Topic Editors

Faculty of Science, University of Petroleum, Beijing, China
Dr. Meixia Shan
School of Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Dr. Yakang Jin
College of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Carbon Capture Science and Technology (CCST), 2nd Edition

Abstract submission deadline
30 September 2025
Manuscript submission deadline
30 November 2025
Viewed by
2825

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

As CO2 is a major greenhouse gas, its increased emissions have led to global climate change and environmental pollution. To realize the economy's green, low-carbon, and sustainable development, carbon capture science and technology (CCST) is a vital and potentially effective route to substantially decrease CO2 emissions. Since the combustion of fossil fuels produces the majority of CO2 emissions, the most direct way is to capture and purify CO2 from emission sources (power plants, steel plants, etc.). In addition, removing or separating CO2 is also urgently important in chemical processes or specific occasions (fermentation plants, natural gas purification, biogas purification, sterile wards, etc.). Meanwhile, CO2 has huge applications in food processing, the electronic industry, enhanced oil recovery (EOR), enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM), and other fields. Therefore, CCST has great scientific significance and engineering application value for environmental protection, energy development, and industrial production.

This Topic is oriented toward experimental research and theoretical analysis of phenomena related to pre-combustion and post-combustion carbon capture, materials- and chemistry-related carbon capture science, environmental, social, and political analysis of carbon capture technologies, CO2 Capture Process, CO2 utilization other than EOR and mineralization, as well as other research related to carbon emission reduction. Of particular interest are articles addressing issues encountered in  CO2 capture and storage technologies developments, the effective and economical use of CO2, lifecycle assessments, and techno-economic analyses to evaluate the various CCST processes. Please contact the editors if you have questions or wish to discuss an idea.

Dr. Zilong Liu
Dr. Meixia Shan
Dr. Yakang Jin
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • CO2
  • carbon capture, utilization, and conversion
  • transportation and storage
  • absorption and adsorption
  • separation and purification

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Energies
energies
3.0 6.2 2008 17.5 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Molecules
molecules
4.2 7.4 1996 15.1 Days CHF 2700 Submit
Processes
processes
2.8 5.1 2013 14.4 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Separations
separations
2.5 3.0 2014 12.4 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Sustainability
sustainability
3.3 6.8 2009 20 Days CHF 2400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 5705 KiB  
Article
Study on Dense Phase Separation of Associated Gas with High Carbon Dioxide Content
by Yuxiao Jing, Ming Zhang, Qihang Wang, Jianlu Zhu, Naiya Xie and Yuxing Li
Processes 2024, 12(12), 2924; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122924 - 20 Dec 2024
Abstract
With the continuous exploitation of offshore natural gas, the content of CO2 produced gradually increases. It is not economical to separate more CO2 from natural gas after transportation, and more CO2 will aggravate the corrosion of pipelines. The commonly used [...] Read more.
With the continuous exploitation of offshore natural gas, the content of CO2 produced gradually increases. It is not economical to separate more CO2 from natural gas after transportation, and more CO2 will aggravate the corrosion of pipelines. The commonly used decarburization process is not suitable for offshore platforms, and there are problems of high energy consumption and large space occupation. Therefore, dense phase separation of associated gas with high carbon dioxide content is a better separation method. In this paper, the equation of state is optimized by comparing the experimental and CO2 system phase characteristics simulation. Based on the selected equation of state (EOS), a three-level separation model of phase equilibrium characteristics is established. The separation efficiency is simulated to complete the separation of CO2 and methane. The separation process is optimized by a genetic algorithm, and the temperature and pressure under the best separation efficiency are determined. The PR-EOS was selected as the equation with the highest calculation accuracy. Through process simulation and algorithm optimization, the best separation efficiency was 72.23%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Carbon Capture Science and Technology (CCST), 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 3797 KiB  
Article
CO2 Storage in Subsurface Formations: Impact of Formation Damage
by Amin Shokrollahi, Syeda Sara Mobasher, Kofi Ohemeng Kyei Prempeh, Parker William George, Abbas Zeinijahromi, Rouhi Farajzadeh, Nazliah Nazma Zulkifli, Mohammad Iqbal Mahammad Amir and Pavel Bedrikovetsky
Energies 2024, 17(17), 4214; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174214 - 23 Aug 2024
Viewed by 859
Abstract
The success of CO2 storage projects largely depends on addressing formation damage, such as salt precipitation, hydrate formation, and fines migration. While analytical models for reservoir behaviour during CO2 storage in aquifers and depleted gas fields are widely available, models addressing [...] Read more.
The success of CO2 storage projects largely depends on addressing formation damage, such as salt precipitation, hydrate formation, and fines migration. While analytical models for reservoir behaviour during CO2 storage in aquifers and depleted gas fields are widely available, models addressing formation damage and injectivity decline are scarce. This work aims to develop an analytical model for CO2 injection in a layer-cake reservoir, considering permeability damage. We extend Dietz’s model for gravity-dominant flows by incorporating an abrupt permeability decrease upon the gas-water interface arrival in each layer. The exact Buckley-Leverett solution of the averaged quasi-2D (x, z) problem provides explicit formulae for sweep efficiency, well impedance, and skin factor of the injection well. Our findings reveal that despite the induced permeability decline and subsequent well impedance increase, reservoir sweep efficiency improves, enhancing storage capacity by involving a larger rock volume in CO2 sequestration. The formation damage factor d, representing the ratio between damaged and initial permeabilities, varies from 0.016 in highly damaged rock to 1 in undamaged rock, resulting in a sweep efficiency enhancement from 1–3% to 50–53%. The developed analytical model was applied to predict CO2 injection into a depleted gas field. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Carbon Capture Science and Technology (CCST), 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3968 KiB  
Article
Carbon Footprint Quantification and Reduction Potential of Ecological Revetment in Water Net Region of China: Case Study in Yancheng, Jiangsu Province
by Kun Liu, Binrong Zhou, Zijie Yang, Yusheng Zhang and Dianyuan Ding
Sustainability 2024, 16(16), 6902; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166902 - 12 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1237
Abstract
With emphasis on constructing low-carbon cities, the renovation of the riverbank highlights energy conservation and carbon reduction. However, methods and standards for quantifying carbon emissions during ecological river channel construction are currently lacking. There is a scientific gap in research into carbon footprint [...] Read more.
With emphasis on constructing low-carbon cities, the renovation of the riverbank highlights energy conservation and carbon reduction. However, methods and standards for quantifying carbon emissions during ecological river channel construction are currently lacking. There is a scientific gap in research into carbon footprint assessment and reduction potential in ecological revetment technologies in water networks of China. This study attempts to clarify the carbon emission factors of different ecological revetment technologies and explore the carbon reduction potential during the construction stage of ecological rivers from the river revetment design, construction process and materials. The results show that in the carbon emission factors of six ecological revetment technologies, building materials have the largest adjusting potential for carbon reduction. The concrete material is responsible for 55.37–95.86% of carbon emissions in six ecological river technologies, with an average proportion of 69.96%. Accordingly, the concrete material emerges as the primary contributor to carbon emissions in ecological river engineering, followed by gasoline truck transportation and earthwork excavation. Moreover, the carbon emissions from ecological frame structures were the largest, followed by those of block structures, gabion structures, planted concrete and interlocking blocks and the wooden stake structure has the smallest carbon footprint. The choice of ecological revetment technologies is not only related to the realisation of regional water conservancy functions, but it also affects the carbon emissions of water conservancy projects. Engineers and decision-makers should pay great attention to the optimal design of the project, selection of low-carbon materials, energy saving and emission reduction in the construction process. This research not only provides guidance for design units in selecting appropriate river revetment technologies but also offers a theoretical foundation and data support for construction units to optimise their construction process management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Carbon Capture Science and Technology (CCST), 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop