The End of the COVID-19 Pandemic—What Is Currently Known and What Could Have Been Useful Four Years Ago? (2nd Edition)

Background/Objectives: People affected by COVID-19 are exposed to abnormal clotting and endothelial dysfunction, which may trigger thromboembolic events. This study aimed at retrospectively investigating whether oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT), encompassing either direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), mainly apixaban, or the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin, could have impacted medium-term mortality in a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 patients. Methods: Among 1238 COVID-19 patients, hospitalized from 17 March 2020 to 15 June 2021, 247 survivors and 247 deceased within 90 days from hospitalization were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission within three days. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate associations by means of odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A univariate regression analysis suggested that OAT, no differently from subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) during hospitalization, has no significant impact (p value > 0.05) on medium-term mortality. A multivariate analysis, limited to baseline variables (i.e., comorbidities and pharmacotherapies at hospital admission) showing significant association (p < 0.05) to mortality in a univariate analysis, revealed that, compared to patients living at 90 days from hospitalization, deceased patients had cancer histories (OR 1.75, CI 1.06–2.90, p = 0.029) or suffered from asthma (OR 2.25, CI 1.13–4.47, p = 0.021). In contrast, heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), arteriopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and kidney failure (KF), which, in a univariate analysis, were found to be associated with the endpoint (p < 0.05), lost significance in a multivariate analysis. Therapy at admission with aldosterone antagonists also appeared to be associated with medium-term mortality (OR 2.49, CI 1.52–4.08, p < 0.001); whereas, vitamin D supplementation during hospitalization appeared to be beneficial. Although not conclusive, a search into the Eudravigilance database, combined with consulting a digital predictive platform (PLATO, polypharmacology platform prediction), suggested potential off-target activities, which might contribute to increasing the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusions: This retrospective clinical study furnished evidences of the impact of OAT, comorbidities and other pharmacological treatments on COVID-19 clinical course. Full article

Background/Objectives: Respiratory diseases are common and result in high mortality, especially in the elderly, with pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Auscultation of lung sounds using a stethoscope is a crucial method for diagnosis, but it may require specialized training and the involvement of pulmonologists. This study aims to assist medical professionals who are non-pulmonologist doctors in early screening for pneumonia and COPD by developing a smart stethoscope with cloud server-embedded machine learning to diagnose lung sounds. Methods: The smart stethoscope was developed using a Micro-Electro-Mechanical system (MEMS) microphone to record lung sounds in the mobile application and then send them wirelessly to a cloud server for real-time machine learning classification. Results: The model of the smart stethoscope classifies lung sounds into four categories: normal, pneumonia, COPD, and other respiratory diseases. It achieved an accuracy of 89%, a sensitivity of 89.75%, and a specificity of 95%. In addition, testing with healthy volunteers yielded an accuracy of 80% in distinguishing normal and diseased lungs. Moreover, the performance comparison between the smart stethoscope and two commercial auscultation stethoscopes showed comparable sound quality and loudness results. Conclusions: The smart stethoscope holds great promise for improving healthcare delivery in the post-COVID-19 era, offering the probability of the most likely respiratory conditions for early diagnosis of pneumonia, COPD, and other respiratory diseases. Its user-friendly design and machine learning capabilities provide a valuable resource for non-pulmonologist doctors by delivering timely, evidence-based diagnoses, aiding treatment decisions, and paving the way for more accessible respiratory care. Full article

Background/Objectives: The rapid viral spread observed in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is capable of inducing the secretion of excessive inflammatory cytokines. The resulting multi-organ damage is a severe complication that can be attenuated through adequate nutrition. Formulae enhanced with either glutamine or arginine are conditionally essential amino acids that have been proven to improve the condition of hospitalized patients. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effects of administering an immune-enhancing enteral formula enhanced with arginine and glutamine on the clinical signs and biomarkers of patients with severe COVID-19. Methods: After checking the data of 232 patients enrolled in the biobank for completeness and eligibility, 31 patients with severe COVID-19 in the intensive care unit at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital were grouped based on the type of enteral formula used: 16 patients received the control formula, and 15 patients received the immune-enhancing formula. Baseline characteristics, clinical signs, and inflammatory markers were analyzed for differences. Results: An increase in IL-10 levels in the intervention group was observed (p = 0.048). Changes in other inflammatory cytokine levels were insignificant. Conclusions: Providing an enteral formula enriched with glutamine and arginine to severe COVID-19 patients may help improve their anti-inflammatory marker levels. Further interventional study utilizing enteral formula enriched with glutamine and arginine is needed to confirm the findings of this study. Full article

Background/Objectives: The impact of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 on the immunity of patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is still not fully known. Further clarification could help address medical concerns related to the use of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory medications, known as disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), in PwMS, as well as ensure adequate protection against severe outcomes of COVID-19. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the humoral and cellular immune response in PwMS treated with DMTs. Methods: The concentrations of IgG Spike (S) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and IgG Nucleocapsid (N) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, as well as interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) titers were analyzed in PwMS groups treated with dimethyl fumarate (DMF), interferon beta (IFN), and healthy control group. Results: Almost 100% of PwMS experienced seroconversion, which resulted from either vaccination and/or prior infection. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the study and control groups in terms of IgG (S) and (N) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels. However, interferon-gamma titers were lower in both PwMS groups, which may indicate adequate humoral and decreased cellular response to the examined PwMS. Additionally, after the division of the whole study group into two subgroups according to the time since the last vaccination, IgG (S) anti-SARS-CoV-2 and IFN-γ concentrations were significantly lower in the case of patients who were immunized more than 200 days before sample collection. No differences were observed in the case of subgroups in which sample collection was less than 200 days after vaccination when compared to the control group. Conclusions: This could indicate a time-related decrease in immunity in PwMS treated with DMTs. Full article

Background: Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) can be regarded as a key factor determining the severity of multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19 in children (MIS-C), and often requires treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) to avoid life-threatening complications. No reputable specific criteria for the diagnosis of MAS in MIS-C patients have yet been identified, and criteria currently used for the diagnosis of hemophagocytic syndromes, such as HLH-2004, MAS-2005, and MAS-2016, are not sufficient for MAS in MIS-C. Our goal in this study was to work out the criteria for the early diagnosis of MAS in MIS-C. Methods: One hundred and sixty-six (166) patients with MIS-C were assessed retrospectively. The two most experienced experts independently identified patients with MAS. The patients were divided into three cohorts: MAS (n = 19), without MAS (n = 78), and probable MAS (n = 67). The latter included patients diagnosed with MAS by only one expert, and it was excluded from the analysis. Results: The age of patients with MAS was much higher, and they more frequently had edematous syndrome, hypotension and/or shock, splenomegaly, and CNS involvement. In their blood tests, thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, and hypertriglyceridemia occurred more often. The level of biomarkers of inflammation, such as ferritin, CRP, troponin, AST, and ALT, was also higher in this group. Increased fibrinogen and D-dimer were also found, demonstrating hypercoagulation in the MAS-MIS-C group. We chose 21 continuous and categorical variables with statistical significance, out of which 2—ferritin > 469 μg/L or platelets < 114 × 10⁹/L—allowed us to discriminate MAS patients. Conclusions: Ferritin > 469 μg/L or platelets < 114 × 10⁹/L can be regarded as key signs to differentiate MAS in MIS-C patients with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 94.9%, and they can be used along with other diagnostic methods. Full article

Background/Objectives: On-site diagnosis of infection in their early stages requires assays with high sensitivities that are compact and easy to operate out of the laboratory and hospital environments. However, current assay technologies fall short of these requirements and require highly skilled technicians to set up, operate, and interpret the results. Methods: To address these challenges, we developed and evaluated a Point-of-Care-Testing (PoCT) immunoassay platform called the D-strip. The D-strip platform combines the capabilities of a digital enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) with a lateral flow assay (LFA). The D-strip sample flow cell is composed of the same components found in conventional LFAs, and its high sensitivity is due to its efficient implementation of ELISA. The fully integrated platform is simple and requires minimal user intervention to operate. Results: The D-strip exhibited a sample-to-result time of 15 min with a limit of detection (LOD) of 1.7 × 10³ copies/mL for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-2-CoV) antigen. The LOD of the D-strip is 488-fold higher than that for conventional LFAs and is comparable to a clinical laboratory test. Conclusions: The D-strip is a compact and highly sensitive immunoassay platform with a strong potential for application as a confirmatory assay outside the clinical laboratory. Full article

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the pentraxin 3 (PTX3) serum level and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism on the severity of radiographic pulmonary infiltrates and the clinical outcomes of COVID-19. Methods: The severity of COVID-19 pulmonary infiltrates was evaluated within a week of admission by analyzing chest X-rays (CXR) using the modified Brixia (MBrixa) scoring system. The insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism of the ACE gene and the serum levels of PTX3 were determined for all patients included in the study. Results: This study included 80 patients. Using a cut-off serum level of PTX3 ≥ 2.765 ng/mL, the ROC analysis (AUC 0.871, 95% CI 0.787–0.954, p < 0.001) showed a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 78.8% in predicting severe MBrixa scores. Compared to ACE I/I polymorphism, D/D polymorphism significantly increased the risk of severe CXR infiltrates, OR 7.7 (95% CI: 1.9–30.1), and p = 0.002. Significant independent predictors of severe CXR infiltrates include hypertension (OR 7.71), PTX3 (OR 1.20), and ACE D/D polymorphism (OR 18.72). Hypertension (OR 6.91), PTX3 (OR 1.47), and ACE I/I polymorphism (OR 0.09) are significant predictors of poor outcomes. Conclusion: PTX3 and ACE D/D polymorphism are significant predictors of the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. PTX3 is a significant predictor of death. Full article

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has imposed several medical and economic challenges since its onset in 2019. This is due to its ability to target the respiratory system as well as other organs, resulting in significant impacts and necessitating organ transplants. Our goal is to compile information from the existing literature to investigate how COVID-19 affects outcomes following organ transplantation. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to target studies reporting post-COVID-19 complications. We included 45 studies reporting data related to solid organ transplants, where either the recipient, organ, or donor was affected by SARS-CoV-2. The majority of the included studies concluded that organ transplantation following COVID-19 infection could be performed safely and with similar outcomes to non-COVID-19 patients, regardless of whether the organ, donor, or recipient was affected by COVID-19. No deviation from standard immunosuppression regimens or surgical protocols was necessary either, further re-assuring the feasibility of these transplants as viable treatment options. This applies to organ transplants involving the lungs, kidneys, liver, or heart. However, there was a limited number of studies in some areas, which warrants the need for additional research in order to reach more concrete conclusions pertaining to COVID-19’s effect on organ transplants. Full article

Introduction: The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its subsequent global pandemic have raised significant concerns regarding its impact on pregnancy outcomes. This review aims to summarize the emerging data on the risk of preterm delivery in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted from March 2020 to December 2023 using PubMed and Web of Science, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies correlating maternal COVID-19 infection with preterm birth were included. Results: Thirteen studies were analyzed, indicating a higher incidence of preterm birth in SARS-CoV-2-positive pregnant women compared to controls. The average incidence rate of preterm birth in infected patients was 18.5%, with a median of 12.75%, while non-infected women showed an average incidence of preterm birth of 10%, with a median of 8.2%. Discussion: Studies suggest an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and increased risk of preterm birth and cesarean section. The severity of symptoms and underlying comorbidities further elevate this risk. Notably, infections during the third trimester pose the highest risk of preterm birth. Conclusion: Preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is crucial to mitigate adverse obstetric outcomes. Close monitoring and tailored interventions for infected pregnant women, particularly those in later trimesters and with comorbidities, are imperative to reduce the risk of preterm birth and improve maternal-fetal outcomes. Full article

Background: During the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic several drugs were used to manage the patients mainly those with a severe phenotype. Potential drugs were used off-label and major concerns arose from their applicability to managing the health crisis highlighting the importance of clinical trials. In this context, we described the mechanisms of the three repurposed drugs [Ivermectin-antiparasitic drug, Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine-antimalarial drugs, and Azithromycin-antimicrobial drug]; and, based on this description, the study evaluated the clinical efficacy of those drugs published in clinical trials. The use of these drugs reflects the period of uncertainty that marked the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, which made them a possible treatment for COVID-19. Methods: In our review, we evaluated phase III randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that analyzed the efficacy of these drugs published from the COVID-19 pandemic onset to 2023. We included eight RCTs published for Ivermectin, 11 RCTs for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine, and three RCTs for Azithromycin. The research question (PICOT) accounted for P—hospitalized patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19; I—use of oral or intravenous Ivermectin OR Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine OR Azithromycin; C—placebo or no placebo (standard of care); O—mortality OR hospitalization OR viral clearance OR need for mechanical ventilation OR clinical improvement; and T—phase III RCTs. Results: While studying these drugs’ respective mechanisms of action, the reasons for which they were thought to be useful became apparent and are as follows: Ivermectin binds to insulin-like growth factor and prevents nuclear transportation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), therefore preventing cell entrance, induces apoptosis, and osmotic cell death and disrupts viral replication. Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine blocks the movement of SARS-CoV-2 from early endosomes to lysosomes inside the cell, also, this drug blocks the binding between SARS-CoV-2 and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE)-2 inhibiting the interaction between the virus spike proteins and the cell membrane and this drug can also inhibit SARS-CoV-2 viral replication causing, ultimately, the reduction in viral infection as well as the potential to progression for a higher severity phenotype culminating with a higher chance of death. Azithromycin exerts a down-regulating effect on the inflammatory cascade, attenuating the excessive production of cytokines and inducing phagocytic activity, and acts interfering with the viral replication cycle. Ivermectin, when compared to standard care or placebo, did not reduce the disease severity, need for mechanical ventilation, need for intensive care unit, or in-hospital mortality. Only one study demonstrated that Ivermectin may improve viral clearance compared to placebo. Individuals who received Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine did not present a lower incidence of death, improved clinical status, or higher chance of respiratory deterioration compared to those who received usual care or placebo. Also, some studies demonstrated that Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine resulted in worse outcomes and side-effects included severe ones. Adding Azithromycin to a standard of care did not result in clinical improvement in hospitalized COVID-19 participants. In brief, COVID-19 was one of the deadliest pandemics in modern human history. Due to the potential health catastrophe caused by SARS-CoV-2, a global effort was made to evaluate treatments for COVID-19 to attenuate its impact on the human species. Unfortunately, several countries prematurely justified the emergency use of drugs that showed only in vitro effects against SARS-CoV-2, with a dearth of evidence supporting efficacy in humans. In this context, we reviewed the mechanisms of several drugs proposed to treat COVID-19, including Ivermectin, Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin, as well as the phase III clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of these drugs for treating patients with this respiratory disease. Conclusions: As the main finding, although Ivermectin, Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin might have mechanistic effects against SARS-CoV-2 infection, most phase III clinical trials observed no treatment benefit in patients with COVID-19, underscoring the need for robust phase III clinical trials. Full article