applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Energy Science and Technology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2020) | Viewed by 25475

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Earth Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
Interests: reservoir simulation; enhanced oil recovery; shale reservoir; CO2 storage
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The steady growth in demand for oil, together with its fluctuating price, is transforming the energy landscape across the world. To meet the world’s growing demand, the development of cost-effective technologies, which yields the maximum oil recovery, is of main interest in today’s petroleum research. It is therefore important to develop new recovery technologies, aimed at implementing new technologies, understanding accompanying phenomena, and calibrating simulation models, including economical models for an optimal control of the oilfield exploitation. The main objective of this Special Issue is to seek research papers to accelerate the development and application of technologies to enhance oil recovery from both conventional and unconventional reservoirs through a variety of advanced recovery methods.

The topic of interest is the development and testing of technologies to increase ultimate recovery and operational efficiency. Related technologies include but are not limited to the following subjects:

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) associated with injection of chemical, miscible, or thermal fluids;

Technical risks associated with field implementation of EOR;

Reducing uncertainty associated with EOR performance to improve project economics;

Optimized applications of advanced recovery methods in unconventional reservoirs;

Application of data science in advanced oil recovery. 

Prof. Dr. Kun Sang Lee
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Enhanced oil recovery
  • Unconventional reservoir
  • Data science
  • Project economics
  • Uncertainty

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 57241 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing Efficiency Considering the Principal Stress in Brushy Canyon Formation of the Permian Basin
by Hyemin Park, Wonmo Sung and Jihoon Wang
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 1069; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031069 - 25 Jan 2021
Viewed by 1958
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of principal stress direction on the efficiency of hydraulic fracturing treatment. There are two different drilling scenarios: 1. Four horizontal wells drilled in four orthogonal directions regardless of in-situ stress condition (“Actual”). 2. [...] Read more.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of principal stress direction on the efficiency of hydraulic fracturing treatment. There are two different drilling scenarios: 1. Four horizontal wells drilled in four orthogonal directions regardless of in-situ stress condition (“Actual”). 2. Three horizontal wells drilled equivalent to “Actual” case by considering the direction of principal stress (“Proposed”). The hydraulic fracturing modeling was carried out based on well logging data and completion reports of Brushy Canyon formation, Permian Basin. In the results of “Actual” case, transverse fractures were generated in two horizontal wells drilled parallel to σhmin-dir (direction of σhmin), similar to “Proposed” case. Meanwhile, for two other wells drilled perpendicular to σhmin-dir, longitudinal fractures were generated. These obliquely deviated fractures significantly decreased the fracture spacing between the stages up to 26%. This induced great stress shadow, however, the fractures propagated straight due to the large stress anisotropy of 2000 psi (σHmaxhmin = 1.4). Therefore, it was found that due to the different direction of fracture propagation in “Actual” case, “Proposed” case was 14.6% of stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) higher. In conclusion, for successful hydraulic fracturing treatment, the direction of horizontal well must be determined in consideration of the principal stress direction as well as stress anisotropy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 6352 KiB  
Article
Effect of Capillary Number on the Residual Saturation of Colloidal Dispersions Stabilized by a Zwitterionic Surfactant
by Han Am Son and Taewoong Ahn
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 524; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020524 - 7 Jan 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2158
Abstract
We investigated oil recovery from porous rock using nanoscale colloidal dispersions, formed by adsorption of an anionic polymer [poly-(4styrenesulfonic acid-co-maleic acid); PSS-co-MA] and a zwitterionic surfactant [N-tetradecyl-N, N-dimethyl-3-ammonio-1-propanesulfonate, TPS] onto silica nanoparticles. In an emulsion, colloidal [...] Read more.
We investigated oil recovery from porous rock using nanoscale colloidal dispersions, formed by adsorption of an anionic polymer [poly-(4styrenesulfonic acid-co-maleic acid); PSS-co-MA] and a zwitterionic surfactant [N-tetradecyl-N, N-dimethyl-3-ammonio-1-propanesulfonate, TPS] onto silica nanoparticles. In an emulsion, colloidal dispersion enhanced the stability of the oil-water interface in the absence of particle aggregation; the hydrophobic alkyl chains of TPS shifted into the oil drop, not only physiochemically, stabilizing the oil-water interface, but also promoting repulsive particle-to-particle interaction. Core flooding experiments on residual oil saturation as a function of capillary number, at various injection rates and oil viscosities, showed that the residual oil level was reduced by almost half when the zwitterionic surfactant was present in the colloidal dispersion. Consequently, the result revealed that this colloidal dispersion at the interface provides a mechanically robust layer at the oil-water interface without particle aggregation. Thus, the dispersion readily entered the pore throat and adhered to the oil-water interface, lowering the interfacial tension and improving oil recovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 7628 KiB  
Article
Compositional Modeling of Dimethyl Ether–CO2 Mixed Solvent for Enhanced Oil Recovery
by Young Woo Lee, Hye Seung Lee, Moon Sik Jeong, Jinhyung Cho and Kun Sang Lee
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 406; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010406 - 4 Jan 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2854
Abstract
Dimethyl ether (DME) is a compound first introduced by Shell as a chemical solvent for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). This study aims to investigate the efficiency of EOR using the minimum miscible pressure (MMP) and viscous gravity number when a mixed solvent of [...] Read more.
Dimethyl ether (DME) is a compound first introduced by Shell as a chemical solvent for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). This study aims to investigate the efficiency of EOR using the minimum miscible pressure (MMP) and viscous gravity number when a mixed solvent of CO2 and DME is injected. Adding DME to the CO2 water-alternating-gas process reduces the MMP and viscous gravity number. Reduction in MMP results in miscible conditions at lower pressures, which has a favorable effect on oil swelling and viscosity reduction, leading to improved mobility of the oil. In addition, the viscous gravity number decreases, increasing the sweep efficiency by 26.6%. Numerical studies were conducted through a series of multi-phase, multi-component simulations. At a DME content of 25%, the MMP decreased by 30.1% and the viscous gravity number decreased by 66.4% compared with the injection of CO2 only. As a result, the maximum oil recovery rate increased by 31% with simultaneous injection of DME and CO2 compared with only using CO2. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2810 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Carbonyl and Hydroxyl Compounds Addition on CO2 Injection through Hydrocarbon Extraction Processes
by Asep Kurnia Permadi, Egi Adrian Pratama, Andri Luthfi Lukman Hakim, Alfanda Kurnia Widi and Doddy Abdassah
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 159; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010159 - 26 Dec 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4029
Abstract
CO2 miscible flooding occurs when injection pressure is higher than the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) which can exceed the fracture pressure. Co-solvents are expected to reduce the MMP by interacting with various hydrocarbons that depend on the polarity and intermolecular forces of [...] Read more.
CO2 miscible flooding occurs when injection pressure is higher than the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) which can exceed the fracture pressure. Co-solvents are expected to reduce the MMP by interacting with various hydrocarbons that depend on the polarity and intermolecular forces of solvent and oil. However, there are limited studies that have investigated co-solvent performance in CO2 injection through an extraction process based on oil compositional analysis. This paper is aimed at studying the effects of carbonyl and hydroxyl compounds on oil extraction and also the mutual interactions of CO2-oil-carbonyl and -hydroxyl. The experiment is conducted by using VIPS (viscosity, interfacial tension, pressure-volume, and swelling) and gas chromatography (GC) apparatuses. The compositional results from GC are utilized to analyze the performance of co-solvents, which are further classified based on the carbon number and molecular structure of oil. Acetone is a non-associated polar compound which reacts easily with and assists CO2 to extract polar-aromatic heavy and slightly polar components such as alkenes and straight-chain alkanes, due to high polarizability and low cohesive forces. Ethanol is a self-associated polar compound which has the capability of extracting high-boiling fractions and slightly polar-aromatic components. Moreover, both co-solvents also assist CO2 to extract non-polar components because they have non-polar end in the alkyl group. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 9528 KiB  
Article
Effect of Thermal Exposure on Oil Shale Saturation and Reservoir Properties
by Aliya Mukhametdinova, Polina Mikhailova, Elena Kozlova, Tagir Karamov, Anatoly Baluev and Alexey Cheremisin
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(24), 9065; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10249065 - 18 Dec 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2514
Abstract
The experimental and numerical modeling of thermal enhanced oil recovery (EOR) requires a detailed laboratory analysis of core properties influenced by thermal exposure. To acquire the robust knowledge on the change in rock saturation and reservoir properties, the fastest way is to examine [...] Read more.
The experimental and numerical modeling of thermal enhanced oil recovery (EOR) requires a detailed laboratory analysis of core properties influenced by thermal exposure. To acquire the robust knowledge on the change in rock saturation and reservoir properties, the fastest way is to examine the rock samples before and after combustion. In the current paper, we studied the shale rock properties, such as core saturation, porosity, and permeability, organic matter content of the rock caused by the combustion front propagation within the experimental modeling of the high-pressure air injection. The study was conducted on Bazhenov shale formation rock samples. We reported the results on porosity and permeability evolution, which was obtained by the gas pressure-decay technique. The measurements revealed a significant increase of porosity (on average, for 9 abs. % of porosity) and permeability (on average, for 1 mD) of core samples after the combustion tube experiment. The scanning electron microscopy showed the changes induced by thermal exposure: the transformation of organic matter with and the formation of new voids and micro and nanofractures in the mineral matrix. Low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) was chosen as a primary non-disruptive tool for measuring the saturation of core samples in ambient conditions. NMR T1–T2 maps were interpreted to determine the rock fluid categories (bitumen and adsorbed oil, structural and adsorbed water, and mobile oil) before and after the combustion experiment. Changes in the distribution of organic matter within the core sample were examined using 2D Rock-Eval pyrolysis technique. Results demonstrated the relatively uniform distribution of OM inside the core plugs after the combustion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 6706 KiB  
Article
Compositional Modeling to Analyze the Effect of CH4 on Coupled Carbon Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery Process
by Jinhyung Cho, Gayoung Park, Seoyoon Kwon, Kun Sang Lee, Hye Seung Lee and Baehyun Min
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(12), 4272; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124272 - 22 Jun 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2854
Abstract
The present study is aimed at the development of compositional simulation models of the co-injection of CO2 and CH4 during the water-alternating-gas (WAG) process in order to assess the efficiency of carbon capture and storage in combination with enhanced oil recovery [...] Read more.
The present study is aimed at the development of compositional simulation models of the co-injection of CO2 and CH4 during the water-alternating-gas (WAG) process in order to assess the efficiency of carbon capture and storage in combination with enhanced oil recovery (CCS-EOR). The co-injection of CO2 and CH4 occupies more reservoir pore volume and causes higher reservoir pressure than CO2 WAG, thus leading to an enhanced early EOR performance. However, the overall EOR performance of the co-injection method becomes lower than that of CO2 WAG due to the reduced miscibility and sweep efficiency upon further CH4 addition. The decrease in gas displacement and sweep efficiency weaken the hysteresis effects upon the residual trapping mechanism. However, the solubility trapping mechanism takes effect because the co-injection generates higher average reservoir pressure than does the CO2 WAG. The index of global warming potential (GWP) in a mole unit is employed to quantify the carbon storage effects of CO2 and co-injection WAG cases. According to the index, 1 mole of CH4 sequestration has the same effects as that of 10 moles of CO2 for global warming mitigation. In conclusion, the carbon storage effects are enhanced as CH4 concentration in the WAG increases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 10173 KiB  
Article
An Elongational and Shear Evaluation of Polymer Viscoelasticity during Flow in Porous Media
by Muhammad Tahir, Rafael E. Hincapie and Leonhard Ganzer
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(12), 4152; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124152 - 17 Jun 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2371
Abstract
This paper uses a combination of approaches to evaluate the viscoelastic phenomenon in high-molecular-weight polymers (24–28 M Daltons) used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications. Rheological data were cross-analyzed with single- and two-phase polymer flooding experiments in outcrop cores and micromodels, respectively. First, [...] Read more.
This paper uses a combination of approaches to evaluate the viscoelastic phenomenon in high-molecular-weight polymers (24–28 M Daltons) used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications. Rheological data were cross-analyzed with single- and two-phase polymer flooding experiments in outcrop cores and micromodels, respectively. First, the impact of semi-harsh conditions (salinity, hardness, and temperature) was evaluated. Second, the impact of polymer degradation (sand face flow), focusing on the viscoelastic properties, was investigated. Finally, polymer viscoelastic properties were characterized, proposing a threefold rheological approach of rotational, oscillatory, and elongational behavior. Data from the rheological approaches were cross-analyzed with core flooding experiments and performed at a room temperature of 22 °C and at a higher temperature of 55 °C. The change in polymer viscoelastic properties were analyzed by investigating the effluents from core flooding experiments. Oil recovery experiments in micromodel helped our understanding of whether salinity or hardness has a dominating impact on in situ viscoelastic polymer response. These approaches were used to study the impact of mechanical degradation on polymer viscoelasticity. The brines showed notable loss in polymer viscoelastic properties, specifically with the hard brine and at higher temperature. However, the same polymer solution diluted in deionized water exhibited stronger viscoelastic properties. Multiple flow-behaviors, such as Newtonian, shear thinning, and thickening dominated flow, were confirmed through pressure drop analysis against interstitial velocity as already reported by other peer researchers. Turbulence-dominated excessive pressure drop in porous media was calculated by comparing core flood pressure drop data against pressure data in extensional viscometer–rheometer on a chip (eVROC®). In addition, a significant reduction in elastic-dominated flow was confirmed through the mechanical degradation that happened during core flood experiments, using various approaches. Finally, reservoir harsh conditions (high temperature, hardness, and salinity) resulted in a significant reduction in polymer viscoelastic behavior for all approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2430 KiB  
Article
Nonionic Surfactant to Enhance the Performances of Alkaline–Surfactant–Polymer Flooding with a Low Salinity Constraint
by Shabrina Sri Riswati, Wisup Bae, Changhyup Park, Asep K. Permadi and Adi Novriansyah
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(11), 3752; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113752 - 28 May 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3255
Abstract
This paper presents a nonionic surfactant in the anionic surfactant pair (ternary mixture) that influences the hydrophobicity of the alkaline–surfactant–polymer (ASP) slug within low-salinity formation water, an environment that constrains optimal designs of the salinity gradient and phase types. The hydrophobicity effectively reduced [...] Read more.
This paper presents a nonionic surfactant in the anionic surfactant pair (ternary mixture) that influences the hydrophobicity of the alkaline–surfactant–polymer (ASP) slug within low-salinity formation water, an environment that constrains optimal designs of the salinity gradient and phase types. The hydrophobicity effectively reduced the optimum salinity, but achieving as much by mixing various surfactants has been challenging. We conducted a phase behavior test and a coreflooding test, and the results prove the effectiveness of the nonionic surfactant in enlarging the chemical applicability by making ASP flooding more hydrophobic. The proposed ASP mixture consisted of 0.2 wt% sodium carbonate, 0.25 wt% anionic surfactant pair, and 0.2 wt% nonionic surfactant, and 0.15 wt% hydrolyzed polyacrylamide. The nonionic surfactant decreased the optimum salinity to 1.1 wt% NaCl compared to the 1.7 wt% NaCl of the reference case with heavy alcohol present instead of the nonionic surfactant. The coreflooding test confirmed the field applicability of the nonionic surfactant by recovering more oil, with the proposed scheme producing up to 74% of residual oil after extensive waterflooding compared to 51% of cumulative oil recovery with the reference case. The nonionic surfactant led to a Winsor type III microemulsion with a 0.85 pore volume while the reference case had a 0.50 pore volume. The nonionic surfactant made ASP flooding more hydrophobic, maintained a separate phase of the surfactant between the oil and aqueous phases to achieve ultra-low interfacial tension, and recovered the oil effectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 10550 KiB  
Article
Flow Dynamics of Sulfate-Modified Water/Polymer Flooding in Micromodels with Modified Wettability
by Muhammad Tahir, Rafael E. Hincapie, Calvin L. Gaol, Stefanie Säfken and Leonhard Ganzer
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(9), 3239; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093239 - 7 May 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2657
Abstract
This work describes the flow behavior of the oil recovery obtained by the injection of sulfate-modified/low-salinity water in micromodels with different wettabilities. It provides a detailed microscopic visualization of the displacement taking place during modified water flooding at a pore-scale level, while evaluating [...] Read more.
This work describes the flow behavior of the oil recovery obtained by the injection of sulfate-modified/low-salinity water in micromodels with different wettabilities. It provides a detailed microscopic visualization of the displacement taking place during modified water flooding at a pore-scale level, while evaluating the effect of wettability on oil recovery. A comprehensive workflow for the evaluation is proposed that includes fluid–fluid and rock–fluid interactions. The methods studied comprise flooding experiments with micromodels. Artificial and real structure water-wet micromodels are used to understand flow behavior and oil recovery. Subsequently, water-wet, complex-wet, and oil-wet micromodels help understand wettability and rock–fluid interaction. The effect of the sulfate content present in the brine is a key variable in this work. The results of micromodel experiments conducted in this work indicate that sulfate-modified water flooding performs better in mixed-wet/oil-wet (artificial structure) than in water-wet systems. This slightly differs from observations of core flood experiments, where oil-wet conditions provided better process efficiency. As an overall result, sulfate-modified water flooding recovered more oil than SSW injection in oil-wet and complex-wet systems compared to water-wet systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop