Next Article in Journal
Strain of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae Loses Virulence through Dysregulation of Cardiolipin Synthase
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Chromosomal Fusion and Transposable Elements on the Genomic Evolution and Genetic Diversity of Ilex Species
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Terpene Trilactones from Cell and Organ Cultures of Ginkgo biloba
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Grazing and Leaf Spot Disease on the Structure and Diversity of Phyllosphere Microbiome Communities in Leymus chinensis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cryopreservation of Medicinal Plant Seeds: Strategies for Genetic Diversity Conservation and Sustainability

by
Lin Zeng
1,*,
Zheng Sun
1,
Li Fu
1,
Yakun Gu
1,
Rongtao Li
1,
Mingjun He
1 and
Jianhe Wei
1,2,*
1
Hainan Provincial Key Laboratory of Resources Conservation and Development of Southern Medicine, Hainan Branch of the Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Haikou 570311, China
2
Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Resources Utilization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(18), 2577; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182577
Submission received: 14 August 2024 / Revised: 10 September 2024 / Accepted: 12 September 2024 / Published: 13 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic and Biological Diversity of Plants)

Abstract

:
The depletion of medicinal plant resources leads to the irreversible loss of their genetic diversity. The preservation of medicinal plant germplasm using cryobanks is crucial for maintaining the sustainability of these resources. This study examined the efficacy of cryopreservation on 164 medicinal plant seeds, identified general principles for preserving medicinal plant seeds at ultra-low temperatures, and established a cryobank for dry-sensitive medicinal plant seeds. Over 90% of orthodox seeds were unaffected by freezing, with optimal conditions being a 5–10% moisture content and direct freezing. Intermediate seeds were best frozen with a 7–15% moisture content, and those with a lower initial moisture content were best suited to direct freezing. While recalcitrant seeds’ freezing was most influenced by moisture content, there was no specific range. Direct freezing is appropriate for recalcitrant seeds possessing a hard seed coat and a firm seed kernel, whereas seeds with a brittle or soft seed coat are better suited for vitrification or stepwise freezing methods. There was no significant correlation between alterations in physiological and biochemical indicators and microscopic structures of seeds before and following liquid nitrogen freezing, as well as their storage characteristics. The findings of this research offer evidence in favor of the extended conservation of plant seeds and the extensive utilization of ultra-low temperature technology and provides an example of protecting the genetic diversity of plant resources.

1. Introduction

According to data from the World Health Organization, an estimated 75% of the global population utilizes plant-based remedies for health preservation, with approximately 21,000 plant species recognized for their medicinal properties [1]. Despite advancements in synthetic compounds, botanical sources continue to serve as the predominant reservoir of medicinal agents on a global scale [2]. The decline in the diversity of medicinal plant resources can be attributed to the impact of human activities and climate change. This has resulted in numerous species facing the threat of extinction, thereby jeopardizing crucial natural resources essential for safeguarding human health [3]. Additionally, this decline has hampered efforts to conserve plant genetic diversity through in situ conservation measures [4]. The preservation and sustainable management of genetic resources of medicinal plants should be regarded as a paramount concern in order to fulfill the needs of forthcoming generations [2]. Hence, ex situ conservation, which is considered a primary approach for safeguarding plant genetic resources, has been extensively utilized, predominantly through the establishment of seed gene banks. Seeds possess substantial genetic variability and serve as the principal medium for plant propagation, making them an invaluable resource for the preservation of species diversity [5]. Currently, the gene bank method stands as the most cost-effective and secure approach for the strategic conservation of biological resources. Plant germplasm resource banks safeguard plant germplasm resources, and low-temperature germplasm resource banks have been demonstrated to be the optimal preservation method. Currently, there exist over 1700 germplasm banks of diverse plant taxa worldwide. These repositories have amassed a collection of over 7.4 million plant germplasm resources, with approximately 90% of these resources being conserved as seed bodies within low-temperature germplasm banks.
A diverse set of medicinal plant seeds with unique biological characteristics exists, which necessitates a variety of storage conditions. Based on the storage attributes of seeds, medicinal plant seeds can be categorized into three groups: orthodox seeds, intermediate seeds, and recalcitrant seeds. Presently, the majority of international seed gene banks predominantly conserve desiccated seeds [6], a method that is generally applicable to most orthodox seeds. Nonetheless, certain orthodox seeds experience a notable decline in vitality following a period of low temperature and low humidity lasting from 3 to 5 years. Conversely, seeds that are sensitive to desiccation, as well as intermediate and recalcitrant seeds, are unable to endure water loss and thus cannot be accommodated within traditional seed gene banks [7,8]. A cryobank for medicinal plants (National Southern Medicinal Gene Bank) has been established in Hainan Province, China, with the purpose of preserving dehydration-sensitive medicinal plant seeds in cryopreservation with liquid nitrogen. Utilizing cryopreservation, the cryobank has successfully preserved 11,055 medicinal plant seeds.
Cryopreservation has emerged as the optimal approach for the extended preservation of desiccation-sensitive seeds [9,10], entailing the placement of seeds in either liquid nitrogen (−196 °C) or its vapor phase (−140 °C). Under such extreme temperatures, the metabolic activity and cellular division of plant seeds essentially halt, rendering them in a state of “pseudo-death”, thereby facilitating long-term storage [11,12]. Simultaneously, cryopreservation serves as a preventive measure against subsequent cultivation and the accumulation of mutations in natural environments. Thus, it is the most advantageous and secure technique for conserving plant seeds and averting their deterioration, thereby guaranteeing the secure preservation of genetic resources pertaining to valuable plant species [13]. The application of this method has proven effective in safeguarding numerous species within the realms of agriculture [14,15,16,17], horticulture [18,19,20,21], and forestry [22,23,24,25] as well as certain medicinal plant germplasms [26]. The authors have successfully implemented ultra-low temperature preservation techniques on the seeds of medicinal plants, including Dalbergia odorifera T. Chen [27], Alpinia oxyphylla Miq. [28], Myristica fragrans Houtt. [29], and Prunella vulgaris L. [30], during the initial phase of their research. However, given the unique characteristics of recalcitrant and intermediate seeds that lack resistance to desiccation and low temperatures, it has become imperative to individually employ cryopreservation techniques, a process that can be time-consuming. Additionally, certain recalcitrant seeds may lose their viability before the completion of the cryopreservation treatment. Moreover, in the case of bulk seed collection, it is essential to swiftly and efficiently carry out mass preservation to prevent seed wastage.
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of cryopreservation for medicinal plant seeds by conducting liquid nitrogen ultra-low temperature preservation experiments on the seeds of 164 species of medicinal plants from 65 families in southern China. The freezing methods and viability recovery capabilities of these seeds were evaluated through the detection of seed physiological and biochemical indicators and the observation of seed microstructure.

2. Results

2.1. Seed Storage Characteristics Results

Based on the evaluation method and steps for seed storage characteristics, a total of 164 medicinal plant seeds were categorized into three groups: 50 orthodox seeds, 42 intermediate seeds, and 72 recalcitrant seeds (Figure 1 or Table A1). The statistical results presented in Figure 1A,B indicate that the orthodox seeds were predominantly from families such as Leguminosae, Poaceae, Cucurbitaceae, and Malvaceae and were characterized by their small seed size. Intermediate seeds were primarily associated with plants from the Rutaceae and Liliaceae families. Recalcitrant seeds, in contrast, were largely collected from tropical and subtropical regions, such as Hainan, Guangdong, and Yunnan, and were primarily represented by plants from the Arecaceae, Zingiberaceae, Myrtaceae, and Sapindaceae families that are known for their large seed size. The seed storage characteristics within a given genus of plants may vary. For example, H. mutabilis, belonging to the Hibiscus genus of the Malvaceae family, displays recalcitrant seed behavior, whereas H. sabdariffa exhibits normal seed characteristics. Similarly, V. trifolia, a member of the Vitex genus within the Lamiaceae family, has orthodox seeds, while V. quinata has recalcitrant seed properties.
The seeds of A. heterophyllus, A. catechu, and other similar species exhibited a high level of recalcitrance when dehydrated to a moisture content of 30%. This dehydration significantly diminished their viability and rendered them poorly tolerant to the absence of water. Consequently, these seeds were classified as highly recalcitrant. Conversely, the seeds of P. pseudoginseng, E. lepta, and other comparable species maintained a considerable level of viability, even when dehydrated to a moisture content ranging from 15 to 30%. The seeds exhibited a moderate tolerance to dehydration, and these seeds could thus be categorized as moderately recalcitrant. Seeds of A. sinensis, A. katsumadai, and other species exhibited a minor decline in viability as the moisture content decreased, if this remained above 12%. Additionally, these seeds could be stored within a temperature range of 4–10 °C for a specific duration and thus possessed characteristics of low recalcitrance. The statistical results presented in Figure 1C reveal the classification of the experimental seeds in this study as follows: 16 seeds exhibit high recalcitrance, 29 seeds display moderate recalcitrance, and 27 seeds demonstrate low recalcitrance.

2.2. Cryopreservation of Seeds

Seeds from 164 species of medicinal plants were subjected to ultra-low temperature freezing, resulting in the successful freezing of 155 species (Figure 2 or Table A1). Both orthodox and intermediate seeds were effectively frozen. However, for nine recalcitrant seeds, H. coronarium, S. cumini, S. aromaticum, S. tonkinensis, P. nigrum, B. balansae, M. falcatum, C. liberica, and S. nervosum, their viability was below 30% or even non-existent following freezing. Based on the analytical data presented in Figure 2A, it was evident that out of the 155 seeds that were successfully frozen, 91 seeds were most effectively preserved through direct freezing, comprising 47 orthodox seeds, 21 intermediate seeds, and 23 recalcitrant seeds. Additionally, 27 seeds (11 intermediate seeds and 16 recalcitrant seeds) were determined to have achieved optimal preservation through stepwise freezing. Furthermore, 37 seeds attained the highest level of preservation through vitrification, comprising three orthodox seeds, 10 intermediate seeds, and 24 recalcitrant seeds.
Recalcitrant seeds with hard seed coats and firm kernels such as A. catechu, M. citrifolia, S. lanceolata, S. lychnophora, S. maritima and V. negundo exhibit enhanced viability when subjected to direct freezing in liquid nitrogen compared to other groups. Conversely, for recalcitrant seeds possessing crisp or soft seed coats, such as O. pinnata, S.dulcificum, A. obtusa, A. heterophyllus, D. calycinum and L. inermis, vitrification or stepwise freezing methods have been demonstrated to be the most suitable freezing techniques.
Observing Figure 2B, we can determine that the viability of most orthodox seeds was not significantly different before and after freezing, provided that their moisture content remained below 15%. However, when the moisture content exceeded 15%, the viability of the seeds decreased after freezing compared to their no-freezing state. Consequently, the recommended moisture content range for cryopreservation was generally between 5 and 15%. Furthermore, the orthodox seeds subjected to freezing using the three different methods displayed enhanced vitality. Notably, the seeds that underwent direct freezing exhibited higher vitality than those subjected to stepwise freezing or vitrification. The viability of intermediate seeds was lower in response to dehydration and low temperature in comparison to orthodox seeds. Additionally, the majority of seeds exhibited reduced viability following cryopreservation. However, the seeds of C. maxima, D. kaki, P. granatum, A. esculentus, P. perfoliatum, and T. scabra demonstrated higher viability after cryopreservation, specifically within the moisture content range of 7–15%.
Seeds exhibiting recalcitrant behavior demonstrated heightened susceptibility to cryopreservation, with their viability significantly impacted by moisture levels. Notably, 15 seeds with low recalcitrance, including A. sinensis and A. katsumadai, exhibited robust vitality following cryopreservation within the moisture content range of 12–20%. Additionally, the seeds of A. muricarpum, V. negundo, and C. argentea displayed increased vitality after cryopreservation compared to their no-freezing state. Seeds with moderate and high levels of recalcitrance exhibited heightened susceptibility to freezing when frozen using liquid nitrogen. In general, seeds with a moisture content below 30% demonstrated diminished viability following freezing, except for those falling within the moisture content range of 35 to 50%. Nevertheless, the seeds of S. lanceolata, S. myrsinifolium, D. calycinum, E. japonica, and other species within each moisture content range displayed vitality levels below 30%.

2.3. Detection of Physiological and Biochemical Indicators of Seeds

After subjecting 62 medicinal plant seeds to ultra-low temperature freezing with liquid nitrogen, a comprehensive analysis was conducted on various parameters, including α-amylase activity, dehydrogenase activity, MDA content, SOD activity, POD activity, CAT activity, protein content, and conductivity (Figure 3 or Table A2). The results revealed changes in these parameters following the cryopreservation process. Among the seeds analyzed, 64.52% exhibited an increase or maintenance in α-amylase activity, while 60.34% displayed a decrease in dehydrogenase activity. Additionally, 48.39% of the seeds exhibited a decrease in CAT activity compared to their pre-freezing state, whereas 43.55% exhibited an increase in SOD activity. Furthermore, 53.24% of the seeds showed no significant change in protein content compared to the control group. The changes in these index values were not significantly related to seed storage characteristics.
Of the seeds subjected to cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen, the structural integrity of the seed cell membranes was compromised in 51.79%. The freezing process involving liquid nitrogen potentially resulted in the disruption of the enzyme system in approximately 35.48% of the seeds. Additionally, this process caused a significant buildup of MDA content within the seed cells, particularly in recalcitrant seeds, as these comprised 50%. The application of liquid nitrogen freezing resulted in a notable improvement in the capacity of 54.84% of the seeds to eliminate free radicals. Moreover, the POD activity exhibited a significant increase following the freezing process.

2.4. Observation of Seed Microstructure

A total of 62 seed types were subjected to cross-section and paraffin sectioning for microscopic examination both before and after undergoing ultra-low temperature freezing (Figure 4 or Figure A1). This sample included 20 seeds classified as orthodox, 17 seeds classified as intermediate, and 25 seeds classified as recalcitrant. The results showed that the majority of seeds that exhibited no apparent alterations in their cross-sectional surfaces following cryopreservation were those with low water content. Specifically, this category encompassed nine orthodox species, three intermediate species, and six low-refractory species, a proportion of 29.03%. The transverse surface of the remaining frozen seeds exhibited a lackluster (Figure 4(b-1)) appearance characterized by a brown (Figure 4(b-3)), dehydrated, and cracked texture (Figure 4(b-2)). Nevertheless, the freezing process utilizing liquid nitrogen did not have any discernible impact on the appearance of the majority of seeds.
Seeds showed plasmolysis before and after freezing with liquid nitrogen. After freezing, plasmolysis was more pronounced in seven types of seeds, including A. precatorius (Figure 4(d-1)). Approximately 27.42% of seed cells displayed irregular arrangement (Figure 4(d-2)) or slight deformation post-freezing, in contrast to their pre-freezing state. Internal organelles were loosely distributed (Figure 4(d-3)) in 18 types of seed embryo cells, and 64.52% of seeds showed changes in inclusions (Figure 4(f1–f3)) after freezing. However, the changes in cell arrangement and content did not demonstrate a significant correlation with seed storage characteristics.

2.5. Seed Germination Results

A germination experiment was conducted on a total of 50 seed varieties that had been subjected to freezing in liquid nitrogen (Table 1). The results revealed that out of the 13 orthodox seed types, all germinated, and the germination rates were above 50%, except for S. sericea, M. argentea, and C. lacryma-jobi. Additionally, intermediate seeds were capable of germination. Notably, H. undatus, A. esculentus, and C. papaya seeds demonstrated higher germination rates, while the remaining 10 seed varieties exhibited rates < 30%. For the recalcitrant seeds, a total of eight species, namely C. pulcherrima, H. campechianum, S. lanceolata, C. annuum, L. inermis, A. sinensis, S. nux-vomica, and C. argentea, successfully germinated. However, 15 species, including S. lychnophora, C. lansium, and A. catechu, exhibited either negligible germination or an exceptionally low germination rate.
Among the seeds examined, those classified as low recalcitrant such as A. sinensis exhibited germination rates exceeding 40%. Conversely, the germination rates of moderately recalcitrant seeds, including S. dulcificum, were relatively low. Notably, except for A. catechu, highly recalcitrant seeds displayed minimal or no germination. Furthermore, a majority of seeds with low or no germination rates exhibited browning and mold growth. While seed vitality is theoretically positively associated with germination rates, the process of seed germination is intricate and multifaceted.

3. Discussion

3.1. Appropriate Moisture Content and Freezing Method Contribute to the Success of Seed Cryopreservation

The freezing treatment plays a pivotal role in the ultra-low temperature preservation process, where a decrease in the preservation temperature increases the likelihood of ice crystal formation in the cells. Given the variation in water content, physiological status, and other characteristics of plant materials, diverse freezing methods are necessary. Plant materials with a low water content, such as pollen [31], orthodox seeds [13,32], some intermediate seeds [33], and a few recalcitrant seeds [30], can be subjected to direct immersion in liquid nitrogen without the need for intricate dehydration and freezing protection agents. This rapid cooling process significantly minimizes the time required for ice nucleation, thereby preventing intracellular crystallization and reducing cellular freezing damage. Consequently, cryopreservation is effectively achieved [34].
However, it is necessary for plant stem tips [35], callus tissue, somatic embryos [36], and high-moisture freezing materials such as recalcitrant seeds to undergo proper dehydration or be subjected to appropriate cryoprotectant treatment prior to their immersion in liquid nitrogen. This process allows for the freezing material to be vitrified and minimizes the formation of ice crystals [37]. Vitrification freezing, a highly prevalent cryopreservation technique, is applicable for freezing materials characterized by high moisture content, including seed embryos and plant stem tips. Moreover, this method is also well-suited for seeds with elevated moisture levels. Additionally, stepwise freezing, facilitated by the incorporation of cryoprotectants to achieve vitrification, is deemed suitable for seeds with high moisture content. Among the 155 species that were successfully subjected to cryopreservation in this study, seeds possessing comparatively lower moisture content were better suited for direct freezing, whereas intermediate or recalcitrant seeds with higher moisture content were more appropriate for vitrification freezing or stepwise freezing methods. However, the viability of seeds possessing elevated moisture content, such as C. lansium, S. lychnophora, and S. nux-vomica, exhibited diminished success after vitrification freezing and stepwise freezing in comparison to direct freezing. This outcome could potentially be attributed to the elevated concentration of cryoprotectants PVS2 or the prolonged duration of immersion in the freezing agent. Nevertheless, these suggestions remain speculative, necessitating further investigation to ascertain the true underlying causes.
The close association between the ultra-low temperature tolerance of plants and their ability to withstand dehydration, freezing at low temperatures, and vitrification has been well documented [38,39]. Seeds that possess normal or intermediate levels of dehydration tolerance can effectively eliminate free water prior to undergoing low-temperature freezing, resulting in a relatively broad spectrum of permissible moisture content. Consequently, the determination of the ideal moisture content, which varies across plant species, constitutes a pivotal factor in the preservation of seeds at ultra-low temperatures [33]. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the optimal moisture content for long-term storage of orthodox seeds falls within the range of 4 to 7%, a value range that aligns with the findings of this investigation. In the case of orthodox seeds, there is generally no notable disparity in viability pre- or post-freezing, provided the moisture content remains between 5 and 10%. This moisture range effectively prevents intracellular freezing damage resulting from excessive moisture at subzero temperatures, while also mitigating dehydration damage caused by insufficient moisture. The moisture content range deemed appropriate for intermediate seeds in this study predominantly fell within the range of 7 to 15%, whereas the suitable moisture content range for recalcitrant seeds lacked specificity.

3.2. The Roles of Seed Structure and Composition in the Cryopreservation Process

Seeds are subjected to significant physical pressure during the process of ultra-low temperature freezing and thawing. If the intercellular matrix of the seeds is unable to withstand this pressure, the seeds will suffer physical damage. This tolerance is closely associated with the moisture content of the seeds [34]. The seeds of Albizia julibrissin Durazz. [40] and Euphorbia marginata Pursh. [41] exhibited explosive behavior upon exposure to liquid nitrogen, whereas the robust seed shell of Prunus pseudocerasus (Lindl.) G. Don seeds [42] mitigated the immediate detrimental effects of temperature fluctuations on the seed coat. Consequently, seed coat rupture following freezing in liquid nitrogen is infrequent. The seed shell provides a protective shield, thereby minimizing the impact of moisture and serving a protective function. Within a specified range of water content, the present study demonstrated that recalcitrant seeds characterized by hard seed coats and thick kernels showed higher vitality after direct freezing in liquid nitrogen, while seeds with crisp or soft seed coats were best preserved through vitrification or stepwise freezing methods. It was initially hypothesized that the freezing of recalcitrant seeds at extremely low temperatures using liquid nitrogen may provide a protective effect due to the presence of a hard seed coat and a tightly packed seed kernel. Conversely, seeds possessing brittle or soft seed coats may necessitate the use of cryoprotectants to mitigate the potential adverse effects of liquid nitrogen freezing.
In conventional storage, seeds with high oil content often have shorter lifespans and are more difficult to store than other seeds containing carbohydrates or proteins. This is because fats are prone to rancidity that produces large amounts of toxic substances, resulting in a shortened lifespan of the seeds. In this study, seeds such as C. anisum-olens, O. pinnata, and V. negundo still had high activity after being frozen at a high moisture content, similar to the results of studies on P. pseudocerasus seeds [22] and Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge seeds [43]. Seeds rich in oil or those with a high lipid content have a higher tolerance to liquid nitrogen freezing at a higher moisture content. It may be that the high content of fats makes the seed’s free water less likely to freeze into ice, thereby reducing the damage of ice crystals to the seeds. This requires further investigation.

3.3. The Significance of Cryopreservation Technology and Cryobank for the Protection of Diversity of Medicinal Plant Genetic Resources

Presently, the genetic diversity of medicinal plants is confronted with numerous challenges [44], including environmental degradation due to anthropogenic activities and the depletion of resources resulting from over-harvesting and unsustainable utilization practices. These challenges have precipitated a sustained decline in the genetic diversity of medicinal plant resources, with certain species approaching the brink of extinction.
Each medicinal plant harbors distinct genetic information and possesses unique medicinal properties [45]. The preservation of these plants is crucial not only for maintaining biodiversity but also for safeguarding traditional medical knowledge. Currently, cryopreservation technology is instrumental in the conservation of plant genetic resources, offering advantages such as long-term stability and safety [46]. By employing cryopreservation and a cryobank, the viability of medicinal plant genetic material can be effectively prolonged, ensuring its enduring and stable conservation [47]. This is crucial for safeguarding the genetic resources of rare and endangered medicinal plants, thereby preserving their genetic integrity and diversity.
Cryopreservation technology, as an advanced method in the field, presents distinct advantages alongside certain limitations. Future research should focus on the development of novel cryoprotectants and optimized freezing protocols to enhance the efficacy of preservation and recovery of medicinal plants. Such advancements will not only broaden the applicability of preservation techniques but also offer more robust technical assurances for the long-term conservation of medicinal plant species.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

The fruits of 164 medicinal plants (Table A1) were gathered in China. Subsequently, the peels and flesh were eliminated, and the seeds were extracted from the fruits. The unprocessed seeds, not subject to any dehydration procedures, were then enclosed in sealed bags and stored in a seed cabinet at a temperature of 10 °C for a maximum duration of 3 days. This was followed by an assessment of the initial moisture content and viability of the seeds. The experimental seeds were fresh seeds, all provided by the National Southern Medicine Gene Bank.

4.2. Storage Characteristic Determination Method

The method and steps (Figure 5) outlined by Hong et al. [48] were employed for the determination of seed storage characteristics. Subsequently, the experimental seed storage type was classified as orthodox, intermediate, or recalcitrant. The seeds were dehydrated to a 10–12% water content and their viability was checked. If most were non-viable, they were recalcitrant. If most were viable, they were further dehydrated to a 5% water content and checked again. If most were non-viable, they were intermediate. If most were viable, they were stored at −20 °C for 3 months and rechecked. If most were non-viable, they were intermediate; if nearly all were viable, they were orthodox seeds.

4.3. Determination of Seed Moisture Content and Viability

The seeds were enclosed in nylon mesh bags and positioned within a desiccator containing silica gel. Subsequently, the seeds were dried at room temperature for varying lengths of time based on their size and initial moisture content, thereby yielding seeds with distinct moisture content gradients. The high constant temperature drying method [49] was employed to ascertain the seeds’ moisture content (w). Specifically, three seeds were selected from refrigeration, their weight was recorded (m1), and they were then dehydrated in a drying oven set at 130 °C for 1 h before being reweighed (m2). The water content calculation formula was as follows: w = (m1 − m2)/m1 × 100%.
The 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) method [32] was used to assess seed viability before and after freezing. Fifteen seeds were peeled, halved along the ridge, placed in 1% TTC buffer (1 g TTC dissolved in every 100 mL of phosphate-buffer saline), incubated at 25 °C in the dark for 4 h, and then observed. Seeds with embryos and endosperms stained bright red and in normal condition were considered viable; others were deemed inactive.

4.4. Cryopreservation Experiments

A total of 164 varieties of medicinal plant seeds were exposed to ultra-low temperature freezing using liquid nitrogen. The viability of the seeds was assessed both before and after freezing, and the optimal freezing method for cryopreservation was determined for each seed. Each experimental seed underwent four treatments, including a control group and three freezing groups. The control group was not subject to freezing treatment, while the three freezing groups employed vitrification freezing, stepwise freezing, and direct freezing techniques, respectively [30].
Vitrification freezing: The cryopreservation tube containing the seeds was subjected to vitrification freezing using an MS solution consisting of 2.0 M glycerol and 0.4 M sucrose that served as the freezing protection loading solution. The tube was then kept at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) for 20 min. Subsequently, the loading solution was substituted with PVS2 vitrification solution composed of 30% glycerol, 0.4 M sucrose, 15% ethylene glycol, and 15% dimethyl sulfoxide per liter of MS solution and placed in an ice bath for 30 min. Finally, the solution was rapidly replaced with pre-cooled fresh PVS2, and the tube was immediately transferred into liquid nitrogen for ultra-low temperature storage.
Stepwise freezing: The seeds designated for examination were immersed in cryotubes containing PVS2 (25 ± 2 °C) and subsequently stored in a refrigerator set at 4 °C for 30 min. Following this, the seeds were promptly transferred to a freezer at −20 °C for 1 h before being transferred into liquid nitrogen for preservation.
Direct freezing: The seeds to be stored were placed in the cryotube and quickly placed in liquid nitrogen for preservation.
Thawing: After 24 h, the seeds that had been subjected to freezing in liquid nitrogen were subsequently thawed at a temperature range of 37 to 40 °C in a water bath for 2–5 min. The seeds from both the stepwise freezing group and the vitrification freezing group were then subjected to three consecutive 5 min washes with MS solution containing 1.2 M sucrose, followed by two 10 min washes with sterile water

4.5. Physiological and Biochemical Indicators

Out of the species that were effectively frozen, a total of 62 species (40%) were chosen at random for the purpose of assessing the physiological and biochemical indicators of their seeds both prior to and following the freezing process. The seeds from both the control group and the optimal freezing group were ground in a freezing grinder to extract enzymes. The subsequent measurements included determining the relative conductivity following the ISTA protocol [49], quantifying the malondialdehyde (MDA) content using the thiobarbituric acid method, and assessing the catalase (CAT) activity through ultraviolet spectrophotometry. The guaiacol method was employed to determine the peroxidase (POD) activity, while the dehydrogenase activity and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity were measured using the nitrogen blue tetrazolium (NBT) method. Additionally, the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid colorimetric method (DNS method) was used to determine the activity of α-amylase. The soluble protein content was determined using the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G250 method [50,51,52]. Due to the number of seeds, not all indicators were measured for some seeds.

4.6. Observation of Seed Internal Structure

From the effectively frozen species, 62 species were randomly chosen to observe the internal structure of these seeds before and after freezing. The seeds from both the control and optimally frozen groups were incised to expose the region containing the embryo, followed by paraffin sectioning. These seeds were immersed in FAA fixative [53] (formaldehyde: acetic acid: alcohol = 1:1:18) for 72 h at 4 °C. The fixed seeds were then dehydrated in ethanol solutions of 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100%, soaking for at least one hour in each. After dehydration, the seeds were cleared in xylene for at least 2 h, then immersed in molten paraffin at 56–58 °C for at least 4 h. The paraffin-impregnated seeds were transferred to pre-cooled molds and solidified at 4 °C into paraffin blocks. Using a Leica RM2245 semi-automatic rotary microtome, paraffin blocks were sliced into 8–12 micrometer sections. These sections were flattened on a 42 °C water surface, transferred to pre-warmed slides, and dried in a 37 °C incubator for at least 2 h. The dried sections were stained with Ponceau S for 1–2 h, rinsed with tap water, stained with Fast Green for 2 min, rinsed again, and air-dried. The stained sections were dehydrated in ethanol solutions (75%, 85%, 95%) for 5 min each, cleared in xylene for 5 min, and sealed with a neutral mounting medium and cover slip. The slides were then examined under an optical microscope to observe the seeds’ internal structure.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

SAS9.4 software was used for all statistical analysis. For all quantitative data, one-way ANOVA was used, followed by an LSD multiple range test when significant differences were detected (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

This study effectively employed cryopreservation to successfully preserve the seeds of 155 medicinal plants. By conducting a comprehensive analysis of moisture content, seed composition, and freezing methods, and employing microscopic observation as well as physiological and biochemical indicators, we identified consistent patterns for the cryopreservation of medicinal plant seeds. Specifically, our findings indicated the following. (1) The freezing method had minimal impact on over 90% of orthodox seeds, and the optimal freezing conditions involved a moisture content ranging from 5 to 10% and direct freezing. Notably, all seeds exhibited successful germination following the freezing process. (2) The freezing moisture content range of 7–15% was suitable for most intermediate seeds, and the direct freezing method was particularly appropriate for seeds with lower initial moisture content. (3) The direct freezing method is recommended for recalcitrant seeds characterized by a hard seed coat and a tightly packed seed kernel. Conversely, recalcitrant seeds that are brittle or soft are better suited for vitrification or stepwise freezing techniques. (4) The freezing of most seeds using liquid nitrogen did not yield any notable alterations in their appearance. (5) The application of cryopreservation adversely affects the biochemical markers of the majority of seeds, a phenomenon that was not significantly associated with the characteristics of seed storage. (6) Seeds exhibiting high recalcitrance exhibited diminished rates of germination after freezing, necessitating further investigation. The research establishes a scientific foundation and technical methodologies for the long-term preservation of medicinal plant germplasm resources, offers strategic responses for biodiversity conservation, and fosters the sustainable utilization of these resources.

Author Contributions

Data curation: Z.S., L.F., R.L. and M.H.; Formal analysis: Z.S. and Y.G.; Funding acquisition: L.Z. and J.W.; Investigation: L.Z., L.F. and R.L.; Methodology: J.W.; Project administration: M.H.; Resources: Y.G. and R.L.; Validation: Z.S.; Visualization: M.H.; Writing—original draft: L.Z.; Writing—review and editing: L.Z. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81603399), the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 322RC797), and the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (No. 2021-I2M-1-032).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Storage characteristics and cryopreservation results of 164 medicinal plant seeds.
Table A1. Storage characteristics and cryopreservation results of 164 medicinal plant seeds.
FamiliesSpeciesInitial Moisture ContentFreezing Moisture Content RangeMinimum ViabilitySuitable Freezing MethodsStorage Characteristics
ControlFreezing
AmaranthaceaeCelosia argentea L.
medicinal part: dry and mature seeds
≥24%7–10%26.67%33.33%stepwise freezinglowly recalcitrant
AnnonaceaeAnnona montana Macf.
medicinal part: fruit
≥22%6–22%100%80%stepwise freezingintermediate
Annona reticulata Linn.
medicinal parts: bark, fruit, leaves
≥25%5–10%93.33%93.33%direct freezingorthodox
Artabotrys hexapetalus
Medicinal part: root
≥15%5–15%96.5%95.42%direct freezingorthodox
Polyalthia lauii Merr.
medicinal parts: roots and leaves
≥38%25–28%62.5%75%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
ApiaceaePeucedanum praeruptorum
Medicinal part: root
≥14%5–10%76.67%85.55%direct freezingorthodox
Apocynaceae Rauvolfia vomitoria
medicinal parts: roots, stem bark
≥13%11–14%53.3%60%vitrification freezingintermediate
Aquifoliaceae Ilex rotunda Thunb.
medicinal parts: leaves and bark
≥17%6–11%92.73%87.76%vitrification freezingorthodox
AraceaeAlocasia macrorrhiza
medicinal part: rootstock
≥45%7–45%76.67%76.8%direct freezingintermediate
AraliaceaePanax pseudoginseng Wall. var. notoginseng (Burkill) Hoo et Tseng
medicinal part: rootstock
≥58%38–48%95%90%stepwise freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Panax ginseng C. A. Mey.
medicinal part: rootstock
≥30%7–28%75%71.67%direct freezingintermediate
Arecaceae Areca catechu L.
medicinal part: seeds
≥57%30–54%80%60%direct freezinghighly recalcitrant
Arenga westerhoutii Griffith
medicinal part: fruit
≥30%6–15%16.67%33.33%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Calamus tetradactylus Hance
medicinal part: whole plant
≥35%10–25%40%80%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Trachycarpus fortunei
medicinal part: petiole
≥20%8–15%70%60%direct freezingintermediate
AsclepiadaceaeTelosma cordata (Burm. f.) Merr.
medicinal part: flower and leaves
≥17%14–15%80%78.89%vitrification freezingintermediate
AsteraceaeArctium lappa L.
medicinal part: fruit
≥12%6–12%90%93.33%direct freezingintermediate
Carthamus tinctorius L.
medicinal part: flower
≥10%5–10%94.44%95%direct freezingorthodox
Xanthium strumarium
medicinal part: fruit
≥25%5–15%100%100%direct freezingorthodox
BoraginaceaeMesserschmidia argentea (L. f.) Johnst.
medicinal part: leaves and stem bark
≥20%9–15%64.17%60.84%direct freezingorthodox
Cactaceae Hylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britt. et Rose
medicinal part: succulent stem and flower
≥15%7–10%61%67%direct freezingintermediate
Cardiopteridaceae Gonocaryum lobbianum (Miers) Kurz
medicinal part: root
≥48%40–45%100%50%stepwise freezingintermediate
CaricaceaeCarica papaya L.
medicinal part: fruit and leaves
≥23%6–17%90%90%direct freezingintermediate
CasuarinaceaeCasuarina equisetifolia Forst.
medicinal part: branches and leaves
≥15%7–15%92%93.3%direct freezingorthodox
ChenopodiaceaeAtriplex repens Roth
medicinal part: whole herb
≥25%12–16%60%55%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
CornaceaeCornus officinalis Siebold & Zucc.
medicinal part: ripe fruit
≥38%25–28%70%66.67%stepwise freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Cucurbitaceae Benincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cogn.
medicinal part: peel and seeds
≥35%5–15%60%65%direct freezingorthodox
Cucurbita moschata (Duch. ex Lam.) Duch. ex Poiret
medicinal part: sarcocarp
≥24%5–10%96%94%direct freezingorthodox
Luffa aegyptiaca
medicinal part: mature fruit vascular bundle, flower, melon stem
≥12%5–12%100%100%direct freezingorthodox
Trichosanthes scabra Loureiro
medicinal part: whole herb
≥22%10–15%92%90%direct freezingintermediate
DaphniphyllaceaeDaphniphyllum calycinum Benth.
medicinal part: root and leaves
≥47%30–33%70%40%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Daphniphyllum macropodium Miq.
medicinal part: seeds and leaves
≥13%10–13%100%70%stepwise freezingintermediate
DipterocarpaceaeVatica mangachapoi Blanco
medicinal part: fruit
≥25%18–22%53.33%33.33%direct freezinghighly recalcitrant
EbenaceaeDiospyros kaki Thunb.
medicinal part: persistent calyx
≥34%7–15%84%96%direct freezingintermediate
Diospyros strigosa Hemsl.
medicinal part: fruit
≥45%40–45%90%85%stepwise freezingmoderately recalcitrant
EuphorbiaceaeHevea brasiliensis
medicinal part: leaves
≥30%10–15%100%83.33%direct freezingintermediate
Mallotus philippensis
medicinal part: the powdery fuzz on the surface of fruit and root
≥15%11–15%26.67%33.33%stepwise freezinglowly recalcitrant
Ricinus communis L.
medicinal part: seeds
≥12%3–12%100%93.33%direct freezingorthodox
Trewia nudiflora
medicinal part: seeds
≥25%5–10%80%83.33%direct freezingorthodox
FlagellariaceaeFlagellaria indica
medicinal part: stems and rhizomes
≥24%11–24%94.17%94%direct freezingintermediate
GinkgoaceaeGinkgo biloba L.
medicinal part: leaves
≥43%12–28%73.68%83.33%direct freezingintermediate
GoodeniaceaeScaevola sericea Vahl
medicinal part: leaves
≥17%10–14%61.96%60%direct freezingorthodox
GuttiferaeCratoxylum cochinchinense (Lour.) Bl.
medicinal part: root, bark and tender leaves
≥11%8–11%76.67%75%vitrification freezingintermediate
IcacinaceaeIodes vitiginea (Hance) Hemsl.
medicinal part: root
≥21%18–20%100%80%direct freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Lamiaceae Anisomeles indica (Linnaeus) Kuntze
medicinal part: whole herb
≥15%5–10%70%40%direct freezingorthodox
Salvia hispanica L.
medicinal part: seeds
≥15%5–10%31%92%stepwise freezinglowly recalcitrant
Vitex negundo L. var. cannabifolia (Sieb. et Zucc.) Hand.-Mazz.
medicinal part: leaves and seeds
≥30%24–28%44.94%66.67%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
Vitex quinata (Lour.) Wall.
medicinal part: root and trunk pith
≥16%10–12%88.33%76.67%vitrification freezinglowly recalcitrant
Vitex rotundifolia Linnaeus f.
medicinal part: fruit
≥37%6–10%66.67%60%stepwise freezingintermediate
Vitex trifolia L
medicinal part: fruit
≥15%6–14%90%71.05%vitrification freezingorthodox
Vitex tripinnata
medicinal part: stem
≥20%5–10%40%71.43%vitrification freezinglowly recalcitrant
LauraceaeCinnamomum camphora (L.) presl
medicinal part: root, fruit, branch and leaves
≥25%10–24%90%66.67%direct freezingintermediate
Cinnamomum burmannii(Nees)Blume
medicinal part: bark, root bark, leaves and branches
≥25%5–10%85%85%direct freezingorthodox
Cinnamomum verum
medicinal part: bark
≥40%33–37%60%33.33%stepwise freezingmoderately recalcitrant
LeguminosaeAbrus precatorius
medicinal part: root and vine
≥14%6–14%81.67%61.9%direct freezingorthodox
Bauhinia purpurea
medicinal part: root, bark, flower and leaves
≥13%5–10%95.55%95.55%direct freezingorthodox
Caesalpinia pulcherrima (L.) Sw.
medicinal part: root and stem bark
≥25%15–19%80%76.67%stepwise freezinglowly recalcitrant
Canavalia maritima (Aubl.) Thou.
medicinal part: root
≥32%6–32%80%67.98%direct freezingintermediate
Erythrophleum fordii Oliv.
medicinal part: seeds, bark
≥22%10–20%60%90%stepwise freezingintermediate
Euchresta japonica
medicinal part: root, stem
≥30%5–10%100%90%direct freezingorthodox
Haematoxylum campechianum L.
medicinal part: wood
≥20%11–13%56.25%84.17%vitrification freezinglowly recalcitrant
Lablab purpureus (Linn.) Sweet
medicinal part: seeds
≥40%5–12%95%95%direct freezingorthodox
Leucaena leucocephala
medicinal part: seeds
≥17%5–10%94.6%93.33%direct freezingorthodox
Ormosia pinnata (Lour.) Merr.
medicinal part: wood
≥65%45–60%80.59%81.84%vitrification freezinghighly recalcitrant
Phaseolus vulgaris Linn.
medicinal part: seeds and whole herb
≥60%7–10%100%95%direct freezingorthodox
Pongamia pinnata
medicinal part: whole plant
≥45%15–42%94.4%87.38%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
Senna tora (Linnaeus) Roxburgh
medicinal part: seeds
≥15%5–15%100%100%direct freezingorthodox
Sesbania cannabina
medicinal part: leaves and seeds
≥18%5–10%100%100%direct freezingorthodox
Sophora flavescens Alt.
medicinal part: root
≥10%5–10%100%96.67%direct freezingorthodox
Tamarindus indica Linn.
medicinal part: fruit
≥20%8–19%83.33%80.95%direct freezingorthodox
Tephrosia candida
medicinal part: leaves
≥15%4–15%100%95%direct freezingorthodox
Cassia occidentalis Linn.
medicinal part: seeds, root and leaves
≥24%4–24%95%95%direct freezingorthodox
Pterocarpus indius
medicinal part: heartwood
≥12%8–11%84.31%88.89%vitrification freezingorthodox
Vigna marina (Burm.) Merr.
medicinal part: whole plant
≥30%11–17%85.83%90%direct freezingintermediate
LiliaceaeCordyline fruticosa (L.) A. Cheval.
medicinal part: flower
≥35%27–32%86.67%63.33%vitrification freezingintermediate
Paris polyphylla
medicinal part: rootstock
≥57%13–52%81.67%63.33%direct freezingintermediate
Ophiopogon japonicus (L. f.) Ker-Gawl.
medicinal part: root
≥33%15–20%60%90%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
LoganiaceaeStrychnos nux-vomica L.
medicinal part: seeds
≥32%28–32%97%56%direct freezingmoderately recalcitrant
LythraceaeLawsonia inermis L.
medicinal part: bark
≥46%27–43%70%72%vitrification freezinglowly recalcitrant
Lagerstroemia speciosa (L.) Pers.
medicinal part: root, leaves and seeds
≥15%10–12%48%50%vitrification freezingintermediate
Punica granatum L.
medicinal part: leaves, root, stem bark and flower
≥15%7–15%88%85%stepwise freezingintermediate
MalvaceaeAbelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench
medicinal part: root, leaves, flower and seeds
≥42%7–20%92%94%direct freezingintermediate
Abroma augustum (L.) L. f.
medicinal part: root and leaves
≥25%5–10%96.67%96.67%direct freezingorthodox
Abutilon indicum
medicinal part: whole herb and root
≥18%5–10%96.67%100%direct freezingorthodox
Hibiscus mutabilis L.
medicinal part: flower, leaves and root
≥25%18–25%100%90%vitrification freezinglowly recalcitrant
Hibiscus sabdariffa L.
medicinal part: calyx
≥20%5–12%88%85%direct freezingorthodox
Sterculia lanceolata Cav.
medicinal part: root and leaves
≥30%13–16%46.67%45%direct freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Sterculia lychnophora Hance
medicinal part: seeds
≥70%45–48%95%69.05%direct freezinghighly recalcitrant
Meliaceae Melia azedarach L.
medicinal part: bark
≥17%5–15%86.67%90%direct freezingorthodox
MenispermaceaeDiploclisia glaucescens Bl.
medicinal part: root
≥45%13–40%75.55%77.78%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
MoraceaeAntiaris toxicaria Lesch.
medicinal part: fresh tree juice and seeds
≥46%24–32%70%73.33%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.
medicinal part: fruit and kernel
≥58%33–54%75%75%stepwise freezinghighly recalcitrant
Malaisia scandens (Lour.) Planch.
medicinal part: root and leaves
≥45%30–40%85%80%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Musaceae Musella lasiocarpa (Franchet) C. Y. Wu ex H. W. Li
medicinal part: flower
≥20%12–20%33.33%53.33%stepwise freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Myricaceae Morella rubra
medicinal part: bark
≥15%5–15%80%80%direct freezingorthodox
MyrtaceaeSyzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & L. M. Perry
medicinal part: flower bud
≥45%19–45%80%0 highly recalcitrant
Syzygium bullockii (Hance) Merr. et Perry
medicinal part: fruit and root
≥48%38–46%60.42%77.08%stepwise freezinglowly recalcitrant
Syzygium myrsinifolium (Hance) Merr. et Perry
medicinal part: fruit, flower, seeds and stem bark
≥48%33–35%33.33%33.33%stepwise freezinghighly recalcitrant
Psidium littorale Raddi
medicinal part: fruit
≥15%7–12%47.78%52.22%vitrification freezingintermediate
Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels
medicinal part: fruit
≥40%22–40% highly recalcitrant
Syzygium nervosum Candolle
medicinal part: flower, leaves and root
≥50%10–50% highly recalcitrant
Nelumbonaceae Nelumbo nucifera
medicinal part: stamens, receptacle, mature seeds and radicles
≥33%5–10%90%93.3%direct freezingorthodox
OlacaceaeOlax austrosinensis Y. R. Ling
medicinal part: root and leaves
≥21%5–15%80%83.3%vitrification freezingintermediate
Oleaceae Ligustrum quihoui Carr.
medicinal part: root bark, leaves and fruit
≥16%11–17%70%60%direct freezingintermediate
Osmanthus fragrans Lour.
medicinal part: flower, fruit and root
≥24%8–15%50%90%vitrification freezingintermediate
PassifloraceaePassiflora foetida L.
medicinal part: leaves
≥28%4–28%95.42%96.67%direct freezingorthodox
Passiflora edulis Sims
medicinal part: fruit
≥15%10–15%67%78%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
Phyllanthaceae Aporusa dioica (Roxb.) Muell. Arg.
medicinal part: leaves
≥43%30–36%60.8%41.29%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Baccaurea ramiflora Loureiro
medicinal part: fruit
≥42%30–35%60%46.67%vitrification freezinghighly recalcitrant
Bischofia javanica Bl.
medicinal part: root
≥25%14–18%61.27%50.28%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
Bridelia balansae Tutcher
medicinal part: root
≥43%6–43% moderately recalcitrant
Cleistanthus sumatranus (Miq.) Muell. Arg.
medicinal part: leaves
≥20%14–17%42%71%vitrification freezingintermediate
PiperaceaePiper nigrum L.
medicinal part: fruit
≥28%21–22%25%23.33% moderately recalcitrant
PittosporaceaePittosporum balansae DC.
medicinal part: root, leaves
≥45%5–10%50%50%direct freezingorthodox
Poaceae Coix lacryma-jobi L.
medicinal part: kernel
≥12%5–10%81%80%direct freezingorthodox
Zea mays L.
medicinal part: seeds and leaves
≥35%5–12%100%96%direct freezingorthodox
PolygonaceaePolygonum perfoliatum
medicinal part: whole herb
≥23%10–17%88%92%stepwise freezingintermediate
PrimulaceaeArdisia crenata Sims
medicinal part: root and leaves
≥56%48–52%73.33%90%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Ardisia humilis Vahl
medicinal part: bark
≥35%7–15%86.67%86.67%direct freezingorthodox
Ardisia obtusa Mez
medicinal part: root
≥35%19–32%85%87.3%vitrification freezinglowly recalcitrant
Embelia ribes Burm. F.
medicinal part: root and leaves
≥30%18–20%46.67%33.33%stepwise freezingintermediate
Embelia scandens (Lour.) Mez
medicinal part: root and leaves
≥38%35–38%100%90%direct freezingmoderately recalcitrant
PutranjivaceaeDrypetes indica (Muell. Arg.) Pax et Hoffm.
medicinal part: leaves
≥27%20–25%36%38%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
RanunculaceaeCoptis chinensis Franch.
medicinal part: rootstock
≥42%30–38%56.67%47.78%stepwise freezingmoderately recalcitrant
RosaceaeEriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.
medicinal part: leaves
≥55%45–52%90.61%35.45%vitrification freezinghighly recalcitrant
RubiaceaeBorreria articularis (L. f.) G. Mey.
medicinal part: whole herb
≥18%7–18%92.73%67.19%direct freezingorthodox
Catunaregam spinosa (Thunb.) Tirveng.
medicinal part: root and leaves
≥15%8–13%95%93.33%direct freezingorthodox
Coffea liberica Bull ex Hiern
medicinal part: seeds
≥40%6–40% highly recalcitrant
Morinda citrifolia L.
medicinal part: fruit, leaves, root, branch and trunk
≥20%10–20%71.67%60%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
RutaceaeClausena anisum-olens (Blanco) Merr.
medicinal part: branch and leaves
≥55%11–53%61.67%83.67%stepwise freezinglowly recalcitrant
Clausena excavata
medicinal part: root, leaves
≥44%40–44%100%53.33%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Clausena lansium (Lour.) Skeels
medicinal part: root, leaves and seeds
≥45%35–45%81.7%81.3%direct freezinghighly recalcitrant
Citrus × junos Siebold ex Tanaka
medicinal part: seeds, peel
≥36%7–25%96%93%direct freezingintermediate
Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr
medicinal part: peel
≥20%5–10%93.33%86.67%direct freezingorthodox
Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr. cv. ‘Tomentosay’
medicinal part: peel
≥15%5–15%60%63.33%stepwise freezingintermediate
Citrus reticulata Blanco
medicinal part: peel
≥50%10–30%90%82%stepwise freezingintermediate
Evodia lepta
medicinal part: root, leaves and fruit
≥24%18–21%52.33%40.84%direct freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Micromelum falcatum (Lour.) Tan.
medicinal part: root, leaves and root bark
≥35%35–45%60%0 highly recalcitrant
Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim.
medicinal part: peel
≥20%6–13%80%60%direct freezingintermediate
Zanthoxylum nitidum (Roxb.) DC.
medicinal part: root, stem, leaves and peel
≥18%10–14%66.67%55.56%direct freezingintermediate
SalicaceaeFlacourtia indica (Burm. f.) Merr.
medicinal part: fruit
≥21%9–21%75%75%direct freezingorthodox
Hydnocarpus anthelminthica
medicinal part: seeds
≥25%10–14%87.8%71.67%stepwise freezingintermediate
SantalaceaeSantalum album
medicinal part: heartwood
≥20%4–20%91.11%86.67%direct freezingorthodox
SapindaceaeArytera littoralis Bl.
medicinal part: seeds
≥40%26–28%60%71.43%direct freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Cardiospermum halicacabum L.
medicinal part: whole plant
≥25%15–25%46.67%55.93%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Dimocarpus longan Lour.
medicinal part: fruit
≥40%12–25%92%80%stepwise freezinglowly recalcitrant
Litchi chinensis Sonn.
medicinal part: kernel
≥50%43–48%86.67%66.67%vitrification freezinghighly recalcitrant
SapotaceaeSynsepalum dulcificum Daniell
medicinal part: sarcocarp
≥40%18–38%84.12%77.46%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
SimaroubaceaeBrucea javanica (L.) Merr.
medicinal part: seeds
≥17%5–17%82.22%80%direct freezingorthodox
Suriana maritima L.
medicinal part: root and bark
≥39%35–38%96.67%58.7%direct freezingmoderately recalcitrant
SolanaceaeCapsicum annuum L.
medicinal part: fruit
≥50%30–45%76%74%vitrification freezingmoderately recalcitrant
Datura metel L.
medicinal part: flower
≥42%4–20%93.33%76.67%direct freezingorthodox
Solanum torvum Swartz
medicinal part: fruit
≥12%7–10%91.3%87.76%direct freezingorthodox
StyracaceaeStyrax suberifolius
medicinal part: root and leaves
≥45%30–40%60%80%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
Styrax tonkinensis (Pierre) Craib ex Hartw.
medicinal part: seed oil and resin
≥40%24–35%67.98%25% moderately recalcitrant
ThymelaeaceaeAquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Spreng.
medicinal part: resin
≥20%10–16%73.33%73.33%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
VitaceaeVitis vinifera L.
medicinal part: fruit, rattan leaf and root
≥20%5–10%90.5%70%direct freezingorthodox
ZingiberaceaeAlpinia katsumadai Hayata
medicinal part: seeds
≥25%12–16%63.33%56.67%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
Alpinia maclurei Merr.
medicinal part: fruit
≥28%15–25%60%50%vitrification freezingintermediate
Amomum muricarpum Elm.
medicinal part: fruit
≥20%11–14%60.99%69.76%stepwise freezinglowly recalcitrant
Costus megalobractea K. Schum.
medicinal part: fruit
≥20%13–16%63.72%60.97%vitrification freezinglowly recalcitrant
Hedychium coronarium Koen.
medicinal part: rootstock
≥78%45–70%61%16% highly recalcitrant
Zingiber corallinum Hance
medicinal part: rootstock
≥25%8–24%75.08%73.33%direct freezingintermediate
Zingiber flavomaculosum S.Q.Tong
medicinal part: rootstock
≥20%11–17%84.82%79.74%direct freezinglowly recalcitrant
Table A2. Changes in physiological and biochemical indicators of seeds before and after ultra-low temperature freezing.
Table A2. Changes in physiological and biochemical indicators of seeds before and after ultra-low temperature freezing.
SpeciesTestREC (%)MDA (μmol/g)CAT (U/g)POD (U/g)SOD (U/g)α-AA (U/g)PRO (%)TTCH (μg/mL)
A. augustumA9.21 ± 0.37 a14.84 ± 0.63 a138.17 ± 0.07 a292.91 ± 0.62 a3183.24 ± 0.39 a60.39 ± 0.33 a4.22 ± 0.07 a19.44 ± 0.18 b
B5.50 ± 0.1 b11.83 ± 0.57 b92.64 ± 0.23 b98.58 ± 0.31 b3018.31 ± 0.42 b60.23 ± 0.22 a3.93 ± 0.17 b20.64 ± 0.61 a
A. catechuA18.53 ± 0.01 b6.81 ± 0.43 b127.35 ± 0.47 a1633.33 ± 7.02 b701.32 ± 13.52 a3.25 ± 1.91 a3.63 ± 0.01 a35.14 ± 0.49 a
B56.36 ± 0.02 a10.83 ± 0.52 a77.97 ± 0.01 b5843.97 ± 17.74 a587.59 ± 1.03 b2.20 ± 1.92 a3.23 ± 0.00 b34.21 ± 1.47 a
A. esculentusA41.80 ± 0.45 b14.33 ± 0.33 a734.09 ± 0.51 a107.09 ± 0.06 a3166.75 ± 0.73 a38.76 ± 0.38 b5.65 ± 0.02 a47.90 ± 0.53 a
B45.56 ± 0.9 a13.90 ± 0.23 b706.29 ± 0.18 b44.68 ± 0.42 b3067.7 ± 0.49 b39.33 ± 0.46 a5.64 ± 0.02 a29.02 ± 0.16 b
A. humilisA4.58 ± 0.35 a66.22 ± 1.62 b160.14 ± 0.89 a1789.17 ± 14.73 b7.34 ± 0.27 b121.88 ± 1.35 b203.18 ± 0.5 b66.65 ± 0.14 a
B3.70 ± 0.59 b108.93 ± 0.05 a86.52 ± 0.49 b2337.20 ± 15.73 a13.54 ± 0.30 a134.37 ± 2.46 a192.04 ± 0.41 a62.57 ± 0.31 b
A. heterophyllusA5.33 ± 0.53 a2.98 ± 0.5 b104.88 ± 0.44 b4083.69 ± 0.93 b844.48 ± 0.74 a23.27 ± 0.15 a4.62 ± 0.42 a18.93 ± 0.85 a
B4.60 ± 0.50 b9.26 ± 0.47 a143.53 ± 0.34 a5845.39 ± 0.44 a738.47 ± 0.20 b23.02 ± 1.05 a4.61 ± 0.09 a3.79 ± 0.20 b
A. katsumadaiA30.93 ± 0.76 a0.93 ± 0.05 b0.6 ± 0.03 a515.66 ± 15.09 a191.1 ± 4.68 a4.08 ± 0.36 a8.37 ± 2.25 b
B31.98 ± 1.10 a1.52 ± 0.49 a0.62 ± 0.03 a494.92 ± 4.27 b178.31 ± 5.52 b3.68 ± 0.20 b39.74 ± 2.59 a
A. obtusaA4.91 ± 0.46 b50.97 ± 0.55 a301.84 ± 3.63 b1337.85 ± 1.68 a6.56 ± 0.18 b94.30 ± 0.43 b27.40 ± 0.44 b34.48 ± 0.21 a
D24.49 ± 0.24 a36.10 ± 2.46 b726.95 ± 3.71 a1112.19 ± 7.13 b14.04 ± 0.1 a101.10 ± 0.51 a32.02 ± 0.49 a32.69 ± 0.67 b
A. precatoriusA7.33 ± 0.28 a313.00 ± 0.76 b220.30 ± 0.44 a7876.60 ± 3.38 a3477.12 ± 0.98 a30.22 ± 0.06 b4.81 ± 1.08 a63.64 ± 0.19 a
B1.14 ± 1.28 b318.21 ± 1.56 a101.37 ± 0.89 b5306.38 ± 0.83 b2642.33 ± 2.27 b36.57 ± 0.15 a5.21 ± 0.95 a61.51 ± 0.28 b
B. javanicaA65.41 ± 0.04 a6.99 ± 0.6 a73.45 ± 1.90 a2078.58 ± 14.1 b2306.17 ± 13.21 a24.14 ± 1.25 a4.31 ± 0.02 a51.85 ± 1.40 a
B54.89 ± 0.06 b7.17 ± 0.35 a63.52 ± 1.00 b2285.11 ± 17.44 a2011.87 ± 11.41 b23.76 ± 1.43 a4.02 ± 0.02 b25.43 ± 0.2 b
A. sinensisA 1.26 ± 0.26 a289.09 ± 12.04 a52.55 ± 1.51 a1650.68 ± 119.52 a9.76 ± 1.00 b 2.13 ± 0.24 b
B 1.36 ± 0.42 a270.77 ± 8.75 b44.64 ± 1.09 b1826.52 ± 235.93 a26.80 ± 1.14 a 2.64 ± 0.13 a
C. annuumA66.49 ± 1.65 b24.23 ± 0.74 b157.8 ± 1.93 b1431.21 ± 1.75 b1551.42 ± 1.91 b13.73 ± 1.05 a4.49 ± 0.09 b4.63 ± 0.52 b
D69.76 ± 0.17 a30.88 ± 1.69 a541.13 ± 1.02 a2850.35 ± 1.74 a2061.17 ± 1.80 a6.57 ± 0.60 b4.93 ± 0.15 a7.61 ± 1.00 a
C. burmanniiA11.70 ± 1.36 b1.57 ± 0.87 a431.96 ± 0.97 b8082.27 ± 7.32 a3245.58 ± 2.88 a14.97 ± 0.49 b2.87 ± 0.29 a46.49 ± 0.17 b
B14.77 ± 0.51 a1.08 ± 0.51 a506.03 ± 1.74 a981.56 ± 1.09 b2524.34 ± 3.45 b15.74 ± 0.35 a3.15 ± 0.28 a55.94 ± 0.87 a
C. camphoraA 3.65 ± 0.88 b28.81 ± 1.54 b614.89 ± 36.56 b2609.93 ± 20.14 a22.96 ± 2.88 a267.83 ± 2.27 a76.78 ± 1.13 a
B 6.34 ± 2.15 a40.60 ± 2.55 a1306.95 ± 78.26 a2638.30 ± 39.16 a21.00 ± 0.49 a266.20 ± 14.57 a44.12 ± 1.04 b
C. fruticosaA16.59 ± 0.16 b7.38 ± 0.54 a476.42 ± 0.23 a10597.16 ± 0.13 a2535.84 ± 1.44 b43.27 ± 0.2 a3.78 ± 0.38 a6.51 ± 0.53 a
D25.05 ± 0.39 a6.25 ± 0.41 b456.65 ± 0.29 b9823.40 ± 0.25 b3010.36 ± 0.56 a40.91 ± 0.37 b4.01 ± 0.62 a5.47 ± 0.09 b
C. junosA6.92 ± 0.5 b11.42 ± 0.62 b141.09 ± 1.92 a10,393.62 ± 14.08 a1319.54 ± 5.05 a10.54 ± 1.47 b5.16 ± 0.14 a34.86 ± 0.71 a
B15.08 ± 1.81 a15.34 ± 0.92 a92.86 ± 2.62 b10,170.21 ± 28.24 b929.37 ± 3.59 b13.54 ± 0.33 a4.59 ± 0.25 b24.10 ± 0.19 b
C.lacryma-jobiA36.84 ± 1.02 b4.84 ± 0.43 a118.35 ± 1.81 b10,287.94 ± 13.59 a2600.47 ± 3.78 b12.16 ± 1.27 a2.91 ± 0.20 a15.96 ± 0.71 b
B49.07 ± 1.55 a4.00 ± 0.69 b245.21 ± 1.58 a10,178.01 ± 16.42 b2718.68 ± 5.52 a12.29 ± 1.45 a2.83 ± 0.19 a17.77 ± 0.84 a
C. lansiumA 1.02 ± 0.26 a55.04 ± 2.91 a90,184.78 ± 28.31 b87,213.60 ± 34.12 a14.04 ± 0.56 b 25.01 ± 1.29 a
B 0.97 ± 0.23 a50.19 ± 0.85 b118,081.04 ± 23.82 a61,162.08 ± 56.25 b17.51 ± 0.54 a 11.09 ± 1.91 b
C. maritimaA76.59 ± 0.82 a10.11 ± 0.62 a599.29 ± 6.14 a9155.32 ± 20.48 a2502.01 ± 4.56 a66.67 ± 0.75 b6.28 ± 0.51 a130.43 ± 1.33 a
B53.53 ± 1.34 b9.17 ± 1.19 a88.57 ± 5.47 b5572.34 ± 18.30 b1222.57 ± 12.12 b67.97 ± 0.61 a6.18 ± 0.26 a94.15 ± 1.22 b
C. maximaA53.00 ± 0.40 a7.2 ± 0.2 a349.87 ± 0.23 b2590.07 ± 0.63 b2941.48 ± 0.08 a46.02 ± 1.42 b5.77 ± 0.31 b61.61 ± 0.23 a
C35.43 ± 0.66 b5.14 ± 1.07 b520.61 ± 0.24 a3175.89 ± 1.1 a2040.92 ± 0.56 b49.04 ± 1.96 a6.53 ± 0.09 a26.23 ± 0.28 b
C.moschataA40.45 ± 2.07 a2.23 ± 0.66 a425.75 ± 1.62 b18,075.89 ± 19.84 b3002.36 ± 5.96 a18.86 ± 1.03 a4.15 ± 0.29 a36.00 ± 0.68 b
B28.34 ± 0.65 b2.61 ± 0.89 a507.98 ± 0.36 a19,784.40 ± 34.15 a2765.96 ± 9.76 b14.58 ± 2.63 b3.71 ± 0.15 b37.54 ± 0.08 a
C. occidentalisA14.81 ± 1.11 b28.15 ± 0.32 a93.39 ± 0.40 a8074.47 ± 0.06 b3260.06 ± 0.48 a43.28 ± 0.23 a5.93 ± 0.43 b235.77 ± 0.38 a
B17.66 ± 1.26 a25.59 ± 0.33 b80.63 ± 0.36 b8582.98 ± 0.63 a3111.16 ± 0.61 b34.44 ± 0.44 b6.38 ± 0.23 a209.78 ± 0.39 b
C. papayaA54.44 ± 0.06 a13.41 ± 0.58 a55.23 ± 0.69 b11498.58 ± 2.04 a2474.62 ± 2.17 a38.48 ± 0.47 a1.01 ± 0.32 a62.08 ± 0.49 b
B55.04 ± 0.47 b14.82 ± 1.74 a225.14 ± 0.68 a10325.53 ± 0.62 b2359.81 ± 2.02 b29.94 ± 0.63 b0.87 ± 0.18 a70.47 ± 0.17 a
C. pulcherrimaA33.06 ± 2.44 a11.92 ± 0.84 a1201.82 ± 16.07 a8709.93 ± 3.28 a2228.47 ± 19.35 a6.19 ± 1.13 b5.05 ± 0.4 a127.88 ± 0.17 b
C29.78 ± 0.84 a12.61 ± 1.61 a82.05 ± 0.32 b3862.41 ± 2.01 b2062.22 ± 16.03 b9.08 ± 0.67 a5.01 ± 0.67 a137.84 ± 0.37 a
C. reticulataA10.17 ± 1.07 b11.70 ± 0.13 a340.47 ± 0.68 b3734.04 ± 2.71 b2482.27 ± 4.4 a5.89 ± 0.54 a3.45 ± 0.22 a72.71 ± 0.54 b
C28.29 ± 0.51 a11.92 ± 1.00 a345.26 ± 0.73 a7443.26 ± 2.46 a2423.17 ± 6.72 b4.88 ± 1.03 a3.68 ± 0.22 a115.77 ± 2.68 a
C.tinctoriusA50.39 ± 1.06 a3.74 ± 2.01 a651.42 ± 2.02 a3139.01 ± 13.59 b761.75 ± 3.28 b11.39 ± 0.85 b4.41 ± 0.07 a9.93 ± 0.99 a
B44.98 ± 1.00 b5.33 ± 0.91 a425.53 ± 3.90 b5265.96 ± 28.74 a2180.19 ± 10.44 a13.93 ± 0.82 a4.37 ± 0.09 a8.79 ± 0.29 b
D. calycinumA16.09 ± 0.06 a9.88 ± 0.82 a222.38 ± 1.49 b2250.71 ± 23.51 b472.81 ± 0.13 b13.15 ± 0.61 a237.44 ± 0.81 b28.79 ± 1.72 a
D11.98 ± 0.02 b8.40 ± 0.50 b325.89 ± 0.8 a2368.79 ± 33.44 a945.63 ± 2.47 a2.33 ± 0.44 b261.36 ± 0.79 a27.58 ± 0.22 a
D. kakiA54.38 ± 0.8 a9.03 ± 1.27 a657.00 ± 2.29 a902.84 ± 2.00 b2634.25 ± 3.73 b6.41 ± 1.15 a2.64 ± 0.40 a27.86 ± 2.14 a
B53.76 ± 0.96 a8.91 ± 1.13 a419.55 ± 1.47 b1678.72 ± 5.94 a3647.42 ± 6.45 a5.52 ± 0.87 a2.25 ± 0.12 a9.84 ± 1.70 b
D. longanA19.18 ± 1.82 b30.87 ± 0.73 a511.39 ± 0.66 b2324.82 ± 3.26 a3444.78 ± 4.48 a25.06 ± 0.43 a2.35 ± 0.46 a63.32 ± 0.72 a
C22.15 ± 1.13 a23.39 ± 0.88 b688.61 ± 1.19 a944.68 ± 0.91 b2228.98 ± 7.45 b16.15 ± 0.49 b2.44 ± 0.14 a60.12 ± 0.31 b
D. metelA14.47 ± 1.43 b8.14 ± 1.41 a227.35 ± 0.77 a8853.90 ± 29.6 a606.55 ± 2.61 a27.97 ± 0.33 a5.09 ± 0.33 b6.11 ± 1.04 a
B21.9 ± 6.26 a9.13 ± 0.43 a145.30 ± 0.83 b8801.42 ± 61.67 a483.34 ± 1.12 b21.30 ± 0.36 b5.47 ± 0.21 a3.89 ± 0.68 b
E. leptaA49.8 ± 0.57 a24.78 ± 2.22 a16.41 ± 0.77 a6.15 ± 1.4 a25.26 ± 2.01 b8.69 ± 1.13 a112.62 ± 11.78 a39.84 ± 2.41 b
B47.68 ± 2.01 b20.81 ± 2.34 b16.44 ± 0.80 a1.13 ± 0.03 b58.4 ± 2.27 a7.99 ± 1.19 a101.83 ± 21.97 a48.7 ± 2.56 a
F. indicaA70.52 ± 0.24 a14.85 ± 0.98 b84.22 ± 1.44 b1136.17 ± 0.42 a263.22 ± 1.21 b11.57 ± 0.25 b4.23 ± 0.21 a127.44 ± 0.4 b
B70.05 ± 0.45 b18.27 ± 0.11 a140.38 ± 0.21 a852.48 ± 0.12 b405.79 ± 1.72 a19.06 ± 0.47 a3.75 ± 0.18 b151.28 ± 0.73 a
G. bilobaA56.65 ± 1.75 a3.78 ± 0.46 a1667.28 ± 2.86 a2309.93 ± 1.28 a1105.90 ± 1.76 b27.57 ± 1.94 a2.72 ± 0.05 a188.58 ± 2.42 a
B42.07 ± 1.92 b4.32 ± 0.99 a811.75 ± 1.16 b914.18 ± 0.88 b1682.89 ± 5.14 a26.39 ± 1.37 a2.59 ± 0.16 a110.47 ± 1.13 b
H. anthelminthicaA 5.49 ± 1.33 a12.47 ± 0.19 b520.57 ± 21.90 b2581.56 ± 46.27 a24.76 ± 0.81 a166.59 ± 3.75 a4.38 ± 1.03 a
C 4.12 ± 1.34 b19.88 ± 2.84 a814.61 ± 59.967 a2170.21 ± 52.12 b16.31 ± 1.24 b164.30 ± 2.76 a2.69 ± 0.45 b
H. mutabilisA12.48 ± 1.83 a10.17 ± 1.39 a655.80 ± 0.89 b3631.21 ± 4.25 b840.56 ± 3.74 b19.78 ± 0.53 a4.62 ± 0.04 a6.26 ± 0.22 a
D7.15 ± 0.38 b8.08 ± 1.72 b821.81 ± 0.95 a4304.96 ± 3.86 a1523.51 ± 5.91 a13.56 ± 0.42 b4.18 ± 0.2 b6.34 ± 1.14 a
H.sabdariffaA23.24 ± 0.57 b34.20 ± 0.23 a401.77 ± 2.67 b10283.69 ± 3.11 a1418.44 ± 6.02 b26.67 ± 1.98 a5.24 ± 0.33 a46.74 ± 0.12 a
B28.45 ± 1.06 a25.46 ± 0.86 b917.82 ± 0.77 a4097.87 ± 3.66 b1442.08 ± 3.27 a23.42 ± 0.78 b4.86 ± 0.69 a39.55 ± 0.43 b
H. undatusA20.85 ± 1.14 a34.12 ± 1.11 a791.71 ± 1.4 b6446.81 ± 3.01 a1013.17 ± 2.4 a21.86 ± 1.35 a3.67 ± 0.21 b4.63 ± 0.22 a
B21.78 ± 2.02 a29.76 ± 0.72 b795.43 ± 1.95 a1133.33 ± 1.39 b607.90 ± 1.71 b13.60 ± 0.22 b4.35 ± 0.30 a4.63 ± 0.24 a
L. purpureusA8.62 ± 1.19 b143.35 ± 2.54 b286.93 ± 4.11 b13,351.06 ± 36.77 b3711.58 ± 7.41 a34.96 ± 1.00 a3.94 ± 0.16 a177.86 ± 0.60 a
B19.90 ± 0.90 a194.34 ± 0.33 a501.51 ± 5.88 a4795.04 ± 12.32 a3167.85 ± 7.73 b31.92 ± 0.82 b3.85 ± 0.29 a172.33 ± 2.07 b
M. argenteaA44.29 ± 0.81 a10.89 ± 0.76 a1.64 ± 1.01 b8414.18 ± 11.83 b1648.99 ± 9.94 a30.56 ± 0.41 a3.56 ± 0.38 a
B39.63 ± 0.72 b9.10 ± 1.37 b13.56 ± 1.42 a9006.38 ± 67.71 a1113.65 ± 18.24 b25.50 ± 0.26 b3.81 ± 0.43 a
M. citrifoliaA61.87 ± 0.51 b9.44 ± 1.10 b54.74 ± 2.82 a7770.92 ± 66.5 b947.73 ± 22.98 b3.98 ± 0.14 a4.23 ± 0.1 a2.96 ± 0.46 a
B64.54 ± 0.19 a11.23 ± 1.10 a9.22 ± 0.53 b10,114.18 ± 47.65 a1197.30 ± 7.38 a3.98 ± 0.34 a3.90 ± 0.15 b2.77 ± 0.12 a
O. pinnataA14.47 ± 1.43 b32.86 ± 0.38 b157.98 ± 2.10 a3577.30 ± 0.29 b2836.88 ± 0.08 a52.21 ± 0.35 a4.77 ± 1.31 a34.06 ± 1.38 a
D21.90 ± 1.26 a60.57 ± 0.54 a80.27 ± 0.10 b4129.79 ± 0.09 a2127.66 ± 0.14 b52.54 ± 1.24 a4.62 ± 0.78 a18.53 ± 0.37 b
P. edulisA31.12 ± 1.24 a12.87 ± 1.17 a316.18 ± 1.63 a8925.53 ± 5.13 a1891.25 ± 5.22 b5.32 ± 0.23 a1.85 ± 0.04 a7.56 ± 0.54 a
B34.02 ± 0.46 b12.67 ± 1.36 a255.01 ± 1.32 b6415.60 ± 4.62 b1950.35 ± 0.00 a5.81 ± 0.73 a1.97 ± 0.25 a7.90 ± 0.9 a
P. ginsengA39.94 ± 0.38 b7.74 ± 0.01 a106.78 ± 0.58 b9951.06 ± 0.36 b2780.75 ± 1.00 b40.29 ± 0.53 a6.39 ± 1.08 a3.49 ± 0.54 a
B46.66 ± 0.24 a6.47 ± 0.45 b291.75 ± 0.29 a10524.11 ± 0.72 a2824.12 ± 1.54 a35.53 ± 0.24 b7.18 ± 0.61 a3.53 ± 0.48 a
P. granatumA49.40 ± 0.86 a39.50 ± 1.26 b266.04 ± 1.10 a10041.84 ± 9.64 a1058.75 ± 6.19 b39.87 ± 1.07 a2.64 ± 0.1 a4.02 ± 1.24 b
C35.00 ± 2.63 b42.69 ± 0.32 a90.60 ± 1.81 b6217.73 ± 0.86 b1692.78 ± 5.55 a38.77 ± 1.34 a2.42 ± 0.27 a5.83 ± 0.27 a
P. indiusA5.59 ± 0.60 a26.93 ± 0.40 a84 ± 0.41 b8622.70 ± 0.27 a3803.76 ± 2.51 b47.81 ± 0.20 a6.02 ± 0.16 a107.73 ± 0.25 b
D6.17 ± 0.39 a22.1 ± 0.13 b135.15 ± 0.43 a7557.45 ± 0.28 b3819.69 ± 2.55 a46.22 ± 0.82 b5.36 ± 0.23 b141.28 ± 0.14 a
P. perfoliatumA49.77 ± 1.16 a7.72 ± 0.87 b375.53 ± 3.86 b303.55 ± 3.9 b1418.44 ± 1.51 b10.85 ± 0.73 a1.45 ± 0.04 a8.30 ± 1.07 b
C42.24 ± 0.55 b11.30 ± 0.44 a634.97 ± 4.83 a1987.23 ± 2.11 a2765.96 ± 2.90 a5.73 ± 0.66 b1.30 ± 0.11 b9.82 ± 1.38 a
P. pinnataA19.5 ± 0.03 b34.28 ± 1.95 a86.61 ± 0.10 b2529.36 ± 12.12 a2576.35 ± 14.77 b27.62 ± 1.94 b264.63 ± 3.09 a37.01 ± 0.63 a
B34.88 ± 0.00 a35.14 ± 2.35 a125.09 ± 0.82 a2293.33 ± 22.07 b2991.27 ± 10.18 a32.20 ± 1.94 a255.41 ± 3.46 b33.53 ± 1.44 b
P. polyphyllaA6.73 ± 1.65 b9.65 ± 0.35 a100.22 ± 0.65 b16023.40 ± 2.45 a2023.31 ± 3.70 a7.35 ± 0.49 b4.09 ± 0.54 a25.88 ± 0.58 a
B40.67 ± 0.13 a5.41 ± 0.27 b103.76 ± 0.53 a13856.03 ± 4.99 b1142.53 ± 2.69 b8.34 ± 0.08 a3.35 ± 0.54 b14.86 ± 1.23 b
P. pseudoginsengA2.73 ± 0.26 b4.66 ± 0.6 b774.20 ± 18.15 a68,913.48 ± 396.26 a765.35 ± 17.62 a22.68 ± 0.64 a6.79 ± 0.23 b13.54 ± 0.23 b
C5.96 ± 0.28 a6.49 ± 1.15 a605.54 ± 33.72 b60,415.60 ± 390.11 b510.23 ± 23.15 b20.14 ± 0.22 b7.04 ± 0.52 a39.99 ± 0.54 a
P. vulgarisA41.80 ± 0.45 b237.54 ± 1.13 a340.92 ± 1.52 a5268.09 ± 8.10 a2193.33 ± 6.17 b15.06 ± 0.97 b4.52 ± 0.07 a47.90 ± 0.53 a
B45.56 ± 0.90 a177.71 ± 0.47 b249.60 ± 0.96 b5142.55 ± 3.01 b2324.67 ± 7.26 a21.27 ± 0.45 a4.65 ± 0.19 a29.02 ± 0.16 b
R. communisA46.3 ± 0.02 b2.83 ± 0.65 a541.62 ± 1.22 b5712.77 ± 12.16 b679.21 ± 0.84 b9.67 ± 0.52 a4.66 ± 0.00 b78.47 ± 1.17 a
B49.03 ± 0.01 a1.93 ± 0.57 b610.20 ± 0.76 a9577.30 ± 14.77 a830.85 ± 0.62 a8.94 ± 0.17 b5.09 ± 0.00 a76.59 ± 1.18 b
S. albumA15.17 ± 1.37 b2.10 ± 0.54 a122.56 ± 1.31 b819.86 ± 1.98 b2868.64 ± 20.13 a51.16 ± 2.46 b1.70 ± 0.23 a51.76 ± 2.6 a
B17.49 ± 1.85 a2.70 ± 0.65 a181.69 ± 2.29 a1013.48 ± 8.54 a2709.85 ± 8.46 b56.40 ± 0.81 a1.84 ± 0.11 a50.81 ± 2.46 a
S. dulcificumA 5.19 ± 0.53 b2.20 ± 0.20 b1302.29 ± 5.80 b1919.86 ± 12.19 a53.11 ± 2.91 a 4.15 ± 0.07 a
D 7.38 ± 0.39 a31.72 ± 1.79 a1445.26 ± 37.26 a1871.99 ± 15.94 b48.71 ± 1.78 b 0.91 ± 0.03 b
S. flavescensA4.08 ± 1.71 a57.05 ± 0.66 b495.26 ± 1.43 a10,315.60 ± 27.49 b2771.21 ± 3.52 a9.66 ± 0.20 b5.45 ± 0.17 a33.30 ± 0.80 a
B3.5 ± 0.84 a64.43 ± 1.95 a259.84 ± 1.23 b8539.72 ± 22.34 a2758.08 ± 2.72 b15.43 ± 1.42 a5.54 ± 0.12 a24.12 ± 1.31 b
S. hispanicaA25.99 ± 1.87 a17.86 ± 1.07 b567.91 ± 2.43 a5509.93 ± 15.68 b530.39 ± 0.62 b22.35 ± 0.66 a4.04 ± 0.29 a4.44 ± 0.6 a
C25.9 ± 1.45 a26.92 ± 1.06 a195.26 ± 2.70 b10441.13 ± 7.13 a1396.09 ± 6.01 a24.09 ± 1.83 a3.63 ± 0.14 b3.37 ± 0.16 b
S. lanceolataA17.42 ± 0.05 b12.07 ± 0.43 b200.04 ± 0.69 b2064.68 ± 22.44 a2706.61 ± 8.36 a50.14 ± 0.49 b246.39 ± 2.73 a47.16 ± 0.89 a
B72.42 ± 0.39 a13.57 ± 0.22 a254.48 ± 0.94 a2033.05 ± 25.73 b2687.32 ± 40.72 a51.90 ± 0.38 a182.99 ± 2.68 b47.90 ± 0.70 a
S. lychnophoraA14.47 ± 0.01 b6.33 ± 1.12 a953.81 ± 22.79 a1514.89 ± 35.51 b861.03 ± 8.84 b13.33 ± 0.79 a3.96 ± 0.00 b34.06 ± 1.38 a
B21.90 ± 0.06 a5.95 ± 0.47 a952.97 ± 12.16 a7319.15 ± 25.59 a1314.21 ± 22.41 a10.05 ± 1.47 b4.39 ± 0.00 a18.53 ± 0.37 b
S. maritimaA65.40 ± 1.58 b29.23 ± 0.94 b1077.08 ± 3.74 a436.17 ± 3.91 b726.59 ± 4.27 b33.66 ± 0.30 a4.29 ± 0.21 a
B70.42 ± 1.09 a32.77 ± 0.59 a305.19 ± 0.61 b493.62 ± 6.77 a1023.55 ± 4.07 a25.20 ± 0.25 b3.85 ± 0.12 b
S. nux-vomicaA25.06 ± 4.96 b3.94 ± 1.39 a1125.31 ± 36.51 a1312.06 ± 16.51 b1459.26 ± 30.3 a16.62 ± 0.14 b4.16 ± 0.25 a18.03 ± 1.75 a
B31.34 ± 4.01 a2.19 ± 0.96 b773.80 ± 24.17 b1917.73 ± 56.52 a887.80 ± 14.47 b19.16 ± 0.35 a4.99 ± 1.4 a2.31 ± 0.19 b
S. sericeaA80.6 ± 0.48 b10.17 ± 0.71 a649.42 ± 3.82 a8649.65 ± 32.33 b145.32 ± 1.93 b5.69 ± 0.48 b3.11 ± 0.12 a4.76 ± 0.38 a
B82.90 ± 0.72 a10.58 ± 0.56 a67.73 ± 2.4 b8731.91 ± 16.57 a852.96 ± 3.56 a11.14 ± 0.72 a2.94 ± 0.09 b3.87 ± 0.34 b
T. candidaA2.67 ± 0.58 a1.61 ± 0.51 b1057.23 ± 31.06 a41,707.80 ± 324.87 a2714.42 ± 52.45 a38.67 ± 1.76 a7.76 ± 0.84 a74.00 ± 2.12 a
B2.95 ± 0.46 a5.97 ± 2.22 a883.20 ± 30.22 b41,831.91 ± 326.50 a2296.04 ± 54.62 b40.06 ± 0.45 a7.29 ± 0.23 a56.70 ± 0.32 b
T. scabraA33.74 ± 2.18 b3.39 ± 1.13 a109.75 ± 2.53 a909.22 ± 23.71 b3054.94 ± 16.77 a24.60 ± 0.14 b2.99 ± 0.19 a10.73 ± 1.44 a
B40.77 ± 0.15 a2.16 ± 0.15 b13.70 ± 0.11 b2126.95 ± 14.96 a2127.66 ± 4.53 b27.06 ± 0.23 a3.11 ± 0.12 a8.68 ± 1.45 b
V. marinaA 60.65 ± 1.05 a40.43 ± 0.03 b9053.48 ± 33.97 b2198.74 ± 22.23 b47.89 ± 2.25 b4.06 ± 0.44 a
B 14.69 ± 0.46 b904.96 ± 0.59 a13,332.62 ± 32.52 a2682.08 ± 9.07 a246.34 ± 1.92 a3.69 ± 0.15 a
V.viniferaA37.03 ± 2.47 b8.40 ± 0.34 a196.01 ± 2.01 b882.27 ± 0.66 b1418.44 ± 1.68 a7.90 ± 1.01 b2.11 ± 0.23 a26.57 ± 0.36 a
B45.68 ± 2.06 a7.50 ± 1.09 a208.73 ± 1.87 a1898.58 ± 1.18 a405.27 ± 0.38 b9.27 ± 1.19 a2.15 ± 0.07 a26.26 ± 0.02 a
Z.maysA25.03 ± 0.48 b19.77 ± 0.58 b444.02 ± 1.66 a2431.91 ± 9.13 b2600.47 ± 6.38 a14.72 ± 1.27 a3.91 ± 0.22 a54.99 ± 0.26 b
B35.28 ± 0.67 a24.01 ± 1.85 a316.35 ± 1.55 b4076.6 ± 2.97 a2198.58 ± 6.52 b11.26 ± 1.79 b3.63 ± 0.22 b67.77 ± 0.99 a
Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in the same physiological and biochemical index of seeds (p < 0.05). REC: relative conductivity; MDA: malondialdehyde; CAT: catalase; POD: peroxidase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; α-AA: α-amylase; PRO: soluble protein; TTCH: Dehydrogenase; A: control group; B: direct freezing; C: stepwise freezing; D: vitrification.
Figure A1. Microstructural observation results of seeds before and after freezing. Note: 1 Cross-section view of control seeds, 2 Cross-section view of frozen seeds, 3 Control seed embryo cells, 4 Frozen seed embryo cells, 5 Control seed endosperm cells, 6 Frozen seed endosperm cells.
Figure A1. Microstructural observation results of seeds before and after freezing. Note: 1 Cross-section view of control seeds, 2 Cross-section view of frozen seeds, 3 Control seed embryo cells, 4 Frozen seed embryo cells, 5 Control seed endosperm cells, 6 Frozen seed endosperm cells.
Plants 13 02577 g0a1

References

  1. Pan, S.-Y.; Litscher, G.; Gao, S.-H.; Yu, Z.-L.; Chen, H.-Q.; Zhang, S.-F.; Tang, M.-K.; Sun, J.-N.; Ko, K.-M. Historical Perspective of Traditional Indigenous Medical Practices: The Current Renaissance and Conservation of Herbal Resources. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. El Merzougui, S.; Benelli, C.; El Boullani, R.; Serghini, M.A. The Cryopreservation of Medicinal and Ornamental Geophytes: Application and Challenges. Plants 2023, 12, 2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; Khan, A. Medicinal plant resources: Manifestation and prospects of life sustaining healthcare system. Cont. J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 4, 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kramer, A.T.; Havens, K. Plant conservation genetics in a changing world. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jump, A.S.; Peńuelas, J.; Rico, L.; Ramallo, E.; Estiarte, M.; Martínez-Izquierdo, J.A.; Lloret, F. Simulated climate change provokes rapid genetic change in the Mediterranean shrub Fumana thymifolia. Glob. Change Biol. 2008, 14, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. FAO. Genebank Standards for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; Food and Agricultural Organization: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fu, J.R.; Song, S.Q. Recalcitrant Seed Physiology; China Science and Culture Press: Beijing, China, 2004. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Pence, V.C.; Ballesteros, D.; Walters, C.; Reed, B.M.; Philpott, M.; Dixon, K.W.; Pritchard, H.W.; Culley, T.M.; Vanhove, A.-C. Cryobiotechnologies: Tools for expanding long-term ex situ conservation to all plant species. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 250, 108736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Walters, C.; Berjak, P.; Pammenter, N.; Kennedy, K.; Raven, P. Preservation of recalcitrant seeds. Science 2013, 339, 915–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Normah, M.N.; Sulong, N.; Reed, B.M. Cryopreservation of shoot tips of recalcitrant and tropical species: Advances and strategies. Cryobiology 2019, 87, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kulus, D.; Zalewska, M. Cryopreservation as a tool used in long-term storage of ornamental species—A review. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 168, 88–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Benson, E.E. Cryopreservation of phytodiversity: A critical appraisal of theory practice. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2008, 27, 141–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Salomao, A.N. Tropical seed species’ responses to liquid nitrogen exposure. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2002, 14, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Byron, Z.; Inaudis, C.; Florent, E.; Domenico, C.; Riccardo, A.; Scarano, M.T.; Ermis, Y.; Marcos, M.M.; Lorenzo, J.C. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of plants regenerated from non-cryopreserved and cryopreserved wild Solanum lycopersicum Mill. seeds. CryoLetters 2014, 35, 216–225. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wen, B.; Wang, R.L.; Cheng, H.Y.; Song, S.Q. Cytological and physiological changes in orthodox maize embryos during cryopreservation. Protoplasma 2010, 239, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ferrari, E.A.P.; Colombo, R.C.; de Faria, R.T.; Takane, R.J. Cryopreservation of seeds of Encholirium spectabile Martius ex Schultes f. by the vitrification method. Rev. Ciênc. Agron. 2016, 47, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Niino, T.; Arizaga, M.V. Cryopreservation for preservation of potato genetic resources. Breed. Sci. 2015, 65, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Civatti, L.; Marchi, M.; Bellintani, M. Cryopreservation of cacti seeds of three ornamental species endemic to the state of Bahia, Brazil. Seed Sci. Technol. 2015, 43, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Watanawikkit, P.; Tantiwiwat, S.; Bunn, E.; Dixon, K.W.; Chayanarit, K. Cryopreservation of in vitro-propagated protocorms of Caladenia for terrestrial orchid conservation in Western Australia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 170, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Galdiano, R.F.; Lemos, E.G.d.M.; Vendrame, W.A. Cryopreservation, early seedling development, and genetic stability of Oncidium flexuosum Sims. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2013, 114, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Galdiano, R.F.; Lemos, E.G.d.M.; de Faria, R.T.; Vendrame, W.A. Seedling Development and Evaluation of Genetic Stability of Cryopreserved Dendrobium Hybrid Mature Seeds. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2004, 172, 2521–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Michalak, M.; Plitta-Michalak, B.P.; Chmielarz, P. A new insight in desiccation tolerance and cryopreservation of mazzard cherry (Prunus avium L.) seeds. Open Life Sci. 2015, 10, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Suszka, J.; Plitta, B.P.; Michalak, M.; Bujarska-Borkowska, B.; Tylkowski, T.; Chmielarz, P. Optimal seed water content and storage temperature for preservation of Populus nigra L. germplasm. Ann. For. Sci. 2014, 71, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Michalak, M.; Plitta-Michalak, B.; Chmielarz, P. Desiccation tolerance and cryopreservation of wild apple (Malus sylvestris) seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 2015, 43, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. San José, M.C.; Corredoira, E.; Oliveira, H.; Santos, C. Cryopreservation of somatic embryos of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. and confirmation of ploidy stability by flow cytometry. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 123, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kholina, A.B.; Voronkova, N.M. Seed Cryopreservation of Some Medicinal Legumes. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, Z.; Jun, H.M.; Kui, C.; He, W.J. Cryopreservation study on seeds and embryos in Dalbergia odorifera. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2014, 39, 2263–2266. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lin, Z.; Yi, W.; Jun, H.M.; Kun, G.Y.; Li, W.D. Physiological and biochemical characteristics of Alpinia oxyphylla seeds after cryopreservation. Guihaia 2018, 38, 529–535. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yi, W.; Kun, G.Y.; Li, F.; Lin, Z. Myristica fragrans Seeds: Cryopreservation Technology and Physiological and Biochemical Activity. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2019, 35, 78–82. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lin, Z.; Jun, H.M.; Yi, W.; Kun, G.Y.; Tao, L.R. Cryopreservation of 6 Kinds of Medicinal Herbs Seeds. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 2017, 38, 1149–1154. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ren, R.; Li, Z.; Li, B.; Xu, J.; Jiang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, K. Changes of pollen viability of ornamental plants after long-term preservation in a cryopreservation pollen bank. Cryobiology 2019, 89, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chmielarz, P. Cryopreservation of orthodox seeds of Alnus glutinosa. CryoLetters 2010, 31, 139–146. [Google Scholar]
  33. Malik, S.K.; Chaudhury, R.; Pritchard, H.W. Long-term, large scale banking of Citrus species embryos: Comparisons between cryopreservation and other seed banking temperatures. CryoLetters 2012, 33, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Engelmann, F. Plant cryopreservation: Progress and prospects. Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2004, 40, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Uchendu, E.E.; Brown, D.W.; Saxena, P.K. Cryopreservation of shoot tips and cotyledons of the North American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.). CryoLetters 2011, 32, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Silva, L.C.; Paiva, R.; Swennen, R.; Andrè, E.; Panis, B. Cryopreservation of Byrsonima intermedia embryos followed by room temperature thawing. Acta Sci. Agron. 2014, 36, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, X.L.; Zhang, J.M.; Xin, X.; Huang, B.; Lu, X.X. Progress on Cryopreservation State and Research of Plant Germplasm Resources. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2013, 14, 414–427. [Google Scholar]
  38. Popova, E.V.; Kim, D.H.; Han, S.H.; Pritchard, H.W.; Lee, J.C. Narrowing of the critical hydration window for cryopreservation of Salix caprea seeds following ageing and a reduction vigour. CryoLetters 2012, 33, 219–230. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, X.N.; Huang, N.; Qin, Z.H.; Yao, R.L.; Yang, H.; Liu, H.L. Cryopreservation of sterile Pinus massoniana seeds. Guihaia 2020, 40, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, Y.H.; Fu, Y.Q.; Liu, Y. Cryopreservation seeds of Albizzia julibrissin and Picea wilsonii. Seed 2013, 32, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Fang, B. Cryopreservation of seeds of ornamental plant. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2001, 23, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  42. Song, C.M.; Wen, X.P.; Li, Q.H. Cryopreservation of seed of Prunus pseudocerasu L. Hongshui by vitrification. Seed 2019, 38, 156–158. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pukacka, S.; Ratajczak, E. Factors influencing the storability of Fagus sylvatica L. seeds after release from dormancy. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 72, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rayalu, M.B.; Siddulu, N.; Raju, K.G. Exploring the genetic diversity of medicinal plants: Conservation and biotechnological approaches. J. Med. Plants Stud. 2024, 12, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ahad, B.; Shahri, W.; Rasool, H.; Reshi, Z.A.; Rasool, S.; Hussain, T. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. Springer Link: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  46. Benelli, C. Plant Cryopreservation: A Look at the Present and the Future. Plants 2021, 10, 2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nits, O.S.; Sementsova, M.V.; Osipova, E.S.; Tereshonok, D.V.; Gladkov, E.A. IPPRAS Cryobank for the conservation of orthodox seeds of rare, endangered, medicinal, and ornamental plant species-current research. Plants 2024, 13, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hong, T.D.; Ellis, R.H. A protocol to determine seed storage behaviour. In Issue 1 of IPGRI Technical Bulletin; Bioversity International: Rome, Italy, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  49. International Seed Testing Association. International Rules for Seed Testing: Chapter9-15; ISTA: Wallisellen, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kui, W.X.; Liang, H.J. Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological and Biochemical Experiments; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhen, Z.S.; Fei, X.P.; Jiang, W.J. Crop Seed Physiology Experiment; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ru, Z.H. Principles and Methods of Biochemical Testing; Ningxia People’s Publishing House: Yinchuan, China, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  53. Yuan, J.; Wang, X.; Zhou, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yu, S.; Wang, M.; Hao, M.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, L.; et al. Comparison of Sample Preparation Techniques for Inspection of Leaf Epidermises Using Light Microscopy and Scanning Electronic Microscopy. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Data analysis chart of seed storage characteristics results. Note: (A,B) show the distribution of plant families for testing seed storage properties. (A) shows at least two plants in a family, and (B) shows a single plant. (C) shows the proportion of storage characteristics of various types of seeds.
Figure 1. Data analysis chart of seed storage characteristics results. Note: (A,B) show the distribution of plant families for testing seed storage properties. (A) shows at least two plants in a family, and (B) shows a single plant. (C) shows the proportion of storage characteristics of various types of seeds.
Plants 13 02577 g001
Figure 2. Analysis chart of seed cryopreservation results. Note: (A) shows the distribution of suitable freezing methods for various types of seeds that have been successfully frozen. (B) shows the distribution of seed moisture content ranges for successful freezing of various types of seeds.
Figure 2. Analysis chart of seed cryopreservation results. Note: (A) shows the distribution of suitable freezing methods for various types of seeds that have been successfully frozen. (B) shows the distribution of seed moisture content ranges for successful freezing of various types of seeds.
Plants 13 02577 g002
Figure 3. Analysis chart of changes in physiological and biochemical indicators of seeds before and after cryopreservation. Note: REC: relative conductivity; MDA: malondialdehyde; CAT: catalase; POD: peroxidase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; α-AA: α-amylase; PRO: soluble protein; TTCH: dehydrogenase.
Figure 3. Analysis chart of changes in physiological and biochemical indicators of seeds before and after cryopreservation. Note: REC: relative conductivity; MDA: malondialdehyde; CAT: catalase; POD: peroxidase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; α-AA: α-amylase; PRO: soluble protein; TTCH: dehydrogenase.
Plants 13 02577 g003
Figure 4. Examples of microstructural observation results of seeds before and after freezing. Note: (a) cross-section view of control seeds, (b) cross-section view of frozen seeds ((b-1): lackluster appearance, (b-3): browning and (b-2): dehydrated), (c) control seed embryo cells, (d) frozen seed embryo cells ((d-1): plasmolysis, (d-2): irregular arrangement and (d-3): loose organelles), (e) control seed endosperm cells, (f) frozen seed endosperm cells ((f-2): changes in content, (f-1): increase or (f-3): decrease in the number of starch granules).
Figure 4. Examples of microstructural observation results of seeds before and after freezing. Note: (a) cross-section view of control seeds, (b) cross-section view of frozen seeds ((b-1): lackluster appearance, (b-3): browning and (b-2): dehydrated), (c) control seed embryo cells, (d) frozen seed embryo cells ((d-1): plasmolysis, (d-2): irregular arrangement and (d-3): loose organelles), (e) control seed endosperm cells, (f) frozen seed endosperm cells ((f-2): changes in content, (f-1): increase or (f-3): decrease in the number of starch granules).
Plants 13 02577 g004
Figure 5. The steps for the determination of seed storage characteristics.
Figure 5. The steps for the determination of seed storage characteristics.
Plants 13 02577 g005
Table 1. Seed germination results after cryopreservation.
Table 1. Seed germination results after cryopreservation.
SpeciesMoisture ContentFreezing MethodsViabilityGermination after Freezing
ControlFreezing
A. catechu35.24%direct freezing96.97%96.97%20%
A. esculentus19.78%direct freezing100%100%33.33%
A. heterophyllus46.53%stepwise freezing98.57%76.19%0
A. sinensis10.12%direct freezing88.33%89%98.33%
C. annuum30%vitrification80%80%80%
C. argentea6.59%stepwise freezing40%70%40%
C. chinensis37.69%stepwise freezing75%47.78%0
C. halicacabum21.35%vitrification94.44%70%0
C. junos24.35%direct freezing91.67%98.33%11.34%
C. lacryma-jobi9.86%direct freezing85%83.33%10%
C. lansium43%direct freezing100%86.67%0
C. maritima9.32%direct freezing89.28%95.24%22.33%
C. maxima7.03%stepwise freezing64.58%68.12%8.98%
C. moschata6.02%direct freezing100%95%86.67%
C. papaya16.94%direct freezing95%95%32%
C. pulcherrima18.92%stepwise freezing80%76.67%90%
C. reticulata23.65%stepwise freezing90%90%20%
C. tinctorius8.40%direct freezing95%95%95.56%
D. calycinum17%vitrification70%50%0
D. indica24.69%stepwise freezing45%38.33%0
D. longan14.42%stepwise freezing90%80%0
F. indica17.03%direct freezing99.17%99.17%26.67%
F. indica Merr5.21%direct freezing95%95%50%
G. biloba19.77%direct freezing96.67%98.33%16.67%
H. campechianum11.66%vitrification80%84.17%95.55%
H. undatus10.49%direct freezing66.67%71%68.67%
L. inermis27.27%vitrification76.67%73.33%60%
M. argentea9.27%direct freezing65%61.67%9%
M. citrifolia10.94%direct freezing75%63.33%0
P. edulis10.25%direct freezing93.33%80%6.67%
P. ginseng21.37%direct freezing95%81.67%6.67%
P. granatum10.32%stepwise freezing78.33%85%10%
P. indius8.61%vitrification84.31%82.22%66.67%
P. nigrum21.77%direct freezing70%24%0
P. perfoliatum15.06%stepwise freezing90%92%8.57%
P. polyphylla51.99%direct freezing90%90%2%
P. praeruptorum5.64%vitrification87.78%93.33%94.44%
P. pseudoginseng38.31%stepwise freezing100%63.33%0
P. vulgaris8.72%direct freezing100%100%75%
R. communis5.35%direct freezing100%95%90%
S. dulcificum27.83%vitrification100%95.55%13.67%
S. lanceolata13.29%direct freezing100%80%45%
S. lychnophora47.66%direct freezing100%69.05%0
S. maritima31%direct freezing96.67%50%2%
S. nux-vomica31.94%direct freezing92.22%56.87%40%
S. sericea13.19%direct freezing73.33%71.11%1.67%
T. candida14.44%direct freezing100%100%75%
T. indica10.07%direct freezing95.24%80.95%85%
Z. mays10.53%direct freezing100%97.33%97.78%
Z. nitidum12.81%direct freezing85.19%81.48%17.89%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, L.; Sun, Z.; Fu, L.; Gu, Y.; Li, R.; He, M.; Wei, J. Cryopreservation of Medicinal Plant Seeds: Strategies for Genetic Diversity Conservation and Sustainability. Plants 2024, 13, 2577. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182577

AMA Style

Zeng L, Sun Z, Fu L, Gu Y, Li R, He M, Wei J. Cryopreservation of Medicinal Plant Seeds: Strategies for Genetic Diversity Conservation and Sustainability. Plants. 2024; 13(18):2577. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182577

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Lin, Zheng Sun, Li Fu, Yakun Gu, Rongtao Li, Mingjun He, and Jianhe Wei. 2024. "Cryopreservation of Medicinal Plant Seeds: Strategies for Genetic Diversity Conservation and Sustainability" Plants 13, no. 18: 2577. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13182577

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop