Previous Issue
Volume 12, June
 
 

Chemosensors, Volume 12, Issue 7 (July 2024) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 4876 KiB  
Article
Electronic Nose and GC-MS Analysis to Detect Mango Twig Tip Dieback in Mango (Mangifera indica) and Panama Disease (TR4) in Banana (Musa acuminata)
by Wathsala Ratnayake, Stanley E. Bellgard, Hao Wang and Vinuthaa Murthy
Chemosensors 2024, 12(7), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12070117 - 24 Jun 2024
Viewed by 226
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), as a biological element released from plants, have been correlated with disease status. Although analysis of VOCs using GC-MS is a routine procedure, it has limitations, including being time-consuming, laboratory-based, and requiring specialist training. Electronic nose devices (E-nose) provide [...] Read more.
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), as a biological element released from plants, have been correlated with disease status. Although analysis of VOCs using GC-MS is a routine procedure, it has limitations, including being time-consuming, laboratory-based, and requiring specialist training. Electronic nose devices (E-nose) provide a portable and rapid alternative. This is the first pilot study exploring three types of commercially available E-nose to assess how accurately they could detect mango twig tip dieback and Panama disease in bananas. The devices were initially trained and validated on known volatiles, then pure cultures of Pantoea sp., Staphylococcus sp., and Fusarium odoratissimum, and finally, on infected and healthy mango leaves and field-collected, infected banana pseudo-stems. The experiments were repeated three times with six replicates for each host-pathogen pair. The variation between healthy and infected host materials was evaluated using inbuilt data analysis methods, mainly by principal component analysis (PCA) and cross-validation. GC-MS analysis was conducted contemporaneously and identified an 80% similarity between healthy and infected plant material. The portable C 320 was 100% successful in discriminating known volatiles but had a low capability in differentiating healthy and infected plant substrates. The advanced devices (PEN 3/MSEM 160) successfully detected healthy and diseased samples with a high variance. The results suggest that E-noses are more sensitive and accurate in detecting changes of VOCs between healthy and infected plants compared to headspace GC-MS. The study was conducted in controlled laboratory conditions, as E-noses are highly sensitive to surrounding volatiles. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3236 KiB  
Article
First Direct Gravimetric Detection of Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid (PFOS) Water Contaminants, Combination with Electrical Measurements on the Same Device—Proof of Concepts
by George R. Ivanov, Tony Venelinov, Yordan G. Marinov, Georgi B. Hadjichristov, Andreas Terfort, Melinda David, Monica Florescu and Selcan Karakuş
Chemosensors 2024, 12(7), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12070116 - 22 Jun 2024
Viewed by 178
Abstract
Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are pollutants of concern due to their long-term persistence in the environment and human health effects. Among them, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) is very ubiquitous and dangerous for health. Currently, the detection levels required by the legislation can [...] Read more.
Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are pollutants of concern due to their long-term persistence in the environment and human health effects. Among them, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) is very ubiquitous and dangerous for health. Currently, the detection levels required by the legislation can be achieved only with expensive laboratory equipment. Hence, there is a need for portable, in-field, and possibly real-time detection. Optical and electrochemical transduction mechanisms are mainly used for the chemical sensors. Here, we report the first gravimetric detection of small-sized molecules like PFOS (MW 500) dissolved in water. A 100 MHz quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) measured at the third harmonic and an even more sensitive 434 MHz two-port surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonator with gold electrodes were used as transducers. The PFOS selective sensing layer was prepared from the metal organic framework (MOF) MIL-101(Cr). Its nano-sized thickness and structure were optimized using the discreet Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) film deposition method. This is the first time that LB multilayers from bulk MOFs have been prepared. The measured frequency downshifts of around 220 kHz per 1 µmol/L of PFOS, a SAW resonator-loaded QL-factor above 2000, and reaction times in the minutes' range are highly promising for an in-field sensor reaching the water safety directives. Additionally, we use the micrometer-sized interdigitated electrodes of the SAW resonator to strongly enhance the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the PFOS contamination. Thus, for the first time, we combine the ultra-sensitive gravimetry of small molecules in a water environment with electrical measurements on a single device. This combination provides additional sensor selectivity. Control tests against a bare resonator and two similar compounds prove the concept’s viability. All measurements were performed with pocket-sized tablet-powered devices, thus making the system highly portable and field-deployable. While here we focus on one of the emerging water contaminants, this concept with a different selective coating can be used for other new contaminants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Sensors and Analytical Methods for Environmental Monitoring)
Previous Issue
Back to TopTop