Previous Issue
Volume 10, August
 
 

Languages, Volume 10, Issue 9 (September 2025) – 4 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 2270 KB  
Article
A Syntactic and Pragmatic Analysis of the Colloquial Expression ʔinno ‘That’ in Jordanian Arabic: Evidence from Social Media Conversation
by Ghada Alkarazoun and Doaa Riziq
Languages 2025, 10(9), 205; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10090205 (registering DOI) - 25 Aug 2025
Abstract
This study investigates the colloquial expression ʔinno that serves as a complementizer (C) and a discourse marker (DM) in Jordanian Arabic (JA). The data includes (422) instances of ʔinno collected from social media conversations of (60) JA speakers. The analysis shows that for [...] Read more.
This study investigates the colloquial expression ʔinno that serves as a complementizer (C) and a discourse marker (DM) in Jordanian Arabic (JA). The data includes (422) instances of ʔinno collected from social media conversations of (60) JA speakers. The analysis shows that for ʔinno as a (C), there are (259) instances that appear in the middle of sentences to introduce subordinate clauses, and it is inflected with pronoun suffixes that specify person, gender, and number. It also serves various functions in verbal and nominal sentences. As a DM, Ɂinno are (163) instances that appear in the middle of sentences between two propositions. A list of contexts is developed featuring Ɂinno in JA. The pragmatic functions of Ɂinno are determined in each situation and validated by an Acceptability Judgment Task which is completed by 20 native speakers of JA. The pragmatic functions of ʔinno fall into six primary categories with sub-functions, such as explanatory functions (like giving reasons or expressing results), elaborative functions (including elaboration and giving examples and clarification), emotional and assessment functions (such as expressing surprise or criticism), emphatic and assertive functions (for emphasizing or warning), epistemic and uncertainty functions (covering hesitation and hedging), and a turn-taking function (specifically urging for continuity). This study concludes that Ɂinno is well established among social media users in the Jordanian context and the varied contexts play a vital role in exploring its pragmatic and syntactic functions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Discourse Marker Research)
31 pages, 1409 KB  
Article
Measuring Emotion Recognition Through Language: The Development and Validation of an English Productive Emotion Vocabulary Size Test
by Allen Jie Ein Chee, Csaba Zoltan Szabo and Sharimila Ambrose
Languages 2025, 10(9), 204; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10090204 - 25 Aug 2025
Abstract
Emotion vocabulary is essential for recognising, expressing, and regulating emotions, playing a critical role in language proficiency and emotional competence. However, traditional vocabulary assessments have largely overlooked emotion-specific lexicons, limiting their ability to identify learners’ gaps in this area. Therefore, this study addresses [...] Read more.
Emotion vocabulary is essential for recognising, expressing, and regulating emotions, playing a critical role in language proficiency and emotional competence. However, traditional vocabulary assessments have largely overlooked emotion-specific lexicons, limiting their ability to identify learners’ gaps in this area. Therefore, this study addresses this gap by developing and validating the Productive Emotion Vocabulary Size Test (PEVST), a tool designed to evaluate productive emotion vocabulary knowledge in ESL/EFL contexts. The PEVST incorporates low-, mid-, and high-frequency emotion words, assessed through context-rich vignettes, offering a comprehensive tool for measuring productive emotion vocabulary knowledge. The study recruited 156 adult participants with varying language proficiency levels. Findings revealed that word frequency significantly influenced production accuracy: higher frequency words were more easily retrieved, while lower frequency words often elicited higher frequency synonyms. Rasch analysis provided validity evidence for the test’s scoring, highlighting the effectiveness of a granular scoring system that considers nuanced responses. However, some limitations arose from misfitting items and the homogeneity of participants’ language proficiency, calling for further evidence with a more linguaculturally diverse target group and careful control for individual differences. Future iterations should address these challenges by incorporating cultural adaptations and accounting for individual differences. The PEVST offers a robust foundation for advancing emotion vocabulary assessment, deepening our understanding of the interplay between language, emotions, and cognition, and informing emotion-focused language pedagogy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 614 KB  
Article
Iterative/Semelfactive = Collective/Singulative? Parallels in Slavic
by Marcin Wągiel
Languages 2025, 10(9), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10090203 - 22 Aug 2025
Viewed by 226
Abstract
In this paper, I will discuss a topic concerning part–whole structures in the nominal and verbal domain. Specifically, I will address the question of whether there is a universal mechanism for the individuation of entities and events by exploring parallels between singulatives and [...] Read more.
In this paper, I will discuss a topic concerning part–whole structures in the nominal and verbal domain. Specifically, I will address the question of whether there is a universal mechanism for the individuation of entities and events by exploring parallels between singulatives and semelfactives in Slavic. Singulatives are derived unit nouns, whereas semelfactives are punctual verbs that describe a brief event which culminates by returning to the initial state. Cross-linguistically, singulative morphology often alternates with collective marking, whereas semelfactives alternate with iteratives. Collectives and iteratives describe homogenous groupings of entities and events, respectively. From a conceptual perspective, both singulatives and semelfactives individuate to the effect of singular bounded unit reference and in the literature, the parallel between the mass count/distinction and aspect has often been drawn. In Slavic, singulative and semelfactive morphologies share a component; specifically, both markers involve a nasal -n and a vocalic component, e.g., compare Russian gorox ‘peas (as a mass)’ ∼goroš-in-a ‘a pea’ and prygať ‘to jump (repeatedly)’ ∼ pryg-nu ‘to jump once’. I will argue that the singulative -in and semelfactive -nu are complex and both involve the very same -n, which denotes a declustering atomizer modeled in mereotopological terms. Full article
35 pages, 2588 KB  
Article
The Role of Determiners in the Processing of Gender Agreement Morphology by Heritage Speakers of Spanish
by Danny Melendez, Jill Jegerski and Silvina Andrea Montrul
Languages 2025, 10(9), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10090202 - 22 Aug 2025
Viewed by 154
Abstract
This eye-tracking study examined how heritage speakers of Spanish process gender agreement morphology at a distance, focusing on the activation of the gender feature during sentence processing. Previous work is conceptually replicated and further extended by assessing (1) whether reduced sensitivity to gender [...] Read more.
This eye-tracking study examined how heritage speakers of Spanish process gender agreement morphology at a distance, focusing on the activation of the gender feature during sentence processing. Previous work is conceptually replicated and further extended by assessing (1) whether reduced sensitivity to gender agreement mismatches when another word intervenes between the head noun and its modifying adjective stems from weakened gender feature activation, (2) whether a gender-marked determiner enhances this activation, and (3) whether Age of Onset of Bilingualism (AOB) plays a role in this activation. Fifty-three English-dominant heritage speakers of Spanish and a comparison group of 32 Spanish-dominant monolingually raised speakers read sentences with and without gender agreement mismatches while their eye movements were monitored. Sentences contained mismatches in adjectives modified by the intensifier “muy” under two conditions: a No Cue condition (e.g., árboles muy altos/*altas) and a Cue condition with a gender-marked determiner (e.g., unos árboles muy altos/*altas). Statistical modeling of the eye-tracking data suggests similar effects for both groups in the No Cue condition, but AOB and proficiency modulated sensitivity for heritage speakers with a later AOB (4–6). Gender cues on the determiner (Cue condition) impacted the time course of agreement processing for all groups, the total time spent reading mismatches for all heritage speakers as a function of proficiency, and the rereading time for heritage speakers with a later AOB (4–9). We consider the role of Age of Onset of Bilingualism (AOB) and proficiency in morphosyntactic processing, feature retrieval, and cue facilitation in heritage language processing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Language Processing in Spanish Heritage Speakers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop