ± 0.41 d
100 mM NaCl62.22 ± 2.63 d8.56 ± 2.36 ab4.35 ± 0.25 bc5.08 ± 0.59 bc1.43 ± 0.20 b
200 mM NaCl40.44 ± 4.63 e9.61 ± 3.07 a3.33 ± 0.54 c4.39 ± 0.56 d1.93 ± 0.22 a
100 mM + 0.1% GA394.00 ± 5.12 b6.31 ± 1.37 b4.22 ± 1.02 bc5.56 ± 1.23 bc1.14 ± 0.42 de
100 mM + 0.2% GA390.00 ± 4.69 b6.10 ± 1.06 bc4.68 ± 1.00 bc5.74 ± 1.20 ab1.83 ± 0.44 b
100 mM + 0.3%KNO389.20 ± 5.58 b5.97 ± 1.64 bc5.32 ± 1.12 ab5.55 ± 0.98 bc1.37 ± 0.25 c
100 mM + 0.4%KNO3100.00 ± 0.00 a5.31 ± 2.05 bc5.38 ± 1.15 ab5.89 ± 1.05 b1.56 ± 0.19 b
200 mM + 0.1% GA366.11 ± 2.93 d6.61 ± 3.01 ab3.39 ± 0.89 c4.81 ± 0.87 c1.43 ± 0.27 bc
200 mM + 0.2% GA362.22 ± 2.63 d6.81 ± 1.96 ab3.41 ± 0.53 c4.52 ± 0.48 c1.92 ± 0.15 a
200 mM + 0.3%KNO363.88 ± 3.33 d6.39 ± 1.17 bc4.35 ± 0.34 bc5.33 ± 1.25 bc1.80 ± 0.30 ab
200 mM + 0.4%KNO368.11 ± 4.85 d6.75 ± 2.09 bc4.89 ± 0.84 ab5.63 ± 1.22 b1.50 ± 0.21 b
BatatiControl81.55 ± 2.20 ab8.58 ± 2.59 b4.35 ± 1.05 b5.28 ± 1.54 c1.4 ± 0.10 b
100 mM NaCl77.22 ± 2.63 b8.33 ± 3.17 bc3.89± 0.56 c4.66 ± 1.27 c1.2 ± 0.20 b
200 mM NaCl42.22 ± 1.63 ef9.75 ± 2.89 a3.10 ± 0.84 cd4.12 ± 0.98 d1.7 ± 0.11 a
100 mM + 0.1% GA384.25 ± 5.78 a8.59 ± 2.29 b4.15 ± 1.02 c4.65 ± 0.85 c1.7 ± 0.20 a
100 mM + 0.2% GA371.66 ± 2.50 c7.76 ± 2.37 c3.95 ± 0.57 bc4.37 ± 1.07 c 1.3 ± 0.10 b
100 mM + 0.3%KNO382.77 ± 2.83 ab7.89 ± 2.92 c4.88 ± 1.04 ab5.27 ± 1.24 bc1.6 ± 0.12 ab
100 mM + 0.4%KNO387.77 ± 2.88 a8.13± 3.15 bc4.89 ± 1.12 ab5.66 ± 1.42 b1.15 ± 0.30 bc
200 mM + 0.1% GA345.00 ± 1.73 e8.89 ± 3.17 ab4.39 ± 1.52 b5.89 ± 0.95 a1.16 ± 0.10 bc
200 mM + 0.2% GA345.00 ± 1.73 e8.75 ± 2.37 ab4.91 ± 1.45 a5.78 ± 1.24 b1.26 ± 0.11 b
200 mM + 0.3%KNO362.22 ± 2.44 d8.23 ± 2.14 bc3.91 ± 0.45 d4.97 ± 1.32 bc1.33 ± 0.30 b
200 mM + 0.4%KNO363.00 ± 2.48 d7.95 ± 2.38 c4.23 ± 0.86 b5.86 ± 0.94 ab1.35 ± 0.50 b
Data are shown as means ± SD. GP: germination percentage; MGT: mean germination time; RL: root length; SL: shoot length; SL/RL: shoot-length-to-root-length ratio; SVI: seedling vigor index. Values with the same letter in each column and for each landrace combination treatment are similar according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRΤ) at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 5. Mean effect of priming treatment on the content of Chl a, Chl b (mg mg−1), carotenoids (mg mg−1), and chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm ratio) of two squash landraces under NaCl-induced salt stress conditions.
Table 5. Mean effect of priming treatment on the content of Chl a, Chl b (mg mg−1), carotenoids (mg mg−1), and chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm ratio) of two squash landraces under NaCl-induced salt stress conditions.
Treatment Chl aChl bCarotenoidsFv/Fm
Control13.02 d5.10 abc0.83 de0.80 cd
0.1% GA312.93 d4.42 cd0.76 g0.80 cd
0.2% GA314.38 b5.77 abc0.86 c0.80 cd
0.3% KNO314.55 a6.47 a0.95 a0.81 c
0.4% KNO314.18 c6.37 ab0.85 cd0.81 c
100 mM NaCl11.11 h4.55 bcd0.76 g0.81 c
200 mM NaCl8.73 j3.27 d0.59 i0.80 cd
100 mM NaCl + 0.1% GA311.12 h4.28 cd0.75 g0.77 f
100 mM NaCl + 0.2% GA311.96 e4.85 bcd0.82 e0.81 c
100 mM NaCl + 0.3% KNO311.69 f4.53 bcd0.80 f0.83 b
100 mM NaCl + 0.4% KNO312.97 d5.44 abc0.89 b0.81 c
200 mM NaCl + 0.1% GA38.85 j3.38 d0.65 h0.80 cd
200 mM NaCl + 0.2% GA39.73 i6.10 abc0.66 h0.84 a
200 mM NaCl + 0.3% KNO39.64 i4.22 cd0.64 h0.77 f
200 mM NaCl + 0.4% KNO311.44 g4.59 bcd0.78 fg0.83 b
Data are shown as means ± SD. Values with the same letter in each column are similar according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRΤ) at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 6. The effect of bio-priming agents on traits related to germination and seedling growth of two squash landraces.
Table 6. The effect of bio-priming agents on traits related to germination and seedling growth of two squash landraces.
Bio-AgentSquash LandraceGP
(%)		MGT
(Days)		RL
(cm)		SL
(cm)		SVI
Control Galaoui65.45 ± 0.81 cd8.68 ± 0.06 a5.13 ± 0.68 d8.16 ± 0.16 c568.92 ± 1.51 c
Batati63.58 ± 1.05 cd8.32 ± 0.08 a5.01 ± 0.45 d7.82 ± 0.28 c291.26 ± 0.87 d
T. harzianumGalaoui91.65 ± 1.87 a5.61 ± 0.08 b10.27 ± 0.49 a12.58 ± 0.26 a988.31 ± 0.51 a
Batati73.45 ± 0.95 c5.12± 0.10 b10.01 ± 0.58 a10.24 ± 0.25 bc800.17 ± 1.01 ab
T. virideGalaoui89.75 ± 1.54 a7.40 ± 0.02 a8.75 ± 0.61 b11.09 ± 0.22 ab898.45 ± 0.88 a
Batati75.42 ± 1.14 bc6.27 ± 0.09 a8.35 ± 0.77 bc10.46 ± 0.21 b767.80 ± 1.05 b
T. virensGalaoui84.87 ± 1.15 ab6.17 ± 0.10 a10.14 ± 0.51 a12.78 ± 0.18 a875.18 ± 1.21 ab
Batati78.18 ± 0.85 bc4.76 ± 0.03 c8.37± 0.64 c10.33 ± 0.31 bc715.63 ± 1.37 b
P. fluorescensGalaoui88.71 ± 1.01 ab7.15 ± 0.06 a8.41 ± 0.66 b10.43 ± 0.28 bc740.27 ± 1.54 b
Batati70.14 ± 0.82 c7.78 ± 0.04 a9.11 ± 0.74 ab10.57 ± 0.34 b544.00 ± 1.00 c
B. subtilisGalaoui89.19 ± 0.94 b6.15 ± 0.02 ab8.76 ± 0.66 ab11.75 ± 0.27 ab730.41 ± 1.16 b
Batati81.12 ± 0.98 b8.11 ± 0.09 a9.11 ± 0.72 ab11.63 ± 0.23 ab684.25 ± 1.22 bc
Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 50). GP: germination percentage; MGT: mean germination time; RL: root length; SL: shoot length; SL/RL: shoot-length-to-root-length ratio; SVI: seedling vigor index. Values with the same letter in each column are similar according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRΤ) at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 7. Combination of pre-sowing seed priming and salinity treatments.
Table 7. Combination of pre-sowing seed priming and salinity treatments.
TreatmentCompositionTreatmentComposition
T1ControlT70.4% KNO3 + 100 mM NaCl
T2100 mM NaClT80.1% GA3 + 200 mM NaCl
T3200 mM NaClT90.2% GA3 + 200 mM NaCl
T40.1% GA3 + 100 mM NaClT100.3% KNO3 + 200 mM NaCl
T50.2% GA3 + 100 mM NaClT110.4% KNO3 + 200 mM NaCl
T60.3% KNO3 + 100 mM NaCl
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tarchoun, N.; Saadaoui, W.; Hamdi, K.; Falleh, H.; Pavli, O.; Ksouri, R.; Petropoulos, S.A. Seed Priming and Biopriming in Two Squash Landraces (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) from Tunisia: A Sustainable Strategy to Promote Germination and Alleviate Salt Stress. Plants 2024, 13, 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13172464

AMA Style

Tarchoun N, Saadaoui W, Hamdi K, Falleh H, Pavli O, Ksouri R, Petropoulos SA. Seed Priming and Biopriming in Two Squash Landraces (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) from Tunisia: A Sustainable Strategy to Promote Germination and Alleviate Salt Stress. Plants. 2024; 13(17):2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13172464

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tarchoun, Néji, Wassim Saadaoui, Khawla Hamdi, Hanen Falleh, Ourania Pavli, Riadh Ksouri, and Spyridon A. Petropoulos. 2024. "Seed Priming and Biopriming in Two Squash Landraces (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) from Tunisia: A Sustainable Strategy to Promote Germination and Alleviate Salt Stress" Plants 13, no. 17: 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13172464

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop