Our revision of the type material of
Liodesmus led to significant adjustments in our understanding of the taxon when the original type specimen of
Pholidophorus gracilis, which was later determined as the type species of the genus
Liodesmus, was recently found in
[...] Read more.
Our revision of the type material of
Liodesmus led to significant adjustments in our understanding of the taxon when the original type specimen of
Pholidophorus gracilis, which was later determined as the type species of the genus
Liodesmus, was recently found in the collection in Berlin. It had been confused with a specimen that was described as the type specimen of the species
Liodesmus gracilis in the collection in Munich. Moreover, the Munich specimen was mistakenly considered by all authors who have studied
Liodesmus as a type specimen for the genus
Liodesmus. However, the original holotype of
Pholidophorus gracilis and this Munich specimen of
Liodesmus gracilis belong to two different families.
Caturus brevicostatus, whose holotype was recently found in Berlin as well, is described in detail here for the first time.
Liodesmus sprattiformis is now described under the new genus
Nasrinsotoudehichthys outside Caturidae but within the Caturoidea. Since all specimens that have been described so far under
Liodesmus either belong to other, previously described genera, belong to new genera clearly outside the description of the genus
Liodesmus, or are nomina dubia (including the type species
Pholidophorus gracilis), the genus
Liodesmus and the Liodesmidae are nomina dubia as well.
Full article