sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Individual Differences in Well-Being: Measures, Predictors, Interventions, and Mechanisms

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Psychology of Sustainability and Sustainable Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2023) | Viewed by 4214

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore
Interests: bilingualism; emotion; cognitive development and aging; technology and social media; healthy aging

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Psychology Department, Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
Interests: evolutionary psychology; wellbeing; motivation; relationships; organizational behavior and group processes; culture

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

It has been well-established over the past few decades that subjective well-being, often referred to as happiness, is not only a desirable end but also a means to other good ends (Diener and Sligman, 2004; Myers and Diener, 2018; Tov and Diener, 2013). Studies have showed the importance of subjective well-being in predicting various positive outcomes, such as health and longevity (e.g., Diener et al., 2017; Diener and Chan, 2011; Martín-María et al., 2017), health behaviors (e.g., Hoyt et al., 2012; Kushlev et al., 2020), employment outcomes and job performance (e.g., Knapp et al., 2011), cognitive functioning (e.g., Comijs et al. 2004; Toh et al., 2020), and social relationships (e.g., Moore and Diener, 2019; Walker et al., 2013). Given the importance of subjective well-being, it is imperative to identify effective ways to maintain or increase subjective well-being in the general population. This is especially important amid the global uncertainties caused by aging populations, climate change, food insecurity, social inequality, changing family structures, and disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

For this Special Issue “Individual Difference in Well-Being: Measures, Predictors, Intervention and Mechanisms”, we are inviting submissions of high-quality papers that examine measures, predictors, interventions, and mechanisms related to individual differences in well-being. Qualitative studies, mixed studies, narrative reviews, perspectives, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses will be equally considered. We also strongly encourage submissions of replication studies and studies with null findings. All research that is rigorous and addresses an important question about individual difference in well-being will be considered regardless of its novelty. Through this Special Issue, we aim to drive solutions in the efforts to promote well-being, sustainable living, and quality of life.

This Special Issue will cover topics including, but not limited to:

  • Research in identifying the demographic, experiential, cognitive social, health, and personality predictors of individual differences in well-being outcomes;
  • Intervention studies to enhance well-being in different populations, contexts, and cultures;
  • Replications of studies previously published on individual difference in well-being;
  • The development or validation of well-being assessments;
  • Theoretical conceptualizations of well-being;
  • Studies of processes and mechanisms underlying well-being and psychological functioning;
  • Cross-cultural comparisons on the antecedents, mechanisms, and predictors of well-being;
  • The development of new paradigms to study individual differences in well-being.

Dr. Andree Hartanto
Dr. Jose C. Yong
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • subjective well-being
  • psychological well-being
  • interventions
  • meta-analysis
  • review

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 1593 KiB  
Article
The Well-Being-Related Living Conditions of Elderly People in the European Union—Selected Aspects
by Beata Bieszk-Stolorz and Krzysztof Dmytrów
Sustainability 2023, 15(24), 16823; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416823 - 14 Dec 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1283
Abstract
One of the main demographic problems is the ageing of populations, especially in European countries. However, this process is not taking place equally in all countries and has a different impact on their socio-economic development. The aim of this research is to assess [...] Read more.
One of the main demographic problems is the ageing of populations, especially in European countries. However, this process is not taking place equally in all countries and has a different impact on their socio-economic development. The aim of this research is to assess and compare the well-being-related living conditions of elderly people in European Union countries. We carried out the analysis for the years 2015 and 2020 on the basis of Eurostat data. We assessed the well-being-related living conditions of older people by applying the multidimensional scaling technique. On its basis, we constructed rankings of the EU countries in the two analysed years. In addition, by using the k-means method, we clustered the countries. The disparity between the well-being-related living conditions of elderly people in Western European countries and the post-communist ones has not declined. Six of the nine analysed indicators improved over the five years between 2015 and 2020, while three (the proportion of elderly people at risk of poverty, the disparity between the incomes of the richest and poorest groups of elderly people, and the proportion of elderly people in the total population) worsened. Socio-economic policies should therefore address these indicators to the greatest extent possible. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 816 KiB  
Article
Untangling the Additive and Multiplicative Relations between Natural Scenery Exposure and Human–Animal Interaction on Affective Well-Being: Evidence from Daily Diary Studies
by Adalia Y. H. Goh, Shu Min Chia, Nadyanna M. Majeed, Nicole R. Y. Chen and Andree Hartanto
Sustainability 2023, 15(4), 2910; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042910 - 6 Feb 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2503
Abstract
Built nature spaces have been increasingly integrated into our urban environments in recent years with the aim of reaping their psychological benefits. However, despite numerous works of research on the relationship between nature exposure and well-being, most studies have looked into the benefits [...] Read more.
Built nature spaces have been increasingly integrated into our urban environments in recent years with the aim of reaping their psychological benefits. However, despite numerous works of research on the relationship between nature exposure and well-being, most studies have looked into the benefits of well-being from the lens of isolated elements of nature, such as natural scenery or animal exposure. This study aims to fill in the gaps by examining the additive and multiplicative relationships between natural scenery exposure and human–animal interaction on affective well-being (i.e., positive affect, negative affect, and stress) through a daily diary study. Over seven days, natural scenery exposure, human–animal interactions, and affective well-being of 514 young adults were assessed. Through multilevel modelling, we found that natural scenery exposure was associated with increased positive affect at the within- and between-person levels. Moreover, human–animal interaction was associated with increased positive affect at the within-person level. No evidence was found for human–animal interaction as a moderator of the relationship between natural scenery exposure and affective well-being. Our findings support the additive, but not multiplicative, relations between natural scenery exposure and human–animal interactions on their influence on affective well-being. The exploratory analysis showed the lack of multiplicative relationship which can be attributed to the distinct mechanism of the effect between natural scenery exposure and human–animal interactions on affective well-being. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop