Positive and Negative Influences of Senescence on Therapy Response

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Molecular Cancer Biology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2023) | Viewed by 3458

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute for Molecular and Cellular Regulation, Gunma University, 3-39-15 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8512, Japan
Interests: cellular senescence; DNA damage response; cancer biology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Cellular senescence is involved in many biological processes, such as development, tissue repair, tumor suppression, tumor promotion, and age-related diseases. Cellular senescence is caused by two major triggers: 1) shortened telomere length, which leads to replicative senescence; 2) endogenous or exogenous stress (e.g., DNA-damage), which leads to stress-induced senescence. Senescent cells are characterized by large and flat shapes, large nuclei and nucleoli, senescence-associated β galactosidase activity (SA-β-gal), and senescence-associated secretary phenotype (SASP). SASP factors include a wide variety of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteases. Therefore, SASP factors autocrinally and/or paracrinally influence cellular function and are thought to be the most important function among senescent cells’ role.

Tumor treatment such as irradiation and chemotherapy damages DNA in both tumor and normal cells. Severe DNA damage induces cell death. In contrast, constitutive mild or moderate DNA damage, which is not be repaired, seems to induce senescence. SASP factors released from senescent cells may affect the growth, differentiation, migration, signal transduction, and cell–cell communication of both tumor and normal cells in patients. However, there are many unknowns in this field of study. The questions are: What kind of SASP factors are secreted from senescent cells? How much are SASP factors secreted? Are the kinds and amounts of SASP factors dependent on the source of DNA damage (e.g., ionizing radiation vs. doxorubicin)? Which cells are prone to senescence? In addition, although the identification of a senescent-cell-specific biomarker is necessary to know the state of a patient’s senescent cells and to develop a therapy targeting cellular senescence, how can we identify it? Finally, many tumor cells lack the p53–p21 and p16–Rb axes, which are important pathways for inducing cellular senescence. Are these tumor cells induced into senescence independent of both axes by DNA damage? Or do senescent cells arising from normal cells affect tumor cells via SASP?   

This Special Issue will highlight the effect of senescent cells, especially SASP, on tumor cells, covering both basic and preclinical aspects that advance our understanding of senescent cells in patients.  

Dr. Tsukasa Oda
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cellular senescence
  • SASP
  • p53–p21 axis
  • p16–Rb axis
  • biomarker
  • DNA damage

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

17 pages, 2943 KiB  
Article
BRD4 Inhibition as a Strategy to Prolong the Response to Standard of Care in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
by Ahmed M. Elshazly, Melanie M. Sinanian, Victoria Neely, Eesha Chakraborty, Muruj A. Alshehri, Michael K. McGrath, Hisashi Harada, Patricia V. Schoenlein and David A. Gewirtz
Cancers 2023, 15(16), 4066; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15164066 - 11 Aug 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1635
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly occurring malignancy in women and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths. ER+ breast cancer constitutes approximately 70% of all breast cancer cases. The standard of care for ER+ breast cancer involves estrogen antagonists [...] Read more.
Breast cancer is the most commonly occurring malignancy in women and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths. ER+ breast cancer constitutes approximately 70% of all breast cancer cases. The standard of care for ER+ breast cancer involves estrogen antagonists such as tamoxifen or fulvestrant in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib. However, these treatments are often not curative, with disease recurrence and metastasis being responsible for patient mortality. Overexpression of the epigenetic regulator, BRD4, has been shown to be a negative prognostic indicator in breast cancer, and BET family inhibitors such as ARV-825 and ABBV-744 have garnered interest for their potential to improve and prolong the response to current therapeutic strategies. The current work examined the potential of utilizing ARV-825 and ABBV-744 to increase the effectiveness of tamoxifen or fulvestrant plus palbociclib. ARV-825 was effective in both p53 wild-type (WT) breast tumor cells and in cells lacking functional p53 either alone or in combination with tamoxifen, while the effectiveness of ABBV-744 was limited to fulvestrant plus palbociclib in p53 WT cells. These differential effects may be related to the capacity to suppress c-Myc, a downstream target of BRD4. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Positive and Negative Influences of Senescence on Therapy Response)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 599 KiB  
Review
Implications of Senescent T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy
by Tetsuhiro Kasamatsu
Cancers 2023, 15(24), 5835; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15245835 - 14 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1518
Abstract
T-cell senescence is thought to result from the age-related loss of the ability to mount effective responses to pathogens and tumor cells. In addition to aging, T-cell senescence is caused by repeated antigenic stimulation and chronic inflammation. Moreover, we demonstrated that T-cell senescence [...] Read more.
T-cell senescence is thought to result from the age-related loss of the ability to mount effective responses to pathogens and tumor cells. In addition to aging, T-cell senescence is caused by repeated antigenic stimulation and chronic inflammation. Moreover, we demonstrated that T-cell senescence was induced by treatment with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agents. The characteristics of therapy-induced senescent T (TIS-T) cells and general senescent T cells are largely similar. Senescent T cells demonstrate an increase in the senescence-associated beta-galactosidase-positive population, cell cycle arrest, secretion of senescence-associated secretory phenotypic factors, and metabolic reprogramming. Furthermore, senescent T cells downregulate the expression of the co-stimulatory molecules CD27 and CD28 and upregulate natural killer cell-related molecules. Moreover, TIS-T cells showed increased PD-1 expression. However, the loss of proliferative capacity and decreased expression of co-stimulatory molecules associated with T-cell senescence cause a decrease in T-cell immunocompetence. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of senescent T-cells, including therapy-induced senescent T cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Positive and Negative Influences of Senescence on Therapy Response)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop