This study evaluates the performance of two-dimensional (2D) detonation simulations against recent experimental measurements for a stoichiometric hydrogen–air mixture at 25 kPa. The validation parameters rely on the average cell size (
), the cell size variability (
[...] Read more.
This study evaluates the performance of two-dimensional (2D) detonation simulations against recent experimental measurements for a stoichiometric hydrogen–air mixture at 25 kPa. The validation parameters rely on the average cell size (
), the cell size variability (
), and the dynamics of both the relative detonation speed (D/D
CJ) and the local induction zone length (
) along the cell cycle. We select Mével 2017’s and San Diego’s chemical models for 2D simulations, after evaluating 13 chemical models with Zeldovich–von Neumann–Döring (ZND) simulations. From this model selection, the effects of nitrogen chemistry and diffusion (Navier–Stokes or Euler equations) are evaluated on the validation parameters. The main findings are as follows: the simulations conducted with the Mével 2017 (with N
2 chemistry) model provide the best agreement with
(≈17%), while the experimental cell variability (
) is reproduced within 20% by most simulation cases. This model (Mével 2017 with N
2 chemistry) also presents good agreement with both the
and D/D
CJ dynamics, whereas San Diego’s simulations under-predict them along the cell. Interestingly, the speed decay along the cell length exhibits self-similar behavior across all cases, suggesting independence from cell size variability, unlike the
dynamics. Finally, this study demonstrates the minimal impact of the diffusion on the simulation results.
Full article