Hexavalent chromium (Cr
VI) compounds are used in a variety of industrial applications and, as a result, large quantities of Cr
VI have been released into the environment due to inadequate precautionary measures or accidental releases. Cr
VI is highly toxic to most living organisms and a known human carcinogen by inhalation route of exposure. Another major issue of concern about Cr
VI compounds is their high mobility, which easily leads to contamination of surface waters, soil, and ground waters. In recent years, attention has been focused on the use of metallic iron (Fe
0) for the abatement of Cr
VI polluted waters. Despite a great deal of research, the mechanisms behind the efficient aqueous Cr
VI removal in the presence of Fe
0 (Fe
0/H
2O systems) remain deeply controversial. The introduction of the Fe
0-based filtration technology, at the beginning of 1990s, was coupled with the broad consensus that direct reduction of Cr
VI by Fe
0 was followed by co-precipitation of resulted cations (Cr
III, Fe
III). This view is still the dominant removal mechanism (reductive-precipitation mechanism) within the Fe
0 remediation industry. An overview on the literature on the Cr geochemistry suggests that the reductive-precipitation theory should never have been adopted. Moreover, recent investigations recalling that a Fe
0/H
2O system is an ion-selective one in which electrostatic interactions are of primordial importance is generally overlooked. The present work critically reviews existing knowledge on the Fe
0/Cr
VI/H
2O and Cr
VI/H
2O systems, and clearly demonstrates that direct reduction with Fe
0 followed by precipitation is not acceptable, under environmental relevant conditions, as the sole/main mechanism of Cr
VI removal in the presence of Fe
0.
Full article